Psychological Reactance

Psychological Reactance

Psychological Reactance is a psychological phenomenon that occurs when individuals perceive their freedom or autonomy is being threatened or restricted. In response, they may react with resistance or opposition to regain their sense of control.

Understanding Psychological Reactance

Psychological Reactance is rooted in several fundamental principles:

  • Freedom and Autonomy: People value their freedom to make choices and decisions. When they perceive that this freedom is threatened or limited, they can experience reactance.
  • Threat Perception: Reactance occurs when individuals perceive a threat to their freedom, choices, or autonomy. This threat can be real or perceived.
  • Resistance Response: In response to the perceived threat, individuals may engage in various behaviors aimed at regaining their freedom or autonomy. This can include resistance, defiance, or opposition.
  • Restoring Balance: The primary goal of psychological reactance is to restore the perceived imbalance in freedom or autonomy. Individuals want to regain a sense of control over their choices and decisions.

Real-World Applications

Psychological Reactance has significant applications in various domains:

1. Advertising and Marketing

  • Understanding reactance helps advertisers and marketers design persuasive messages that avoid triggering resistance while still influencing consumer behavior positively.
  • Strategies that emphasize choice and freedom can be effective in marketing campaigns.

2. Health Communication

  • In healthcare, it’s essential to communicate health recommendations and restrictions effectively. Knowledge of reactance helps in crafting messages that encourage compliance without provoking resistance.
  • Public health campaigns, such as those related to vaccination or smoking cessation, need to consider reactance in their messaging.

3. Education and Parenting

  • Teachers and parents can benefit from understanding reactance when setting rules and boundaries. Effective communication with children and students can reduce resistance and opposition.
  • Encouraging autonomy and choice within limits can promote cooperation.

4. Legal and Compliance

  • In legal contexts, individuals may resist compliance with laws and regulations if they perceive them as infringing on their freedom. Legal authorities need to consider reactance in enforcement strategies.
  • Encouraging voluntary compliance and emphasizing the importance of rules can mitigate reactance.

5. Social and Interpersonal Relationships

  • In personal relationships, individuals may experience reactance if they feel their freedom to make choices or express themselves is threatened.
  • Effective communication and conflict resolution techniques can help manage reactance in relationships.

Advantages of Understanding Psychological Reactance

Understanding Psychological Reactance offers several advantages:

  • Effective Communication: Recognizing reactance helps communicators craft messages that are more persuasive and less likely to trigger resistance.
  • Conflict Resolution: In conflict situations, acknowledging and addressing reactance can facilitate resolution and cooperation.
  • Personal Growth: Individuals can benefit from understanding their own reactance tendencies, leading to improved self-awareness and emotional regulation.
  • Choice Promotion: In various contexts, emphasizing choice and autonomy can enhance individuals’ decision-making and sense of control.

Disadvantages of Understanding Psychological Reactance

While Psychological Reactance has its advantages, it also has limitations:

  • Overemphasis on Freedom: An overemphasis on individual freedom can sometimes lead to resistance against necessary rules and regulations.
  • Manipulation Concerns: In some cases, understanding reactance could be used to manipulate individuals into compliance against their best interests.
  • Complexity: Reactance is a complex phenomenon influenced by individual differences and contextual factors, making it challenging to predict and manage in every situation.
  • Misinterpretation: Misinterpreting reactance can lead to ineffective communication or conflict escalation.

Strategies for Managing Psychological Reactance

To manage Psychological Reactance effectively, consider the following strategies:

  1. Empathy and Understanding: Approach situations with empathy and an understanding of individuals’ need for autonomy.
  2. Choice and Empowerment: When possible, provide choices and opportunities for individuals to exercise their autonomy.
  3. Effective Communication: Craft messages that avoid unnecessary threats to freedom and instead focus on positive incentives and benefits.
  4. Conflict Resolution Skills: In conflicts, use conflict resolution techniques that acknowledge and address reactance while promoting cooperation.
  5. Transparency: Be transparent about the reasons behind rules and restrictions, helping individuals understand the necessity and fairness of such constraints.
  6. Engagement: Involve individuals in decision-making processes when appropriate to increase their sense of ownership and control.

When Psychological Reactance Becomes a Concern

Psychological Reactance becomes a concern when:

  • Communication Breaks Down: If resistance and opposition hinder effective communication and collaboration.
  • Conflict Escalation: When reactance leads to escalating conflicts or negative consequences for individuals or groups.
  • Non-Compliance: In situations where non-compliance with rules, regulations, or recommendations has detrimental effects on safety, health, or well-being.
  • Manipulation Occurs: If individuals or entities exploit reactance to manipulate or deceive others for personal gain.

Conclusion

Psychological Reactance is a fundamental concept that helps us understand how individuals react when they perceive threats to their freedom and autonomy. By recognizing the principles of reactance, individuals, professionals, and organizations can communicate more effectively, resolve conflicts, and promote cooperation while respecting individual autonomy. While reactance can present challenges, it also highlights the importance of choice, freedom, and empowerment in various aspects of life. Ultimately, understanding and managing psychological reactance is essential for fostering healthy relationships, effective communication, and responsible governance in today’s complex and interconnected world.

Key Highlights:

  • Overview of Psychological Reactance: Psychological reactance arises when individuals perceive their freedom or autonomy to be threatened, leading to a response aimed at regaining control and restoring balance.
  • Core Principles: Reactance is rooted in the value of freedom and autonomy, the perception of threat, and the goal of restoring balance through resistance or opposition.
  • Real-World Applications: It finds applications in advertising and marketing, health communication, education and parenting, legal and compliance contexts, and social and interpersonal relationships.
  • Advantages: Understanding reactance enables more effective communication, conflict resolution, personal growth, and promotion of choice and empowerment.
  • Disadvantages: Potential downsides include overemphasis on freedom, concerns about manipulation, complexity, and misinterpretation of reactance.
  • Strategies for Managing Reactance: Strategies involve empathy and understanding, choice and empowerment, effective communication, conflict resolution skills, transparency, and engagement.
  • Concerns with Reactance: Reactance becomes a concern when communication breaks down, conflict escalates, non-compliance occurs, or manipulation is evident.
  • Conclusion: Psychological reactance is crucial for understanding and managing responses to perceived threats to freedom and autonomy. Recognizing and addressing reactance effectively promotes healthy relationships, effective communication, and responsible governance.

Related FrameworkDescriptionWhen to Apply
Persuasion TechniquesPersuasion Techniques encompass various strategies and methods used to influence people’s attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors. – When individuals perceive that their freedom of choice or autonomy is threatened, they may experience reactance and resist persuasion attempts. – Understanding reactance can help communicators tailor their persuasive messages to avoid triggering resistance and increase the effectiveness of their communication efforts.– When crafting persuasive messages or communication strategies that aim to influence attitudes or behaviors. – To anticipate and mitigate reactance by framing messages in ways that respect individuals’ autonomy and freedom of choice, thus increasing the likelihood of persuasion and reducing resistance.
Marketing and AdvertisingMarketing and Advertising often utilize persuasive techniques to influence consumer behavior and decision-making. – However, overly aggressive or manipulative tactics can trigger reactance among consumers, leading to resistance or avoidance of the advertised products or messages. – Marketers and advertisers need to balance persuasive appeals with respect for consumer autonomy to avoid triggering reactance and achieve their communication goals effectively.– When designing marketing campaigns or advertisements to promote products or services. – To avoid triggering reactance and resistance among consumers, marketers should use persuasion techniques that respect individual autonomy and preferences, thus enhancing the effectiveness of their marketing efforts and improving consumer perceptions of the brand or product.
Freedom of Speech AdvocacyFreedom of Speech Advocacy focuses on defending individuals’ rights to express their opinions and ideas freely without censorship or restriction. – Reactance theory underscores the importance of preserving freedom of speech, as attempts to suppress or control speech can trigger reactance and resistance among individuals. – Advocates for freedom of speech often cite reactance as a reason to uphold and protect this fundamental human right in democratic societies.– When advocating for policies or practices that protect freedom of speech and expression. – Reactance theory provides a theoretical basis for defending freedom of speech as a fundamental human right and highlighting the potential negative consequences of censorship or attempts to restrict speech, thus informing advocacy efforts and policy debates in support of freedom of expression.
Negotiation StrategiesNegotiation Strategies involve techniques and tactics used to achieve favorable outcomes in negotiation situations. – Reactance can arise during negotiations when individuals perceive their autonomy or freedom of choice to be threatened. – Negotiators can mitigate reactance by adopting collaborative, problem-solving approaches that respect the autonomy and interests of all parties involved, thus fostering cooperation and reaching mutually beneficial agreements.– When engaging in negotiations or conflict resolution processes to reach agreements or settlements. – To prevent reactance and resistance during negotiations, negotiators should employ strategies that prioritize mutual respect, understanding, and collaboration, thus enhancing the likelihood of reaching successful outcomes and preserving relationships among parties.
Health Communication StrategiesHealth Communication Strategies aim to promote healthy behaviors and encourage individuals to adopt preventive measures or seek medical treatment when necessary. – Reactance theory informs health communication efforts by highlighting the potential negative effects of overly controlling or fear-based messages, which can trigger reactance and lead to counterproductive behaviors or resistance to health recommendations. – Effective health communication strategies respect individuals’ autonomy and empower them to make informed decisions about their health.– When designing health promotion campaigns or interventions to encourage healthy behaviors. – To maximize the effectiveness of health communication efforts, practitioners should employ strategies that avoid triggering reactance and empower individuals to take ownership of their health decisions, thus promoting positive behavior change and improving health outcomes within communities or populations.
Parenting and Child DevelopmentParenting and Child Development involve fostering healthy relationships and supporting children’s growth and development. – Reactance theory applies to parenting practices, as overly controlling or restrictive parenting styles can trigger reactance in children, leading to defiance or rebellion. – Parents can promote autonomy and independence in their children by providing guidance and boundaries while respecting their individual preferences and choices, thus fostering positive parent-child relationships and psychological well-being.– When parenting or providing guidance to children and adolescents. – Reactance theory can inform parenting practices by highlighting the importance of respecting children’s autonomy and individuality, thus fostering positive parent-child relationships and promoting healthy development and adjustment among children and adolescents.
Change Management StrategiesChange Management Strategies are approaches and techniques used to facilitate organizational change and transition processes. – Reactance can arise among employees during times of organizational change when they perceive their autonomy or job security to be threatened. – Change managers can mitigate reactance by involving employees in decision-making, providing clear communication and support, and addressing concerns and resistance to change through collaborative problem-solving and participation.– When implementing organizational changes or transitions within the workplace. – To minimize resistance and promote acceptance of change, change managers should employ strategies that foster employee involvement, communication, and collaboration, thus reducing reactance and facilitating smoother transitions and successful outcomes within the organization.
Crisis Communication StrategiesCrisis Communication Strategies are plans and protocols used to manage and respond to crises or emergencies effectively. – Reactance theory informs crisis communication efforts by emphasizing the importance of transparency, honesty, and empathy in messaging to avoid triggering reactance among stakeholders. – Crisis communicators should provide accurate information, acknowledge concerns, and involve stakeholders in decision-making to maintain trust and credibility during crises.– When developing crisis communication plans or responding to emergencies or critical incidents. – Reactance theory underscores the need for crisis communicators to communicate openly, honestly, and empathetically to avoid triggering reactance among stakeholders and maintain trust and credibility during crises, thus enhancing the effectiveness of crisis communication efforts and mitigating negative consequences.
Consumer Choice ArchitectureConsumer Choice Architecture refers to the design of environments or systems that influence consumer decision-making and behavior. – Reactance theory suggests that overly restrictive or coercive choice architectures can trigger reactance among consumers, leading to resistance or avoidance of the desired behaviors or outcomes. – Choice architects should design choice environments that respect consumer autonomy and preferences while nudging individuals towards desired choices or behaviors effectively.– When designing products, services, or environments to influence consumer behavior. – To avoid triggering reactance and resistance among consumers, choice architects should design choice environments that offer autonomy, transparency, and meaningful options, thus increasing the likelihood of desired behaviors or outcomes while preserving consumer trust and satisfaction.
Educational PedagogyEducational Pedagogy involves teaching methods and approaches used to facilitate learning and knowledge acquisition among students. – Reactance theory applies to education, as overly prescriptive or controlling teaching styles can trigger reactance in students, leading to disengagement or resistance to learning. – Educators can promote student engagement and motivation by providing opportunities for autonomy, choice, and self-directed learning, thus fostering positive learning experiences and outcomes.– When designing educational curricula or teaching strategies to engage students and facilitate learning. – Reactance theory informs educational practices by highlighting the importance of respecting student autonomy and fostering intrinsic motivation, thus promoting positive learning experiences and academic achievement among students across diverse educational settings and contexts.
Legal and Regulatory ComplianceLegal and Regulatory Compliance involves adhering to laws, regulations, and standards governing business practices and operations. – Reactance theory informs compliance efforts by emphasizing the importance of fair and transparent regulatory frameworks that respect individual rights and freedoms. – Regulators and policymakers should consider reactance when designing and enforcing regulations to ensure they are perceived as legitimate and effective by the public and stakeholders.– When developing or enforcing laws, regulations, or standards to govern business practices or societal behavior. – Reactance theory underscores the need for regulators and policymakers to design and implement regulatory frameworks that respect individual autonomy and rights, thus fostering compliance and cooperation among businesses and stakeholders while promoting trust and legitimacy in regulatory processes and outcomes.

