impulse-control

Impulse Control

Impulse control is the ability to resist immediate desires and urges, enabling better decision-making and self-regulation. It involves self-discipline and varies among individuals. Improving impulse control leads to healthier choices, emotional well-being, and reduced negative consequences of impulsivity.

Understanding Impulse Control

  • Definition: Impulse control, also known as self-control or self-regulation, refers to the capacity to inhibit or delay immediate gratification in favor of long-term goals, values, or desired behaviors. It involves resisting impulsive actions or reactions and making conscious choices based on rational thinking.
  • Key Features:
    • Delayed Gratification: Impulse control often involves postponing immediate rewards or pleasures to achieve more significant, long-term benefits.
    • Emotional Regulation: It plays a crucial role in managing and regulating emotions, preventing impulsive emotional reactions.

Mechanisms of Impulse Control

  • Prefrontal Cortex: The prefrontal cortex, particularly the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, is a brain region associated with impulse control. It is responsible for executive functions like decision-making, planning, and inhibiting impulsive responses.
  • Emotional Regulation: Effective impulse control requires the ability to regulate emotions, especially negative ones like anger, frustration, or impulsivity, that can trigger impulsive behaviors.
  • Cognitive Strategies: Cognitive strategies, such as mindfulness, cognitive reappraisal, and setting implementation intentions, can enhance impulse control by promoting self-awareness and self-regulation.

Real-World Examples of Impulse Control

  • Diet and Nutrition: Resisting the temptation to indulge in unhealthy foods or snacks and making healthier dietary choices requires impulse control.
  • Financial Management: Saving money, budgeting, and avoiding impulsive purchases exemplify impulse control in the context of personal finance.
  • Anger Management: Managing anger by responding calmly and thoughtfully instead of reacting aggressively demonstrates impulse control in emotional regulation.
  • Procrastination: Overcoming procrastination involves resisting the impulse to delay tasks and taking action promptly.

Strategies for Improving Impulse Control

  • Mindfulness Meditation: Mindfulness practices help individuals become more aware of their thoughts and emotions, allowing them to respond to impulses mindfully instead of reactively.
  • Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT): CBT techniques teach individuals to identify and challenge irrational thoughts and impulsive reactions, promoting more thoughtful responses.
  • Emotion Regulation Skills: Learning emotion regulation skills, such as deep breathing exercises or progressive muscle relaxation, can help individuals manage impulsive emotional responses.
  • Setting Clear Goals: Establishing clear, achievable goals and breaking them down into smaller, manageable steps enhances impulse control by providing a structured approach to decision-making.

Key Highlights of Impulse Control:

  • Urge and Desire Management: Impulse control involves managing immediate urges and desires.
  • Self-Discipline: It requires self-discipline and the ability to resist immediate gratification.
  • Individual Variability: Impulse control varies among individuals due to personality and situational factors.
  • Healthier Choices: Enhancing impulse control leads to making healthier lifestyle choices.
  • Temptation Resistance: It helps in resisting temptations and addictive behaviors.
  • Decision-Making Improvement: Impulse control enhances decision-making and self-regulation.
  • Self-Control Improvement: Better impulse control results in improved self-control and goal achievement.
  • Emotional and Social Well-Being: Enhanced impulse control contributes to better emotional and social well-being.
  • Reduced Negative Outcomes: Improving impulse control reduces negative consequences associated with impulsivity.
  • Instant Gratification Struggles: Challenges arise from psychological battles with the allure of instant gratification.
  • Stressful Situations: Maintaining impulse control can be difficult under stress.
  • Complex Decision-Making: Overwhelming complexity in decision-making can impact impulse control.
  • Resisting Unhealthy Foods: Overcoming the urge to eat unhealthy foods for long-term well-being.
  • Curbing Impulsive Buying: Exerting control over impulsive shopping behaviors.
  • Managing Anger: Regulating aggressive responses and managing anger through impulse control.

