porters-generic-strategies

Porter’s Generic Strategies In A Nutshell

In his book, “Competitive Advantage,” in 1985, Porter conceptualized the concept of competitive advantage, by looking at two key aspects. Industry attractiveness, and the company’s strategic positioning. The latter, according to Porter, can be achieved either via cost leadership, differentiation, or focus.

Quick intro do generic strategies

As Porter was trying to conceptualize and break down what determined a competitive advantage for companies within specific industries, Porter created a framework that would stick for decades.

This framework moved along two core sub-frameworks.

One is to determine industry attractiveness (Porter’s five forces).

And another one, also based on the industry attractiveness, determined the strategic positioning (Porter’s generic strategies to gain a competitive advantage).

As he explained in the book, “competition is at the core of the success or failure of firms.”

The whole point for Porter was, through competitive strategy“to establish a profitable and sustainable position against the forces that determine industry competition.”

Industry attractiveness could be analyzed through five core forces:

porter-five-forces
Porter’s Five Forces is a model that helps organizations to gain a better understanding of their industries and competition. Published for the first time by Professor Michael Porter in his book “Competitive Strategy” in the 1980s. The model breaks down industries and markets by analyzing them through five forces

Once a company had clear in mind the context and industry, it needed to make a strategic choice, which for Porter, was summarized in three core moves.

Be a cost leader, differentiator, focuser, or die…

cost-leadership

Within cost leadership, a company that, for several factors (spanning from economies of scale to operational efficiency) managed to sell a product at a lower price and still make good profit margins, would sustain its long-term competitive advantage, is in a good strategic position.

On the other side, based on a different context, a company could still reach a competitive advantage in a broad market through differentiation.

differentiation-strategy

A third generic strategy that targeted a narrow scope within an industry could also be reached through cost focus or differentiation focus.

focus-strategies-porter

There is one scenario that Porter emphasized avoiding: being stuck in the middle.

Getting stuck in the middle

stuck-in-the-middle

In all the cases in which a company wouldn’t be able to execute one of the generic strategies highlighted by Porter in competitive advantage, this would result in a stuck-in-the-middle scenario where no competitive advantage is created.

Case Studies

Automobile Industry

Porter’s Generic Strategies Application:

  • Cost Leadership: Companies like Hyundai and Kia focus on producing vehicles at a lower cost while maintaining acceptable quality standards.
  • Differentiation: Luxury brands like Mercedes-Benz or BMW differentiate with high-end features, advanced technology, and brand prestige.
  • Focus: Tesla initially employed a focus strategy, targeting the niche electric vehicle market with high-end models like the Roadster, before broadening its range.

Stuck-in-the-Middle Scenario: A car manufacturer attempting to produce luxury vehicles at a low cost might compromise on quality, failing to attract either the luxury or budget market segments.

Fast-food Industry

Porter’s Generic Strategies Application:

  • Cost Leadership: Brands like McDonald’s and Burger King emphasize quick service, large volumes, and competitive pricing.
  • Differentiation: Chipotle differentiates with a focus on fresh, organic, and locally-sourced ingredients.
  • Focus: A vegan fast-food joint might cater specifically to the vegan market with specialized offerings.

Stuck-in-the-Middle Scenario: A fast-food chain attempting to offer gourmet meals at rock-bottom prices might struggle with operational inefficiencies and fail to appeal to either gourmet diners or budget-conscious customers.

Technology Industry

Porter’s Generic Strategies Application:

  • Cost Leadership: Companies like Acer or Lenovo offer affordable computing solutions with competitive specs.
  • Differentiation: Apple stands out with its unique design, user-friendly interface, and brand appeal.
  • Focus: Razer focuses specifically on gamers, offering specialized laptops, peripherals, and software.

Stuck-in-the-Middle Scenario: A tech company producing high-end, luxury smartphones without unique features or brand recognition might struggle to compete against established brands like Apple or Samsung.

Airline Industry

Porter’s Generic Strategies Application:

  • Cost Leadership: Budget airlines like Ryanair or EasyJet focus on basic service at low prices.
  • Differentiation: Carriers like Emirates or Singapore Airlines offer premium services, luxurious in-flight experiences, and extensive in-flight entertainment.
  • Focus: Regional airlines may focus on serving specific geographic areas or niche markets.

Stuck-in-the-Middle Scenario: An airline offering low-cost tickets but with premium services might struggle to maintain profitability or identify its target audience.

Fashion Retail Industry

Porter’s Generic Strategies Application:

  • Cost Leadership: Brands like Primark or Walmart’s clothing line focus on producing trendy clothing at affordable prices.
  • Differentiation: Gucci or Louis Vuitton emphasize exclusivity, high-quality materials, and brand prestige.
  • Focus: A brand might focus specifically on sustainable, eco-friendly fashion, catering to an environmentally-conscious audience.

Stuck-in-the-Middle Scenario: A clothing retailer attempting to sell luxury items in bulk quantities at low prices might struggle to maintain brand prestige or appeal to the luxury market segment.

Beverage Industry

Porter’s Generic Strategies Application:

  • Cost Leadership: Generic store brands of sodas or bottled water offer basic beverages at competitive prices.
  • Differentiation: Coca-Cola differentiates with its secret formula, global brand recognition, and extensive marketing.
  • Focus: A brand like LaCroix targets a niche market with flavored sparkling water without sweeteners or artificial ingredients.

Stuck-in-the-Middle Scenario: A beverage company introducing a high-priced cola without a unique flavor or brand differentiation might struggle to compete against established giants like Coca-Cola or Pepsi.

Publishing Industry

Porter’s Generic Strategies Application:

  • Cost Leadership: Companies like Amazon Kindle Direct Publishing allow authors to self-publish at low costs, making e-books available at competitive prices.
  • Differentiation: Penguin Random House emphasizes its legacy, the quality of authors it publishes, and its global reach.
  • Focus: Hay House Publishers specializes in self-help and transformational books, catering to readers interested in personal development.

Cosmetics Industry

Porter’s Generic Strategies Application:

  • Cost Leadership: Brands like e.l.f. Cosmetics offer quality makeup products at affordable price points.
  • Differentiation: Sephora differentiates itself by offering a wide variety of high-end brands, exclusive collections, and a unique in-store experience.
  • Focus: Fenty Beauty, launched by Rihanna, initially focused on providing a diverse range of foundation shades catering to all skin tones, addressing a gap in the market.

Online Streaming Industry

Porter’s Generic Strategies Application:

  • Cost Leadership: Platforms like Tubi or Crackle provide free streaming services, monetized through ads.
  • Differentiation: Netflix differentiates with its original content, user-friendly interface, and absence of commercials.
  • Focus: Crunchyroll focuses specifically on anime and manga content, catering to a niche audience of anime enthusiasts.

Fitness and Gym Industry

Porter’s Generic Strategies Application:

  • Cost Leadership: Planet Fitness markets itself as a low-cost gym with a judgment-free environment.
  • Differentiation: Gold’s Gym emphasizes its legacy, high-quality equipment, and commitment to serious fitness.
  • Focus: OrangeTheory Fitness provides heart rate-based training focusing on high-intensity interval training (HIIT) workouts, targeting fitness enthusiasts looking for structured, intense workouts.

Coffee Shop Industry

Porter’s Generic Strategies Application:

  • Cost Leadership: Dunkin’ emphasizes quick service and competitive prices for its range of coffees and donuts.
  • Differentiation: Starbucks differentiates with its unique coffee blends, in-store ambiance, and customer loyalty programs.
  • Focus: Blue Bottle Coffee focuses on offering high-quality, freshly roasted coffee, targeting coffee connoisseurs and enthusiasts.

Music Industry

Porter’s Generic Strategies Application:

  • Cost Leadership: Platforms like SoundCloud allow emerging artists to upload and share their music for free or at low costs.
  • Differentiation: Spotify offers a vast music library, curated playlists, and a personalized music experience with its “Discover Weekly” feature.
  • Focus: Tidal, co-owned by Jay-Z and other artists, focuses on providing lossless audio quality and exclusive content, targeting audiophiles and fans seeking exclusive releases.

Key Highlights

  • Competitive Advantage Concept: Michael Porter introduced the concept of competitive advantage in his book “Competitive Advantage” in 1985. He emphasized two key aspects: industry attractiveness and strategic positioning.
  • Porter’s Generic Strategies: Porter’s generic strategies outline three core moves to achieve competitive advantage: cost leadership, differentiation, and focus. A company can either be a cost leader, offering products at a lower price, or differentiate its products to stand out in the market. Alternatively, it can focus on a narrow market segment with cost focus or differentiation focus.
  • Stuck-in-the-Middle Scenario: Porter warns against getting stuck in the middle, where a company fails to execute any of the generic strategies, resulting in no competitive advantage.
  • Porter’s Other Strategic Frameworks:
    • Porter’s Five Forces: Analyzes industry attractiveness by examining five forces—bargaining power of buyers and suppliers, threat of substitutes, threat of new entrants, and competitive rivalry.
    • Porter’s Diamond Model: Explains why certain industries in a nation become internationally competitive, considering factors like strategy, structure, rivalry, factor conditions, demand conditions, and related and supporting industries.
    • Porter’s Four Corners Analysis: Helps a business understand its competitive landscape by assessing competitors’ drivers, current strategy, management assumptions, and capabilities.
    • Porter’s Value Chain Model: Analyzes a company’s collection of processes to create value for consumers, directly linked to competitive advantage.

