Systems Boundary

A Systems Boundary is a defining line that separates a system from its environment. It can be physical or conceptual, serving to clarify scope and focus on core functions. Implications include boundary-spanning interactions and possible scope adjustments. Examples range from software development to environmental ecosystems and business processes.

Introduction to Systems Boundary

The Systems Boundary is a fundamental concept in systems thinking, a discipline that focuses on understanding complex systems and their interactions. A system is a collection of interrelated components or elements that work together to achieve a common purpose or goal. The systems boundary defines the scope of the system by delineating what is considered part of the system and what lies outside of it.

Key principles of Systems Boundary include:

  1. Clarity and Definition: Defining a clear systems boundary is essential for understanding the system’s structure, behavior, and interactions.
  2. Contextual Understanding: The boundary helps establish the context within which the system operates, distinguishing between internal processes and external influences.
  3. Scope Management: It aids in managing the scope of analysis or study, ensuring that efforts are focused on the relevant components and interactions.
  4. Dynamic Nature: Systems boundaries can be dynamic and may change over time as the system evolves or as the focus of analysis shifts.

Key Concepts in Systems Boundary

To effectively grasp the concept of Systems Boundary, it’s important to understand key concepts and terminology associated with systems thinking:

1. System:

A system is a collection of interconnected components or elements that work together to achieve a specific purpose or goal. Systems can be simple or highly complex, and they can exist in various domains, including engineering, biology, ecology, and social sciences.

2. Environment:

The environment refers to everything that exists outside of the defined systems boundary. It includes external factors, influences, and entities that interact with or impact the system. Understanding the relationship between a system and its environment is central to systems thinking.

3. Inputs and Outputs:

Systems typically have inputs (resources, information, energy) and outputs (results, products, waste). The systems boundary helps identify what constitutes an input or output and what is relevant for analysis.

4. Interactions:

Interactions occur within a system and between the system and its environment. These interactions can be physical, chemical, biological, informational, or social in nature. Systems boundary delineates which interactions are considered part of the system.

5. Holism:

Systems thinking emphasizes a holistic approach, considering the entire system as a whole rather than focusing solely on its individual components. The systems boundary helps define what is encompassed by this holistic perspective.

Methods for Defining Systems Boundary

Defining a systems boundary involves a series of steps and considerations to ensure a clear and accurate representation of the system under study:

1. Define the Purpose:

Clearly articulate the purpose of defining the systems boundary. What is the specific goal or objective of the analysis? Understanding the purpose helps guide the boundary definition.

2. Identify Key Components:

Identify the main components or elements of the system. What are the essential parts that make up the system? This step helps determine what should be included within the boundary.

3. Determine Interactions:

Identify the interactions between the components and elements of the system. What processes, flows, or relationships exist within the system? Understanding these interactions is critical for boundary definition.

4. Consider Inputs and Outputs:

Define the inputs and outputs of the system. What resources, information, or energy enter the system, and what results, products, or waste exit the system? Clarify which of these are within the boundary.

5. Assess Boundaries:

Consider the boundaries in the context of the system’s purpose and the scope of analysis. Determine where the system ends and the environment begins. This may involve making explicit decisions about what is excluded.

6. Document Boundary Decisions:

Document the decisions made regarding the systems boundary. Create a clear and concise description that outlines the scope of the system and its relationship with the environment.

7. Review and Refine:

Periodically review and, if necessary, refine the systems boundary. As circumstances change or new insights emerge, the boundary may need adjustment to maintain accuracy and relevance.

Real-World Applications of Systems Boundary

The concept of Systems Boundary finds applications in a wide range of fields and domains:

1. Engineering:

In engineering, Systems Boundary is used to define the scope of a system under design or analysis. It helps engineers identify the relevant components, interactions, and inputs and outputs for a particular project.

2. Ecology:

Ecologists use Systems Boundary to delineate ecosystems and study the interactions between organisms and their environment. Understanding the boundaries of ecosystems is essential for ecological research and conservation efforts.

3. Management:

In management and business, Systems Boundary is applied to define the scope of organizational systems. It helps managers identify the internal processes and external factors that influence the organization’s performance.

