amazon-organizational-structure

Amazon Organizational Structure In A Nutshell

The Amazon organizational structure is predominantly hierarchical with elements of function-based structure and geographic divisions. While Amazon started as a lean, flat organization in its early years, it transitioned into a hierarchical organization with its jobs and functions clearly defined as it scaled.

DepartmentTypeDetailsAdvantagesDrawbacks
Amazon RetailDivisional Structure– Amazon’s core business, the online retail platform, operates as separate divisions based on product categories (e.g., Amazon Books, Amazon Electronics). Each division manages its own product selection, pricing, and customer experience.– High divisional autonomy allows for specialized product management. – Quick adaptation to market changes in specific categories. – Efficient inventory management.– Limited central control over pricing and product selection. – May lead to inconsistency in customer experience across divisions. – Challenges in maintaining a unified brand image.
Amazon Web Services (AWS)Divisional Structure– AWS is a separate division responsible for Amazon’s cloud computing and web hosting services. It operates autonomously, providing services to various industries and organizations worldwide.– Specialized focus on cloud computing services. – Ability to address diverse customer needs. – Rapid innovation and expansion in the cloud industry.– Potential for competition and conflicting interests with other Amazon divisions. – Coordination challenges between AWS and other business units. – Different customer bases and service priorities.
Amazon DevicesDivisional Structure– Amazon Devices includes hardware products such as Kindle, Echo, and Fire TV. Each product line operates as a separate division, managing its own research, development, and marketing.– Specialization in hardware product development and innovation. – Streamlined marketing and sales for individual devices. – Faster response to market demands in the tech hardware sector.– Potential for overlap or competition between product divisions. – Coordination challenges in creating a cohesive ecosystem of devices and services. – May result in varied customer experiences across devices.
Amazon Prime VideoDivisional Structure– Prime Video is responsible for Amazon’s streaming and entertainment services. It operates independently, producing original content and licensing content from various studios.– Focused content creation and acquisition strategies. – Flexibility in catering to different global entertainment markets. – Strong competition in the streaming industry.– Potential conflicts with other divisions regarding content and partnerships. – Coordination challenges in bundling Prime Video with other Amazon services. – Varied content libraries for different regions.
Corporate FunctionsFunctional– Corporate functions such as finance, HR, legal, and corporate strategy are organized hierarchically. They provide centralized support and governance for the entire Amazon organization.– Efficient centralized control over critical functions. – Ensures compliance with legal and financial regulations. – Streamlines decision-making at the corporate level.– Limited local autonomy for critical functions. – Potential for communication challenges between corporate and divisional levels. – May lead to slower response times for certain decisions.

History of Amazon

Understanding the Amazon organizational structure

Amazon is the largest eCommerce company in the world, employing over a million people spread across many different countries.

The Amazon organizational structure favors a vertical hierarchical approach with global, function-based groups and geographic divisions. This gives the company extensive top-down control over global operations, allowing it to increase market share and maintain market leadership status.

At the top of this chain is a senior management team reporting directly to CEO Jeff Bezos. Dubbed the S Team, this small team of Amazon senior executives works with Bezos to disseminate his ideas, solve problems, set high-level goals, and shape company culture.

The S Team has senior executives in charge of several function-based groups, including:

  1. Finance.
  2. Human resources.
  3. Corporate affairs.
  4. Amazon Web Services (AWS).
  5. Worldwide consumers.
  6. Amazon devices and digital management.
  7. Worldwide operations.
  8. Legal and secretariat.

Members of Amazon’s S Team

Amazon’s S Team (sometimes dubbed Amazon Steam) is comprised of 28 individuals:

  1. CEO Andy Jassy.
  2. CEO Doug Herrington – Worldwide Amazon Stores.
  3. CEO Adam Selipsky – Amazon Web Services.
  4. Chief Security Officer Steve Schmidt.
  5. SVP and Distinguished Engineer James Hamilton – AWS.
  6. SVP Amit Agarwal – Country Manager of Amazon India.
  7. SVP Colleen Aubrey – Performance Advertising.
  8. SVP Christine Beauchamp – North American Stores.
  9. SVP Jeff Blackburn – Global Media & Entertainment.
  10. SVP John Felton – Worldwide Operations.
  11. SVP Beth Galetti – People, Experience, and Technology.
  12. SVP Matt Garman – AWS Sales and Marketing.
  13. SVP Russell Grandinetti – International Consumer. 
  14. SVP Drew Hardener – Worldwide Communications.
  15. SVP Mike Hopkins – Prime Video and Amazon Studios.
  16. SVP Paul Kotas – Advertising, Music & IMDb.
  17. SVP Dave Limp – Devices & Services.
  18. SVP Neil Lindsay – Prime and Marketing.
  19. SVP Brian Olsavsky – Chief Financial Officer.
  20. SVP and head scientist Rohit Prasad – Alexa Artificial Intelligence.
  21. SVP Dave Treadwell – E-commerce Services.
  22. SVP and general counsel David Zapolsky. 
  23. VP Peter DeSantis – Global Infrastructure and Customer Support.
  24. VP Peter Krawiec – Worldwide Corporate Development
  25. VP Steve Boom – Audio, Twitch & Games.
  26. VP Candi Castleberry – Global Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion.
  27. VP Udit Madan – Amazon Transportation.
  28. VP Rob Williams – Device Software and Services.

