What Is Round-robin Brainstorming? Round-robin Brainstorming In A Nutshell

Round-robin brainstorming is a collective and iterative approach to brainstorming. Brainstorming is an effective way of generating fresh ideas for an organization. Round-robin brainstorming is a balanced approach, employing an iterative, circular process that builds on the previous contribution of each participant. 

Concept OverviewRound-Robin Brainstorming is a structured group creativity technique used to generate a wide range of ideas or solutions to a problem or challenge. It ensures that all participants have an equal opportunity to contribute their thoughts and encourages diverse thinking.
Key ComponentsRound-Robin Brainstorming typically involves the following components: (1) Small group setting, (2) Sequential idea sharing, (3) Timed rotations, (4) Facilitator guidance, (5) Idea recording, (6) Group discussion and evaluation.
Small Group SettingParticipants are divided into small groups, usually consisting of 4-6 members. These groups provide a comfortable environment for brainstorming and encourage active participation.
Sequential Idea SharingIn each group, participants take turns sharing one idea at a time in a clockwise or counterclockwise rotation. This sequential process ensures that everyone’s ideas are heard and avoids interruptions.
Timed RotationsA facilitator or timer manages the process, allocating a specific time limit for each rotation. This keeps the brainstorming session structured and efficient. Participants are encouraged to think quickly and stay focused.
Facilitator GuidanceA facilitator guides the session, sets the problem statement or topic, explains the rules, manages the timing, and encourages positive and open-minded interactions. The facilitator ensures that the process flows smoothly.
Idea RecordingIdeas shared during the round-robin process are recorded on a whiteboard, flipchart, or digital tool visible to all participants. This recording allows everyone to see and build upon previously shared ideas.
Group Discussion and EvaluationAfter all participants have had a chance to contribute ideas, the group engages in a discussion to elaborate on the generated ideas, clarify their potential, and evaluate their feasibility. This phase helps refine and select the most promising concepts.
Implications of Round-Robin Brainstorming– Equal Participation: It ensures that all participants have an equal opportunity to contribute, regardless of their speaking order. – Diverse Ideas: The structured approach promotes diverse thinking and reduces the influence of dominant voices. – Efficient Idea Generation: Timed rotations maintain focus and efficiency during the brainstorming process.
Benefits of Round-Robin Brainstorming– Inclusivity: It fosters an inclusive environment, making it suitable for diverse groups. – Idea Generation: It generates a wide range of ideas and encourages creative thinking. – Minimizes Interruptions: Sequential sharing reduces interruptions and ensures that each idea receives attention.
Drawbacks and Limitations– Time-Consuming: The process can be time-consuming, especially with larger groups or complex topics. – Limited Interaction: It may not allow for immediate discussion and elaboration of ideas. – Idea Evaluation: In-depth evaluation may require additional time outside the session.
Applications of the Approach– Business Innovation: Organizations use round-robin brainstorming to develop innovative product ideas or marketing strategies. – Education: It is applied in educational settings to encourage creative thinking and problem-solving among students. – Problem-Solving: Teams utilize this approach to address complex challenges and find solutions. – Research and Development: Scientists and researchers employ it to generate new hypotheses and research directions.
Examples of Round-Robin Brainstorming– Corporate Strategy: A team of executives gathers to brainstorm strategies for entering a new market, taking turns to share their ideas. – Classroom Exercise: Students participate in round-robin brainstorming to generate project topics, each contributing one idea at a time. – Product Development: A cross-functional team in a tech company engages in round-robin brainstorming to ideate new features for a software product. – Scientific Research: Researchers employ the technique to brainstorm potential experiments and hypotheses for a scientific study.

Understanding round-robin brainstorming

iI a group situation, brainstorming can be dominated by one or two personalities who discourage others from sharing their opinions.

Round-robin brainstorming is a more balanced approach, employing an iterative, circular process that builds on the previous contribution of each participant. 

The technique makes it more difficult for large personalities to dominate by adding structure and organization to the brainstorming process. This makes it suitable for any situation where a range of personality types need to be considered. Which is to say, most situations.

Implementing a round-robin brainstorming session

Teams should know that implementing a round-robin brainstorming session is rather easy.

