theory-x-and-theory-y

What are Theory X and Theory Y? Theory X and Theory Y In A Nutshell

Theory X and Theory Y were developed in the 1960s by American management professor and social psychologist Douglas McGregor. McGregor believed there were two fundamental approaches to managing people in the workplace to get things done and benefit the organization. Theory X and Theory Y are theories of motivation used by managers to increase the performance of subordinates.

Understanding Theory X and Theory Y

These approaches were based on the idea that every manager has a personal view regarding what motivates people. These views affect what the manager does and how they behave. In other words, their management or leadership style.

The two approaches McGregor named Theory X and Theory Y. In the next section, we’ll discuss both theories in more detail.

Theory X and Theory Y

1 – Theory X

Theory X describes an authoritarian leadership style where managers give direct instruction and supervise subordinates closely. 

Theory X is based on the following assumptions:

  • The employee dislikes work and is unmotivated, lazy, gullible, and unintelligent.
  • The employee shirks responsibility and as a result, prefers for someone else to lead. 
  • The employee is self-centered and indifferent toward the interests of the organization.
  • Management is responsible for assembling money, material, people, and equipment.
  • Management is required to control employees by modifying their behavior to comply with or suit organizational needs.
  • Management must also ensure employees work toward economic goals through persuasion, incentivization, punishment, and control.

2 – Theory Y

Theory Y describes a participative leadership style where managers assume employees are self-motivated and directed toward accomplishing organizational goals. As a result, these leaders attempt to receive maximum employee output for minimum managerial effort.

Theory Y is based on the following assumptions:

  • The average employee is creative and self-motivated and does not inherently dislike their work.
  • Since employees are self-directed and self-controlled, punishment is not the only way to increase motivation.
  • Employee commitment is positively correlated with the reward received, with the largest rewards associated with satisfaction of the ego and self-actualization. 
  • The average employee is ambitious and does not shirk responsibility. As a result, they readily adopt leadership roles.
  • Employees use a relatively high degree of imagination and creativity in solving complex organizational problems. What’s more, the capacity for creativity spreads throughout a company.

Implications of Theory X and Theory Y

We can observe that Theory X management takes a pessimistic view of employee behavior and capabilities. McGregor believed authoritarian leadership was not effective because it relied on lower-level needs such as food, money, job security, and shelter to motivate employees. 

Monetary compensation works for a time, but the motivation to perform disappears as soon as these lower-level needs have been met. This causes unmotivated employees to go to work simply to collect a paycheque and use their leisure time to satisfy higher-level needs. With all of that said, McGregor did acknowledge that authoritarian leadership was useful in managing subordinates still in the developmental stage.

Theory Y has a far more optimistic view of employees. McGregor suggested participative leadership encouraged harmonious team relations and stimulated collaborative decision-making. Importantly, employees under this management style could be motivated for longer because higher-level needs around self-actualization and self-esteem are never truly satisfied. Under Theory Y, there is also an opportunity for managers to align personal goals with organizational goals by using an employee’s need for self-actualization as the motivator.

In determining the best approach, McGregor suggested neither was optimal. In the authoritarian approach, hostile employees lower their output and frequently involve unions in disputes. In the participative approach, management is permissive and seeks harmony in the hope that employees will cooperate in return. This hope-based approach also results in employees expecting progressively larger rewards in exchange for progressively diminishing effort.

Key takeaways:

  • Theory X and Theory Y are theories of motivation used by managers to increase the performance of subordinates. Both were developed by social psychologist Douglas McGregor in the 1960s.
  • Theory X describes an authoritarian leadership style where managers give direct instruction and supervise subordinates closely. Theory Y, on the other hand, describes a participative leadership style where managers assume employees are self-motivated and directed toward accomplishing organizational goals.
  • McGregor believed neither theory was a totally effective management approach. Authoritarian leaders create hostile work environments where employees involve unions and deliberately lower their output. Participative leadership can also create a decrease in output because the reciprocal relationship between managers and subordinates is based on hope.

Connected Leadership Frameworks

leadership-styles
Leadership styles encompass the behavioral qualities of a leader. These qualities are commonly used to direct, motivate, or manage groups of people. Some of the most recognized leadership styles include Autocratic, Democratic, or Laissez-Faire leadership styles.
transformational-leadership
Transformational leadership is a style of leadership that motivates, encourages, and inspires employees to contribute to company growth. Leadership expert James McGregor Burns first described the concept of transformational leadership in a 1978 book entitled Leadership. Although Burns’ research was focused on political leaders, the term is also applicable for businesses and organizational psychology.
lockes-goal-setting-theory
The theory was developed by psychologist Edwin Locke who also has a background in motivation and leadership research. Locke’s goal-setting theory of motivation provides a framework for setting effective and motivating goals. Locke was able to demonstrate that goal setting was linked to performance.
kotters-8-step-change-model
Harvard Business School professor Dr. John Kotter has been a thought-leader on organizational change, and he developed Kotter’s 8-step change model, which helps business managers deal with organizational change. Kotter created the 8-step model to drive organizational transformation.
value-disciplines-model
The Value Disciplines Model was developed by authors Michael Treacy and Fred Wiersema. In their model, the authors use the term value discipline to represent any method a business may use to differentiate itself. The Value Disciplines Model argues that for a business to be viable, it must be successful in three key areas: customer intimacy, product leadership, and operational excellence.
what-is-okr
Andy Grove, helped Intel become among the most valuable companies by 1997. In his years at Intel, he conceived a management and goal-setting system, called OKR, standing for “objectives and key results.” Venture capitalist and early investor in Google, John Doerr, systematized in the book “Measure What Matters.”
tipping-point-leadership
Tipping Point Leadership is a low-cost means of achieving a strategic shift in an organization by focusing on extremes. Here, the extremes may refer to small groups of people, acts, and activities that exert a disproportionate influence over business performance.
amazon-leadership-principles
Amazon fundamental principles that drove and drive the company are: Customer Obsession Ownership Invent and Simplify Are Right, A Lot Learn and Be Curious Hire and Develop the Best Insist on the Highest Standards Think Big Bias for Action Frugality Earn Trust Dive Deep Have Backbone; Disagree and Commit Deliver Results
porters-generic-strategies
In his book, “Competitive Advantage,” in 1985, Porter conceptualized the concept of competitive advantage, by looking at two key aspects. Industry attractiveness, and the company’s strategic positioning. The latter, according to Porter, can be achieved either via cost leadership, differentiation, or focus.