Recent additions to the S Team

In December 2022, CEO Andy Jassy released a short note to explain that the S Team would be expanding with four additional members. These include:

  • Steve Boom – a Harvard Law School-educated employee with a Bachelor of Science in Electric Engineering from Stanford University. Boom served as the VP of Amazon Music for a decade between 2012 and 2022.
  • Candi Castleberry – the former VP of Intersectionality, Culture, and Diversity (ICD) at Twitter who was responsible for related initiatives both internally and on the social media platform. Castleberry has also worked at Xerox, Sun Microsystems, and Motorola.
  • Udit Madan – a 15-year Amazon veteran who now heads the rapidly growing Last Mile team at the company’s Bellevue, Washington campus. Madan is primarily tasked with connecting processes, people, and technology to develop innovative solutions.
  • Rob Williams – like Madan, Williams has been with Amazon for over a decade. He started as a financial analyst but then moved into the company’s global pricing, supply chain, and vendor management processes. Before becoming VP of Device Software and Services, he worked as a Senior Manager of Fintech Product Management. 

Jassy noted that these new additions exemplified Amazon’s leadership principles and were also customer obsessed, inventive, curious, and had “a propensity to be right a lot”.  

The additions of Castleberry and Madan were also seen as a way for the company to increase diversity among senior executives – a facet Amazon has tended to struggle with in the past.

Geographic divisions

Despite the vast geographical reach of Amazon, the company only has two geographic divisions: North America and International.

The company also utilizes groups according to physical location and related business goals. For instance, Amazon.com Inc. is the eCommerce arm of the company. It uses groups to manage eCommerce operations according to geographic regions and their associated regulatory frameworks and logistical challenges. Ultimately, this allows Amazon to address country or region-specific issues proactively and efficiently. 

How has Amazon used organizational structure to its advantage?

Many would assume that a large, hierarchical organization would be rigid and resistant to change.

However, this is not the case at Amazon. The company is a flexible and adaptive market leader in eCommerce. Indeed, Amazon has caused disruptive innovation in online marketplaces and also in global logistics.

How is this status maintained in the face of centralized decision-making and top-down control?

One key contributing factor is the Two Pizza Rule. Instituted by Bezos, the Two Pizza Rule states that no meeting should be so large that two pizzas cannot feed the entire group.

The goal here is efficiency and scalability. Smaller teams spend less time managing timetables or keeping others in the loop and more time doing what needs to be done. In turn, each team has access to company resources to meet short and long-term goals. A product team, for example, can add new product lines without having to meet with the project, process, or logistics teams. 

In purely theoretical terms, these teams are given more autonomy than say a worker in an Amazon warehouse. But they are very much marching to the beat of Bezos’ drum.

Stability

Stability is also a notable feature of the Amazon organizational structure – particularly in senior management.

Although there are frequent new additions to the S Team, many members have been in the same position for years or in some cases, decades. The long-term success of the hierarchical model has resulted in a highly experienced senior management team. 

Ultimately, this has allowed Amazon to grow and expand into new markets without sacrificing competitiveness.