FrameworkDescriptionWhen to Apply
Delay DiscountingDelay Discounting: Delay discounting refers to the tendency for individuals to devalue future rewards or outcomes as the delay until their receipt increases. It is a measure of impulsivity, reflecting the preference for immediate gratification over larger, delayed rewards. Delay discounting is influenced by factors such as individual differences in self-control, temporal orientation, and reward sensitivity. By understanding delay discounting, interventions can promote strategies and techniques to enhance impulse control and decision-making skills. Strategies such as mindfulness training, reward bundling, and goal setting can help individuals overcome impulsivity and prioritize long-term goals over short-term temptations.Enhancing impulse control and decision-making skills through delay discounting, in addiction treatment, financial planning, or behavior change contexts where organizations aim to promote self-regulation and goal attainment, in implementing interventions or programs that provide mindfulness training and goal-setting strategies to mitigate impulsivity, in adopting strategies or approaches that bundle rewards and structure decision-making processes to promote long-term goal pursuit through delay discounting principles and practices.
Hot and Cold SystemHot and Cold System: The hot and cold system model distinguishes between two cognitive systems involved in decision-making: the “hot” system, which is driven by emotions, impulses, and immediate rewards, and the “cold” system, which is characterized by rational thought, planning, and delayed gratification. Impulse control involves regulating the influence of the hot system to make decisions aligned with long-term goals and values. By understanding the interplay between the hot and cold systems, interventions can equip individuals with strategies to manage impulses and make more deliberate choices. Strategies such as cognitive restructuring, emotion regulation techniques, and environmental modifications can help individuals strengthen impulse control and resist short-term temptations.Managing impulses and making deliberate choices through the hot and cold system model, in addiction recovery, weight management, or decision-making contexts where organizations aim to promote self-regulation and goal-directed behavior, in implementing interventions or workshops that provide cognitive restructuring and emotion regulation techniques to mitigate impulsive behaviors, in adopting strategies or approaches that modify environments and reduce triggers for impulsive decisions through the hot and cold system principles and practices.
Self-Regulation TheorySelf-Regulation Theory: Self-regulation theory posits that individuals actively manage their thoughts, emotions, and behaviors to achieve desired goals and outcomes. Impulse control is a key component of self-regulation, involving the ability to inhibit immediate impulses and delay gratification in pursuit of long-term objectives. Self-regulation encompasses processes such as goal setting, monitoring progress, and adjusting strategies to overcome obstacles and temptations. By fostering self-awareness and self-monitoring, interventions can empower individuals to strengthen impulse control and regulate their behavior more effectively. Strategies such as self-monitoring tools, feedback mechanisms, and implementation intentions can support individuals in managing impulses and staying on track towards their goals.Empowering individuals to regulate behavior effectively through self-regulation theory, in habit formation, productivity enhancement, or behavior change contexts where organizations aim to promote goal attainment and self-management, in implementing interventions or apps that provide self-monitoring tools and feedback mechanisms to support impulse control, in adopting strategies or approaches that facilitate the formation of implementation intentions and reinforce goal-directed behaviors through self-regulation theory principles and practices.
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT)Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT): Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) is a psychotherapeutic approach that focuses on identifying and modifying dysfunctional thought patterns and behaviors. It addresses impulse control by helping individuals recognize triggers, challenge irrational beliefs, and develop coping strategies to manage impulses effectively. CBT techniques include cognitive restructuring, behavioral experiments, and relaxation training to enhance self-control and decision-making skills. By targeting cognitive and behavioral factors contributing to impulsivity, interventions can empower individuals to make healthier choices and break harmful patterns of behavior. Strategies such as exposure therapy, skills training, and problem-solving techniques can complement CBT principles in addressing impulse control difficulties and promoting positive change.Developing healthier choices and breaking harmful patterns through cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), in addiction treatment, anxiety management, or impulse control disorders where organizations aim to promote behavior change and emotional regulation, in implementing interventions or therapy sessions that utilize cognitive restructuring and behavioral experiments to address impulsivity, in adopting strategies or approaches that provide skills training and problem-solving techniques to enhance self-control through CBT principles and practices.
Mindfulness-Based InterventionsMindfulness-Based Interventions: Mindfulness-based interventions incorporate practices such as meditation, mindfulness, and acceptance to cultivate present-moment awareness and nonjudgmental attention to thoughts and emotions. Impulse control is addressed by increasing individuals’ capacity to observe and regulate their impulses without reacting impulsively. Mindfulness-based techniques promote emotional regulation, stress reduction, and cognitive flexibility, which are essential for managing impulses effectively. By fostering a mindful approach to decision-making, interventions can help individuals pause, reflect, and respond thoughtfully rather than react impulsively to triggers. Strategies such as mindfulness meditation, body scan exercises, and mindful eating practices can strengthen impulse control and promote well-being.Cultivating present-moment awareness and emotional regulation through mindfulness-based interventions, in stress management, addiction recovery, or emotional regulation contexts where organizations aim to promote self-awareness and impulse control, in implementing interventions or mindfulness programs that teach mindfulness meditation and body scan exercises to mitigate impulsive reactions, in adopting strategies or approaches that integrate mindfulness practices into daily routines and decision-making processes through mindfulness-based intervention principles and practices.
