The ladder of inference is a conscious or subconscious thinking process where an individual moves from a fact to a decision or action. The ladder of inference was created by academic Chris Argyris to illustrate how people form and then use mental models to make decisions.
|What is the Ladder of Inference?||The ladder of inference is a decision-making process where individuals move from collecting facts to making decisions or taking actions. It illustrates how personal beliefs and biases influence this process.|
|Purpose||To understand how our mental models, assumptions, and biases impact the way we perceive information and make decisions, and to promote more informed and unbiased decision-making.|
|Mental Models||Mental models are unique assumptions and generalizations that individuals hold based on their past experiences, values, and beliefs. These models shape how we interpret information.|
|Stages of the Ladder||There are seven stages in the ladder of inference, each representing a step in the decision-making process: Available Data, Select Data, Paraphrase Data, Name What Is Happening, Explain or Evaluate, Develop Beliefs, and Take Action.|
|Stage 1 – Available Data||Collecting facts and reality; the foundation of the ladder.|
|Stage 2 – Select Data||Choosing which data to pay attention to, often influenced by subconscious decisions.|
|Stage 3 – Paraphrase Data||Adding personal meaning and biases to the selected data, without necessarily evaluating its validity.|
|Stage 4 – Name What Is Happening||Labeling situations based on a combination of interpreted facts and personal assumptions.|
|Stage 5 – Explain or Evaluate||Seeking reasons or judgments by considering causal theories and evaluating them based on personal values and beliefs.|
|Stage 6 – Develop Beliefs||Forming beliefs based on conclusions drawn from previous stages, which then shape future judgments and actions.|
|Stage 7 – Take Action||Making decisions and taking actions based on the beliefs and assumptions developed throughout the process.|
|Improving Decision Making||Recognizing biases and consciously adjusting one’s position on the ladder to promote more objective and informed decision-making.|
|Examples of Biases||Various biases, such as Maslow’s Hammer (over-reliance on familiar tools), Pygmalion Effect (higher expectations leading to improved performance), and Ringelmann Effect (reduced productivity in larger groups), can affect decision-making at different stages of the ladder.|
Understanding the ladder of inference
Mental models encapsulate assumptions and generalizations and are unique to everyone.
They explain why two people can witness the same event but experience it in two vastly different fashions.
Fundamentally, the ladder of inference encourages informed decision making based on fact and not on personal biases that characterize mental models.
By acting without bias, the individual or business experiences growth. Indeed, the ladder is often equated with the cycle of growth, where completion of each cycle results in improvement based on continuous learning.
Climbing the rungs of the inference ladder
The ladder of inference can be thought of as a visual representation of the decision-making thought process.
Seven rungs exist, with each rung representing one of the seven stages of thinking.
Let’s look at each stage:
Stage 1 – available data
At the bottom of the ladder exists information about the reality and facts of daily life.
This includes everything from the body language of a colleague to the results from a marketing campaign.
Stage 2 – select data
Given the richness and abundance of available data, people cannot pay attention to all of it simultaneously.
Instead, mostly subconscious choices are made regarding what data is selected and what data is ignored.
Stage 3 – paraphrase data
In the third stage, the individual adds meaning to the data based on unique past experiences, values, beliefs, or biases.
Often, there is no consideration regarding whether the meaning applied is valid or true.
Stage 4 – name what is happening
Here, the individual names the situation based on a combination of interpreted fact and personal assumptions.
Stage 5 – explain or evaluate what is happening
Having just explained what is happening, the individual then seeks to explain why it is happening.
This is performed by considering a list of causal theories that are judged as either good or bad according to the individual’s values.
Stage 6 – develop beliefs based on conclusions
These beliefs then shape future judgments in scenarios with similar contexts.
The classic example is an employee who is consistently late to work in the belief that they will not be reprimanded by management.
This belief then leads the employee to be late to meetings and other formal engagements.
Stage 7 – take action
In the final stage, the individual takes what they believe is the right course of action. Of course, their actions are always based on beliefs and assumptions.
Using the ladder of inference to make better decisions
Many assume that the ladder of inference is a systematic guide to making better decisions.
However, the ladder merely outlines the natural thought process that every individual experiences.
To improve decision making, an individual must know where they sit on the ladder and adjust accordingly.
Indeed, one of the key steps within the process is to recognize the biases that might be affecting our judgement.
Perhaps counterintuitively, it is preferable to occupy the lower rungs of the ladder or descend where possible.
An individual who tends to paraphrase data (Stage 3) to their detriment should be more selective about the data they select from their environment (Stage 2).
An individual who tends to select data to suit their own agenda (Stage 2) should consider incorporating a broader subset of available data (Stage 1).
In both cases, the individual is encouraged to question the validity of their assumptions and beliefs.