4. Biology:

Biologists use Systems Boundary to define the boundaries of biological systems, such as cells, organs, and ecosystems. This aids in understanding how these systems function and interact with their surroundings.

5. Information Technology:

In IT systems and software development, Systems Boundary is used to specify the limits of a software application or system. It helps software engineers define what is included in the system’s functionality.

6. Social Sciences:

Social scientists apply Systems Boundary to study social systems and organizations. It helps define the boundaries of research and understand the relationships between social entities and their environment.

The Significance of Systems Boundary

The Systems Boundary holds significant importance in systems thinking and analysis for several reasons:

  1. Clarity and Focus: It provides clarity by defining what is included within the system and what is external to it. This clarity helps focus analysis and research efforts.
  2. Contextual Understanding: Systems Boundary helps establish the context within which a system operates, enabling a better understanding of the system’s behavior and interactions.
  3. Scope Management: It aids in managing the scope of analysis, ensuring that efforts are directed toward the relevant components and interactions.
  4. Communication and Collaboration: Clearly defined systems boundaries facilitate communication and collaboration among stakeholders, ensuring a shared understanding of the system’s scope.
  5. Problem-Solving: When addressing complex issues or challenges, a well-defined systems boundary allows for a systematic approach to problem-solving and decision-making.
  6. Holistic Perspective: By explicitly defining the boundary, systems thinking encourages a holistic perspective that considers the entire system as a whole.


The concept of Systems Boundary is a fundamental aspect of systems thinking and analysis, applicable across diverse fields and disciplines. Whether defining the scope of a technical system in engineering or delineating the boundaries of an ecological ecosystem, a clear and well-defined systems boundary is essential for understanding, analyzing, and managing complex systems and their interactions. It serves as a guiding framework that helps individuals and organizations navigate the intricate relationships between systems and their environments. As systems thinking continues to play a pivotal role in addressing complex challenges, the Systems Boundary remains a critical concept for researchers, practitioners, and decision-makers alike.

Case Studies

  • Ecosystem Boundary: In ecology, the boundary of an ecosystem separates one ecological community from another. For instance, the boundary between a freshwater lake ecosystem and a surrounding forest ecosystem defines the limits of each system.
  • Urban Planning: When designing a city’s public transportation system, a systems boundary is used to define the scope of the transit network. This boundary distinguishes the transportation system (buses, trains, subways) from the city’s other infrastructure.
  • Manufacturing: In a manufacturing plant, the systems boundary separates the production line (the system) from the warehouse and distribution facilities (the external environment). This distinction is crucial for efficient inventory management and production processes.
  • Information Technology: In network security, the systems boundary separates an organization’s internal network from the external internet. This boundary is essential for implementing security measures to protect sensitive data.
  • Healthcare: In healthcare systems, the boundary of a hospital system defines the extent of healthcare services provided within the hospital’s facilities. Services like surgery, diagnostics, and patient care are within the boundary, while services like patient transportation may be outside.
  • Business Supply Chain: The boundary of a supply chain system includes all processes related to the production, procurement, and distribution of products within the supply chain network. It separates these internal processes from external suppliers and customers.
  • Aerospace Engineering: In aircraft design, the systems boundary separates the aircraft (the system) from its surrounding atmosphere (the external environment). This boundary helps engineers analyze aerodynamics and flight characteristics.
  • Software Development: The boundary in software development separates the custom code and functionalities developed for a specific application from external libraries and third-party APIs. This boundary helps maintain code modularity and reuse.
  • Energy Grids: Electricity grids have clear systems boundaries that differentiate between the grid’s infrastructure (power lines, substations) and the electricity generation facilities (power plants, renewable sources) that feed into the grid.
  • Environmental Conservation: Conservation efforts often focus on preserving the biodiversity within a specific natural reserve. The boundary of the reserve separates the protected area from the surrounding landscape to ensure the conservation of local ecosystems.

Key Highlights

  • Definition: Systems boundaries define the limits or edges of a particular system. They establish what is inside the system and what is external to it.
  • Scope Determination: Boundaries are essential for determining the scope of a system. They help clarify what aspects are considered part of the system and what falls outside of it.
  • Interactions: Systems boundaries are where interactions occur between a system and its environment. These interactions often drive processes and behaviors within the system.
  • System Identification: Clear boundaries are crucial for identifying and distinguishing one system from another. They aid in understanding the components and functions unique to each system.
  • Analysis and Modeling: Systems boundaries are fundamental in systems thinking, analysis, and modeling. They help simplify complex systems by focusing on the interactions within the defined limits.
  • Problem Solving: When addressing issues or optimizing processes, defining clear boundaries is a critical step. It ensures that efforts are directed toward the specific system components that require attention.
  • Resource Allocation: Systems boundaries guide resource allocation decisions. They help organizations allocate resources effectively to manage and improve the components within the system.
  • Security and Control: In various fields, such as cybersecurity and environmental management, systems boundaries play a vital role in establishing security measures and control mechanisms.
  • Boundary Spanning: In interdisciplinary fields, understanding systems boundaries is essential for effective collaboration and communication between different experts and stakeholders.
  • Adaptability: Systems boundaries can be adjusted when necessary to accommodate changes in the environment or system requirements, allowing for adaptability and evolution.
  • Holistic View: By considering both the internal and external factors, systems boundaries encourage a holistic view of systems, promoting a deeper understanding of their behavior.
  • Complexity Management: Boundaries help manage the complexity of systems by simplifying the focus to what is relevant and significant for analysis and decision-making.

Connected Thinking Frameworks

Convergent vs. Divergent Thinking

Convergent thinking occurs when the solution to a problem can be found by applying established rules and logical reasoning. Whereas divergent thinking is an unstructured problem-solving method where participants are encouraged to develop many innovative ideas or solutions to a given problem. Where convergent thinking might work for larger, mature organizations where divergent thinking is more suited for startups and innovative companies.

Critical Thinking

Critical thinking involves analyzing observations, facts, evidence, and arguments to form a judgment about what someone reads, hears, says, or writes.


The concept of cognitive biases was introduced and popularized by the work of Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman in 1972. Biases are seen as systematic errors and flaws that make humans deviate from the standards of rationality, thus making us inept at making good decisions under uncertainty.

Second-Order Thinking

Second-order thinking is a means of assessing the implications of our decisions by considering future consequences. Second-order thinking is a mental model that considers all future possibilities. It encourages individuals to think outside of the box so that they can prepare for every and eventuality. It also discourages the tendency for individuals to default to the most obvious choice.

Lateral Thinking

Lateral thinking is a business strategy that involves approaching a problem from a different direction. The strategy attempts to remove traditionally formulaic and routine approaches to problem-solving by advocating creative thinking, therefore finding unconventional ways to solve a known problem. This sort of non-linear approach to problem-solving, can at times, create a big impact.

Bounded Rationality

Bounded rationality is a concept attributed to Herbert Simon, an economist and political scientist interested in decision-making and how we make decisions in the real world. In fact, he believed that rather than optimizing (which was the mainstream view in the past decades) humans follow what he called satisficing.

Dunning-Kruger Effect

The Dunning-Kruger effect describes a cognitive bias where people with low ability in a task overestimate their ability to perform that task well. Consumers or businesses that do not possess the requisite knowledge make bad decisions. What’s more, knowledge gaps prevent the person or business from seeing their mistakes.

Occam’s Razor

Occam’s Razor states that one should not increase (beyond reason) the number of entities required to explain anything. All things being equal, the simplest solution is often the best one. The principle is attributed to 14th-century English theologian William of Ockham.

Lindy Effect

The Lindy Effect is a theory about the ageing of non-perishable things, like technology or ideas. Popularized by author Nicholas Nassim Taleb, the Lindy Effect states that non-perishable things like technology age – linearly – in reverse. Therefore, the older an idea or a technology, the same will be its life expectancy.


Antifragility was first coined as a term by author, and options trader Nassim Nicholas Taleb. Antifragility is a characteristic of systems that thrive as a result of stressors, volatility, and randomness. Therefore, Antifragile is the opposite of fragile. Where a fragile thing breaks up to volatility; a robust thing resists volatility. An antifragile thing gets stronger from volatility (provided the level of stressors and randomness doesn’t pass a certain threshold).

Systems Thinking

Systems thinking is a holistic means of investigating the factors and interactions that could contribute to a potential outcome. It is about thinking non-linearly, and understanding the second-order consequences of actions and input into the system.