Motivational Interviewing (MI)Motivational Interviewing (MI): Motivational Interviewing (MI) is a collaborative, goal-oriented approach to counseling and behavior change that explores individuals’ ambivalence towards change and empowers them to make informed decisions. Impulse control is addressed by enhancing individuals’ intrinsic motivation to change and strengthening their commitment to long-term goals. MI techniques include reflective listening, open-ended questioning, and affirmations to evoke individuals’ values and motivations for change. By fostering a supportive and nonjudgmental environment, interventions can help individuals explore the pros and cons of their impulsive behaviors and identify intrinsic reasons for making healthier choices. Strategies such as readiness rulers, decisional balance exercises, and change planning can enhance impulse control and promote sustainable behavior change.Exploring values and motivations for change through motivational interviewing (MI), in addiction counseling, health coaching, or behavior change contexts where organizations aim to promote intrinsic motivation and commitment to change, in implementing interventions or therapy sessions that use reflective listening and decisional balance exercises to address impulsivity, in adopting strategies or approaches that facilitate change planning and goal setting through motivational interviewing principles and practices.
Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT)Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT): Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) is a type of cognitive behavioral therapy that focuses on teaching individuals skills to manage emotions, tolerate distress, and improve interpersonal effectiveness. Impulse control is addressed through modules such as emotion regulation, distress tolerance, and mindfulness to help individuals regulate intense emotions and impulsive behaviors. DBT techniques include emotion regulation strategies, crisis survival skills, and interpersonal effectiveness training to promote adaptive coping and decision-making skills. By building emotion regulation and distress tolerance capacities, interventions can empower individuals to respond to impulses in a more adaptive and intentional manner. Strategies such as diary cards, behavioral chain analysis, and coping skill rehearsal can enhance impulse control and promote emotional well-being.Building emotion regulation and distress tolerance capacities through dialectical behavior therapy (DBT), in emotion regulation, self-harm prevention, or borderline personality disorder treatment where organizations aim to promote adaptive coping and decision-making, in implementing interventions or therapy sessions that teach emotion regulation strategies and crisis survival skills to address impulsivity, in adopting strategies or approaches that provide diary cards and coping skill rehearsal to enhance impulse control through dialectical behavior therapy principles and practices.
Self-Determination Theory (SDT)Self-Determination Theory (SDT): Self-Determination Theory (SDT) is a motivational framework that emphasizes individuals’ inherent need for autonomy, competence, and relatedness in driving behavior and well-being. Impulse control is influenced by individuals’ motivation to satisfy these basic psychological needs and pursue self-determined goals. SDT distinguishes between intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, with intrinsic motivation being more conducive to sustained impulse control and goal pursuit. By supporting individuals’ autonomy and competence, interventions can enhance intrinsic motivation and promote self-regulated behavior. Strategies such as autonomy support, goal setting, and feedback provision can foster a sense of ownership and commitment to behavioral change.Supporting autonomy and competence to foster intrinsic motivation through self-determination theory (SDT), in education, workplace motivation, or behavior change contexts where organizations aim to promote self-regulation and goal attainment, in implementing interventions or programs that provide autonomy support and goal-setting strategies to mitigate impulsivity, in adopting strategies or approaches that offer constructive feedback and foster intrinsic motivation through self-determination theory principles and practices.
Positive Psychology InterventionsPositive Psychology Interventions: Positive psychology interventions focus on promoting individuals’ strengths, well-being, and flourishing by cultivating positive emotions, engagement, relationships, meaning, and accomplishment. Impulse control is addressed by fostering positive emotions and enhancing individuals’ capacity for self-regulation and self-control. Positive psychology techniques include gratitude exercises, strengths identification, and positive self-talk to build resilience and optimism. By nurturing individuals’ positive resources and coping skills, interventions can empower them to manage impulses more effectively and pursue meaningful goals. Strategies such as daily gratitude journals, acts of kindness, and savouring experiences can enhance impulse control and foster psychological well-being.Cultivating positive emotions and building resilience through positive psychology interventions, in mental health promotion, stress reduction, or resilience building contexts where organizations aim to promote well-being and adaptive coping, in implementing interventions or workshops that provide gratitude exercises and strengths identification techniques to address impulsivity, in adopting strategies or approaches that encourage acts of kindness and positive self-talk through positive psychology principles and practices.
Goal Setting TheoryGoal Setting Theory: Goal setting theory posits that setting specific, challenging goals enhances motivation and performance by directing individuals’ attention and efforts towards goal-relevant activities. Impulse control is facilitated by establishing clear, achievable goals and monitoring progress towards their attainment. Goal setting involves defining objectives, breaking them down into manageable steps, and establishing deadlines for completion. By providing a roadmap for behavior change and accountability, interventions can empower individuals to regulate impulses and stay focused on their goals. Strategies such as SMART goal setting, action planning, and self-monitoring can enhance impulse control and promote goal-directed behavior.Providing a roadmap for behavior change and accountability through goal setting theory, in personal development, habit formation, or performance improvement contexts where organizations aim to promote goal attainment and self-regulation, in implementing interventions or coaching sessions that use SMART goal setting and action planning to address impulsivity, in adopting strategies or approaches that facilitate self-monitoring and progress tracking through goal setting theory principles and practices.

