3C Analysis Business Model In A Nutshell

The 3C Analysis Business Model was developed by Japanese business strategist Kenichi Ohmae. The 3C Model is a marketing tool that focuses on customers, competitors, and the company. At the intersection of these three variables lies an effective marketing strategy to gain a potential competitive advantage and build a lasting company.

Understanding the 3C Analysis Business Model

The 3C analysis business model was developed by Japanese business strategist and organizational theorist Kenichi Ohmae in 1982. 

The model first appeared in Ohmae’s book The Mind of the Strategist: The Art of Japanese Business, where he discussed the thinking processes and planning techniques of some of the world’s most successful companies. 

The book was well-received for its ability to empower modern decision-makers to be courageous, innovative, problem-solvers.

Indeed, Harvard Business School Professor Michael Porter said that Ohmae’s book was “A fascinating window into the mind of one of Japan’s premier strategists…full of ideas about how to improve strategic thinking.

In essence, Ohmae posited that business success was based on a mix of:

  • The needs of the customer.
  • The strengths of the corporation, and
  • The products and services offered by competitors.

When a firm takes the time to integrate all three components in harmony, it can then develop a sustainable competitive advantage.

However, when one of these components is not in balance, the success of the company may be jeopardized.

In the following sections, we’ll take a look at customers, corporations, and competitors in more detail.


Customers are the most important of the three components, for without customers there can be no company nor any way to gain a competitive advantage.

Ohmae believed that customers were the foundation for any strategy and that the goal of any business should be to support the interests of the customer and not shareholders, for example.

Businesses must know their customers intimately so that their marketing strategies resonate with them on a meaningful level. This starts with research and a few questions such as:

  • What is the demographic of the target audience? In other words, who are the customers that a business wants to target? 
  • Why do they make buying decisions? Are they motivated by value, economy, or status? What other problems might they be trying to solve?
  • What are the different segments of a target audience and how might be they marketed to effectively? For example, a consumer who drinks coffee to stay awake will need a different strategy than one who drinks it socially in a café. 


A business must know where it stands in relation to its competitors. Is it bigger? Smaller? Is the competition trying to take market share from the business, or is the opposite true?

According to Ohmae, competitor-based marketing strategies involve looking for a point of difference in purchasing, engineering, sales, or servicing. 

This can be achieved in several ways:

Investing in brand image

Ohmae noted that companies such as Sony and Honda were able to sell more than their competitors in the Japanese market because of heavy investment in advertising and consumer relations.


Japanese business planners believe in the concept of hito-kane-mono, loosely translated as people, money, and things (assets).

As a point of competitive differentiation, businesses can ensure these resources are in balance without waste or surplus.

For example, managers who are given more money than they can competently spend tend to waste that money unnecessarily. In this case, Ohmae argues that managers should first define their ideas and then adapt a budget to suit.

Profit and cost-structure differences

Different sources of profit can also be exploited, such as the profit seen in new product sales or value-adding services.

Large companies with lower fixed-cost ratios can also lower their prices in a stagnant market to gain market share.


The company itself must also look inwardly to design strategies aimed at maximizing strengths relative to the competition. This involves a combination of short and long-term strategies, including:


A business should always identify one or two areas of expertise, instead of trying to specialize in everything.

Produce or procure

In terms of manufacturing, a business has two options. It can take advantage of backward integration and take control of its supply chain in the process. Or, it can outsource non-value-adding activities to a third party.


This is a relatively simple way of gaining a competitive advantage. Businesses can reduce basic operating costs by focusing on processes that have the highest potential for automation or streamlining.

Longer-term, businesses can combine resources and knowledge with others in their industry to develop a competitive advantage.

Interpreting the 3C analysis

Interpreting the 3C analysis means taking a look at how each circle overlaps and interacts with the other circles. To better understand these interactions, we have provided a basic explanation of each below:

Customer/company overlap

This provides a competitive advantage in the market where a product is positively perceived by consumers who are more importantly willing to pay for it.

Customer/company/competition overlap

At the intersection of all three circles there is likely to be a price war. In other words, there is little differentiation between the products and services of one company and alternatives from another.

With consumers unable differentiate a value proposition, a price war may ensue.