Vertical Thinking

Vertical thinking, on the other hand, is a problem-solving approach that favors a selective, analytical, structured, and sequential mindset. The focus of vertical thinking is to arrive at a reasoned, defined solution.

Maslow’s Hammer

Maslow’s Hammer, otherwise known as the law of the instrument or the Einstellung effect, is a cognitive bias causing an over-reliance on a familiar tool. This can be expressed as the tendency to overuse a known tool (perhaps a hammer) to solve issues that might require a different tool. This problem is persistent in the business world where perhaps known tools or frameworks might be used in the wrong context (like business plans used as planning tools instead of only investors’ pitches).

Peter Principle

The Peter Principle was first described by Canadian sociologist Lawrence J. Peter in his 1969 book The Peter Principle. The Peter Principle states that people are continually promoted within an organization until they reach their level of incompetence.

Straw Man Fallacy

The straw man fallacy describes an argument that misrepresents an opponent’s stance to make rebuttal more convenient. The straw man fallacy is a type of informal logical fallacy, defined as a flaw in the structure of an argument that renders it invalid.

Streisand Effect

The Streisand Effect is a paradoxical phenomenon where the act of suppressing information to reduce visibility causes it to become more visible. In 2003, Streisand attempted to suppress aerial photographs of her Californian home by suing photographer Kenneth Adelman for an invasion of privacy. Adelman, who Streisand assumed was paparazzi, was instead taking photographs to document and study coastal erosion. In her quest for more privacy, Streisand’s efforts had the opposite effect.


As highlighted by German psychologist Gerd Gigerenzer in the paper “Heuristic Decision Making,” the term heuristic is of Greek origin, meaning “serving to find out or discover.” More precisely, a heuristic is a fast and accurate way to make decisions in the real world, which is driven by uncertainty.

Recognition Heuristic

The recognition heuristic is a psychological model of judgment and decision making. It is part of a suite of simple and economical heuristics proposed by psychologists Daniel Goldstein and Gerd Gigerenzer. The recognition heuristic argues that inferences are made about an object based on whether it is recognized or not.

Representativeness Heuristic

The representativeness heuristic was first described by psychologists Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky. The representativeness heuristic judges the probability of an event according to the degree to which that event resembles a broader class. When queried, most will choose the first option because the description of John matches the stereotype we may hold for an archaeologist.

Take-The-Best Heuristic

The take-the-best heuristic is a decision-making shortcut that helps an individual choose between several alternatives. The take-the-best (TTB) heuristic decides between two or more alternatives based on a single good attribute, otherwise known as a cue. In the process, less desirable attributes are ignored.

Bundling Bias

The bundling bias is a cognitive bias in e-commerce where a consumer tends not to use all of the products bought as a group, or bundle. Bundling occurs when individual products or services are sold together as a bundle. Common examples are tickets and experiences. The bundling bias dictates that consumers are less likely to use each item in the bundle. This means that the value of the bundle and indeed the value of each item in the bundle is decreased.

Barnum Effect

The Barnum Effect is a cognitive bias where individuals believe that generic information – which applies to most people – is specifically tailored for themselves.

First-Principles Thinking

First-principles thinking – sometimes called reasoning from first principles – is used to reverse-engineer complex problems and encourage creativity. It involves breaking down problems into basic elements and reassembling them from the ground up. Elon Musk is among the strongest proponents of this way of thinking.

Ladder Of Inference

The ladder of inference is a conscious or subconscious thinking process where an individual moves from a fact to a decision or action. The ladder of inference was created by academic Chris Argyris to illustrate how people form and then use mental models to make decisions.

Goodhart’s Law

Goodhart’s Law is named after British monetary policy theorist and economist Charles Goodhart. Speaking at a conference in Sydney in 1975, Goodhart said that “any observed statistical regularity will tend to collapse once pressure is placed upon it for control purposes.” Goodhart’s Law states that when a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure.

Six Thinking Hats Model

The Six Thinking Hats model was created by psychologist Edward de Bono in 1986, who noted that personality type was a key driver of how people approached problem-solving. For example, optimists view situations differently from pessimists. Analytical individuals may generate ideas that a more emotional person would not, and vice versa.