This helps them break free of the reflexive loop – where assumptions and beliefs impact the data that will be selected in similar future scenarios.
This can often lead to a toxic cycle where actions are reinforced by limited or flawed information and vice versa.
Thus, the ladder of inference is the first step toward understanding and recognizing which biases might be limiting our understanding of the world and, based on that, what mental models we can use as effective ways to make decisions.
Ladder of inference and biases in decision making
Take the case of interpreting the world based on the tools that we know, thus falling into the trap of Maslow’s Hammer.
We might select the tools and frameworks that we’re familiar with, thinking that those are the tools that work in every scenario, thus impairing our ability to be effective in specific situations.
Or take the case of the Pygmalion effect within organizations and how it might affect the decision-making process.
Or how decision-making is affected within large groups.
All these sorts of biases need to be identified within the ladder of inference to be able to make effective decisions, based on reliable mental models!
- Stage 1 – Available Data
- A scientist collects temperature and humidity readings from a weather station.
- A salesperson reviews monthly sales figures for a product.
- Stage 2 – Select Data
- A news editor decides which news stories to feature on the front page.
- A job applicant highlights specific achievements on their resume for a job interview.
- Stage 3 – Paraphrase Data
- A manager interprets an employee’s frequent absences as a lack of dedication.
- A chef perceives a customer’s preference for spicy food based on their previous orders.
- Stage 4 – Name What Is Happening
- An event planner labels a decrease in RSVPs as “low interest” without investigating further.
- A teacher describes a student’s behavior as “disruptive” without considering external factors.
- Stage 5 – Explain or Evaluate What Is Happening
- A financial analyst attributes a drop in stock prices to economic instability, leading to a negative evaluation.
- A coach believes a team’s success is due to their training methods and evaluates them positively.
- Stage 6 – Develop Beliefs Based on Conclusions
- An employee believes they won’t be promoted due to past rejections, leading to reduced ambition.
- A student who consistently receives praise develops a belief in their own intelligence, boosting confidence.
- Stage 7 – Take Action
- An investor sells their stocks based on the belief that a recession is imminent.
- A manager implements a new project management approach because they believe it will increase team productivity.
- Maslow’s Hammer Bias
- Pygmalion Effect Bias
- A teacher with high expectations for students’ success sees improved academic performance in their class.
- A coach who believes in the team’s potential motivates players to achieve better results.
- Ringelmann Effect Bias
- In a large brainstorming session, individual participants contribute less as the group size increases.
- In a massive organization, employees become less engaged and productive as the company expands.
- The ladder of inference describes how people form and sustain mental models in the decision-making process.
- The ladder of inference has seven rungs, with each rung representing a particular stage of decision making based on personal assumptions, beliefs, or biases.
- The ladder of inference is not intended to provide advice on optimal decision making. Instead, it allows individuals to identify where their process is flawed and move down the ladder to correct it.
Ladder of Inference Highlights:
- Definition: The ladder of inference is a cognitive process where individuals move from facts to decisions or actions. It was introduced by Chris Argyris to illustrate how people form and utilize mental models to make decisions.
- Mental Models and Diversity: Mental models are individual assumptions and generalizations that influence how people perceive events. They explain why different people can experience the same event differently due to their unique mental frameworks.
- Bias-Free Decision Making: The ladder of inference encourages unbiased decision-making based on facts rather than personal biases inherent in mental models. By minimizing bias, individuals and businesses can achieve growth and continuous learning.
- Stages of the Ladder: The ladder of inference represents a seven-stage decision-making process:
- Stage 1: Available data (facts).
- Stage 2: Selection of data based on attention and relevance.
- Stage 3: Paraphrasing data with personal meaning and biases.
- Stage 4: Naming the situation based on interpretations.
- Stage 5: Explaining or evaluating the situation based on causal theories.
- Stage 6: Developing beliefs based on conclusions.
- Stage 7: Taking action guided by beliefs and assumptions.
- Improving Decision Making: The ladder of inference does not provide a formula for optimal decision-making but helps individuals recognize biases in their process. By identifying biases, individuals can adjust their decision-making and strive to make more objective choices.
- Cognitive Biases and Mental Models: Cognitive biases, systematic errors in decision-making, are intertwined with mental models and ladder of inference stages. Understanding biases within the ladder’s framework is crucial for effective decision-making.
- Examples of Biases: Various biases, such as Maslow’s Hammer (over-reliance on familiar tools) and the Pygmalion Effect (higher expectations leading to improved performance), can affect decision-making. The Ringelmann Effect (reduced productivity in larger groups) is another bias that influences decision-making.
- Key Takeaway: The ladder of inference provides a framework for understanding how personal assumptions, beliefs, and biases influence decision-making. By recognizing biases within the ladder’s stages, individuals can make more informed and unbiased decisions based on reliable mental models.
Connected Thinking Frameworks