Customer/competition overlap

An undesirable situation where consumers prefer the products and services of a competitor and are willing to pay for them.

Competition/company overlap

When the circles representing competition and company intersect, this may signify an illegal price-fixing situation.

Implementing the 3C analysis

For best results, decision-makers must not attempt to implement each of three components simultaneously.

Aside from the unnecessary stress and logistical issues that may arise, a better approach is to focus on the customers first and work from there. Making customers a priority does not mean shareholders are rejected.

In fact, a company that has authentic interest in its customers will find that shareholder interests are taken care of automatically.

Once the needs, wants, and demands of the consumer have been identified, the business should then concern itself with other matters.

In other words, how does the consumer base perceive its products and services? How does it perceive competitor products? This provides insight into what the competition is capable of doing in the market.

From there, the business must direct resources in such a way that its strengths are maximized and competitive advantage is created.

For the model to be effective, it is important to note that the business does not need to excel in every area.

It can start with a decisive edge in just one key function and then set about enhancing the other functions.

The 3C model is not complex or convoluted, but it does encourage decision-makers to simplify operations by focusing on customers, competitors, and the corporation at all times.

Key takeaways:

  • The 3C Analysis Business Model suggests a business focuses on three key factors for success – company, customer, and the competition.
  • The strengths of the 3C Analysis Business Model lie in its simplicity, practicality, and emphasis on efficiency to reduce wastage.
  • Customers are crucial to the success of the 3C Analysis Business Model, dictating the strategies formulated for competitors and the company.

What is the 3C model used for?

Japanese business strategist Kenichi Ohmae developed the 3C Analysis Business Model, which is a holistic framework that analyzes and looks at business model development by focusing on three core stakeholders: customers, competitors, and the company.

Why is the 3C model important?

The 3C Business Model Analysis tool is very useful for taking a better snapshot of business models by looking at three core stakeholders (customers, competitors, and companies). By balancing these three stakeholders, a company can generate and capture value in the marketplace.

Business Engineering


Technological Modeling

Technological modeling is a discipline to provide the basis for companies to sustain innovation, thus developing incremental products. While also looking at breakthrough innovative products that can pave the way for long-term success. In a sort of Barbell Strategy, technological modeling suggests having a two-sided approach, on the one hand, to keep sustaining continuous innovation as a core part of the business model. On the other hand, it places bets on future developments that have the potential to break through and take a leap forward.

Revenue Model

In the Business Model Canvas, the Revenue Streams building block details the way a business intends to solve customer problems for financial gain. Revenue streams represent the various ways a business generates cash from each customer segment.

What is a Business Model?

A business model is a framework for finding a systematic way to unlock long-term value for an organization while delivering value to customers and capturing value through monetization strategies. A business model is a holistic framework to understand, design, and test your business assumptions in the marketplace.

Business Model Wheel

A business model wheel provides a structured approach to defining a business model. Each model wheel is broken down into three core components: offering, monetization and sustainability. Each component in turn contributes to a total of eight areas that make up an ideal business model.

Tech Business Model Framework

A tech business model is made of four main components: value model (value propositions, mission, vision), technological model (R&D management), distribution model (sales and marketing organizational structure), and financial model (revenue modeling, cost structure, profitability and cash generation/management). Those elements coming together can serve as the basis to build a solid tech business model.

Blockchain Business Models Framework

A Blockchain Business Model according to the FourWeekMBA framework is made of four main components: Value Model (Core Philosophy, Core Value and Value Propositions for the key stakeholders), Blockchain Model (Protocol Rules, Network Shape and Applications Layer/Ecosystem), Distribution Model (the key channels amplifying the protocol and its communities), and the Economic Model (the dynamics through which protocol players make money). Those elements coming together can serve as the basis to build and analyze a solid Blockchain Business Model.

Connected Analysis Frameworks

Cynefin Framework

The Cynefin Framework gives context to decision making and problem-solving by providing context and guiding an appropriate response. The five domains of the Cynefin Framework comprise obvious, complicated, complex, chaotic domains and disorder if a domain has not been determined at all.

SWOT Analysis

A SWOT Analysis is a framework used for evaluating the business’s Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats. It can aid in identifying the problematic areas of your business so that you can maximize your opportunities. It will also alert you to the challenges your organization might face in the future.