Connected Thinking Frameworks

Convergent vs. Divergent Thinking

convergent-vs-divergent-thinking
Convergent thinking occurs when the solution to a problem can be found by applying established rules and logical reasoning. Whereas divergent thinking is an unstructured problem-solving method where participants are encouraged to develop many innovative ideas or solutions to a given problem. Where convergent thinking might work for larger, mature organizations where divergent thinking is more suited for startups and innovative companies.

Critical Thinking

critical-thinking
Critical thinking involves analyzing observations, facts, evidence, and arguments to form a judgment about what someone reads, hears, says, or writes.

Biases

biases
The concept of cognitive biases was introduced and popularized by the work of Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman in 1972. Biases are seen as systematic errors and flaws that make humans deviate from the standards of rationality, thus making us inept at making good decisions under uncertainty.

Second-Order Thinking

second-order-thinking
Second-order thinking is a means of assessing the implications of our decisions by considering future consequences. Second-order thinking is a mental model that considers all future possibilities. It encourages individuals to think outside of the box so that they can prepare for every and eventuality. It also discourages the tendency for individuals to default to the most obvious choice.

Lateral Thinking

lateral-thinking
Lateral thinking is a business strategy that involves approaching a problem from a different direction. The strategy attempts to remove traditionally formulaic and routine approaches to problem-solving by advocating creative thinking, therefore finding unconventional ways to solve a known problem. This sort of non-linear approach to problem-solving, can at times, create a big impact.

Bounded Rationality

bounded-rationality
Bounded rationality is a concept attributed to Herbert Simon, an economist and political scientist interested in decision-making and how we make decisions in the real world. In fact, he believed that rather than optimizing (which was the mainstream view in the past decades) humans follow what he called satisficing.

Dunning-Kruger Effect

dunning-kruger-effect
The Dunning-Kruger effect describes a cognitive bias where people with low ability in a task overestimate their ability to perform that task well. Consumers or businesses that do not possess the requisite knowledge make bad decisions. What’s more, knowledge gaps prevent the person or business from seeing their mistakes.

Occam’s Razor

occams-razor
Occam’s Razor states that one should not increase (beyond reason) the number of entities required to explain anything. All things being equal, the simplest solution is often the best one. The principle is attributed to 14th-century English theologian William of Ockham.

Lindy Effect

lindy-effect
The Lindy Effect is a theory about the ageing of non-perishable things, like technology or ideas. Popularized by author Nicholas Nassim Taleb, the Lindy Effect states that non-perishable things like technology age – linearly – in reverse. Therefore, the older an idea or a technology, the same will be its life expectancy.

Antifragility

antifragility
Antifragility was first coined as a term by author, and options trader Nassim Nicholas Taleb. Antifragility is a characteristic of systems that thrive as a result of stressors, volatility, and randomness. Therefore, Antifragile is the opposite of fragile. Where a fragile thing breaks up to volatility; a robust thing resists volatility. An antifragile thing gets stronger from volatility (provided the level of stressors and randomness doesn’t pass a certain threshold).

Systems Thinking

systems-thinking
Systems thinking is a holistic means of investigating the factors and interactions that could contribute to a potential outcome. It is about thinking non-linearly, and understanding the second-order consequences of actions and input into the system.

Vertical Thinking

vertical-thinking
Vertical thinking, on the other hand, is a problem-solving approach that favors a selective, analytical, structured, and sequential mindset. The focus of vertical thinking is to arrive at a reasoned, defined solution.