Simply follow these steps:

  1. Arrange the team in a circle and give each member an index card so that they can record their ideas.
  2. Then, the facilitator clearly articulates the problem to be solved and details company objectives. At this point, the facilitator can take questions but should actively discourage discussion among group members. 
  3. In the third step, each individual should brainstorm ideas in complete silence.
  4. After brainstorming, each person should pass their idea to the person seated adjacent. 
  5. Team members should then use the idea of their neighbor as the inspiration for a new idea. In some interpretations of round-robin brainstorming, the individual identifies possible risks or obstacles to their idea. The neighbor card initially swapped in the previous step should be handed to the facilitator. Then, everyone passes their new idea to the next person to begin step four again.
  6. The circular swapping process should continue for as long as the facilitator deems it necessary. Ideas should be collated, discussed, and voted on by the group.

Advantages of round-robin brainstorming

  • The silent, collaborative, and iterative approach allow all ideas to be given equal consideration and the chance to be improved upon.
  • The ideation process can gain momentum as it moves around the circle, resulting in ideas that may have been overlooked in a traditional brainstorming method. Momentum can also lead to empowered teams that feel confident to act on larger or more creative ideas.

Disadvantages of round-robin brainstorming

  • Some argue that a lack of idea anonymity might cause some team members to withhold their ideas. Although there is no requirement to label each idea card with a name, the process does not make it difficult to connect match an idea with a specific individual.
  • Round-robin brainstorming effectiveness can be limited since each team member can only improve on the idea of the person seated next to them. There is no capacity to gather input from every member of the group on a single idea.

Case Studies

1. Redesigning a Company Logo

  • Step 1 (Silent Brainstorming): Each team member sketches or writes down logo design ideas on their index cards without discussing them.
  • Step 2 (Pass Ideas): Everyone passes their index cards with logo ideas to the person sitting to their right.
  • Step 3 (Build on Ideas): Team members use the ideas they receive as inspiration to refine or expand upon the logo concepts.
  • Step 4 (Pass Again): Index cards are passed to the right again, and the process continues.
  • Step 5 (Discussion and Evaluation): After several rounds, the group discusses and evaluates the logo concepts to select the most promising design.

2. Improving Customer Service in a Retail Store

  • Step 1 (Silent Brainstorming): Each team member writes down ideas for improving customer service on their index cards.
  • Step 2 (Pass Ideas): Index cards with ideas are passed to the person on the right.
  • Step 3 (Build on Ideas): Team members use the received ideas to brainstorm additional strategies for enhancing customer service.
  • Step 4 (Pass Again): Index cards are passed to the right again, and the process continues.
  • Step 5 (Discussion and Evaluation): The group discusses and evaluates the proposed customer service improvements, prioritizing the most effective ones.

3. Planning a Marketing Campaign for a New Product

  • Step 1 (Silent Brainstorming): Each team member jots down marketing campaign ideas for the new product.
  • Step 2 (Pass Ideas): Pass index cards to the person on the right.
  • Step 3 (Build on Ideas): Team members use the received ideas to develop marketing strategies, including social media campaigns, influencer partnerships, and advertising approaches.
  • Step 4 (Pass Again): Continue passing index cards to the right for further ideation.
  • Step 5 (Discussion and Evaluation): Evaluate the marketing campaign ideas, considering their potential impact and cost-effectiveness.

4. Enhancing Safety Measures in a Manufacturing Plant

  • Step 1 (Silent Brainstorming): Each team member writes down safety improvement ideas on their index cards.
  • Step 2 (Pass Ideas): Pass index cards to the person on the right.
  • Step 3 (Build on Ideas): Team members use the received safety ideas to brainstorm additional safety protocols and equipment upgrades.
  • Step 4 (Pass Again): Continue passing index cards for ongoing safety brainstorming.
  • Step 5 (Discussion and Evaluation): Discuss and evaluate the proposed safety enhancements to prioritize implementation.

5. Creating Innovative Features for a Mobile App

  • Step 1 (Silent Brainstorming): Team members individually list innovative features for the mobile app.
  • Step 2 (Pass Ideas): Pass index cards to the person on the right.
  • Step 3 (Build on Ideas): Use received ideas to develop more advanced features or refine existing ones.
  • Step 4 (Pass Again): Continue passing index cards for further feature ideation.
  • Step 5 (Discussion and Evaluation): Discuss and evaluate the innovative features to select those most suitable for the app.

Key takeaways

  • Round-robin brainstorming is a collective and iterative approach to generating creative ideas.
  • Round-robin brainstorming is implemented in six easy steps. Each step should be completed without discussion to give creative ideas equal weight. Discussion should only be encouraged at the sixth and final step when ideas are evaluated.
  • Round-robin brainstorming helps teams build momentum and confidence, leading to creative insights that may not have been apparent in other brainstorming techniques. However, some argue that a relative lack of anonymity might still allow larger personalities to dominate the ideation process.

Key Highlights of Round-Robin Brainstorming:

  • Definition and Purpose: Round-robin brainstorming is a collective and iterative approach to brainstorming that aims to balance the contribution of all participants. It involves a structured and circular process where each participant builds on the previous idea, making it suitable for situations with a diverse range of personalities.
  • Advantages of Round-Robin Brainstorming:
    • Equal Consideration: All ideas are given equal consideration and can be improved upon collaboratively.
    • Momentum: The process gains momentum as it moves around the circle, potentially uncovering overlooked ideas.
    • Empowered Teams: Empowers teams to act on larger or more creative ideas.
  • Disadvantages of Round-Robin Brainstorming:
    • Lack of Anonymity: Some team members might withhold ideas due to a lack of idea anonymity.
    • Limited Input: Ideas can only be improved upon by the person seated next, limiting input from the entire group.
  • Implementing Round-Robin Brainstorming:
    • Arrange participants in a circle and provide index cards for recording ideas.
    • Clearly state the problem and objectives while discouraging discussion.
    • Participants brainstorm ideas in silence.
    • Ideas are passed to adjacent participants, who use them as inspiration for new ideas.
    • Circular swapping continues as long as needed, and ideas are collated, discussed, and evaluated.

Read Next: Business AnalysisCompetitor Analysis, Continuous InnovationAgile MethodologyLean StartupBusiness Model InnovationProject Management.

Connected Analysis Frameworks

Failure Mode And Effects Analysis

A failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) is a structured approach to identifying design failures in a product or process. Developed in the 1950s, the failure mode and effects analysis is one the earliest methodologies of its kind. It enables organizations to anticipate a range of potential failures during the design stage.

Agile Business Analysis

Agile Business Analysis (AgileBA) is certification in the form of guidance and training for business analysts seeking to work in agile environments. To support this shift, AgileBA also helps the business analyst relate Agile projects to a wider organizational mission or strategy. To ensure that analysts have the necessary skills and expertise, AgileBA certification was developed.

Business Valuation

Business valuations involve a formal analysis of the key operational aspects of a business. A business valuation is an analysis used to determine the economic value of a business or company unit. It’s important to note that valuations are one part science and one part art. Analysts use professional judgment to consider the financial performance of a business with respect to local, national, or global economic conditions. They will also consider the total value of assets and liabilities, in addition to patented or proprietary technology.

Paired Comparison Analysis

A paired comparison analysis is used to rate or rank options where evaluation criteria are subjective by nature. The analysis is particularly useful when there is a lack of clear priorities or objective data to base decisions on. A paired comparison analysis evaluates a range of options by comparing them against each other.

Monte Carlo Analysis

The Monte Carlo analysis is a quantitative risk management technique. The Monte Carlo analysis was developed by nuclear scientist Stanislaw Ulam in 1940 as work progressed on the atom bomb. The analysis first considers the impact of certain risks on project management such as time or budgetary constraints. Then, a computerized mathematical output gives businesses a range of possible outcomes and their probability of occurrence.

Cost-Benefit Analysis

A cost-benefit analysis is a process a business can use to analyze decisions according to the costs associated with making that decision. For a cost analysis to be effective it’s important to articulate the project in the simplest terms possible, identify the costs, determine the benefits of project implementation, assess the alternatives.

CATWOE Analysis

The CATWOE analysis is a problem-solving strategy that asks businesses to look at an issue from six different perspectives. The CATWOE analysis is an in-depth and holistic approach to problem-solving because it enables businesses to consider all perspectives. This often forces management out of habitual ways of thinking that would otherwise hinder growth and profitability. Most importantly, the CATWOE analysis allows businesses to combine multiple perspectives into a single, unifying solution.

