On Survivorship Bias In Business

Survivorship bias is a pervasive fallacy that exists in business, where people focus on the few survived players, in any given market, without realizing that most initial players in that given market are dead, or went into oblivion. In short, survivorship bias transforms the past into a linear story, by removing uncertainty from it.

Understanding survivorship bias

When I saw this on Twitter, I had to comment on it!

It is true that when you take a very long-term view (at least 10-15 years) of markets, it’s easy to argue that you’ll win.

But that misses a few key points about how the real world works:

1. When we analyze the past, the survivorship bias is extreme.

We tend to see only the very few players that made it when most initial players were either wiped out, bought at a discount, or went into oblivion.

2. Markets might rebound in the very long term. But they also might not.

In short, during the dot-com bubble, Amazon crashed by more than 90%, and yet, it took Amazon the stock made it back to new all-time highs by late 2009, all the while the company faced tough times.

The crisis eventually changed the business playbook, yet survival was not a guarantee!

3. When markets turn bad, priorities change.

When there is a lot of liquidity, investors prioritize growth at all costs.

When markets turn red, they look for profit margins and viable business models.

Therefore, having the runaway, to stand for at least a few quarters, becomes critical, and cutting the unnecessary costs becomes key.

4. Many failures during market downturns don’t mean they were terrible ideas.

In many cases, they simply had the wrong timing or execution strategy.

Take how companies like Webvan (grocery online) failed miserably, and yet how, today, this is one of the hottest industries around.

5. Over time, especially in the tech world, things tend to consolidate in the hands of a few winners.

Picking them up is like winning the lottery.

Imagine a game where you start with a thousand potential winners, but after ten years, you only have 3-5.

You might have been correct in guessing the Internet was the future, and yet you might have missed it, in terms of investing, altogether.

In short, placing bets on the future isn’t an easy game. I wish all it took were a long-term perspective.

6. A long-term perspective does help, indeed!

As markets are mostly tied to liquidity and macroeconomics in short.

On the other hand, they align (or at least the chances to align) with fundamentals in the long term.

7. As a business person, you want to focus on building valuable stuff.

So whether markets go up or down is relatively significant.

Of course, it matters because you might be navigating in stormy waters if you need funding.

And in addition, revenues and profitability might slow down independently of how good is the product.

But this is also an opportunity to reduce the noise and focus on what works.

Indeed, there is much less noise during downturns, and builders can concentrate on the product

Key takeaways

  • There is a spread survivorship bias when looking at business history, which focuses on the very few survived companies. Looking back, it was apparent they were supposed to thrive. Yet, placing a bet on those companies back in the day was as tricky as an understanding today which companies are worth betting on! Things look linear and straightforward only in hindsight. 
  • The survivorship bias is very pervasive, and it starts from the assumption that if you were to hold your position for long enough, you would get rewarded. Yet while this might be true in some cases, many other companies cease to exist altogether when a crisis strike. 
  • Downturns are great opportunities to revise a business playbook, shift focus on product, and build valuable stuff. Noise reduction in downturns is incredible, and this becomes the best time to make valuable stuff!

Keep these things in mind!


With ♥️ Gennaro, FourWeekMBA

Read Next: Business Model.

Related Business Concepts

As highlighted by German psychologist Gerd Gigerenzer in the paper “Heuristic Decision Making,” the term heuristic is of Greek origin, meaning “serving to find out or discover.” More precisely, a heuristic is a fast and accurate way to make decisions in the real world, which is driven by uncertainty.
The recognition heuristic is a psychological model of judgment and decision making. It is part of a suite of simple and economical heuristics proposed by psychologists Daniel Goldstein and Gerd Gigerenzer. The recognition heuristic argues that inferences are made about an object based on whether it is recognized or not.
The representativeness heuristic was first described by psychologists Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky. The representativeness heuristic judges the probability of an event according to the degree to which that event resembles a broader class. When queried, most will choose the first option because the description of John matches the stereotype we may hold for an archaeologist.
The take-the-best heuristic is a decision-making shortcut that helps an individual choose between several alternatives. The take-the-best (TTB) heuristic decides between two or more alternatives based on a single good attribute, otherwise known as a cue. In the process, less desirable attributes are ignored.
The concept of cognitive biases was introduced and popularized by the work of Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman since 1972. Biases are seen as systematic errors and flaws that make humans deviate from the standards of rationality, thus making us inept at making good decisions under uncertainty.
The bundling bias is a cognitive bias in e-commerce where a consumer tends not to use all of the products bought as a group, or bundle. Bundling occurs when individual products or services are sold together as a bundle. Common examples are tickets and experiences. The bundling bias dictates that consumers are less likely to use each item in the bundle. This means that the value of the bundle and indeed the value of each item in the bundle is decreased.
The Barnum Effect is a cognitive bias where individuals believe that generic information – which applies to most people – is specifically tailored for themselves.
Nudge theory argues positive reinforcement and indirect suggestion is an effective way to influence the behavior and decision making of individuals or groups. Nudge theory was an idea first popularized by behavioral economist Richard Thaler and political scientist Cass Sunstein. However, the pair based much of their theory on heuristic research conducted by psychologists Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky in the 1970s.
The bullwhip effect describes the increasing fluctuations in inventory in response to changing consumer demand as one moves up the supply chain. Observing, analyzing, and understanding how the bullwhip effect influences the whole supply chain can unlock important insights into various parts of it.
Maslow’s Hammer, otherwise known as the law of the instrument or the Einstellung effect, is a cognitive bias causing an over-reliance on a familiar tool. This can be expressed as the tendency to overuse a known tool (perhaps a hammer) to solve issues that might require a different tool. This problem is persistent in the business world where perhaps known tools or frameworks might be used in the wrong context (like business plans used as planning tools instead of only investors’ pitches).
The Hawthorne Effect refers to an inclination of some people to work harder or perform better when they know they are being observed. The effect is most associated with those who are experiment participants, who alter their behavior due to the attention they are receiving and not due to any manipulation of independent variables. Therefore, the Hawthorne Effect describes the tendency for a person to change their behavior with the awareness that they are being observed.
In statistics, the Simpson Paradox happens when a trend clearly shows up in clusters/brackets of data. But it disappears or at worse it reverses when the data is grouped and combined. In short, the Simpson paradox shows that when the data moves from clusters to combined data, it hides several distributions, which end up creating a biased overall effect.
Nudge theory argues positive reinforcement and indirect suggestion is an effective way to influence the behavior and decision making of individuals or groups. Nudge theory was an idea first popularized by behavioral economist Richard Thaler and political scientist Cass Sunstein. However, the pair based much of their theory on heuristic research conducted by psychologists Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky in the 1970s.

Main Free Guides:

Scroll to Top