Resource Mobilization Theory

Resource Mobilization Theory

Business / By /

Resource Mobilization Theory (RMT) is a sociological framework that seeks to understand the organizational and strategic aspects of social movements. It posits that social movements are not just expressions of grievances or ideology but are also highly rational and resource-driven endeavors. Developed in the 1970s, RMT has been instrumental in shedding light on how social movements emerge, organize, and achieve their goals.

Understanding Resource Mobilization Theory

Resource Mobilization Theory is grounded in the idea that social movements are rational actors that strategically mobilize resources to achieve their objectives. These resources include financial assets, organizational structures, human capital, media support, and political influence. According to RMT, social movements are not solely driven by passion and grievances; they are also influenced by their ability to effectively mobilize resources.

Key concepts of Resource Mobilization Theory include:

  1. Resource Dependency: RMT posits that social movements are dependent on resources to function effectively. Movements need resources to sustain themselves, attract members, and exert influence on society and politics.
  2. Rational Choice: RMT applies rational choice theory to social movements, suggesting that activists make rational decisions about how to allocate resources to maximize their impact. Activists weigh the costs and benefits of different strategies and tactics.
  3. Political Opportunity Structure: RMT emphasizes the importance of the political context in which movements operate. Movements assess the political opportunity structure, which includes factors like the receptivity of the government to change, the level of repression, and the availability of allies.
  4. Organizational Capacity: RMT highlights the role of organizations within social movements. Effective organizations help mobilize and allocate resources efficiently, coordinate actions, and engage in strategic planning.
  5. Resource Mobilization Processes: RMT outlines the processes through which movements acquire, allocate, and utilize resources. This includes fundraising, recruitment, and the deployment of resources for specific actions.
  6. Interactions with Allies and Opponents: Movements engage in interactions with other actors, including allies and opponents. These interactions can impact resource mobilization and the movement’s overall success.

Historical Development of Resource Mobilization Theory

Resource Mobilization Theory emerged in the 1970s as a response to the shortcomings of earlier theories of social movements, such as the relative deprivation theory and the collective behavior theory. While these earlier theories focused on the psychological and emotional aspects of social movements, RMT shifted the focus toward a more rational and organizational perspective.

The development of RMT was influenced by several key factors:

  1. Changing Social Movements: The 1960s and 1970s witnessed a surge in social movements, including civil rights, anti-war, and environmental movements. These movements exhibited sophisticated organizational structures and strategies that challenged traditional explanations.
  2. Critique of Psychological Explanations: The psychological explanations of earlier theories were criticized for their inability to explain the complexity and durability of social movements. RMT sought to provide a more comprehensive and empirically grounded framework.
  3. Incorporating Insights from Other Fields: RMT drew insights from fields such as economics, political science, and sociology, incorporating elements of rational choice theory and organizational theory into its framework.
  4. Empirical Research: Scholars conducted empirical research to test and refine RMT, providing evidence for the theory’s applicability in explaining various social movements.

Significance of Resource Mobilization Theory

Resource Mobilization Theory has had a significant impact on the study of social movements and has several practical implications:

  1. Strategic Planning: RMT underscores the importance of strategic planning and resource allocation within social movements. Activists can benefit from a more systematic and strategic approach to achieving their goals.
  2. Resource Acquisition: Understanding the need for resources, including financial support, organizational infrastructure, and media visibility, can help movements identify potential sources of support and develop effective fundraising strategies.
  3. Alliance Building: RMT encourages movements to assess their political opportunity structure and strategically build alliances with other groups or organizations that share similar objectives.
  4. Long-Term Sustainability: By recognizing the importance of resource mobilization, movements can work toward long-term sustainability and resilience, ensuring their continued influence.
  5. Organizational Development: The theory emphasizes the role of organizations within social movements. Movements can benefit from strong, well-organized structures that facilitate resource mobilization and coordination.
  6. Political Impact: RMT highlights the significance of understanding the political context in which movements operate. Movements can adjust their strategies and tactics based on the political opportunity structure.

Criticisms and Limitations

Resource Mobilization Theory, like any theoretical framework, has faced criticisms and limitations:

  1. Resource-Centric: Critics argue that RMT may oversimplify the motivations of activists by focusing primarily on resource mobilization. It may downplay the role of values, ideals, and emotions in driving social change.
  2. Applicability to All Movements: Some scholars suggest that RMT may not be equally applicable to all types of social movements. Movements with deeply rooted cultural or ideological foundations may prioritize values over resource allocation.
  3. Limited Attention to Repression: RMT tends to downplay the role of state repression in influencing social movements. Critics argue that movements in highly repressive environments face unique challenges that the theory does not adequately address.
  4. Underestimating Grassroots Movements: RMT’s emphasis on organizational structures may underestimate the significance of grassroots, decentralized movements that rely on bottom-up organizing and networks.
  5. Influence of Ideological Factors: While RMT acknowledges the importance of political context, it may not fully account for the influence of ideological factors, cultural norms, and historical legacies in shaping movements.

Practical Applications

Resource Mobilization Theory has practical applications in various fields:

  1. Social Movement Strategy: Activists and organizers can use RMT principles to develop strategic plans for resource acquisition, organizational development, and alliance building.
  2. Nonprofit Management: Nonprofit organizations often adopt resource mobilization strategies to secure funding, engage supporters, and achieve their mission.
  3. Political Campaigns: Political campaigns can benefit from RMT’s emphasis on resource allocation, strategic planning, and political opportunity assessment.
  4. Public Policy Advocacy: Advocacy groups seeking to influence public policy can use RMT to assess their resource needs and develop effective advocacy strategies.
  5. Organizational Development: Businesses and organizations can apply resource mobilization principles to improve their efficiency, allocate resources effectively, and navigate competitive landscapes.

Conclusion

Resource Mobilization Theory has provided valuable insights into the organizational and strategic aspects of social movements. By emphasizing the rational and resource-driven nature of movements, RMT has enhanced our understanding of how movements emerge, function, and achieve their objectives. While it may not provide a complete explanation for all aspects of social movements, RMT remains a valuable framework for scholars, activists, and organizers seeking to make sense of the complex dynamics of social change. By recognizing the importance of resource mobilization, individuals and groups can work towards more effective and sustainable efforts to create social and political transformation.

