DACI Decision-Making Framework

The DACI Decision-Making Framework was developed by software company Intuit in the 1980s. The DACI Decision-Making Framework assigns and then displays the responsibilities of the individual when making decision. DACI stands for driver, approver, contributor, and informed.

Understanding the DACI Decision-Making Framework

It is a group decision-making technique assigning roles and responsibilities to team members.

This includes identifying those who:

  • Must be consulted for further information.
  • Must be tasked with conducting research, interviews, surveys, or polls.
  • Must be informed once a decision has been made.
  • Make, approve, or disapprove decisions.
  • Follow or decide on recommendations.

By clearly delineating roles and responsibilities, the DACI framework encourages collaboration and reduces friction. Ultimately, this increases the speed of project management, allowing teams to make informed and timely decisions crucial to success. 

The four roles of the DACI Decision-Making Framework

DACI is an acronym of four different group member roles that aid in simplifying decision-making.

Following is a look at each:

D – Driver 

This is the individual who moves the decision making process forward. They ensure that decisions are made without necessarily making the decision themself on each occasion.

Drivers are tasked with setting decision timelines and ensuring that team activities run on schedule. They must also liaise with subject matter experts to make well-informed decisions.

A – Approver

The approver has the final say on a project aspect. Many companies may have more than one approver, but they should be kept to a minimum to fully realize the DACI benefits of speed and simplicity.

C – Contributor

A contributor is a person who influences decision making through specific knowledge or expertise. As a result, they act as consultants to drivers who then determine how that knowledge or expertise can be utilised.

I – Informed 

Informed individuals have no authority over decision making, nor are they directly involved in the project itself.

Nevertheless, their own work may be indirectly affected as the project progresses. For a team working on a new product, an informed group may encompass customer service, sales, and marketing. While these groups have no say on the final product, they should be regularly updated so that resource allocation and planning can progress accordingly.

Implementing the DACI Decision-Making Framework

Teams that want to implement the DACI model should:

  1. Determine the decision to be made. Here, the emphasis is on breaking the project down into smaller tasks and assigning a Driver to each. There should also be agreement on each action item and its associated outcomes.
  2. Define DACI roles. Then, assign roles such as Approver or Contributor to each member of the team using a spreadsheet. Ensure that every individual understands their role well. It’s also important to note that one individual can hold several roles if required.
  3. Define the workflow. At this point, the Driver begins developing the action plan. These plans should be broad and answer important questions. For example, who should attend meetings and how often will meetings occur once the project has begun? Will tasks be tracked by using a project management app, spreadsheet, or roadmap software? What will be the nature or structure of the decision-making process? In other words, will the Approver and Contributor have more say in decision making? Or will the project team as a whole collaborate directly with the Driver?

Key takeaways:

  • The DACI Decision-Making Framework clarifies roles and responsibilities for each member of a product development team to make better decisions.
  • The DACI Decision-Making Framework is based on four key roles that comprise the DACI acronym: Drivers, Approvers, Contributors, and Informed.
  • The DACI Decision-Making Framework is effective when projects are broken into smaller parts, with roles assigned to each. Before the project can begin, all members must understand and then agree upon their roles and responsibilities.

Related Business Frameworks

The Six Thinking Hats model was created by psychologist Edward de Bono in 1986, who noted that personality type was a key driver of how people approached problem-solving. For example, optimists view situations differently from pessimists. Analytical individuals may generate ideas that a more emotional person would not, and vice versa.
Value stream mapping uses flowcharts to analyze and then improve on the delivery of products and services. Value stream mapping (VSM) is based on the concept of value streams – which are a series of sequential steps that explain how a product or service is delivered to consumers.
Affinity grouping is a collaborative prioritization process where group participants brainstorm ideas and opportunities according to their similarities. Affinity grouping is a broad and versatile process based on simple but highly effective ideas. It helps teams generate and then organize teams according to their similarity or likeness.
The Fishbone Diagram is a diagram-based technique used in brainstorming to identify potential causes for a problem, thus it is a visual representation of cause and effect. The problem or effect serves as the head of the fish. Possible causes of the problem are listed on the individual “bones” of the fish. This encourages problem-solving teams to consider a wide range of alternatives.
Eighteen years later, it was adapted by psychologist Bob Eberle in his book SCAMPER: Games for Imagination Development. The SCAMPER method was first described by advertising executive Alex Osborne in 1953. The SCAMPER method is a form of creative thinking or problem solving based on evaluating ideas or groups of ideas.
The MECE framework is an exhaustive expression of information that must account for all conceivable scenarios. While the framework is used in categorizing information and data processing, it is commonly used in formulating problems and then solving them. The MECE framework is a means of the exhaustive grouping of information into categories that are both mutually exclusive (ME) and collectively exhaustive (CE).
The Nadler-Tushman Congruence Model was created by David Nadler and Michael Tushman at Columbia University. The Nadler-Tushman Congruence Model is a diagnostic tool that identifies problem areas within a company. In the context of business, congruence occurs when the goals of different people or interest groups coincide.
Lewin’s change management model helps businesses manage the uncertainty and resistance associated with change. Kurt Lewin, one of the first academics to focus his research on group dynamics, developed a three-stage model. He proposed that the behavior of individuals happened as a function of group behavior.

Read Next: Business AnalysisCompetitor Analysis, Continuous InnovationAgile MethodologyLean StartupBusiness Model InnovationProject Management.

Main Free Guides:

$200 Off Library
No prize
Next time
$300 Off BMI Course
50% Off Flagship Book
No Prize
No luck today
Unlucky :(
No prize
Get your chance to win a prize!
I have read and agree to the Privacy Policy
Scroll to Top