ibm-organizational-structure

IBM Organizational Structure

IBM has an organizational structure characterized by product-based divisions, enabling its strategy to develop innovative and competitive products in multiple markets. IBM is also characterized by function-based segments that support product development and innovation for each product-based division, which include Global Markets, Integrated Supply Chain, Research, Development, and Intellectual Property.

Introduction

IBM is an American multinational technology corporation that was founded in 1911 by Charles Ranlett Flint as the Computing-Tabulating-Recording Company (CTR).

IBM is a manufacturer and seller of various products, such as computer software, middleware, and hardware, nanotechnology, and hosting and consultancy services. IBM is also a serious innovator, filing more patents than any other company for a record 30 consecutive years between 1992 and 2022.

Over this time, some of IBM’s notable inventions include the ATM, hard disk drive, magnetic stripe card, SQL programming language, and dynamic random-access memory (DRAM).

With these various interests in mind, let’s analyze the company’s organizational structure.

Product-based divisions

IBM has an organizational structure characterized by product-based divisions. This allows the company to carry out its strategy of developing innovative and competitive products across multiple markets.

To that end, the company’s major operations consist of five divisions:

  1. Global Technology Services (GTS) – mostly consisting of IT infrastructure and business process services.
  2. Global Business Services (GBS) – this division focuses on delivering client value via consultancy in areas such as cloud, mobile, social business, enterprise applications, analytics, and smart eCommerce. 
  3. Software – middleware and operating systems software. 
  4. Systems and Technology (STG) – encompassing any business solution that requires advanced storage capabilities or computing power.
  5. Global Financing – IBM also offers lease and loan financing to end-users and internal clients. This division also includes commercial financing to dealers and remarketers of IT products.

In some instances, GTS and GBS are collectively known as Global Services.

Function-based segments and geographic divisions

To a lesser extent, IBM’s structure is characterized by function-based segments and geographical divisions. These are explained below.

Function-based segments

To support the core global IT business and support each product-based division, there are three function-based segments:

  1. Global Markets (this was previously known as Sales and Distribution).
  2. Integrated Supply Chain, and
  3. Research, Development and Intellectual Property.

Geographic divisions

Like most organizations, IBM’s geographic divisions help it manage a global business despite differences in various regional markets. This is important for IBM since the company has operations in more than 170 countries.

IBM has a total of three geographic divisions:

  1. Americas.
  2. Asia Pacific, and
  3. Europe/Middle East/Africa.

Most company revenue is attributed to the Americas division, with the $28 billion generated in 2021 representing nearly 50% of IBM’s total revenue.

Key takeaways

  • IBM has an organizational structure characterized by product-based divisions. This allows the company to carry out its strategy of developing innovative and competitive products in multiple markets.
  • IBM’s structure is also characterized by function-based segments that support product development and innovation for each product-based division. These include Global Markets, Integrated Supply Chain, and Research, Development, and Intellectual Property.
  • Like organizations with a similar global reach, IBM’s geographic divisions help it manage operations despite differences in various regional markets. The Americas division is by far the most lucrative for IBM in terms of revenue.

Related Visual Stories

IBM Business Model

IBM Revenue

ibm-revenue
In 2018, revenue was $80 billion. Revenue decreased to $77 billion in 2019. In 2020, revenue dropped further to $73.62 billion. The revenue saw a significant decline in 2021, reaching $57.35 billion. In 2022, revenue experienced a slight increase, amounting to $60.53 billion.

IBM Profits

ibm-profits
2019: Net income increased from $8.73 billion in 2018 to $9 billion, resulting in a 3.09% increase year over year. 2020: Net income decreased to $5.59 billion, reflecting a -37.89% change compared to 2019. 2021: Net income slightly increased to $5.74 billion, indicating a 2.68% increase year over year compared to 2020. 2022: Net income decreased significantly to $1.64 billion, showing a -71.43% change compared to 2021.

IBM Revenue Breakdown

ibm-revenue-breakdown
Software revenue increased from $23.42 billion in 2021 to $25 billion in 2022, resulting in a 6.73% growth year over year. Consulting revenue grew from $17.84 billion in 2021 to $19.1 billion in 2022, reflecting a 7.08% growth year over year. Infrastructure revenue rose from $14.2 billion in 2021 to $15.3 billion in 2022, indicating a 7.75% growth year over year. Financing revenue declined from $0.774 billion in 2021 to $0.645 billion in 2022, showing a -16.67% decrease year over year. Other revenue experienced a significant drop from $1.12 billion in 2021 to $0.453 billion in 2022, resulting in a -59.55% decrease year over year.

IBM Cost Structure

ibm-cost-structure
Software: Generated $25 billion in revenue. Contributed $19.94 billion in gross profit. Consulting: Produced $19.1 billion in revenue. Accounted for $4.86 billion in gross profit. Infrastructure: Brought in $15.3 billion in revenue. Generated $8 billion in gross profit.

Read Next: Organizational Structure.

Read Also: IBM Business Model.

Types of Organizational Structures

organizational-structure-types
Organizational Structures

Siloed Organizational Structures

Functional

functional-organizational-structure
In a functional organizational structure, groups and teams are organized based on function. Therefore, this organization follows a top-down structure, where most decision flows from top management to bottom. Thus, the bottom of the organization mostly follows the strategy detailed by the top of the organization.

Divisional

divisional-organizational-structure

Open Organizational Structures

Matrix

matrix-organizational-structure

Flat

flat-organizational-structure
In a flat organizational structure, there is little to no middle management between employees and executives. Therefore it reduces the space between employees and executives to enable an effective communication flow within the organization, thus being faster and leaner.