Related ConceptsDescriptionPurposeKey Components/Steps
Resource Mobilization TheoryResource Mobilization Theory (RMT) is a sociological theory that explains social movements’ success in terms of their ability to mobilize and deploy resources effectively. It emphasizes the importance of resources such as money, labor, and organizational infrastructure in facilitating collective action and achieving movement goals. RMT suggests that social movements are rational actors who strategically mobilize resources to challenge power structures and effect social change.To understand how social movements mobilize and deploy resources to achieve their goals, allowing for the analysis of the organizational, strategic, and structural factors that contribute to movement success or failure.1. Resource Mobilization: Identify and mobilize resources such as financial capital, human resources, and organizational networks to support movement activities and campaigns. 2. Strategic Planning: Develop strategic plans and tactics for resource allocation, recruitment, and mobilization to maximize movement effectiveness and impact. 3. Organizational Structure: Establish and maintain organizational structures and networks that facilitate resource mobilization, coordination, and collective action among movement members. 4. Coalition Building: Form alliances and coalitions with other organizations or social groups to pool resources and amplify collective power and influence.
Political Process TheoryPolitical Process Theory (PPT) is a sociological theory that focuses on the political dynamics and processes shaping social movements. It emphasizes the role of political opportunities, state repression, and collective identity in mobilizing and sustaining movements over time. PPT suggests that social movements emerge in response to perceived grievances or injustices and capitalize on favorable political conditions to mobilize collective action and challenge existing power structures.To examine the political factors and processes that influence the emergence, development, and outcomes of social movements, allowing for the analysis of the interaction between social movement actors, political institutions, and broader socio-political contexts.1. Political Opportunities: Identify and capitalize on opportunities for political change or reform, such as shifts in government policy, public opinion, or elite alignments, to mobilize support and advance movement goals. 2. State Repression: Respond to state repression or resistance through adaptive strategies and tactics that mitigate risks and sustain movement momentum. 3. Collective Identity: Foster a collective identity and sense of solidarity among movement participants, uniting diverse individuals or groups around shared grievances or goals. 4. Mobilization Structures: Develop mobilization structures and networks that facilitate coordination, communication, and collective action among movement members, enabling effective resource mobilization and strategic planning.
Social Movement TheorySocial Movement Theory (SMT) encompasses various theoretical perspectives that seek to explain the origins, dynamics, and outcomes of social movements. It includes resource mobilization theory, political process theory, and other frameworks that analyze the structural, cultural, and organizational factors shaping movement mobilization and activism. SMT emphasizes the complex interplay between social, political, and cultural factors in driving collective action and social change.To provide a comprehensive understanding of social movements and their dynamics, drawing on multiple theoretical perspectives to analyze the multifaceted factors influencing movement emergence, development, and outcomes.1. Structural Factors: Examine the structural conditions and inequalities that shape social movements, such as socio-economic disparities, political marginalization, and institutional constraints, influencing movement mobilization and goals. 2. Cultural Dynamics: Analyze the cultural beliefs, norms, and values that motivate and sustain collective action, shaping collective identities, solidarity, and collective efficacy among movement participants. 3. Organizational Dynamics: Investigate the organizational structures, networks, and strategies employed by social movements to mobilize resources, coordinate actions, and achieve movement objectives, assessing factors contributing to movement success or failure. 4. Collective Action Processes: Explore the processes of mobilization, recruitment, and participation within social movements, examining individual and collective motivations, grievances, and tactics that drive activism and social change.
Collective Behavior TheoryCollective Behavior Theory (CBT) examines the spontaneous and unstructured forms of collective action that emerge in response to social disruptions or crises. It focuses on the dynamics of crowds, riots, panics, and other forms of collective behavior, emphasizing the role of shared emotions, contagion, and emergent norms in shaping group behavior. CBT explores how individuals act collectively in unfamiliar or ambiguous situations, often exhibiting non-rational or irrational behavior under heightened emotional arousal.To understand the spontaneous and unpredictable forms of collective action that arise in response to social disruptions or crises, allowing for the analysis of group dynamics, norms, and behavior in unstructured or emergent situations.1. Emergent Norms: Investigate the formation and influence of emergent norms or codes of behavior within collective groups, which may deviate from conventional social norms or rules under conditions of uncertainty or crisis. 2. Emotional Contagion: Explore the role of emotional contagion and arousal in shaping collective behavior, as individuals respond to the emotional cues and expressions of others within the group, leading to intensified emotions and collective action. 3. Structural Conditions: Analyze the structural conditions and contextual factors that precipitate collective behavior, such as social disorganization, perceived threats, or opportunities for social change, influencing the likelihood and nature of collective responses. 4. Group Dynamics: Examine the dynamics of crowds, mobs, and other collective groups, including factors such as leadership, communication, and solidarity, that shape group cohesion, coordination, and effectiveness in achieving collective goals.

Connected Thinking Frameworks

Convergent vs. Divergent Thinking

convergent-vs-divergent-thinking
Convergent thinking occurs when the solution to a problem can be found by applying established rules and logical reasoning. Whereas divergent thinking is an unstructured problem-solving method where participants are encouraged to develop many innovative ideas or solutions to a given problem. Where convergent thinking might work for larger, mature organizations where divergent thinking is more suited for startups and innovative companies.

Critical Thinking

critical-thinking
Critical thinking involves analyzing observations, facts, evidence, and arguments to form a judgment about what someone reads, hears, says, or writes.