Comparison with Top Related Companies

  • Walmart: Walmart operates with a traditional hierarchical structure that is heavily divisional, focusing on different retail formats and geographic regions. While both companies are hierarchical, Walmart’s structure is more rigid, focusing on efficiency in retail operations. Amazon’s hierarchical structure is supplemented by its innovative approach in areas like Amazon Web Services (AWS) and its adaptive use of technology in retail, which provides it with flexibility to innovate more than Walmart’s more traditional model.
  • eBay: eBay has a less hierarchical, more flexible organizational structure compared to Amazon. eBay operates primarily as a marketplace and thus does not require the extensive supply chain and logistics structure that Amazon maintains. This allows eBay to be more agile in decision-making and adapting to market changes, whereas Amazon’s hierarchical structure supports its vast operational needs but may slow down decision-making.
  • Alibaba: Alibaba’s structure is somewhat similar to Amazon’s in that it also combines elements of a hierarchical and divisional structure, particularly in managing its diverse array of businesses from e-commerce to cloud computing. However, Alibaba tends to operate more as a holding company with considerable autonomy granted to its various subsidiaries, which can foster innovation but may lead to less control from the central corporate level compared to Amazon.

Similarities and Differences

  • Similarities: All these companies utilize a hierarchical structure at some level to manage their operations, focusing on efficiency and clear lines of authority. Amazon, Walmart, and Alibaba all operate globally and need robust organizational structures to manage their widespread operations.
  • Differences: Amazon’s structure uniquely blends its hierarchical nature with innovation-driven units like AWS, which operates somewhat autonomously within the broader corporate structure. This allows Amazon to engage more effectively in technology-driven markets compared to Walmart. Compared to eBay, Amazon has a more complex and structured hierarchy to support its extensive logistics and product range.

Implications

  • Innovation and Scale: Amazon’s hierarchical structure supports its massive scale and operational complexity, particularly in logistics and product fulfillment. This structure supports stable growth but needs continuous adaptation to maintain innovation pace, especially in technology-oriented sectors like cloud computing and AI.
  • Operational Efficiency: The hierarchical nature of Amazon’s structure ensures operational efficiency and effective management of resources across its vast operations, from retail to technology services. However, this might limit flexibility in some areas, unlike eBay, which can pivot more quickly due to its less cumbersome organizational setup.
  • Market Adaptability: Amazon’s divisional approach within its hierarchy, with clear roles for different business areas, helps tailor strategies to specific markets and products, similar to Alibaba. However, the autonomy Alibaba provides its subsidiaries can lead to faster localized innovations at the expense of centralized control.

Key takeaways:

  • Amazon is a predominantly hierarchical organization incorporating function-based groups and geographic divisions.
  • Reportable to CEO Jeff Bezos is a group of senior executives called the S Team. Each member of the S Team is responsible for leading a functional or business unit. Many of these units are in fact large organizations in themselves.
  • Amazon has maintained its position as a flexible and adaptable market leader despite a rigid hierarchical structure. To some extent, this has been facilitated by small product teams having autonomous access to company resources and stable, experienced leadership.

Key Highlights:

  • Evolution of Structure: Amazon’s organizational structure has evolved from a lean and flat organization in its early years to a more hierarchical structure as it scaled and expanded.
  • S Team and Function-Based Groups: At the top of the hierarchy is the S Team, a small group of senior executives reporting directly to the CEO. This team is responsible for disseminating ideas, solving problems, setting high-level goals, and shaping company culture. The S Team oversees various function-based groups such as Finance, Human Resources, Amazon Web Services (AWS), and more.
  • Geographic Divisions: Amazon has two main geographic divisions: North America and International. It also utilizes groups based on physical locations and business goals to address region-specific issues proactively.
  • Two Pizza Rule: Amazon follows the “Two Pizza Rule,” which aims to keep teams small enough that two pizzas can feed the entire group. This promotes efficiency, scalability, and autonomy within smaller teams.
  • Stability and Experience: While there are frequent new additions to the S Team, the organizational structure maintains stability in senior management. Many S Team members have held their positions for years, resulting in a highly experienced leadership team.
  • Flexibility and Adaptability: Amazon has successfully maintained its status as a flexible and adaptable market leader despite its hierarchical structure. The use of small, autonomous teams and experienced leadership has contributed to this ability to innovate and expand.
  • Global Operations: The hierarchical structure with clear function-based groups and geographic divisions gives Amazon top-down control over its global operations, allowing the company to maintain its market leadership and expand its market share.
  • Customer-Centric Approach: Amazon’s focus on the customer is evident in its organizational structure, where customer satisfaction is a top priority, and processes are aligned to meet customer needs.
  • Innovation and Growth: Despite being hierarchical, Amazon’s structure promotes innovation and growth by providing autonomy to smaller teams and leveraging the expertise of experienced senior leaders.
  • Long-Term Success: The stability of the organizational structure, coupled with a customer-centric approach and innovative strategies, has contributed to Amazon’s long-term success in various markets and industries.

Related to Amazon Business Model

Amazon Business Model

amazon-business-model
Amazon has a diversified business model. In 2023, Amazon generated nearly $575 billion in revenues while it posted a net profit of over $30 billion. Online stores contributed over 40% of Amazon revenues. Third-party Seller Services and Physical Stores generated the remaining. Amazon AWS, Subscription Services, and Advertising revenues play a significant role within Amazon as fast-growing segments.

Amazon Mission Statement

amazon-vision-statement-mission-statement (1)
Amazon’s mission statement is to “serve consumers through online and physical stores and focus on selection, price, and convenience.” Amazon’s vision statement is “to be Earth’s most customer-centric company, where customers can find and discover anything they might want to buy online, and endeavors to offer its customers the lowest possible prices.” 

Customer Obsession

customer-obsession
In the Amazon Shareholders’ Letter for 2018, Jeff Bezos analyzed the Amazon business model, and it also focused on a few key lessons that Amazon as a company has learned over the years. These lessons are fundamental for any entrepreneur, of small or large organization to understand the pitfalls to avoid to run a successful company!

Who Owns Amazon

who-owns-amazon
With 64,588,418 shares, Jeff Bezos is the primary individual investor. Owning 12.7% of the company. Other top individual investors include Amazon’s CEO Andy Jessy, who has 94,729 shares. Top institutional investors include mutual funds like The Vanguard Group (6.6% ownership) and BlackRock (5.7% ownership). 

Amazon Revenues

amazon-revenues
Amazon generated over half a trillion dollars in revenue in 2023, of which $231.87B from online stores, over $140.05B from third-party seller services, $90.76B from AWS, $46.9B from advertising, $40.21B from subscription services, $20.03B billion in physical stores, and $4.96B from other sources.

Amazon Profitability

is-amazon-profitable
Amazon was profitable in 2023. On nearly $575 billion in revenue for 2023, Amazon generated a net profit of over $30 billion. Since 2014, Amazon hasn’t recorded a net loss, but it did record a net loss of over $2.7 billion in 2022, while it recouped that in 2023.  Indeed, in 2014, Amazon reported a net loss of $241 million, and it would be profitable until 2021. In 2022, Amazon turned unprofitable again and highly profitable again in 2023. 

Amazon AWS Business

amazon-aws-platform-business-model
Amazon AWS follows a platform business model that gains traction by tapping into network effects. Born as an infrastructure built on top of Amazon’s infrastructure, AWS has become a company offering cloud services to thousands of clients from the enterprise level, to startups. And its marketplace enables companies to connect to other service providers to build integrated solutions for their organizations.

Amazon Prime Revenue

amazon-prime-revenue
Amazon subscription revenue in 2023 was over $40 billion, compared to over $35 billion in 2022 and nearly $32 billion in 2021. Amazon Prime grew from a $4.5 billion revenue segment in 2015 to an over $40 billion segment in 2023.

Amazon Advertising Revenue

amazon-ads-revenues

Amazon Cash Conversion

cash-conversion-cycle-amazon

Working Backwards

working-backwards
The Amazon Working Backwards Method is a product development methodology that advocates building a product based on customer needs. The Amazon Working Backwards Method gained traction after notable Amazon employee Ian McAllister shared the company’s product development approach on Quora. McAllister noted that the method seeks “to work backwards from the customer, rather than starting with an idea for a product and trying to bolt customers onto it.”

Amazon Flywheel

amazon-flywheel
The Amazon Flywheel or Amazon Virtuous Cycle is a strategy that leverages on customer experience to drive traffic to the platform and third-party sellers. That improves the selections of goods, and Amazon further improves its cost structure so it can decrease prices which spins the flywheel.

Jeff Bezos Day One

jeff-bezos-day-1
In the letter to shareholders in 2016, Jeff Bezos addressed a topic he had been thinking quite profoundly in the last decades as he led Amazon: Day 1. As Jeff Bezos put it “Day 2 is stasis. Followed by irrelevance. Followed by excruciating, painful decline. Followed by death. And that is why it is always Day 1.”

Regret Minimization Framework

regret-minimization-framework
A regret minimization framework is a business heuristic that enables you to make a decision, by projecting yourself in the future, at an old age, and visualize whether the regrets of missing an opportunity would hunt you down, vs. having taken the opportunity and failed. In short, if taking action and failing feels much better than regretting it, in the long run, that is when you’re ready to go!

Network Effects

network-effects
network effect is a phenomenon in which as more people or users join a platform, the more the value of the service offered by the platform improves for those joining afterward.

Platform Business Model

platform-business-models
A platform business model generates value by enabling interactions between people, groups, and users by leveraging network effects. Platform business models usually comprise two sides: supply and demand. Kicking off the interactions between those two sides is one of the crucial elements for a platform business model’s success.

Jeff Bezos Empire

jeff-bezos-companies
Jeff Bezos was best known for founding eCommerce giant Amazon in 1994. However, the entrepreneur owns companies in several industries, including health care, retail, robotics, real estate, and media. Many of these companies have been acquired by Amazon over the years, but some have been the result of direct investment from Bezos himself (through his investment arm is called Bezos Expeditions).

Amazon Subsidiaries

amazon-subsidiaries
Amazon is a consumer e-commerce platform with a diversified business model spanning across e-commerce, cloud, advertising, streaming, and more. Over the years Amazon acquired several companies. Among its 12 subsidiaries, Amazon has AbeBooks.com, Audible, CamiXology, Fabric.com, IMDb, PillPack, Shopbop, Souq.com, Twitch, Whole Foods Market, Woot! and Zappos.

Read Next: Organizational Structure, Amazon Business Model, Amazon Mission.

Organizational Structure Case Studies

OpenAI Organizational Structure

openai-organizational-structure
OpenAI is an artificial intelligence research laboratory that transitioned into a for-profit organization in 2019. The corporate structure is organized around two entities: OpenAI, Inc., which is a single-member Delaware LLC controlled by OpenAI non-profit, And OpenAI LP, which is a capped, for-profit organization. The OpenAI LP is governed by the board of OpenAI, Inc (the foundation), which acts as a General Partner. At the same time, Limited Partners comprise employees of the LP, some of the board members, and other investors like Reid Hoffman’s charitable foundation, Khosla Ventures, and Microsoft, the leading investor in the LP.

Airbnb Organizational Structure

airbnb-organizational-structure
Airbnb follows a holacracy model, or a sort of flat organizational structure, where teams are organized for projects, to move quickly and iterate fast, thus keeping a lean and flexible approach. Airbnb also moved to a hybrid model where employees can work from anywhere and meet on a quarterly basis to plan ahead, and connect to each other.

Amazon Organizational Structure

amazon-organizational-structure
The Amazon organizational structure is predominantly hierarchical with elements of function-based structure and geographic divisions. While Amazon started as a lean, flat organization in its early years, it transitioned into a hierarchical organization with its jobs and functions clearly defined as it scaled.

Apple Organizational Structure

apple-organizational-structure
Apple has a traditional hierarchical structure with product-based grouping and some collaboration between divisions.

Coca-Cola Organizational Structure

coca-cola-organizational-structure
The Coca-Cola Company has a somewhat complex matrix organizational structure with geographic divisions, product divisions, business-type units, and functional groups.

Costco Organizational Structure

costco-organizational-structure
Costco has a matrix organizational structure, which can simply be defined as any structure that combines two or more different types. In this case, a predominant functional structure exists with a more secondary divisional structure. Costco’s geographic divisions reflect its strong presence in the United States combined with its expanding global presence. There are six divisions in the country alone to reflect its standing as the source of most company revenue. Compared to competitor Walmart, for example, Costco takes more a decentralized approach to management, decision-making, and autonomy. This allows the company’s stores and divisions to more flexibly respond to local market conditions.

Dell Organizational Structure

dell-organizational-structure
Dell has a functional organizational structure with some degree of decentralization. This means functional departments share information, contribute ideas to the success of the organization and have some degree of decision-making power.

eBay Organizational Structure

ebay-organizational-structure
eBay was until recently a multi-divisional (M-form) organization with semi-autonomous units grouped according to the services they provided. Today, eBay has a single division called Marketplace, which includes eBay and its international iterations.

Facebook Organizational Structure

facebook-organizational-structure
Facebook is characterized by a multi-faceted matrix organizational structure. The company utilizes a flat organizational structure in combination with corporate function-based teams and product-based or geographic divisions. The flat organization structure is organized around the leadership of Mark Zuckerberg, and the key executives around him. On the other hand, the function-based teams are based on the main corporate functions (like HR, product management, investor relations, and so on).

Goldman Sachs’ Organizational Structure

goldman-sacks-organizational-structures
Goldman Sachs has a hierarchical structure with a clear chain of command and defined career advancement process. The structure is also underpinned by business-type divisions and function-based groups.