Personal SWOT Analysis

The SWOT analysis is commonly used as a strategic planning tool in business. However, it is also well suited for personal use in addressing a specific goal or problem. A personal SWOT analysis helps individuals identify their strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats.

Pareto Analysis

The Pareto Analysis is a statistical analysis used in business decision making that identifies a certain number of input factors that have the greatest impact on income. It is based on the similarly named Pareto Principle, which states that 80% of the effect of something can be attributed to just 20% of the drivers.

Failure Mode And Effects Analysis

A failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) is a structured approach to identifying design failures in a product or process. Developed in the 1950s, the failure mode and effects analysis is one the earliest methodologies of its kind. It enables organizations to anticipate a range of potential failures during the design stage.

Blindspot Analysis

A Blindspot Analysis is a means of unearthing incorrect or outdated assumptions that can harm decision making in an organization. The term “blindspot analysis” was first coined by American economist Michael Porter. Porter argued that in business, outdated ideas or strategies had the potential to stifle modern ideas and prevent them from succeeding. Furthermore, decisions a business thought were made with care caused projects to fail because major factors had not been duly considered.

Comparable Company Analysis

A comparable company analysis is a process that enables the identification of similar organizations to be used as a comparison to understand the business and financial performance of the target company. To find comparables you can look at two key profiles: the business and financial profile. From the comparable company analysis it is possible to understand the competitive landscape of the target organization.

Cost-Benefit Analysis

A cost-benefit analysis is a process a business can use to analyze decisions according to the costs associated with making that decision. For a cost analysis to be effective it’s important to articulate the project in the simplest terms possible, identify the costs, determine the benefits of project implementation, assess the alternatives.

Agile Business Analysis

Agile Business Analysis (AgileBA) is certification in the form of guidance and training for business analysts seeking to work in agile environments. To support this shift, AgileBA also helps the business analyst relate Agile projects to a wider organizational mission or strategy. To ensure that analysts have the necessary skills and expertise, AgileBA certification was developed.

SOAR Analysis

A SOAR analysis is a technique that helps businesses at a strategic planning level to: Focus on what they are doing right. Determine which skills could be enhanced. Understand the desires and motivations of their stakeholders.

STEEPLE Analysis

The STEEPLE analysis is a variation of the STEEP analysis. Where the step analysis comprises socio-cultural, technological, economic, environmental/ecological, and political factors as the base of the analysis. The STEEPLE analysis adds other two factors such as Legal and Ethical.

Pestel Analysis

The PESTEL analysis is a framework that can help marketers assess whether macro-economic factors are affecting an organization. This is a critical step that helps organizations identify potential threats and weaknesses that can be used in other frameworks such as SWOT or to gain a broader and better understanding of the overall marketing environment.

DESTEP Analysis

A DESTEP analysis is a framework used by businesses to understand their external environment and the issues which may impact them. The DESTEP analysis is an extension of the popular PEST analysis created by Harvard Business School professor Francis J. Aguilar. The DESTEP analysis groups external factors into six categories: demographic, economic, socio-cultural, technological, ecological, and political.

Paired Comparison Analysis

A paired comparison analysis is used to rate or rank options where evaluation criteria are subjective by nature. The analysis is particularly useful when there is a lack of clear priorities or objective data to base decisions on. A paired comparison analysis evaluates a range of options by comparing them against each other.

Related Strategy Concepts: Go-To-Market StrategyMarketing StrategyBusiness ModelsTech Business ModelsJobs-To-Be DoneDesign ThinkingLean Startup CanvasValue ChainValue Proposition CanvasBalanced ScorecardBusiness Model CanvasSWOT AnalysisGrowth HackingBundlingUnbundlingBootstrappingVenture CapitalPorter’s Five ForcesPorter’s Generic StrategiesPorter’s Five ForcesPESTEL AnalysisSWOTPorter’s Diamond ModelAnsoffTechnology Adoption CurveTOWSSOARBalanced ScorecardOKRAgile MethodologyValue PropositionVTDF FrameworkBCG MatrixGE McKinsey MatrixKotter’s 8-Step Change Model.

More resources:

Scroll to Top