Biases

biases
The concept of cognitive biases was introduced and popularized by the work of Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman in 1972. Biases are seen as systematic errors and flaws that make humans deviate from the standards of rationality, thus making us inept at making good decisions under uncertainty.

Second-Order Thinking

second-order-thinking
Second-order thinking is a means of assessing the implications of our decisions by considering future consequences. Second-order thinking is a mental model that considers all future possibilities. It encourages individuals to think outside of the box so that they can prepare for every and eventuality. It also discourages the tendency for individuals to default to the most obvious choice.

Lateral Thinking

lateral-thinking
Lateral thinking is a business strategy that involves approaching a problem from a different direction. The strategy attempts to remove traditionally formulaic and routine approaches to problem-solving by advocating creative thinking, therefore finding unconventional ways to solve a known problem. This sort of non-linear approach to problem-solving, can at times, create a big impact.

Bounded Rationality

bounded-rationality
Bounded rationality is a concept attributed to Herbert Simon, an economist and political scientist interested in decision-making and how we make decisions in the real world. In fact, he believed that rather than optimizing (which was the mainstream view in the past decades) humans follow what he called satisficing.

Dunning-Kruger Effect

dunning-kruger-effect
The Dunning-Kruger effect describes a cognitive bias where people with low ability in a task overestimate their ability to perform that task well. Consumers or businesses that do not possess the requisite knowledge make bad decisions. What’s more, knowledge gaps prevent the person or business from seeing their mistakes.

Occam’s Razor

occams-razor
Occam’s Razor states that one should not increase (beyond reason) the number of entities required to explain anything. All things being equal, the simplest solution is often the best one. The principle is attributed to 14th-century English theologian William of Ockham.

Lindy Effect

lindy-effect
The Lindy Effect is a theory about the ageing of non-perishable things, like technology or ideas. Popularized by author Nicholas Nassim Taleb, the Lindy Effect states that non-perishable things like technology age – linearly – in reverse. Therefore, the older an idea or a technology, the same will be its life expectancy.

Antifragility

antifragility
Antifragility was first coined as a term by author, and options trader Nassim Nicholas Taleb. Antifragility is a characteristic of systems that thrive as a result of stressors, volatility, and randomness. Therefore, Antifragile is the opposite of fragile. Where a fragile thing breaks up to volatility; a robust thing resists volatility. An antifragile thing gets stronger from volatility (provided the level of stressors and randomness doesn’t pass a certain threshold).

Systems Thinking

systems-thinking
Systems thinking is a holistic means of investigating the factors and interactions that could contribute to a potential outcome. It is about thinking non-linearly, and understanding the second-order consequences of actions and input into the system.

Vertical Thinking

vertical-thinking
Vertical thinking, on the other hand, is a problem-solving approach that favors a selective, analytical, structured, and sequential mindset. The focus of vertical thinking is to arrive at a reasoned, defined solution.

Maslow’s Hammer

einstellung-effect
Maslow’s Hammer, otherwise known as the law of the instrument or the Einstellung effect, is a cognitive bias causing an over-reliance on a familiar tool. This can be expressed as the tendency to overuse a known tool (perhaps a hammer) to solve issues that might require a different tool. This problem is persistent in the business world where perhaps known tools or frameworks might be used in the wrong context (like business plans used as planning tools instead of only investors’ pitches).

Peter Principle

peter-principle
The Peter Principle was first described by Canadian sociologist Lawrence J. Peter in his 1969 book The Peter Principle. The Peter Principle states that people are continually promoted within an organization until they reach their level of incompetence.

Straw Man Fallacy

straw-man-fallacy
The straw man fallacy describes an argument that misrepresents an opponent’s stance to make rebuttal more convenient. The straw man fallacy is a type of informal logical fallacy, defined as a flaw in the structure of an argument that renders it invalid.