VTDF Framework

It’s possible to identify the key players that overlap with a company’s business model with a competitor analysis. This overlapping can be analyzed in terms of key customers, technologies, distribution, and financial models. When all those elements are analyzed, it is possible to map all the facets of competition for a tech business model to understand better where a business stands in the marketplace and its possible future developments.

Pareto Analysis

The Pareto Analysis is a statistical analysis used in business decision making that identifies a certain number of input factors that have the greatest impact on income. It is based on the similarly named Pareto Principle, which states that 80% of the effect of something can be attributed to just 20% of the drivers.

Comparable Analysis

A comparable company analysis is a process that enables the identification of similar organizations to be used as a comparison to understand the business and financial performance of the target company. To find comparables you can look at two key profiles: the business and financial profile. From the comparable company analysis it is possible to understand the competitive landscape of the target organization.

SWOT Analysis

A SWOT Analysis is a framework used for evaluating the business’s Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats. It can aid in identifying the problematic areas of your business so that you can maximize your opportunities. It will also alert you to the challenges your organization might face in the future.

PESTEL Analysis

The PESTEL analysis is a framework that can help marketers assess whether macro-economic factors are affecting an organization. This is a critical step that helps organizations identify potential threats and weaknesses that can be used in other frameworks such as SWOT or to gain a broader and better understanding of the overall marketing environment.

Business Analysis

Business analysis is a research discipline that helps driving change within an organization by identifying the key elements and processes that drive value. Business analysis can also be used in Identifying new business opportunities or how to take advantage of existing business opportunities to grow your business in the marketplace.

Financial Structure

In corporate finance, the financial structure is how corporations finance their assets (usually either through debt or equity). For the sake of reverse engineering businesses, we want to look at three critical elements to determine the model used to sustain its assets: cost structure, profitability, and cash flow generation.

Financial Modeling

Financial modeling involves the analysis of accounting, finance, and business data to predict future financial performance. Financial modeling is often used in valuation, which consists of estimating the value in dollar terms of a company based on several parameters. Some of the most common financial models comprise discounted cash flows, the M&A model, and the CCA model.

Value Investing

Value investing is an investment philosophy that looks at companies’ fundamentals, to discover those companies whose intrinsic value is higher than what the market is currently pricing, in short value investing tries to evaluate a business by starting by its fundamentals.

Buffet Indicator

The Buffet Indicator is a measure of the total value of all publicly-traded stocks in a country divided by that country’s GDP. It’s a measure and ratio to evaluate whether a market is undervalued or overvalued. It’s one of Warren Buffet’s favorite measures as a warning that financial markets might be overvalued and riskier.

Financial Analysis

Financial accounting is a subdiscipline within accounting that helps organizations provide reporting related to three critical areas of a business: its assets and liabilities (balance sheet), its revenues and expenses (income statement), and its cash flows (cash flow statement). Together those areas can be used for internal and external purposes.

Post-Mortem Analysis

Post-mortem analyses review projects from start to finish to determine process improvements and ensure that inefficiencies are not repeated in the future. In the Project Management Book of Knowledge (PMBOK), this process is referred to as “lessons learned”.

Retrospective Analysis

Retrospective analyses are held after a project to determine what worked well and what did not. They are also conducted at the end of an iteration in Agile project management. Agile practitioners call these meetings retrospectives or retros. They are an effective way to check the pulse of a project team, reflect on the work performed to date, and reach a consensus on how to tackle the next sprint cycle.

Root Cause Analysis

In essence, a root cause analysis involves the identification of problem root causes to devise the most effective solutions. Note that the root cause is an underlying factor that sets the problem in motion or causes a particular situation such as non-conformance.

Blindspot Analysis


Break-even Analysis

A break-even analysis is commonly used to determine the point at which a new product or service will become profitable. The analysis is a financial calculation that tells the business how many products it must sell to cover its production costs.  A break-even analysis is a small business accounting process that tells the business what it needs to do to break even or recoup its initial investment. 