Google Organizational Structure

google-organizational-structure
Google (Alphabet) has a cross-functional (team-based) organizational structure known as a matrix structure with some degree of flatness. Over the years, as the company scaled and it became a tech giant, its organizational structure is morphing more into a centralized organization.

IBM Organizational Structure

ibm-organizational-structure
IBM has an organizational structure characterized by product-based divisions, enabling its strategy to develop innovative and competitive products in multiple markets. IBM is also characterized by function-based segments that support product development and innovation for each product-based division, which include Global Markets, Integrated Supply Chain, Research, Development, and Intellectual Property.

McDonald’s Organizational Structure

mcdonald-organizational-structure
McDonald’s has a divisional organizational structure where each division – based on geographical location – is assigned operational responsibilities and strategic objectives. The main geographical divisions are the US, internationally operated markets, and international developmental licensed markets. And on the other hand, the hierarchical leadership structure is organized around regional and functional divisions.

McKinsey Organizational Structure

mckinsey-organizational-structure
McKinsey & Company has a decentralized organizational structure with mostly self-managing offices, committees, and employees. There are also functional groups and geographic divisions with proprietary names.

Microsoft Organizational Structure

microsoft-organizational-structure
Microsoft has a product-type divisional organizational structure based on functions and engineering groups. As the company scaled over time it also became more hierarchical, however still keeping its hybrid approach between functions, engineering groups, and management.

Nestlé Organizational Structure

nestle-organizational-structure
Nestlé has a geographical divisional structure with operations segmented into five key regions. For many years, Swiss multinational food and drink company Nestlé had a complex and decentralized matrix organizational structure where its numerous brands and subsidiaries were free to operate autonomously.

Nike Organizational Structure

nike-organizational-structure
Nike has a matrix organizational structure incorporating geographic divisions. Nike’s matrix structure is also present at the regional and sub-regional levels. Managerial responsibility is segmented according to business unit (apparel, footwear, and equipment) and function (human resources, finance, marketing, sales, and operations).

Patagonia Organizational Structure

patagonia-organizational-structure
Patagonia has a particular organizational structure, where its founder, Chouinard, disposed of the company’s ownership in the hands of two non-profits. The Patagonia Purpose Trust, holding 100% of the voting stocks, is in charge of defining the company’s strategic direction. And the Holdfast Collective, a non-profit, holds 100% of non-voting stocks, aiming to re-invest the brand’s dividends into environmental causes.

Samsung Organizational Structure

samsung-organizational-structure (1)
Samsung has a product-type divisional organizational structure where products determine how resources and business operations are categorized. The main resources around which Samsung’s corporate structure is organized are consumer electronics, IT, and device solutions. In addition, Samsung leadership functions are organized around a few career levels grades, based on experience (assistant, professional, senior professional, and principal professional).

Sony Organizational Structure

sony-organizational-structure
Sony has a matrix organizational structure primarily based on function-based groups and product/business divisions. The structure also incorporates geographical divisions. In 2021, Sony announced the overhauling of its organizational structure, changing its name from Sony Corporation to Sony Group Corporation to better identify itself as the headquarters of the Sony group of companies skewing the company toward product divisions.

Starbucks Organizational Structure

starbucks-organizational-structure
Starbucks follows a matrix organizational structure with a combination of vertical and horizontal structures. It is characterized by multiple, overlapping chains of command and divisions.

Tesla Organizational Structure

tesla-organizational-structure
Tesla is characterized by a functional organizational structure with aspects of a hierarchical structure. Tesla does employ functional centers that cover all business activities, including finance, sales, marketing, technology, engineering, design, and the offices of the CEO and chairperson. Tesla’s headquarters in Austin, Texas, decide the strategic direction of the company, with international operations given little autonomy.

Toyota Organizational Structure

toyota-organizational-structure
Toyota has a divisional organizational structure where business operations are centered around the market, product, and geographic groups. Therefore, Toyota organizes its corporate structure around global hierarchies (most strategic decisions come from Japan’s headquarter), product-based divisions (where the organization is broken down, based on each product line), and geographical divisions (according to the geographical areas under management).

Walmart Organizational Structure

walmart-organizational-structure
Walmart has a hybrid hierarchical-functional organizational structure, otherwise referred to as a matrix structure that combines multiple approaches. On the one hand, Walmart follows a hierarchical structure, where the current CEO Doug McMillon is the only employee without a direct superior, and directives are sent from top-level management. On the other hand, the function-based structure of Walmart is used to categorize employees according to their particular skills and experience.

Main Free Guides:

Discover more from FourWeekMBA

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Scroll to Top
FourWeekMBA