Streisand Effect

streisand-effect
The Streisand Effect is a paradoxical phenomenon where the act of suppressing information to reduce visibility causes it to become more visible. In 2003, Streisand attempted to suppress aerial photographs of her Californian home by suing photographer Kenneth Adelman for an invasion of privacy. Adelman, who Streisand assumed was paparazzi, was instead taking photographs to document and study coastal erosion. In her quest for more privacy, Streisand’s efforts had the opposite effect.

Heuristic

heuristic
As highlighted by German psychologist Gerd Gigerenzer in the paper “Heuristic Decision Making,” the term heuristic is of Greek origin, meaning “serving to find out or discover.” More precisely, a heuristic is a fast and accurate way to make decisions in the real world, which is driven by uncertainty.

Recognition Heuristic

recognition-heuristic
The recognition heuristic is a psychological model of judgment and decision making. It is part of a suite of simple and economical heuristics proposed by psychologists Daniel Goldstein and Gerd Gigerenzer. The recognition heuristic argues that inferences are made about an object based on whether it is recognized or not.

Representativeness Heuristic

representativeness-heuristic
The representativeness heuristic was first described by psychologists Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky. The representativeness heuristic judges the probability of an event according to the degree to which that event resembles a broader class. When queried, most will choose the first option because the description of John matches the stereotype we may hold for an archaeologist.

Take-The-Best Heuristic

take-the-best-heuristic
The take-the-best heuristic is a decision-making shortcut that helps an individual choose between several alternatives. The take-the-best (TTB) heuristic decides between two or more alternatives based on a single good attribute, otherwise known as a cue. In the process, less desirable attributes are ignored.

Bundling Bias

bundling-bias
The bundling bias is a cognitive bias in e-commerce where a consumer tends not to use all of the products bought as a group, or bundle. Bundling occurs when individual products or services are sold together as a bundle. Common examples are tickets and experiences. The bundling bias dictates that consumers are less likely to use each item in the bundle. This means that the value of the bundle and indeed the value of each item in the bundle is decreased.

Barnum Effect

barnum-effect
The Barnum Effect is a cognitive bias where individuals believe that generic information – which applies to most people – is specifically tailored for themselves.

First-Principles Thinking

first-principles-thinking
First-principles thinking – sometimes called reasoning from first principles – is used to reverse-engineer complex problems and encourage creativity. It involves breaking down problems into basic elements and reassembling them from the ground up. Elon Musk is among the strongest proponents of this way of thinking.

Ladder Of Inference

ladder-of-inference
The ladder of inference is a conscious or subconscious thinking process where an individual moves from a fact to a decision or action. The ladder of inference was created by academic Chris Argyris to illustrate how people form and then use mental models to make decisions.

Goodhart’s Law

goodharts-law
Goodhart’s Law is named after British monetary policy theorist and economist Charles Goodhart. Speaking at a conference in Sydney in 1975, Goodhart said that “any observed statistical regularity will tend to collapse once pressure is placed upon it for control purposes.” Goodhart’s Law states that when a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure.

Six Thinking Hats Model

six-thinking-hats-model
The Six Thinking Hats model was created by psychologist Edward de Bono in 1986, who noted that personality type was a key driver of how people approached problem-solving. For example, optimists view situations differently from pessimists. Analytical individuals may generate ideas that a more emotional person would not, and vice versa.

Mandela Effect

mandela-effect
The Mandela effect is a phenomenon where a large group of people remembers an event differently from how it occurred. The Mandela effect was first described in relation to Fiona Broome, who believed that former South African President Nelson Mandela died in prison during the 1980s. While Mandela was released from prison in 1990 and died 23 years later, Broome remembered news coverage of his death in prison and even a speech from his widow. Of course, neither event occurred in reality. But Broome was later to discover that she was not the only one with the same recollection of events.

Crowding-Out Effect

crowding-out-effect
The crowding-out effect occurs when public sector spending reduces spending in the private sector.