Decision Analysis

Stanford University Professor Ronald A. Howard first defined decision analysis as a profession in 1964. Over the ensuing decades, Howard has supervised many doctoral theses on the subject across topics including nuclear waste disposal, investment planning, hurricane seeding, and research strategy. Decision analysis (DA) is a systematic, visual, and quantitative decision-making approach where all aspects of a decision are evaluated before making an optimal choice.

DESTEP Analysis

A DESTEP analysis is a framework used by businesses to understand their external environment and the issues which may impact them. The DESTEP analysis is an extension of the popular PEST analysis created by Harvard Business School professor Francis J. Aguilar. The DESTEP analysis groups external factors into six categories: demographic, economic, socio-cultural, technological, ecological, and political.

STEEP Analysis

The STEEP analysis is a tool used to map the external factors that impact an organization. STEEP stands for the five key areas on which the analysis focuses: socio-cultural, technological, economic, environmental/ecological, and political. Usually, the STEEP analysis is complementary or alternative to other methods such as SWOT or PESTEL analyses.

STEEPLE Analysis

The STEEPLE analysis is a variation of the STEEP analysis. Where the step analysis comprises socio-cultural, technological, economic, environmental/ecological, and political factors as the base of the analysis. The STEEPLE analysis adds other two factors such as Legal and Ethical.

Activity-Based Management

Activity-based management (ABM) is a framework for determining the profitability of every aspect of a business. The end goal is to maximize organizational strengths while minimizing or eliminating weaknesses. Activity-based management can be described in the following steps: identification and analysis, evaluation and identification of areas of improvement.

PMESII-PT Analysis

PMESII-PT is a tool that helps users organize large amounts of operations information. PMESII-PT is an environmental scanning and monitoring technique, like the SWOT, PESTLE, and QUEST analysis. Developed by the United States Army, used as a way to execute a more complex strategy in foreign countries with a complex and uncertain context to map.

SPACE Analysis

The SPACE (Strategic Position and Action Evaluation) analysis was developed by strategy academics Alan Rowe, Richard Mason, Karl Dickel, Richard Mann, and Robert Mockler. The particular focus of this framework is strategy formation as it relates to the competitive position of an organization. The SPACE analysis is a technique used in strategic management and planning. 

Lotus Diagram

A lotus diagram is a creative tool for ideation and brainstorming. The diagram identifies the key concepts from a broad topic for simple analysis or prioritization.

Functional Decomposition

Functional decomposition is an analysis method where complex processes are examined by dividing them into their constituent parts. According to the Business Analysis Body of Knowledge (BABOK), functional decomposition “helps manage complexity and reduce uncertainty by breaking down processes, systems, functional areas, or deliverables into their simpler constituent parts and allowing each part to be analyzed independently.”

Multi-Criteria Analysis

The multi-criteria analysis provides a systematic approach for ranking adaptation options against multiple decision criteria. These criteria are weighted to reflect their importance relative to other criteria. A multi-criteria analysis (MCA) is a decision-making framework suited to solving problems with many alternative courses of action.

Stakeholder Analysis

A stakeholder analysis is a process where the participation, interest, and influence level of key project stakeholders is identified. A stakeholder analysis is used to leverage the support of key personnel and purposefully align project teams with wider organizational goals. The analysis can also be used to resolve potential sources of conflict before project commencement.

Strategic Analysis

Strategic analysis is a process to understand the organization’s environment and competitive landscape to formulate informed business decisions, to plan for the organizational structure and long-term direction. Strategic planning is also useful to experiment with business model design and assess the fit with the long-term vision of the business.

Related Strategy Concepts: Go-To-Market StrategyMarketing StrategyBusiness ModelsTech Business ModelsJobs-To-Be DoneDesign ThinkingLean Startup CanvasValue ChainValue Proposition CanvasBalanced ScorecardBusiness Model CanvasSWOT AnalysisGrowth HackingBundlingUnbundlingBootstrappingVenture CapitalPorter’s Five ForcesPorter’s Generic StrategiesPorter’s Five ForcesPESTEL AnalysisSWOTPorter’s Diamond ModelAnsoffTechnology Adoption CurveTOWSSOARBalanced ScorecardOKRAgile MethodologyValue PropositionVTDF FrameworkBCG MatrixGE McKinsey MatrixKotter’s 8-Step Change Model.

Main Guides:

About The Author

Scroll to Top