Other strategic frameworks by Porter

Porter’s Diamond Model

porters-diamond-model
Porter’s Diamond Model is a diamond-shaped framework that explains why specific industries in a nation become internationally competitive while those in other nations do not. The model was first published in Michael Porter’s 1990 book The Competitive Advantage of Nations. This framework looks at the firm strategy, structure/rivalry, factor conditions, demand conditions, related and supporting industries.

Porter’s Four Corners Analysis

four-corners-analysis
Developed by American academic Michael Porter, the Four Corners Analysis helps a business understand its particular competitive landscape. The analysis is a form of competitive intelligence where a business determines its future strategy by assessing its competitors’ strategy, looking at four elements: drivers, current strategy, management assumptions, and capabilities.

Porter’s Value Chain Model

porters-value-chain-model
In his 1985 book Competitive Advantage, Porter explains that a value chain is a collection of processes that a company performs to create value for its consumers. As a result, he asserts that value chain analysis is directly linked to competitive advantage. Porter’s Value Chain Model is a strategic management tool developed by Harvard Business School professor Michael Porter. The tool analyses a company’s value chain – defined as the combination of processes that the company uses to make money.

Connected Strategy Frameworks

ADKAR Model

adkar-model
The ADKAR model is a management tool designed to assist employees and businesses in transitioning through organizational change. To maximize the chances of employees embracing change, the ADKAR model was developed by author and engineer Jeff Hiatt in 2003. The model seeks to guide people through the change process and importantly, ensure that people do not revert to habitual ways of operating after some time has passed.

Ansoff Matrix

ansoff-matrix
You can use the Ansoff Matrix as a strategic framework to understand what growth strategy is more suited based on the market context. Developed by mathematician and business manager Igor Ansoff, it assumes a growth strategy can be derived from whether the market is new or existing, and whether the product is new or existing.

Business Model Canvas

business-model-canvas
The business model canvas is a framework proposed by Alexander Osterwalder and Yves Pigneur in Busines Model Generation enabling the design of business models through nine building blocks comprising: key partners, key activities, value propositions, customer relationships, customer segments, critical resources, channels, cost structure, and revenue streams.

Lean Startup Canvas

lean-startup-canvas
The lean startup canvas is an adaptation by Ash Maurya of the business model canvas by Alexander Osterwalder, which adds a layer that focuses on problems, solutions, key metrics, unfair advantage based, and a unique value proposition. Thus, starting from mastering the problem rather than the solution.

Blitzscaling Canvas

blitzscaling-business-model-innovation-canvas
The Blitzscaling business model canvas is a model based on the concept of Blitzscaling, which is a particular process of massive growth under uncertainty, and that prioritizes speed over efficiency and focuses on market domination to create a first-scaler advantage in a scenario of uncertainty.

Blue Ocean Strategy

blue-ocean-strategy
A blue ocean is a strategy where the boundaries of existing markets are redefined, and new uncontested markets are created. At its core, there is value innovation, for which uncontested markets are created, where competition is made irrelevant. And the cost-value trade-off is broken. Thus, companies following a blue ocean strategy offer much more value at a lower cost for the end customers.

Business Analysis Framework

business-analysis
Business analysis is a research discipline that helps driving change within an organization by identifying the key elements and processes that drive value. Business analysis can also be used in Identifying new business opportunities or how to take advantage of existing business opportunities to grow your business in the marketplace.

BCG Matrix

bcg-matrix
In the 1970s, Bruce D. Henderson, founder of the Boston Consulting Group, came up with The Product Portfolio (aka BCG Matrix, or Growth-share Matrix), which would look at a successful business product portfolio based on potential growth and market shares. It divided products into four main categories: cash cows, pets (dogs), question marks, and stars.

Balanced Scorecard

balanced-scorecard
First proposed by accounting academic Robert Kaplan, the balanced scorecard is a management system that allows an organization to focus on big-picture strategic goals. The four perspectives of the balanced scorecard include financial, customer, business process, and organizational capacity. From there, according to the balanced scorecard, it’s possible to have a holistic view of the business.

Blue Ocean Strategy 

blue-ocean-strategy
A blue ocean is a strategy where the boundaries of existing markets are redefined, and new uncontested markets are created. At its core, there is value innovation, for which uncontested markets are created, where competition is made irrelevant. And the cost-value trade-off is broken. Thus, companies following a blue ocean strategy offer much more value at a lower cost for the end customers.