Maslow’s Hammer

einstellung-effect
Maslow’s Hammer, otherwise known as the law of the instrument or the Einstellung effect, is a cognitive bias causing an over-reliance on a familiar tool. This can be expressed as the tendency to overuse a known tool (perhaps a hammer) to solve issues that might require a different tool. This problem is persistent in the business world where perhaps known tools or frameworks might be used in the wrong context (like business plans used as planning tools instead of only investors’ pitches).

Peter Principle

peter-principle
The Peter Principle was first described by Canadian sociologist Lawrence J. Peter in his 1969 book The Peter Principle. The Peter Principle states that people are continually promoted within an organization until they reach their level of incompetence.

Straw Man Fallacy

straw-man-fallacy
The straw man fallacy describes an argument that misrepresents an opponent’s stance to make rebuttal more convenient. The straw man fallacy is a type of informal logical fallacy, defined as a flaw in the structure of an argument that renders it invalid.

Streisand Effect

streisand-effect
The Streisand Effect is a paradoxical phenomenon where the act of suppressing information to reduce visibility causes it to become more visible. In 2003, Streisand attempted to suppress aerial photographs of her Californian home by suing photographer Kenneth Adelman for an invasion of privacy. Adelman, who Streisand assumed was paparazzi, was instead taking photographs to document and study coastal erosion. In her quest for more privacy, Streisand’s efforts had the opposite effect.

Heuristic

heuristic
As highlighted by German psychologist Gerd Gigerenzer in the paper “Heuristic Decision Making,” the term heuristic is of Greek origin, meaning “serving to find out or discover.” More precisely, a heuristic is a fast and accurate way to make decisions in the real world, which is driven by uncertainty.

Recognition Heuristic

recognition-heuristic
The recognition heuristic is a psychological model of judgment and decision making. It is part of a suite of simple and economical heuristics proposed by psychologists Daniel Goldstein and Gerd Gigerenzer. The recognition heuristic argues that inferences are made about an object based on whether it is recognized or not.

Representativeness Heuristic

representativeness-heuristic
The representativeness heuristic was first described by psychologists Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky. The representativeness heuristic judges the probability of an event according to the degree to which that event resembles a broader class. When queried, most will choose the first option because the description of John matches the stereotype we may hold for an archaeologist.

Take-The-Best Heuristic

take-the-best-heuristic
The take-the-best heuristic is a decision-making shortcut that helps an individual choose between several alternatives. The take-the-best (TTB) heuristic decides between two or more alternatives based on a single good attribute, otherwise known as a cue. In the process, less desirable attributes are ignored.

Bundling Bias

bundling-bias
The bundling bias is a cognitive bias in e-commerce where a consumer tends not to use all of the products bought as a group, or bundle. Bundling occurs when individual products or services are sold together as a bundle. Common examples are tickets and experiences. The bundling bias dictates that consumers are less likely to use each item in the bundle. This means that the value of the bundle and indeed the value of each item in the bundle is decreased.

Barnum Effect

barnum-effect
The Barnum Effect is a cognitive bias where individuals believe that generic information – which applies to most people – is specifically tailored for themselves.

First-Principles Thinking

first-principles-thinking
First-principles thinking – sometimes called reasoning from first principles – is used to reverse-engineer complex problems and encourage creativity. It involves breaking down problems into basic elements and reassembling them from the ground up. Elon Musk is among the strongest proponents of this way of thinking.

Ladder Of Inference

ladder-of-inference
The ladder of inference is a conscious or subconscious thinking process where an individual moves from a fact to a decision or action. The ladder of inference was created by academic Chris Argyris to illustrate how people form and then use mental models to make decisions.

Goodhart’s Law

goodharts-law
Goodhart’s Law is named after British monetary policy theorist and economist Charles Goodhart. Speaking at a conference in Sydney in 1975, Goodhart said that “any observed statistical regularity will tend to collapse once pressure is placed upon it for control purposes.” Goodhart’s Law states that when a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure.

Six Thinking Hats Model

six-thinking-hats-model
The Six Thinking Hats model was created by psychologist Edward de Bono in 1986, who noted that personality type was a key driver of how people approached problem-solving. For example, optimists view situations differently from pessimists. Analytical individuals may generate ideas that a more emotional person would not, and vice versa.