Connected Management Frameworks

change-management
Change is an important and necessary fact of life for all organizations. But change is often unsuccessful because the people within organizations are resistant to change. Change management is a systematic approach to managing the transformation of organizational goals, values, technologies, or processes.
risk-management-framework
An effective risk management framework is crucial for any organization. The framework endeavors to protect the organization’s capital base and revenue generation capability without hindering growth. A risk management framework (RMF) allows businesses to strike a balance between taking risks and reducing them.
timeboxing
Timeboxing is a simple yet powerful time-management technique for improving productivity. Timeboxing describes the process of proactively scheduling a block of time to spend on a task in the future. It was first described by author James Martin in a book about agile software development.
herzbergs-two-factor-theory
Herzberg’s two-factor theory argues that certain workplace factors cause job satisfaction while others cause job dissatisfaction. The theory was developed by American psychologist and business management analyst Frederick Herzberg. Until his death in 2000, Herzberg was widely regarded as a pioneering thinker in motivational theory.
kepner-tregoe-matrix
The Kepner-Tregoe matrix was created by management consultants Charles H. Kepner and Benjamin B. Tregoe in the 1960s, developed to help businesses navigate the decisions they make daily, the Kepner-Tregoe matrix is a root cause analysis used in organizational decision making.
adkar-model
The ADKAR model is a management tool designed to assist employees and businesses in transitioning through organizational change. To maximize the chances of employees embracing change, the ADKAR model was developed by author and engineer Jeff Hiatt in 2003. The model seeks to guide people through the change process and importantly, ensure that people do not revert to habitual ways of operating after some time has passed.
catwoe-analysis
The CATWOE analysis is a problem-solving strategy that asks businesses to look at an issue from six different perspectives. The CATWOE analysis is an in-depth and holistic approach to problem-solving because it enables businesses to consider all perspectives. This often forces management out of habitual ways of thinking that would otherwise hinder growth and profitability. Most importantly, the CATWOE analysis allows businesses to combine multiple perspectives into a single, unifying solution.
agile-project-management
Agile project management (APM) is a strategy that breaks large projects into smaller, more manageable tasks. In the APM methodology, each project is completed in small sections – often referred to as iterations. Each iteration is completed according to its project life cycle, beginning with the initial design and progressing to testing and then quality assurance.
holacracy
A holacracy is a management strategy and an organizational structure where the power to make important decisions is distributed throughout an organization. It differs from conventional management hierarchies where power is in the hands of a select few. The core principle of a holacracy is self-organization where employees organize into several teams and then work in a self-directed fashion toward a common goal.
cage-distance-diagram
The CAGE Distance Framework was developed by management strategist Pankaj Ghemawat as a way for businesses to evaluate the differences between countries when developing international strategies. Therefore, be able to better execute a business strategy at the international level.
balanced-scorecard
First proposed by accounting academic Robert Kaplan, the balanced scorecard is a management system that allows an organization to focus on big-picture strategic goals. The four perspectives of the balanced scorecard include financial, customer, business process, and organizational capacity. From there, according to the balanced scorecard, it’s possible to have a holistic view of the business.
what-is-scrum
Scrum is a methodology co-created by Ken Schwaber and Jeff Sutherland for effective team collaboration on complex products. Scrum was primarily thought for software development projects to deliver new software capability every 2-4 weeks. It is a sub-group of agile also used in project management to improve startups’ productivity.
kanban
Kanban is a lean manufacturing framework first developed by Toyota in the late 1940s. The Kanban framework is a means of visualizing work as it moves through identifying potential bottlenecks. It does that through a process called just-in-time (JIT) manufacturing to optimize engineering processes, speed up manufacturing products, and improve the go-to-market strategy.
pomodoro-technique
The Pomodoro Technique was created by Italian business consultant Francesco Cirillo in the late 1980s. The Pomodoro Technique is a time management system where work is performed in 25-minute intervals.
what-is-okr
Andy Grove, helped Intel become among the most valuable companies by 1997. In his years at Intel, he conceived a management and goal-setting system, called OKR, standing for “objectives and key results.” Venture capitalist and early investor in Google, John Doerr, systematized in the book “Measure What Matters.”

Main Free Guides:

Published by

Gennaro Cuofano

Gennaro is the creator of FourWeekMBA which reached over a million business students, executives, and aspiring entrepreneurs in 2020 alone | He is also Head of Business Development for a high-tech startup, which he helped grow at double-digit rate | Gennaro earned an International MBA with emphasis on Corporate Finance and Business Strategy | Visit The FourWeekMBA BizSchool | Or Get The FourWeekMBA Flagship Book "100+ Business Models"