Commitment bias describes the tendency of an individual to remain committed to past behaviors – even if they result in undesirable outcomes. The bias is particularly pronounced when such behaviors are performed publicly. Commitment bias is also known as escalation of commitment.
|Definition||Commitment Bias, also known as Escalation of Commitment or Sunk Cost Fallacy, is a cognitive bias that occurs when individuals continue investing time, effort, or resources into a decision, project, or course of action despite evidence that it’s not delivering the expected results. This bias arises from a desire to justify past decisions and avoid admitting that previous investments were misguided or wasted. It can lead to suboptimal outcomes as individuals persist in unproductive or failing endeavors, driven by their initial commitment rather than objective evaluation. Understanding Commitment Bias is vital for making rational decisions and avoiding the trap of escalating commitment to a losing proposition.|
|Key Concepts||– Sunk Costs: The central concept is the consideration of costs already incurred, which should not influence future decisions. – Escalation: The bias involves an escalation of commitment to a failing course of action. – Justification: People seek to justify past decisions by persisting in them. – Optimism Bias: Optimistic beliefs about the future success of the project contribute to this bias. – Avoiding Regret: Individuals often fear regretting the abandonment of an endeavor.|
|Characteristics||– Continued Investment: Commitment Bias is characterized by continued investment in a failing project or decision. – Ignoring New Information: Individuals may ignore or downplay new information that contradicts their initial commitment. – Emotional Attachment: Emotional attachment to the initial decision plays a significant role. – Optimistic Outlook: Optimism about the future success of the endeavor is a common trait. – Avoiding Regret: People may persist to avoid regretting the abandonment of the project.|
|Implications||– Suboptimal Outcomes: Commitment Bias can lead to suboptimal results due to the persistence in failing endeavors. – Resource Wastage: Continued investment in a failing project can waste resources. – Loss of Objectivity: The bias hinders objective decision-making by focusing on past commitments. – Escalation of Conflict: In interpersonal relationships or disputes, it can escalate conflicts unnecessarily. – Negative Psychological Impact: Persisting in failing decisions can lead to stress and anxiety.|
|Advantages||– Persistence: Commitment Bias can foster persistence and determination in the face of challenges. – Learning Opportunities: It can provide opportunities to learn from mistakes and failures. – Goal Achievement: In some cases, persistence can lead to eventual success. – Sticking to Values: Commitment to values and principles can be a positive aspect. – Motivation: It can serve as a motivating factor to overcome obstacles.|
|Drawbacks||– Suboptimal Outcomes: The primary drawback is the tendency to persist in failing endeavors. – Resource Wastage: Valuable resources can be wasted on futile projects. – Stress and Anxiety: Continuously investing in failing endeavors can lead to stress and anxiety. – Negative Impact on Others: Escalation of commitment can negatively affect others involved in the project. – Loss of Objectivity: Objectivity is compromised when past commitments dominate decision-making.|
|Applications||– Business and Investments: Commitment Bias can affect business decisions, project management, and investment strategies. – Personal Relationships: It can impact personal relationships when individuals persist in toxic or unfulfilling relationships. – Sports and Athletics: Athletes may push through injuries due to commitment bias. – Career Decisions: It can influence career choices and job persistence. – Politics: In politics, individuals may continue to support a party or candidate despite evidence of poor performance.|
|Use Cases||– Business Project: A company continues funding a failing project because of the resources already invested, despite evidence of its unviability. – Personal Relationship: An individual remains in a toxic relationship, justifying it based on the time and emotions already invested. – Athlete’s Decision: An athlete ignores an injury and continues to compete in a tournament, fearing the sunk cost of training and preparation. – Career Path: A person persists in a career they dislike because of the years they have spent pursuing it. – Political Support: A voter continues to support a political party even when it no longer aligns with their values, citing past allegiance.|
Understanding commitment bias
Indeed, the failure of the project is often painfully obvious to outsiders and they see any attempt to save it as fruitless.
Commitment bias argues that the number of resources invested in a failing project is proportional to how much time, money, or energy has already been spent.
This somewhat irrational behavior is caused by an inability to accept or acknowledge failure.
But what causes commitment bias? There are several theories:
A desire for people to be judged positively by others
Many want to avoid being judged by others as an incompetent individual who makes poor choices.
This is also known as saving face.
In other words, the legitimacy or potential of the project itself is ignored.
Perceptions and emotional attachment
A perceived emotional connection to a project causes them to devalue alternative projects or courses of action.
Common examples of commitment bias
Although commitment bias is traditionally associated with failing projects, it can also be seen in scenarios such as:
Poor investment decisions
Investors may continue to hold a depreciating stock if the capital invested makes up a large percentage of their portfolio.
Worse still, they may continue to invest in the stock in a vain attempt to justify their original decision.
Remaining in an unsuitable job
An employee occupying a role they dislike is less likely to resign if the job was hard to land.
They may also view resignation as a waste of a degree or other skills and experience.
Businesses can become irrational and spend vast amounts of money at auction for the simple reason of not wanting their bidding effort to go to waste.
After a 10-week bidding war to acquire the parent company of department store Bloomingdale’s, Robert Campeau became victor after a bid of $6.58 billion.
But driven by irrational behavior and a win-at-all-costs mentality, the grossly excessive bid caused Campeau to declare bankruptcy soon after.
- Commitment bias is a tendency for individuals or businesses to remain committed to past behavior, particularly if that behavior is displayed publicly.
- The degree of commitment bias is proportional to the amount of time, energy, or money invested. It is caused by the need the feel validated by others and the sunk-cost fallacy. Emotional attachment to project outcomes is also a major contributing factor.
- Commitment bias causes poor investment decisions and results in employees remaining in unsatisfactory positions. The irrational behavior that exemplifies commitment has also been seen in takeover bidding wars.
Commitment Bias Highlights:
- Definition of Commitment Bias: Commitment bias, also known as escalation of commitment, refers to the tendency for individuals or organizations to persist in their commitment to past actions, even when those actions result in negative outcomes.
- Observable in Failing Projects: Commitment bias is often evident in scenarios where resources like time, money, or effort have been invested in a failing project. Instead of recognizing the failure and cutting losses, individuals may continue investing in hopes of turning things around.
- Factors Behind Commitment Bias:
- Desire for Positive Judgment: People often want to be seen as competent decision-makers and may avoid admitting mistakes to save face.
- Sunk-Cost Fallacy: Individuals may continue with a failing endeavor due to the sunk-cost fallacy, which leads them to consider the resources already invested and not the project’s potential.
- Perceptions and Emotional Attachment: Emotional attachment to a project, combined with tunnel vision, can lead to a disregard for alternatives.
- Examples of Commitment Bias:
- Poor Investment Decisions: Investors may hold onto depreciating assets due to the fear of losing out on their initial investment.
- Remaining in Unsuitable Jobs: Employees might stay in jobs they dislike because of the effort it took to secure the position and a reluctance to waste their skills.
- Bidding Wars: Businesses can engage in irrational bidding wars to avoid the feeling that their bidding efforts were in vain, leading to excessive spending.
Connected Thinking Frameworks