Mandela Effect

mandela-effect
The Mandela effect is a phenomenon where a large group of people remembers an event differently from how it occurred. The Mandela effect was first described in relation to Fiona Broome, who believed that former South African President Nelson Mandela died in prison during the 1980s. While Mandela was released from prison in 1990 and died 23 years later, Broome remembered news coverage of his death in prison and even a speech from his widow. Of course, neither event occurred in reality. But Broome was later to discover that she was not the only one with the same recollection of events.

Crowding-Out Effect

crowding-out-effect
The crowding-out effect occurs when public sector spending reduces spending in the private sector.

Bandwagon Effect

bandwagon-effect
The bandwagon effect tells us that the more a belief or idea has been adopted by more people within a group, the more the individual adoption of that idea might increase within the same group. This is the psychological effect that leads to herd mentality. What in marketing can be associated with social proof.

Moore’s Law

moores-law
Moore’s law states that the number of transistors on a microchip doubles approximately every two years. This observation was made by Intel co-founder Gordon Moore in 1965 and it become a guiding principle for the semiconductor industry and has had far-reaching implications for technology as a whole.

Disruptive Innovation

disruptive-innovation
Disruptive innovation as a term was first described by Clayton M. Christensen, an American academic and business consultant whom The Economist called “the most influential management thinker of his time.” Disruptive innovation describes the process by which a product or service takes hold at the bottom of a market and eventually displaces established competitors, products, firms, or alliances.

Value Migration

value-migration
Value migration was first described by author Adrian Slywotzky in his 1996 book Value Migration – How to Think Several Moves Ahead of the Competition. Value migration is the transferal of value-creating forces from outdated business models to something better able to satisfy consumer demands.

Bye-Now Effect

bye-now-effect
The bye-now effect describes the tendency for consumers to think of the word “buy” when they read the word “bye”. In a study that tracked diners at a name-your-own-price restaurant, each diner was asked to read one of two phrases before ordering their meal. The first phrase, “so long”, resulted in diners paying an average of $32 per meal. But when diners recited the phrase “bye bye” before ordering, the average price per meal rose to $45.

Groupthink

groupthink
Groupthink occurs when well-intentioned individuals make non-optimal or irrational decisions based on a belief that dissent is impossible or on a motivation to conform. Groupthink occurs when members of a group reach a consensus without critical reasoning or evaluation of the alternatives and their consequences.

Stereotyping

stereotyping
A stereotype is a fixed and over-generalized belief about a particular group or class of people. These beliefs are based on the false assumption that certain characteristics are common to every individual residing in that group. Many stereotypes have a long and sometimes controversial history and are a direct consequence of various political, social, or economic events. Stereotyping is the process of making assumptions about a person or group of people based on various attributes, including gender, race, religion, or physical traits.

Murphy’s Law

murphys-law
Murphy’s Law states that if anything can go wrong, it will go wrong. Murphy’s Law was named after aerospace engineer Edward A. Murphy. During his time working at Edwards Air Force Base in 1949, Murphy cursed a technician who had improperly wired an electrical component and said, “If there is any way to do it wrong, he’ll find it.”

Law of Unintended Consequences

law-of-unintended-consequences
The law of unintended consequences was first mentioned by British philosopher John Locke when writing to parliament about the unintended effects of interest rate rises. However, it was popularized in 1936 by American sociologist Robert K. Merton who looked at unexpected, unanticipated, and unintended consequences and their impact on society.

Fundamental Attribution Error

fundamental-attribution-error
Fundamental attribution error is a bias people display when judging the behavior of others. The tendency is to over-emphasize personal characteristics and under-emphasize environmental and situational factors.

Outcome Bias

outcome-bias
Outcome bias describes a tendency to evaluate a decision based on its outcome and not on the process by which the decision was reached. In other words, the quality of a decision is only determined once the outcome is known. Outcome bias occurs when a decision is based on the outcome of previous events without regard for how those events developed.

Hindsight Bias

hindsight-bias
Hindsight bias is the tendency for people to perceive past events as more predictable than they actually were. The result of a presidential election, for example, seems more obvious when the winner is announced. The same can also be said for the avid sports fan who predicted the correct outcome of a match regardless of whether their team won or lost. Hindsight bias, therefore, is the tendency for an individual to convince themselves that they accurately predicted an event before it happened.

Read Next: BiasesBounded RationalityMandela EffectDunning-Kruger EffectLindy EffectCrowding Out EffectBandwagon Effect.

Main Guides:

Scroll to Top

Discover more from FourWeekMBA

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

FourWeekMBA