Decision-making for business people needs to leverage simple techniques. Indeed, in most cases, the problem is unknown in the real world, the situation highly opaque and highly uncertain. Therefore, simple frameworks and techniques that require little data can be much more helpful than complex models.
Speed-Reversibility Matrix

Lightning Decision Jam

Less-Is-Better Effect

Kelly Criterion

Ladder of Inference

Pareto Principle Analysis

Force-Field Analysis

Bounded Rationality

Cost-Benefit Analysis

Go/No-Go Decision Making

Scenario Planning

Decision Matrix

Satisficing

RAPID Framework

Foursquare Protocol

DACI Decision-Making

Lightning Decision Jam

Multi-Criteria Analysis

Cynefin Framework

SWOT Analysis

Personal SWOT Analysis

Pareto Analysis

Failure Mode And Effects Analysis

Key highlights of decision-making techniques in business:
- Speed-Reversibility Matrix: A technique for making quick and reversible decisions, especially in uncertain and complex situations.
- Lightning Decision Jam (LDJ): A method for making fast decisions and providing quick direction, developed by design agency AJ&Smart.
- Less-Is-Better Effect: Describes the consumer tendency to choose the worse of two options when each option is presented separately.
- Kelly Criterion: A formula-based approach to investing and gambling, used for wise resource allocation in bets or investments.
- Ladder of Inference: A thinking process where individuals move from a fact to a decision or action using mental models.
- Pareto Principle Analysis: A statistical analysis that identifies a small number of input factors that have the greatest impact on income.
- Force-Field Analysis: A decision-making tool to quantify factors that support or oppose a change initiative.
- Bounded Rationality: A concept where individuals make satisfactory decisions instead of optimizing in decision-making.
- Cost-Benefit Analysis: A process to analyze decisions based on the costs associated with making them.
- Go/No-Go Decision Making: A process of passing or failing a proposition based on specific criteria.
- Scenario Planning: A method to make assumptions about future events and their potential impact on business operations.
- Decision Matrix: A tool to evaluate and prioritize options based on specific criteria.
- Satisficing: A decision-making technique where individuals consider various solutions until they find an acceptable option.
- RAPID Framework: A tool to help businesses make important decisions by defining roles and responsibilities.
- Foursquare Protocol: An ethical decision-making model that helps businesses respond to challenging situations according to a code of ethics.
- DACI Decision-Making: A framework that assigns and displays responsibilities for decision-making.
- Multi-Criteria Analysis: A systematic approach for ranking options against multiple decision criteria.
- Cynefin Framework: A decision-making and problem-solving framework that provides context and guides appropriate responses.
- SWOT Analysis: A framework for evaluating an organization’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats.
- Personal SWOT Analysis: Adapting SWOT analysis for personal use to address specific goals or problems.
- Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA): A structured approach to identifying design failures in a product or process.
User Guide to These Frameworks
| Decision-Making Framework/Concept | Description | When to Use | Advantages | Drawbacks |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Speed-Reversibility Matrix | A tool for evaluating decision speed and reversibility. | When facing time-sensitive decisions requiring reversibility. | Helps make quick yet reversible decisions. | May oversimplify complex decisions. |
| Lightning Decision Jam (LDJ) | A rapid decision-making method for efficient meetings. | When quick direction is needed in meetings or brainstorming sessions. | Speeds up decision-making and promotes collaboration. | May not suit all decision scenarios. |
| Less-Is-Better Effect | A phenomenon where less valuable options are perceived as more generous. | When presenting choices individually to influence perceptions. | Can lead to cost savings and favorable perceptions. | Limited applicability to all decisions. |
| Kelly Criterion | A formula-based approach for investment and gambling fund allocation. | In investment or gambling to optimize fund allocation. | Aids in maximizing returns while managing risk. | Requires accurate probability estimates. |
| Ladder of Inference | A process for moving from facts to decisions based on mental models. | When analyzing decision-making processes and improving critical thinking. | Helps identify cognitive biases and enhance decision quality. | May be challenging to apply in practice. |
| Pareto Principle Analysis | A statistical analysis identifying key input factors with the greatest impact. | When prioritizing factors influencing outcomes. | Focuses resources on high-impact factors, improving efficiency. | May not consider interactions between factors. |