Mandela Effect

The Mandela effect is a phenomenon where a large group of people remembers an event differently from how it occurred. The Mandela effect was first described in relation to Fiona Broome, who believed that former South African President Nelson Mandela died in prison during the 1980s. While Mandela was released from prison in 1990 and died 23 years later, Broome remembered news coverage of his death in prison and even a speech from his widow. Of course, neither event occurred in reality. But Broome was later to discover that she was not the only one with the same recollection of events.

Crowding-Out Effect

The crowding-out effect occurs when public sector spending reduces spending in the private sector.

Bandwagon Effect

The bandwagon effect tells us that the more a belief or idea has been adopted by more people within a group, the more the individual adoption of that idea might increase within the same group. This is the psychological effect that leads to herd mentality. What in marketing can be associated with social proof.

Moore’s Law

Moore’s law states that the number of transistors on a microchip doubles approximately every two years. This observation was made by Intel co-founder Gordon Moore in 1965 and it become a guiding principle for the semiconductor industry and has had far-reaching implications for technology as a whole.

Disruptive Innovation

Disruptive innovation as a term was first described by Clayton M. Christensen, an American academic and business consultant whom The Economist called “the most influential management thinker of his time.” Disruptive innovation describes the process by which a product or service takes hold at the bottom of a market and eventually displaces established competitors, products, firms, or alliances.

Value Migration

Value migration was first described by author Adrian Slywotzky in his 1996 book Value Migration – How to Think Several Moves Ahead of the Competition. Value migration is the transferal of value-creating forces from outdated business models to something better able to satisfy consumer demands.

Bye-Now Effect

The bye-now effect describes the tendency for consumers to think of the word “buy” when they read the word “bye”. In a study that tracked diners at a name-your-own-price restaurant, each diner was asked to read one of two phrases before ordering their meal. The first phrase, “so long”, resulted in diners paying an average of $32 per meal. But when diners recited the phrase “bye bye” before ordering, the average price per meal rose to $45.


Groupthink occurs when well-intentioned individuals make non-optimal or irrational decisions based on a belief that dissent is impossible or on a motivation to conform. Groupthink occurs when members of a group reach a consensus without critical reasoning or evaluation of the alternatives and their consequences.


A stereotype is a fixed and over-generalized belief about a particular group or class of people. These beliefs are based on the false assumption that certain characteristics are common to every individual residing in that group. Many stereotypes have a long and sometimes controversial history and are a direct consequence of various political, social, or economic events. Stereotyping is the process of making assumptions about a person or group of people based on various attributes, including gender, race, religion, or physical traits.

Murphy’s Law

Murphy’s Law states that if anything can go wrong, it will go wrong. Murphy’s Law was named after aerospace engineer Edward A. Murphy. During his time working at Edwards Air Force Base in 1949, Murphy cursed a technician who had improperly wired an electrical component and said, “If there is any way to do it wrong, he’ll find it.”

Law of Unintended Consequences

The law of unintended consequences was first mentioned by British philosopher John Locke when writing to parliament about the unintended effects of interest rate rises. However, it was popularized in 1936 by American sociologist Robert K. Merton who looked at unexpected, unanticipated, and unintended consequences and their impact on society.

Fundamental Attribution Error

Fundamental attribution error is a bias people display when judging the behavior of others. The tendency is to over-emphasize personal characteristics and under-emphasize environmental and situational factors.

Outcome Bias

Outcome bias describes a tendency to evaluate a decision based on its outcome and not on the process by which the decision was reached. In other words, the quality of a decision is only determined once the outcome is known. Outcome bias occurs when a decision is based on the outcome of previous events without regard for how those events developed.

Hindsight Bias

Hindsight bias is the tendency for people to perceive past events as more predictable than they actually were. The result of a presidential election, for example, seems more obvious when the winner is announced. The same can also be said for the avid sports fan who predicted the correct outcome of a match regardless of whether their team won or lost. Hindsight bias, therefore, is the tendency for an individual to convince themselves that they accurately predicted an event before it happened.

Read Next: BiasesBounded RationalityMandela EffectDunning-Kruger EffectLindy EffectCrowding Out EffectBandwagon Effect.

Main Guides:

About The Author

Scroll to Top