Bandwagon Effect

bandwagon-effect
The bandwagon effect tells us that the more a belief or idea has been adopted by more people within a group, the more the individual adoption of that idea might increase within the same group. This is the psychological effect that leads to herd mentality. What in marketing can be associated with social proof.

Moore’s Law

moores-law
Moore’s law states that the number of transistors on a microchip doubles approximately every two years. This observation was made by Intel co-founder Gordon Moore in 1965 and it become a guiding principle for the semiconductor industry and has had far-reaching implications for technology as a whole.

Disruptive Innovation

disruptive-innovation
Disruptive innovation as a term was first described by Clayton M. Christensen, an American academic and business consultant whom The Economist called “the most influential management thinker of his time.” Disruptive innovation describes the process by which a product or service takes hold at the bottom of a market and eventually displaces established competitors, products, firms, or alliances.

Value Migration

value-migration
Value migration was first described by author Adrian Slywotzky in his 1996 book Value Migration – How to Think Several Moves Ahead of the Competition. Value migration is the transferal of value-creating forces from outdated business models to something better able to satisfy consumer demands.

Bye-Now Effect

bye-now-effect
The bye-now effect describes the tendency for consumers to think of the word “buy” when they read the word “bye”. In a study that tracked diners at a name-your-own-price restaurant, each diner was asked to read one of two phrases before ordering their meal. The first phrase, “so long”, resulted in diners paying an average of $32 per meal. But when diners recited the phrase “bye bye” before ordering, the average price per meal rose to $45.

Groupthink

groupthink
Groupthink occurs when well-intentioned individuals make non-optimal or irrational decisions based on a belief that dissent is impossible or on a motivation to conform. Groupthink occurs when members of a group reach a consensus without critical reasoning or evaluation of the alternatives and their consequences.

Stereotyping

stereotyping
A stereotype is a fixed and over-generalized belief about a particular group or class of people. These beliefs are based on the false assumption that certain characteristics are common to every individual residing in that group. Many stereotypes have a long and sometimes controversial history and are a direct consequence of various political, social, or economic events. Stereotyping is the process of making assumptions about a person or group of people based on various attributes, including gender, race, religion, or physical traits.

Murphy’s Law

murphys-law
Murphy’s Law states that if anything can go wrong, it will go wrong. Murphy’s Law was named after aerospace engineer Edward A. Murphy. During his time working at Edwards Air Force Base in 1949, Murphy cursed a technician who had improperly wired an electrical component and said, “If there is any way to do it wrong, he’ll find it.”

Law of Unintended Consequences

law-of-unintended-consequences
The law of unintended consequences was first mentioned by British philosopher John Locke when writing to parliament about the unintended effects of interest rate rises. However, it was popularized in 1936 by American sociologist Robert K. Merton who looked at unexpected, unanticipated, and unintended consequences and their impact on society.

Fundamental Attribution Error

fundamental-attribution-error
Fundamental attribution error is a bias people display when judging the behavior of others. The tendency is to over-emphasize personal characteristics and under-emphasize environmental and situational factors.

Outcome Bias

outcome-bias
Outcome bias describes a tendency to evaluate a decision based on its outcome and not on the process by which the decision was reached. In other words, the quality of a decision is only determined once the outcome is known. Outcome bias occurs when a decision is based on the outcome of previous events without regard for how those events developed.

Hindsight Bias

hindsight-bias
Hindsight bias is the tendency for people to perceive past events as more predictable than they actually were. The result of a presidential election, for example, seems more obvious when the winner is announced. The same can also be said for the avid sports fan who predicted the correct outcome of a match regardless of whether their team won or lost. Hindsight bias, therefore, is the tendency for an individual to convince themselves that they accurately predicted an event before it happened.

Read Next: Biases, Bounded Rationality, Mandela Effect, Dunning-Kruger Effect, Lindy Effect, Crowding Out Effect, Bandwagon Effect.

Main Guides:

More Resources

Scroll to Top

Discover more from FourWeekMBA

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

FourWeekMBA