| Force-Field Analysis | Quantifies factors supporting or opposing change initiatives. | When assessing the feasibility of implementing organizational changes. | Provides a structured approach to change management. | Requires comprehensive data and analysis. |
| Bounded Rationality | A concept acknowledging cognitive limitations in decision-making. | In scenarios where seeking optimal solutions is impractical. | Helps make satisfactory decisions efficiently. | May result in suboptimal outcomes. |
| Cost-Benefit Analysis | Analyzes decisions based on costs, benefits, and alternatives. | When evaluating the feasibility of projects or initiatives. | Provides a systematic approach to decision-making. | Relies on accurate cost and benefit estimates. |
| Go/No-Go Decision Making | Evaluates propositions against criteria for project advancement. | When deciding whether to proceed or terminate projects. | Enhances project selection and resource allocation. | Criteria may require continuous adjustment. |
| Scenario Planning | Makes assumptions about future events and their impact. | When anticipating future uncertainties and strategic planning. | Helps identify potential risks and opportunities. | Requires thorough scenario analysis. |
| Decision Matrix | Evaluates and prioritizes options based on multiple criteria. | In complex decision scenarios with multiple factors to consider. | Facilitates systematic evaluation and comparison of options. | Can be time-consuming to create and use. |
| Satisficing | Chooses a satisfactory solution rather than seeking the optimal one. | When optimizing is impractical or resource-intensive. | Streamlines decision-making and conserves resources. | May lead to missed optimal solutions. |
| RAPID Framework | Clarifies roles and responsibilities in decision-making. | When making important decisions within organizations. | Enhances decision clarity and accountability. | Requires clear definition of roles. |
| Foursquare Protocol | An ethical decision-making model for businesses and individuals. | When facing ethical dilemmas or moral decisions. | Provides a structured ethical decision-making process. | Limited applicability beyond ethical decisions. |
| DACI Decision-Making | Assigns responsibilities (Driver, Approver, Contributor, Informed) for decision-making. | In organizations to clarify decision roles and responsibilities. | Enhances transparency and accountability in decision processes. | May not address all aspects of complex decisions. |
| Multi-Criteria Analysis | Ranks options against multiple criteria, each weighted by importance. | When making decisions with multiple influencing factors. | Considers various criteria and their relative importance. | Complex and requires data on multiple criteria. |
| Cynefin Framework | Categorizes situations into domains (obvious, complicated, complex, chaotic) to guide responses. | When addressing problems or making decisions in various contexts. | Helps tailor decision-making approaches to different situations. | May require subjective interpretation. |
| SWOT Analysis | Evaluates Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats for strategic planning. | In strategic planning and assessing business situations. | Provides a comprehensive overview of internal and external factors. | Relies on accurate and up-to-date data. |
| Personal SWOT Analysis | Applies SWOT analysis to individuals for personal development. | When individuals want to assess their strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. | Helps individuals identify areas for personal growth and improvement. | Subjective self-assessment may be biased. |
| Pareto Analysis | Identifies key input factors with the greatest impact on outcomes. | In decision-making when prioritizing factors with significant influence. | Focuses resources on factors contributing most to desired outcomes. | Ignores potential interactions between factors. |
| Failure Mode And Effects Analysis (FMEA) | Identifies design failures in products or processes to prevent issues. | In product or process design to anticipate and mitigate potential failures. | Enhances product reliability and safety through proactive problem-solving. | Time-consuming and may not uncover all possible failures. |
Read Next: Mental Models, Biases, Bounded Rationality, Mandela Effect, Dunning-Kruger Effect, Lindy Effect, Crowding Out Effect, Bandwagon Effect, Decision-Making Matrix.
Related Strategy Concepts: Go-To-Market Strategy, Marketing Strategy, Business Models, Tech Business Models, Jobs-To-Be Done, Design Thinking, Lean Startup Canvas, Value Chain, Value Proposition Canvas, Balanced Scorecard, Business Model Canvas, SWOT Analysis, Growth Hacking, Bundling, Unbundling, Bootstrapping, Venture Capital, Porter’s Five Forces, Porter’s Generic Strategies, Porter’s Five Forces, PESTEL Analysis, SWOT, Porter’s Diamond Model, Ansoff, Technology Adoption Curve, TOWS, SOAR, Balanced Scorecard, OKR, Agile Methodology, Value Proposition, VTDF Framework, BCG Matrix, GE McKinsey Matrix, Kotter’s 8-Step Change Model.
Main Guides:







