anticipatory-grief

Anticipatory Grief

Anticipatory grief is the emotional response and preparatory phase experienced before an expected loss, such as the death of a loved one. It involves a future focus on life without the person. While it offers psychological preparation and a chance to express love, challenges include emotional turmoil and the uncertainty of the grieving timeline.

Understanding Anticipatory Grief

  • Definition: Anticipatory grief is the process of mourning, coping, and emotionally preparing for an impending loss. It occurs when individuals are aware that a significant loss will occur in the near future, such as the impending death of a loved one.
  • Causes: Anticipatory grief is often triggered by events such as a terminal illness diagnosis, a loved one’s deteriorating health, or life-altering events like divorce or separation.
  • Unique Aspects:
    • Anticipatory grief is a distinct process, separate from the grief experienced after a loss has occurred.
    • It can be both a private and shared experience, involving the individual facing the loss and their loved ones.
    • The emotions and challenges of anticipatory grief may differ from traditional grief, as individuals grapple with uncertainty, hope, and loss simultaneously.

Stages of Anticipatory Grief

Anticipatory grief is not a linear process, and individuals may move back and forth between stages. The stages may include:

  • Shock and Denial: Initially, there may be disbelief or shock about the impending loss, leading to a state of denial.
  • Anxiety and Fear: As the reality of the situation sets in, anxiety and fear about the future may intensify.
  • Anger and Resentment: Feelings of anger, frustration, or resentment may arise as individuals grapple with the unfairness of the impending loss.
  • Depression and Sadness: Pervasive sadness, sorrow, and a sense of helplessness can become overwhelming.
  • Acceptance and Adaptation: Over time, individuals may begin to accept the inevitability of the loss and adapt to their new reality.

Coping Strategies for Anticipatory Grief

  • Open Communication: Honest and open conversations with loved ones and healthcare providers can provide emotional support and clarify expectations.
  • Seeking Professional Help: Therapy or counseling can offer individuals and families a safe space to process emotions and develop coping strategies.
  • Support Groups: Joining support groups with others who are experiencing or have experienced anticipatory grief can provide validation, shared experiences, and emotional support.
  • Self-Care: Prioritizing self-care, including rest, nutrition, and exercise, can help individuals cope with the physical and emotional toll of anticipatory grief.
  • Create Meaningful Moments: Making the most of the time remaining with a loved one by creating meaningful memories and cherishing moments together.
  • Advance Care Planning: Engaging in discussions and planning for end-of-life care, including legal matters and funeral arrangements, can provide a sense of control and reduce anxiety.

Impact of Anticipatory Grief

  • Psychological Impact: Anticipatory grief can lead to a range of emotions, including depression, anxiety, anger, and guilt. Individuals may also experience anticipatory bereavement dreams or thoughts about life after the loss.
  • Physical Impact: The stress of anticipatory grief can manifest physically through symptoms like fatigue, sleep disturbances, and changes in appetite.
  • Social Impact: Anticipatory grief can strain relationships, as individuals and their loved ones navigate emotional turmoil and the evolving dynamics of the impending loss.
  • Preparation: While challenging, anticipatory grief can offer individuals the opportunity to prepare emotionally and practically for the loss. This can lead to a more peaceful transition when the time comes.

Key Highlights:

  • Anticipatory grief is the process of mourning and emotionally preparing for an impending loss, such as the expected death of a loved one.
  • Causes include terminal illness diagnoses, deteriorating health, and life-altering events like divorce.
  • It is distinct from grief experienced after a loss and can be both a private and shared experience.
  • Stages of anticipatory grief include shock and denial, anxiety and fear, anger and resentment, depression and sadness, and acceptance and adaptation.
  • Coping strategies involve open communication, seeking professional help, support groups, self-care, creating meaningful moments, and advance care planning.
  • Anticipatory grief has psychological, physical, and social impacts, including a range of emotions, physical symptoms, and potential strains on relationships.
  • It also provides an opportunity for emotional and practical preparation for the impending loss, which can lead to a more peaceful transition.
FrameworkDescriptionWhen to Apply
Kübler-Ross ModelKübler-Ross Model: The Kübler-Ross model, also known as the five stages of grief, outlines a series of emotional stages experienced by individuals facing terminal illness or impending loss. The stages include denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and acceptance, though not everyone experiences all stages or in the same order. Anticipatory grief can manifest within these stages as individuals grapple with the impending loss of a loved one or their own mortality. By understanding the Kübler-Ross model, interventions can provide support and guidance to individuals experiencing anticipatory grief, helping them navigate through the emotional stages and cope with the impending loss effectively. Strategies such as counseling, support groups, and palliative care can employ the Kübler-Ross model to address anticipatory grief and promote emotional well-being.Providing support and guidance to individuals experiencing anticipatory grief, in terminal illness or end-of-life care contexts where individuals and their families face impending loss, in implementing interventions or support services that address the emotional stages of grief outlined in the Kübler-Ross model, in adopting strategies or approaches that promote coping and emotional well-being through the Kübler-Ross model principles and practices.
Dual Process Model of CopingDual Process Model of Coping: The dual process model of coping posits that individuals oscillate between loss-oriented and restoration-oriented coping strategies when faced with bereavement or anticipatory grief. Loss-oriented coping involves confronting and processing the emotional aspects of grief, while restoration-oriented coping focuses on engaging in activities that distract from or alleviate the pain of loss. Anticipatory grief may involve preoccupation with the impending loss (loss-oriented coping) as well as efforts to maintain normalcy and engage in life activities (restoration-oriented coping). By understanding the dual process model of coping, interventions can help individuals balance between confronting their emotions and engaging in adaptive coping behaviors, facilitating adjustment to the impending loss. Strategies such as grief counseling, mindfulness practices, and leisure activities can employ the dual process model to support individuals experiencing anticipatory grief and promote resilience.Facilitating adjustment and promoting resilience in individuals experiencing anticipatory grief, in bereavement support programs, end-of-life care settings, or counseling services where individuals grapple with impending loss, in implementing interventions or activities that address both loss-oriented and restoration-oriented coping strategies outlined in the dual process model, in adopting strategies or approaches that foster adaptive coping behaviors and emotional balance through the dual process model principles and practices.
Stress and Coping TheoryStress and Coping Theory: Stress and coping theory explores how individuals perceive and respond to stressors, including significant life events such as loss and bereavement. Anticipatory grief can be viewed through the lens of stress and coping theory, as individuals experience psychological distress and adaptive responses when facing the impending loss of a loved one. Coping strategies, such as problem-focused coping (taking action to address the stressor) and emotion-focused coping (managing emotional distress), play a crucial role in how individuals navigate anticipatory grief. By understanding stress and coping theory, interventions can provide individuals with coping resources and strategies to manage anticipatory grief effectively, promoting psychological resilience and adjustment. Strategies such as stress management techniques, social support networks, and cognitive-behavioral therapy can employ stress and coping theory to support individuals experiencing anticipatory grief and enhance their coping abilities.Providing coping resources and strategies to manage anticipatory grief effectively, in counseling sessions, support groups, or therapeutic interventions where individuals confront the psychological distress of impending loss, in implementing stress management programs or psychoeducational interventions that teach coping skills outlined in stress and coping theory, in adopting strategies or approaches that foster psychological resilience and adjustment through stress and coping theory principles and practices.
Attachment TheoryAttachment Theory: Attachment theory explores how early relationships and attachment patterns influence individuals’ responses to separation, loss, and death. Anticipatory grief may evoke attachment-related emotions and behaviors, such as longing for closeness with the dying person, fear of abandonment, and attempts to maintain proximity and connection. Attachment theory provides insights into how individuals cope with the impending loss of attachment figures and navigate the emotional challenges of anticipatory grief. By understanding attachment theory, interventions can address attachment-related needs and emotions, providing support and validation to individuals experiencing anticipatory grief. Strategies such as grief therapy, reminiscence activities, and attachment-focused interventions can employ attachment theory to help individuals process their emotions, strengthen interpersonal bonds, and find meaning in the face of loss.Addressing attachment-related needs and emotions in individuals experiencing anticipatory grief, in therapy sessions, support groups, or grief counseling where attachment-related issues contribute to emotional distress, in implementing interventions or activities that focus on strengthening interpersonal bonds and processing attachment-related emotions, in adopting strategies or approaches that provide support and validation through attachment theory principles and practices.
Dyadic CopingDyadic Coping: Dyadic coping refers to the mutual efforts of partners to cope with stressors and challenges within their relationship. Anticipatory grief can profoundly affect both the individual facing the impending loss and their close relationships, including their partner or family members. Dyadic coping involves shared coping efforts, emotional support, and communication strategies to navigate the challenges of anticipatory grief together. By understanding dyadic coping, interventions can focus on strengthening couple or family relationships, fostering open communication, and promoting collaborative coping strategies to address anticipatory grief effectively. Strategies such as couples therapy, family counseling, and dyadic coping interventions can employ dyadic coping principles to support both individuals and their partners in coping with the impending loss and maintaining relational well-being.Strengthening couple or family relationships and promoting collaborative coping strategies in the face of anticipatory grief, in couples therapy sessions, family counseling sessions, or support groups where partners or family members grapple with the impending loss together, in implementing interventions or activities that facilitate open communication and shared coping efforts, in adopting strategies or approaches that promote relational well-being through dyadic coping principles and practices.
Meaning-Making FrameworkMeaning-Making Framework: The meaning-making framework posits that individuals actively seek to make sense of significant life events, including loss and grief, by attributing meaning and significance to their experiences. Anticipatory grief may prompt individuals to search for meaning in the impending loss, reflect on the impact of the loss on their lives, and find ways to integrate the experience into their sense of self and worldview. The meaning-making process involves cognitive, emotional, and existential dimensions, shaping how individuals cope with anticipatory grief and derive a sense of coherence and purpose from their experiences. By understanding the meaning-making framework, interventions can support individuals in their quest for meaning, providing opportunities for reflection, expression, and existential exploration to facilitate adaptation and growth in the face of impending loss. Strategies such as narrative therapy, legacy-building activities, and existential counseling can employ the meaning-making framework to help individuals find meaning and purpose amidst anticipatory grief.Supporting individuals in their quest for meaning and facilitating adaptation in the face of impending loss, in therapy sessions, support groups, or existential counseling where individuals grapple with existential questions and search for meaning in anticipatory grief, in implementing interventions or activities that encourage reflection and existential exploration, in adopting strategies or approaches that promote growth and integration through the meaning-making framework principles and practices.
Trauma TheoryTrauma Theory: Trauma theory explores the psychological and emotional impact of traumatic events on individuals’ beliefs, behaviors, and well-being. Anticipatory grief may evoke trauma-related responses in individuals as they anticipate the loss of a loved one and confront the uncertainty and distress associated with impending death. Trauma theory provides insights into how individuals process and cope with anticipatory grief, recognizing the potential for trauma symptoms such as intrusive thoughts, avoidance behaviors, and emotional dysregulation. By understanding trauma theory, interventions can address trauma-related responses to anticipatory grief, providing support, validation, and trauma-informed care to individuals experiencing distress. Strategies such as trauma-focused therapy, mindfulness-based interventions, and psychoeducation can employ trauma theory to help individuals navigate anticipatory grief and promote healing and recovery from traumatic experiences.Addressing trauma-related responses to anticipatory grief and promoting healing and recovery, in therapy sessions, trauma-focused interventions, or trauma-informed care where individuals experience distress associated with impending loss, in implementing interventions or activities that target trauma symptoms and promote emotional regulation, in adopting strategies or approaches that provide validation and support through trauma theory principles and practices.
Resilience FrameworkResilience Framework: Resilience refers to the capacity to adapt, bounce back, and thrive in the face of adversity or significant life challenges. Anticipatory grief poses a profound emotional and existential challenge for individuals as they confront the impending loss of a loved one and navigate the complex emotions and uncertainties associated with grief. Resilience frameworks explore the factors and processes that contribute to individuals’ ability to cope effectively with adversity and maintain psychological well-being. By understanding resilience frameworks, interventions can promote resilience-building strategies, coping skills, and social support networks to help individuals facing anticipatory grief harness their inner strengths, foster hope, and navigate the grieving process with greater resilience and adaptive coping. Strategies such as resilience training, strengths-based interventions, and peer support groups can employ resilience frameworks to empower individuals and promote positive adjustment in the face of impending loss.Promoting resilience-building strategies and fostering adaptive coping in individuals facing anticipatory grief, in resilience training programs, psychoeducational interventions, or peer support groups where individuals harness their inner strengths and coping resources, in implementing interventions or activities that cultivate optimism and social support networks, in adopting strategies or approaches that empower individuals and promote positive adjustment through resilience framework principles and practices.
Social Support TheorySocial Support Theory: Social support theory posits that interpersonal relationships and social networks play a critical role in buffering stress, enhancing coping, and promoting psychological well-being in individuals facing adversity or life challenges. Anticipatory grief may evoke intense emotional distress and existential concerns in individuals as they confront the impending loss of a loved one. Social support networks provide emotional, instrumental, and informational resources that help individuals navigate the grieving process and cope with anticipatory grief more effectively. By understanding social support theory, interventions can facilitate the mobilization of social support networks, strengthen interpersonal connections, and promote coping resources to help individuals facing anticipatory grief feel supported, validated, and resilient in the face of impending loss. Strategies such as support groups, peer mentoring, and family therapy can employ social support theory to enhance social support and promote well-being in individuals experiencing anticipatory grief.Facilitating the mobilization of social support networks and promoting well-being in individuals facing anticipatory grief, in support group sessions, peer mentoring programs, or family therapy where individuals receive emotional validation and instrumental assistance, in implementing interventions or activities that strengthen interpersonal connections and promote coping resources, in adopting strategies or approaches that foster resilience and social integration through social support theory principles and practices.

Connected Thinking Frameworks

Convergent vs. Divergent Thinking

convergent-vs-divergent-thinking
Convergent thinking occurs when the solution to a problem can be found by applying established rules and logical reasoning. Whereas divergent thinking is an unstructured problem-solving method where participants are encouraged to develop many innovative ideas or solutions to a given problem. Where convergent thinking might work for larger, mature organizations where divergent thinking is more suited for startups and innovative companies.

Critical Thinking

critical-thinking
Critical thinking involves analyzing observations, facts, evidence, and arguments to form a judgment about what someone reads, hears, says, or writes.

Biases

biases
The concept of cognitive biases was introduced and popularized by the work of Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman in 1972. Biases are seen as systematic errors and flaws that make humans deviate from the standards of rationality, thus making us inept at making good decisions under uncertainty.

Second-Order Thinking

second-order-thinking
Second-order thinking is a means of assessing the implications of our decisions by considering future consequences. Second-order thinking is a mental model that considers all future possibilities. It encourages individuals to think outside of the box so that they can prepare for every and eventuality. It also discourages the tendency for individuals to default to the most obvious choice.

Lateral Thinking

lateral-thinking
Lateral thinking is a business strategy that involves approaching a problem from a different direction. The strategy attempts to remove traditionally formulaic and routine approaches to problem-solving by advocating creative thinking, therefore finding unconventional ways to solve a known problem. This sort of non-linear approach to problem-solving, can at times, create a big impact.

Bounded Rationality

bounded-rationality
Bounded rationality is a concept attributed to Herbert Simon, an economist and political scientist interested in decision-making and how we make decisions in the real world. In fact, he believed that rather than optimizing (which was the mainstream view in the past decades) humans follow what he called satisficing.

Dunning-Kruger Effect

dunning-kruger-effect
The Dunning-Kruger effect describes a cognitive bias where people with low ability in a task overestimate their ability to perform that task well. Consumers or businesses that do not possess the requisite knowledge make bad decisions. What’s more, knowledge gaps prevent the person or business from seeing their mistakes.

Occam’s Razor

occams-razor
Occam’s Razor states that one should not increase (beyond reason) the number of entities required to explain anything. All things being equal, the simplest solution is often the best one. The principle is attributed to 14th-century English theologian William of Ockham.

Lindy Effect

lindy-effect
The Lindy Effect is a theory about the ageing of non-perishable things, like technology or ideas. Popularized by author Nicholas Nassim Taleb, the Lindy Effect states that non-perishable things like technology age – linearly – in reverse. Therefore, the older an idea or a technology, the same will be its life expectancy.

Antifragility

antifragility
Antifragility was first coined as a term by author, and options trader Nassim Nicholas Taleb. Antifragility is a characteristic of systems that thrive as a result of stressors, volatility, and randomness. Therefore, Antifragile is the opposite of fragile. Where a fragile thing breaks up to volatility; a robust thing resists volatility. An antifragile thing gets stronger from volatility (provided the level of stressors and randomness doesn’t pass a certain threshold).

Systems Thinking

systems-thinking
Systems thinking is a holistic means of investigating the factors and interactions that could contribute to a potential outcome. It is about thinking non-linearly, and understanding the second-order consequences of actions and input into the system.

Vertical Thinking

vertical-thinking
Vertical thinking, on the other hand, is a problem-solving approach that favors a selective, analytical, structured, and sequential mindset. The focus of vertical thinking is to arrive at a reasoned, defined solution.

Maslow’s Hammer

einstellung-effect
Maslow’s Hammer, otherwise known as the law of the instrument or the Einstellung effect, is a cognitive bias causing an over-reliance on a familiar tool. This can be expressed as the tendency to overuse a known tool (perhaps a hammer) to solve issues that might require a different tool. This problem is persistent in the business world where perhaps known tools or frameworks might be used in the wrong context (like business plans used as planning tools instead of only investors’ pitches).

Peter Principle

peter-principle
The Peter Principle was first described by Canadian sociologist Lawrence J. Peter in his 1969 book The Peter Principle. The Peter Principle states that people are continually promoted within an organization until they reach their level of incompetence.

Straw Man Fallacy

straw-man-fallacy
The straw man fallacy describes an argument that misrepresents an opponent’s stance to make rebuttal more convenient. The straw man fallacy is a type of informal logical fallacy, defined as a flaw in the structure of an argument that renders it invalid.

Streisand Effect

streisand-effect
The Streisand Effect is a paradoxical phenomenon where the act of suppressing information to reduce visibility causes it to become more visible. In 2003, Streisand attempted to suppress aerial photographs of her Californian home by suing photographer Kenneth Adelman for an invasion of privacy. Adelman, who Streisand assumed was paparazzi, was instead taking photographs to document and study coastal erosion. In her quest for more privacy, Streisand’s efforts had the opposite effect.

Heuristic

heuristic
As highlighted by German psychologist Gerd Gigerenzer in the paper “Heuristic Decision Making,” the term heuristic is of Greek origin, meaning “serving to find out or discover.” More precisely, a heuristic is a fast and accurate way to make decisions in the real world, which is driven by uncertainty.

Recognition Heuristic

recognition-heuristic
The recognition heuristic is a psychological model of judgment and decision making. It is part of a suite of simple and economical heuristics proposed by psychologists Daniel Goldstein and Gerd Gigerenzer. The recognition heuristic argues that inferences are made about an object based on whether it is recognized or not.

Representativeness Heuristic

representativeness-heuristic
The representativeness heuristic was first described by psychologists Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky. The representativeness heuristic judges the probability of an event according to the degree to which that event resembles a broader class. When queried, most will choose the first option because the description of John matches the stereotype we may hold for an archaeologist.

Take-The-Best Heuristic

take-the-best-heuristic
The take-the-best heuristic is a decision-making shortcut that helps an individual choose between several alternatives. The take-the-best (TTB) heuristic decides between two or more alternatives based on a single good attribute, otherwise known as a cue. In the process, less desirable attributes are ignored.

Bundling Bias

bundling-bias
The bundling bias is a cognitive bias in e-commerce where a consumer tends not to use all of the products bought as a group, or bundle. Bundling occurs when individual products or services are sold together as a bundle. Common examples are tickets and experiences. The bundling bias dictates that consumers are less likely to use each item in the bundle. This means that the value of the bundle and indeed the value of each item in the bundle is decreased.

Barnum Effect

barnum-effect
The Barnum Effect is a cognitive bias where individuals believe that generic information – which applies to most people – is specifically tailored for themselves.

First-Principles Thinking

first-principles-thinking
First-principles thinking – sometimes called reasoning from first principles – is used to reverse-engineer complex problems and encourage creativity. It involves breaking down problems into basic elements and reassembling them from the ground up. Elon Musk is among the strongest proponents of this way of thinking.

Ladder Of Inference

ladder-of-inference
The ladder of inference is a conscious or subconscious thinking process where an individual moves from a fact to a decision or action. The ladder of inference was created by academic Chris Argyris to illustrate how people form and then use mental models to make decisions.

Goodhart’s Law

goodharts-law
Goodhart’s Law is named after British monetary policy theorist and economist Charles Goodhart. Speaking at a conference in Sydney in 1975, Goodhart said that “any observed statistical regularity will tend to collapse once pressure is placed upon it for control purposes.” Goodhart’s Law states that when a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure.

Six Thinking Hats Model

six-thinking-hats-model
The Six Thinking Hats model was created by psychologist Edward de Bono in 1986, who noted that personality type was a key driver of how people approached problem-solving. For example, optimists view situations differently from pessimists. Analytical individuals may generate ideas that a more emotional person would not, and vice versa.

