In the context of an organization, cultural models are frameworks that define, shape, and influence corporate culture. Cultural models also provide some structure to a corporate culture that tends to be fluid and vulnerable to change. Once upon a time, most businesses utilized a hierarchical culture where various levels of management oversaw subordinates below them. Today, however, there exists a greater diversity in models as leaders realize the top-down approach is outdated in many industries and that success can be found elsewhere.
Competing Values Framework

The Competing Values Framework was developed in 1983 by Robert Quinn and John Rohrbaugh.
The pair found that successful companies needed to balance two factors:
- Focus – some companies were effective when they maintained a competitive external position, while others were better suited to focusing on internal processes, and
- Stability – some companies were also more efficient when they displayed flexibility, while others were successful because they favored control and stability.
From these two factors, Quinn and Rohrbaugh argued there were four ideal types of organization with each having a unique set of behaviors:
- Hierarchy – inward-looking, ordered, and controlled companies with a focus on structure. Their rigidity makes them less responsive to situations and market demands.
- Clan – also inward-looking but able to respond to change with teamwork, collaboration, and a shared, almost familial environment.
- Adhocracy – outward-looking companies that are flexible and responsive innovators and risk-takers. Unsurprisingly, they tend to be entrepreneurial and driven.
- Market – outward-looking companies that are customer-oriented, competitive, less nurturing, and cognizant of their position in the market.
Denison organizational culture model
The Denison organizational culture model is a relatively recent model that was based on the Competing Values Framework.
It describes four key traits (and twelve associated management techniques) that help an organization develop a robust and effective culture. These include:
- Mission – does the company know where it is heading?
- Involvement – are employees engaged with their work and in alignment?
- Adaptability – is the company able to respond to the market, customers, and other external factors?
- Consistency – can the company leverage its values, processes, and systems?
The model measures behaviors that are driven by the beliefs and assumptions of each trait to help the business clarify its culture.
Hall’s iceberg model
Hall’s iceberg model was developed in 1976 by American anthropologist and cross-cultural researcher Edward T. Hall.
Hall likened corporate culture to an iceberg. He posited that some aspects of culture were:
- Visible (above the waterline) – such as vision, mission, strategy, external presentation, and policies.
- Invisible (below the waterline) – such as values, norms, relationships, unwritten rules, status, and fundamental employee needs such as safety and belonging.
Companies use Hall’s cultural model to shape their culture by addressing the invisible aspects, as these constitute the values and thought patterns that ultimately drive behavior.
McKinsey 7s framework

The McKinsey 7s framework was developed by Tom Peters and Robert Waterman while they were involved with McKinsey as consultants in the 1970s.
Peters and Waterman describe a corporate culture in terms of six elements that are classified as either:
- Hard elements – strategy, structure, and systems, or
- Soft elements – staff, skills, and shared values.
Each of these six elements is interdependent and each must be balanced for the company to succeed.
To that end, the McKinsey 7s framework has a core focus on change management and its ability to positively or negatively reshape corporate culture.
Hofstede model

The Hofstede model was developed by culture expert Geert Hofstede in the 1980s to serve as a framework for cross-cultural communication. Over six years, he analyzed the results of IBM employee surveys to determine how the culture of society impacted their values and by extension, workplaces.
Hofstede’s work has been used by consultants in international business, psychology, and communication.
The model does not provide a concrete plan of action. Instead, it is used by businesses to conceptualize their ideal corporate culture and understand the various societal and cultural factors that are present.
This makes it ideal for new companies who need to establish a corporate culture or develop a cultural manifesto.
Key takeaways:
- In the context of an organization, cultural models are frameworks that define, shape, and influence corporate culture. Cultural models are frameworks that provide some structure to a corporate culture that tends to be fluid and vulnerable to change.
- Cultural models include the Competing Values Framework, a common cultural model that inspired the relatively recent Denison model.
- Other models include Hall’s iceberg model, the McKinsey 7s framework, and the Hofstede model which is based on research into the impact of culture on employee values, societies, and workplaces.
Other Types of Organizational Structures

Siloed Organizational Structures
Functional

Divisional

Open Organizational Structures
Matrix

Flat

Read Next: Organizational Structure.
Organizational Structure Case Studies
Airbnb Organizational Structure




Facebook Organizational Structure

Google Organizational Structure

Tesla Organizational Structure

McDonald’s Organizational Structure

Walmart Organizational Structure

Microsoft Organizational Structure

Main Free Guides: