What Are Likert’s Management Systems? The Likert’s Management Systems In A Nutshell

Likert’s management systems were developed by American social psychologist Rensis Likert. Likert’s management systems are a series of leadership theories based on the study of various organizational dynamics and characteristics. Likert proposed four systems of management, which can also be thought of as leadership styles: Exploitative authoritative, Benevolent authoritative, Consultative, Participative.

Understanding Likert’s management systems

During the 1960s, Likert distributed questionnaires to managers from 200 organizations to study patterns in leadership style.

Specifically, Likert evaluated management performance by determining whether leaders could extract higher productivity levels from their subordinates.

He discovered that greater organizational efficiency occurred when managers applied a general supervision style and focused on building relationships.

These managers were defined as employee-centered.

Conversely, managers who maintained the constant pressure of production through a focus on tasks were said to be job-centered.

Likert and his colleagues argued traditional methods for measuring bottom-line performance ignored the human component.

As a result, they emphasized the need to consider both human resources and capital resources as assets requiring proper management.

More broadly, Likert’s work made it possible to quantify the research many other theorists were doing into group dynamics at the time.

Likert’s four systems of management

Likert proposed four systems of management, which can also be thought of as leadership styles. 

Each describes the relationships, involvement, and roles of managers and subordinates in an industrial setting:

Exploitative authoritative

In this system, responsibility and power lie in the upper echelons of the management hierarchy.

Superiors have no trust or confidence in subordinates, with decisions imposed on the latter with no scope for discussion.

Motivation is based on threats and fear and management is highly task-oriented.

Benevolent authoritative

Authority and decision-making ability remains with upper management, but subordinates are motivated by rewards.

As a natural consequence, leaders have condescending confidence and trust in their subordinates similar to a master-servant relationship.

Benevolence also means a limited number of decisions are allowed to be made by middle or lower management.


This system of leadership uses rewards, autonomy, and participatory teamwork as the basis for motivation.

Management has substantial but not total confidence in subordinates, with some degree of horizontal and vertical communication.

Employees are involved during some decision-making processes – particularly if decisions are likely to make a significant impact on them.


Likert considered this system to be the most satisfying for employees.

Superiors have full confidence in subordinates and encourage them to participate in group-based decision making – which also serves as a motivational driver.

Two-way communication is also prevalent as the subordinate feels empowered to discuss any job-related issue with their superiors.

The seven variables of Likert’s management systems

Each of the management systems above, Likert argued, are underpinned to varying degrees by seven key variables:


Whether positive (rewards and incentives) or negative (punishment).


Likert’s systems cover many leadership styles, including autocratic leadership, situational leadership, and transformational leadership.

Leadership styles encompass the behavioral qualities of a leader. These qualities are commonly used to direct, motivate, or manage groups of people. Some of the most recognized leadership styles include Autocratic, Democratic, or Laissez-Faire leadership styles.


Likert also suggested the way communication is utilized determines the way power and authority are distributed throughout an organization.

One-way communication is associated with exploitative systems, while two-way communication is seen in participative systems.

You got various types of communication models.

From linear communication models.

The linear model of communication is a relatively simplistic model envisaging a process in which a sender encodes and transmits a message that is received and decoded by a recipient. The linear model of communication suggests communication moves in one direction only. The sender transmits a message to the receiver, but the receiver does not transmit a response or provide feedback to the sender.

To transactional communication models and more.

The transactional model of communication describes communication as a two-way, interactive process within social, relational, and cultural contexts. The transactional model of communication is best exemplified by two models. Barnlund’s model describes communication as a complex, multi-layered process where the feedback from the sender becomes the message for the receiver. Dance’s helical model is another example, which suggests communication is continuous, dynamic, evolutionary, and non-linear.


What level of influence do employees have on decision-making?

The more participatory the system, the more influence employees possess.


Not to be confused with the fourth variable, decision-making describes the extent to which employees are asked to give their opinion on business operations or strategy.

In some systems, decision-making ability or engagement increases motivation.

Furthermore, employee thoughts or values may directly or indirectly influence the beliefs of superiors.


How concentrated are management oversight and quality control functions?

How is productivity and performance data used? Is it a motivator or controller?

Goal setting

How are organizational goals established? To what extent is there resistance to implementing evidence-based practices?

Key takeaways

  • Likert’s management systems are a series of leadership theories based on the study of various organizational dynamics and characteristics. They were developed by Rensis Likert after an analysis of 200 organizations in the 1960s.
  • Likert proposed four management systems: exploitative authoritative, benevolent authoritative, consultative, and participative. Each describes different interactions between leaders and subordinates in an industrial setting.
  • Likert’s management systems are based on seven dynamic variables: motivation, leadership, communication, interaction, decision-making, control, and goal setting.

Other Management Frameworks

Change Management

Change is an important and necessary fact of life for all organizations. But change is often unsuccessful because the people within organizations are resistant to change. Change management is a systematic approach to managing the transformation of organizational goals, values, technologies, or processes.

Risk Management Framework

An effective risk management framework is crucial for any organization. The framework endeavors to protect the organization’s capital base and revenue generation capability without hindering growth. A risk management framework (RMF) allows businesses to strike a balance between taking risks and reducing them.


Timeboxing is a simple yet powerful time-management technique for improving productivity. Timeboxing describes the process of proactively scheduling a block of time to spend on a task in the future. It was first described by author James Martin in a book about agile software development.

Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory

Herzberg’s two-factor theory argues that certain workplace factors cause job satisfaction while others cause job dissatisfaction. The theory was developed by American psychologist and business management analyst Frederick Herzberg. Until his death in 2000, Herzberg was widely regarded as a pioneering thinker in motivational theory.

Kepner-Tregoe Matrix

The Kepner-Tregoe matrix was created by management consultants Charles H. Kepner and Benjamin B. Tregoe in the 1960s, developed to help businesses navigate the decisions they make daily, the Kepner-Tregoe matrix is a root cause analysis used in organizational decision making.

Adkar Model

The ADKAR model is a management tool designed to assist employees and businesses in transitioning through organizational change. To maximize the chances of employees embracing change, the ADKAR model was developed by author and engineer Jeff Hiatt in 2003. The model seeks to guide people through the change process and importantly, ensure that people do not revert to habitual ways of operating after some time has passed.

CATWOE Analysis

The CATWOE analysis is a problem-solving strategy that asks businesses to look at an issue from six different perspectives. The CATWOE analysis is an in-depth and holistic approach to problem-solving because it enables businesses to consider all perspectives. This often forces management out of habitual ways of thinking that would otherwise hinder growth and profitability. Most importantly, the CATWOE analysis allows businesses to combine multiple perspectives into a single, unifying solution.

Agile Project Management

Agile project management (APM) is a strategy that breaks large projects into smaller, more manageable tasks. In the APM methodology, each project is completed in small sections – often referred to as iterations. Each iteration is completed according to its project life cycle, beginning with the initial design and progressing to testing and then quality assurance.


A holacracy is a management strategy and an organizational structure where the power to make important decisions is distributed throughout an organization. It differs from conventional management hierarchies where power is in the hands of a select few. The core principle of a holacracy is self-organization where employees organize into several teams and then work in a self-directed fashion toward a common goal.

CAGE Distance Framework

The CAGE Distance Framework was developed by management strategist Pankaj Ghemawat as a way for businesses to evaluate the differences between countries when developing international strategies. Therefore, be able to better execute a business strategy at the international level.

Balanced Scorecard

First proposed by accounting academic Robert Kaplan, the balanced scorecard is a management system that allows an organization to focus on big-picture strategic goals. The four perspectives of the balanced scorecard include financial, customer, business process, and organizational capacity. From there, according to the balanced scorecard, it’s possible to have a holistic view of the business.


Scrum is a methodology co-created by Ken Schwaber and Jeff Sutherland for effective team collaboration on complex products. Scrum was primarily thought for software development projects to deliver new software capability every 2-4 weeks. It is a sub-group of agile also used in project management to improve startups’ productivity.

Kanban Framework

Kanban is a lean manufacturing framework first developed by Toyota in the late 1940s. The Kanban framework is a means of visualizing work as it moves through identifying potential bottlenecks. It does that through a process called just-in-time (JIT) manufacturing to optimize engineering processes, speed up manufacturing products, and improve the go-to-market strategy.

Pomodoro Technique


Main Free Guides:

Scroll to Top