The cashless effect is a bias which argues that consumers are likely to spend more money when they don’t have to physically give it up. Physically giving up money is also called “pain of payment” – the more pain a consumer associates with paying, the less likely they are to spend.
Understanding the cashless effect
As developed nations transition to cash“>cash-free societies, the implications of the cashless effect for consumer spending habits are significant.
The cashless effect states that consumers are willing to pay more when they can’t physically see the money being spent.
In another study by MIT, two groups of people were asked to bid on tickets to a sporting event. The group who had a credit card to fund the purchase bid up to 72% more than the group funded with cash“>cash.
The benefits of a business taking advantage of the cashless effect are obvious, but this does not diminish their scalability or effectiveness.
Let’s take a look at how the cashless effect is already being implemented:
- Reducing pain. By taking as much effort out of the purchasing process as possible, businesses are also reducing payment pain. Apple Pay has revolutionized the payment process, with users simply having to wave one of their devices in front of a payment terminal. Amazon’s one-click ordering has also taken much of the hassle out of e-commerce ordering.
- Simplicity – many businesses are now incorporating entire payment experiences within smartphone apps. Coffee company Harris + Hoole recently won an award for its app, which allows users to order their daily cup of coffee or add funds to their account in just a few short taps.
- Tipping – when making a credit card payment at a restaurant, diners are now prompted to automatically add a tip to the cost of their meals. Paying with a credit card means that tips are likely to be higher. Given that the percentage amount of tips is calculated for the consumer, further pain is reduced from the payment process.
Potential limitations to cashless effect in business
With the shift toward digital transactions, payment providers and app developers may decide to establish or increase user fees. While this is unlikely to curb spending habits for existing users, fees may dissuade others from signing up.
The ease of spending associated with the cashless effect can also create social problems and widen economic inequality. For example, consumer debt in the U.S. in 2019 was almost $14 trillion alone. Long term, consumer debt is bad for business because people have less disposable income.
In the face of the COVID-19 pandemic, many countries have also seen credit card ownership and debt reduced significantly. Whether this reduces the cashless effect remains to be seen, but there is potential that consumers who use debit cards for purchases may be more discerning buyers.
- In simple terms, the cashless effect describes the consumer tendency to spend more money when that money is intangible.
- The cashless effect is a bias related to the pain of payment, which states that consumers who pay with cash experience more pain and are therefore likely to spend less.
- The cashless effect is becoming ubiquitous as trends shift toward card transactions that remove the pain and hassle out of purchasing. However, the effect has the potential to exacerbate wealth inequality and is vulnerable to the rising unpopularity of credit use in some countries.