Connected Business Frameworks

Portfolio Management

project-portfolio-matrix
Project portfolio management (PPM) is a systematic approach to selecting and managing a collection of projects aligned with organizational objectives. That is a business process of managing multiple projects which can be identified, prioritized, and managed within the organization. PPM helps organizations optimize their investments by allocating resources efficiently across all initiatives.

Kotter’s 8-Step Change Model

kotters-8-step-change-model
Harvard Business School professor Dr. John Kotter has been a thought-leader on organizational change, and he developed Kotter’s 8-step change model, which helps business managers deal with organizational change. Kotter created the 8-step model to drive organizational transformation.

Nadler-Tushman Congruence Model

nadler-tushman-congruence-model
The Nadler-Tushman Congruence Model was created by David Nadler and Michael Tushman at Columbia University. The Nadler-Tushman Congruence Model is a diagnostic tool that identifies problem areas within a company. In the context of business, congruence occurs when the goals of different people or interest groups coincide.

McKinsey’s Seven Degrees of Freedom

mckinseys-seven-degrees
McKinsey’s Seven Degrees of Freedom for Growth is a strategy tool. Developed by partners at McKinsey and Company, the tool helps businesses understand which opportunities will contribute to expansion, and therefore it helps to prioritize those initiatives.

Mintzberg’s 5Ps

5ps-of-strategy
Mintzberg’s 5Ps of Strategy is a strategy development model that examines five different perspectives (plan, ploy, pattern, position, perspective) to develop a successful business strategy. A sixth perspective has been developed over the years, called Practice, which was created to help businesses execute their strategies.

COSO Framework

coso-framework
The COSO framework is a means of designing, implementing, and evaluating control within an organization. The COSO framework’s five components are control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, and monitoring activities. As a fraud risk management tool, businesses can design, implement, and evaluate internal control procedures.

TOWS Matrix

tows-matrix
The TOWS Matrix is an acronym for Threats, Opportunities, Weaknesses, and Strengths. The matrix is a variation on the SWOT Analysis, and it seeks to address criticisms of the SWOT Analysis regarding its inability to show relationships between the various categories.

Lewin’s Change Management

lewins-change-management-model
Lewin’s change management model helps businesses manage the uncertainty and resistance associated with change. Kurt Lewin, one of the first academics to focus his research on group dynamics, developed a three-stage model. He proposed that the behavior of individuals happened as a function of group behavior.

Organizational Structure Case Studies

Airbnb Organizational Structure

airbnb-organizational-structure
Airbnb follows a holacracy model, or a sort of flat organizational structure, where teams are organized for projects, to move quickly and iterate fast, thus keeping a lean and flexible approach. Airbnb also moved to a hybrid model where employees can work from anywhere and meet on a quarterly basis to plan ahead, and connect to each other.

eBay Organizational Structure

ebay-organizational-structure
eBay was until recently a multi-divisional (M-form) organization with semi-autonomous units grouped according to the services they provided. Today, eBay has a single division called Marketplace, which includes eBay and its international iterations.

IBM Organizational Structure

ibm-organizational-structure
IBM has an organizational structure characterized by product-based divisions, enabling its strategy to develop innovative and competitive products in multiple markets. IBM is also characterized by function-based segments that support product development and innovation for each product-based division, which include Global Markets, Integrated Supply Chain, Research, Development, and Intellectual Property.

Sony Organizational Structure

sony-organizational-structure
Sony has a matrix organizational structure primarily based on function-based groups and product/business divisions. The structure also incorporates geographical divisions. In 2021, Sony announced the overhauling of its organizational structure, changing its name from Sony Corporation to Sony Group Corporation to better identify itself as the headquarters of the Sony group of companies skewing the company toward product divisions.

Facebook Organizational Structure

facebook-organizational-structure
Facebook is characterized by a multi-faceted matrix organizational structure. The company utilizes a flat organizational structure in combination with corporate function-based teams and product-based or geographic divisions. The flat organization structure is organized around the leadership of Mark Zuckerberg, and the key executives around him. On the other hand, the function-based teams based on the main corporate functions (like HR, product management, investor relations, and so on).

Google Organizational Structure

google-organizational-structure
Google (Alphabet) has a cross-functional (team-based) organizational structure known as a matrix structure with some degree of flatness. Over the years, as the company scaled and it became a tech giant, its organizational structure is morphing more into a centralized organization.

Tesla Organizational Structure

tesla-organizational-structure
Tesla is characterized by a functional organizational structure with aspects of a hierarchical structure. Tesla does employ functional centers that cover all business activities, including finance, sales, marketing, technology, engineering, design, and the offices of the CEO and chairperson. Tesla’s headquarters in Austin, Texas, decide the strategic direction of the company, with international operations given little autonomy.

McDonald’s Organizational Structure

mcdonald-organizational-structure
McDonald’s has a divisional organizational structure where each division – based on geographical location – is assigned operational responsibilities and strategic objectives. The main geographical divisions are the US, internationally operated markets, and international developmental licensed markets. And on the other hand, the hierarchical leadership structure is organized around regional and functional divisions.

Walmart Organizational Structure

walmart-organizational-structure
Walmart has a hybrid hierarchical-functional organizational structure, otherwise referred to as a matrix structure that combines multiple approaches. On the one hand, Walmart follows a hierarchical structure, where the current CEO Doug McMillon is the only employee without a direct superior, and directives are sent from top-level management. On the other hand, the function-based structure of Walmart is used to categorize employees according to their particular skills and experience.

Microsoft Organizational Structure

microsoft-organizational-structure
Microsoft has a product-type divisional organizational structure based on functions and engineering groups. As the company scaled over time it also became more hierarchical, however still keeping its hybrid approach between functions, engineering groups, and management.

Main Free Guides:

About The Author

Scroll to Top
FourWeekMBA