Mandela Effect

mandela-effect
The Mandela effect is a phenomenon where a large group of people remembers an event differently from how it occurred. The Mandela effect was first described in relation to Fiona Broome, who believed that former South African President Nelson Mandela died in prison during the 1980s. While Mandela was released from prison in 1990 and died 23 years later, Broome remembered news coverage of his death in prison and even a speech from his widow. Of course, neither event occurred in reality. But Broome was later to discover that she was not the only one with the same recollection of events.

Crowding-Out Effect

crowding-out-effect
The crowding-out effect occurs when public sector spending reduces spending in the private sector.

Bandwagon Effect

bandwagon-effect
The bandwagon effect tells us that the more a belief or idea has been adopted by more people within a group, the more the individual adoption of that idea might increase within the same group. This is the psychological effect that leads to herd mentality. What in marketing can be associated with social proof.

Moore’s Law

moores-law
Moore’s law states that the number of transistors on a microchip doubles approximately every two years. This observation was made by Intel co-founder Gordon Moore in 1965 and it become a guiding principle for the semiconductor industry and has had far-reaching implications for technology as a whole.

Disruptive Innovation

disruptive-innovation
Disruptive innovation as a term was first described by Clayton M. Christensen, an American academic and business consultant whom The Economist called “the most influential management thinker of his time.” Disruptive innovation describes the process by which a product or service takes hold at the bottom of a market and eventually displaces established competitors, products, firms, or alliances.

Value Migration

value-migration
Value migration was first described by author Adrian Slywotzky in his 1996 book Value Migration – How to Think Several Moves Ahead of the Competition. Value migration is the transferal of value-creating forces from outdated business models to something better able to satisfy consumer demands.

Bye-Now Effect

bye-now-effect
The bye-now effect describes the tendency for consumers to think of the word “buy” when they read the word “bye”. In a study that tracked diners at a name-your-own-price restaurant, each diner was asked to read one of two phrases before ordering their meal. The first phrase, “so long”, resulted in diners paying an average of $32 per meal. But when diners recited the phrase “bye bye” before ordering, the average price per meal rose to $45.

Groupthink

groupthink
Groupthink occurs when well-intentioned individuals make non-optimal or irrational decisions based on a belief that dissent is impossible or on a motivation to conform. Groupthink occurs when members of a group reach a consensus without critical reasoning or evaluation of the alternatives and their consequences.

Stereotyping

stereotyping
A stereotype is a fixed and over-generalized belief about a particular group or class of people. These beliefs are based on the false assumption that certain characteristics are common to every individual residing in that group. Many stereotypes have a long and sometimes controversial history and are a direct consequence of various political, social, or economic events. Stereotyping is the process of making assumptions about a person or group of people based on various attributes, including gender, race, religion, or physical traits.

Murphy’s Law

murphys-law
Murphy’s Law states that if anything can go wrong, it will go wrong. Murphy’s Law was named after aerospace engineer Edward A. Murphy. During his time working at Edwards Air Force Base in 1949, Murphy cursed a technician who had improperly wired an electrical component and said, “If there is any way to do it wrong, he’ll find it.”

Law of Unintended Consequences

law-of-unintended-consequences
The law of unintended consequences was first mentioned by British philosopher John Locke when writing to parliament about the unintended effects of interest rate rises. However, it was popularized in 1936 by American sociologist Robert K. Merton who looked at unexpected, unanticipated, and unintended consequences and their impact on society.

Fundamental Attribution Error

fundamental-attribution-error
Fundamental attribution error is a bias people display when judging the behavior of others. The tendency is to over-emphasize personal characteristics and under-emphasize environmental and situational factors.

Outcome Bias

outcome-bias
Outcome bias describes a tendency to evaluate a decision based on its outcome and not on the process by which the decision was reached. In other words, the quality of a decision is only determined once the outcome is known. Outcome bias occurs when a decision is based on the outcome of previous events without regard for how those events developed.

Hindsight Bias

hindsight-bias
Hindsight bias is the tendency for people to perceive past events as more predictable than they actually were. The result of a presidential election, for example, seems more obvious when the winner is announced. The same can also be said for the avid sports fan who predicted the correct outcome of a match regardless of whether their team won or lost. Hindsight bias, therefore, is the tendency for an individual to convince themselves that they accurately predicted an event before it happened.

Read Next: BiasesBounded RationalityMandela EffectDunning-Kruger EffectLindy EffectCrowding Out EffectBandwagon Effect.

Main Guides:

Scroll to Top

Discover more from FourWeekMBA

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

FourWeekMBA