GAP Analysis

gap-analysis
A gap analysis helps an organization assess its alignment with strategic objectives to determine whether the current execution is in line with the company’s mission and long-term vision. Gap analyses then help reach a target performance by assisting organizations to use their resources better. A good gap analysis is a powerful tool to improve execution.

GE McKinsey Model

ge-mckinsey-matrix
The GE McKinsey Matrix was developed in the 1970s after General Electric asked its consultant McKinsey to develop a portfolio management model. This matrix is a strategy tool that provides guidance on how a corporation should prioritize its investments among its business units, leading to three possible scenarios: invest, protect, harvest, and divest.

McKinsey 7-S Model

mckinsey-7-s-model
The McKinsey 7-S Model was developed in the late 1970s by Robert Waterman and Thomas Peters, who were consultants at McKinsey & Company. Waterman and Peters created seven key internal elements that inform a business of how well positioned it is to achieve its goals, based on three hard elements and four soft elements.

McKinsey’s Seven Degrees

mckinseys-seven-degrees
McKinsey’s Seven Degrees of Freedom for Growth is a strategy tool. Developed by partners at McKinsey and Company, the tool helps businesses understand which opportunities will contribute to expansion, and therefore it helps to prioritize those initiatives.

McKinsey Horizon Model

mckinsey-horizon-model
The McKinsey Horizon Model helps a business focus on innovation and growth. The model is a strategy framework divided into three broad categories, otherwise known as horizons. Thus, the framework is sometimes referred to as McKinsey’s Three Horizons of Growth.

Porter’s Five Forces

porter-five-forces
Porter’s Five Forces is a model that helps organizations to gain a better understanding of their industries and competition. Published for the first time by Professor Michael Porter in his book “Competitive Strategy” in the 1980s. The model breaks down industries and markets by analyzing them through five forces.

Porter’s Generic Strategies

competitive-advantage
According to Michael Porter, a competitive advantage, in a given industry could be pursued in two key ways: low cost (cost leadership), or differentiation. A third generic strategy is focus. According to Porter a failure to do so would end up stuck in the middle scenario, where the company will not retain a long-term competitive advantage.

Porter’s Value Chain Model

porters-value-chain-model
In his 1985 book Competitive Advantage, Porter explains that a value chain is a collection of processes that a company performs to create value for its consumers. As a result, he asserts that value chain analysis is directly linked to competitive advantage. Porter’s Value Chain Model is a strategic management tool developed by Harvard Business School professor Michael Porter. The tool analyses a company’s value chain – defined as the combination of processes that the company uses to make money.

Porter’s Diamond Model

porters-diamond-model
Porter’s Diamond Model is a diamond-shaped framework that explains why specific industries in a nation become internationally competitive while those in other nations do not. The model was first published in Michael Porter’s 1990 book The Competitive Advantage of Nations. This framework looks at the firm strategy, structure/rivalry, factor conditions, demand conditions, related and supporting industries.

SWOT Analysis

swot-analysis
A SWOT Analysis is a framework used for evaluating the business‘s Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats. It can aid in identifying the problematic areas of your business so that you can maximize your opportunities. It will also alert you to the challenges your organization might face in the future.

PESTEL Analysis

pestel-analysis

Scenario Planning

scenario-planning
Businesses use scenario planning to make assumptions on future events and how their respective business environments may change in response to those future events. Therefore, scenario planning identifies specific uncertainties – or different realities and how they might affect future business operations. Scenario planning attempts at better strategic decision making by avoiding two pitfalls: underprediction, and overprediction.

STEEPLE Analysis

steeple-analysis
The STEEPLE analysis is a variation of the STEEP analysis. Where the step analysis comprises socio-cultural, technological, economic, environmental/ecological, and political factors as the base of the analysis. The STEEPLE analysis adds other two factors such as Legal and Ethical.

SWOT Analysis

swot-analysis
A SWOT Analysis is a framework used for evaluating the business’s Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats. It can aid in identifying the problematic areas of your business so that you can maximize your opportunities. It will also alert you to the challenges your organization might face in the future.

Related Strategy Concepts: Go-To-Market StrategyMarketing StrategyBusiness ModelsTech Business ModelsJobs-To-Be DoneDesign ThinkingLean Startup CanvasValue ChainValue Proposition CanvasBalanced ScorecardBusiness Model CanvasSWOT AnalysisGrowth HackingBundlingUnbundlingBootstrappingVenture CapitalPorter’s Five ForcesPorter’s Generic StrategiesPorter’s Five ForcesPESTEL AnalysisSWOTPorter’s Diamond ModelAnsoffTechnology Adoption CurveTOWSSOARBalanced ScorecardOKRAgile MethodologyValue PropositionVTDF

Main Free Guides:

About The Author

Scroll to Top
FourWeekMBA