Connected Thinking Frameworks

Convergent vs. Divergent Thinking

convergent-vs-divergent-thinking
Convergent thinking occurs when the solution to a problem can be found by applying established rules and logical reasoning. Whereas divergent thinking is an unstructured problem-solving method where participants are encouraged to develop many innovative ideas or solutions to a given problem. Where convergent thinking might work for larger, mature organizations where divergent thinking is more suited for startups and innovative companies.

Critical Thinking

critical-thinking
Critical thinking involves analyzing observations, facts, evidence, and arguments to form a judgment about what someone reads, hears, says, or writes.

Biases

biases
The concept of cognitive biases was introduced and popularized by the work of Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman in 1972. Biases are seen as systematic errors and flaws that make humans deviate from the standards of rationality, thus making us inept at making good decisions under uncertainty.

Second-Order Thinking

second-order-thinking
Second-order thinking is a means of assessing the implications of our decisions by considering future consequences. Second-order thinking is a mental model that considers all future possibilities. It encourages individuals to think outside of the box so that they can prepare for every and eventuality. It also discourages the tendency for individuals to default to the most obvious choice.

Lateral Thinking

lateral-thinking
Lateral thinking is a business strategy that involves approaching a problem from a different direction. The strategy attempts to remove traditionally formulaic and routine approaches to problem-solving by advocating creative thinking, therefore finding unconventional ways to solve a known problem. This sort of non-linear approach to problem-solving, can at times, create a big impact.

Bounded Rationality

bounded-rationality
Bounded rationality is a concept attributed to Herbert Simon, an economist and political scientist interested in decision-making and how we make decisions in the real world. In fact, he believed that rather than optimizing (which was the mainstream view in the past decades) humans follow what he called satisficing.

Dunning-Kruger Effect

dunning-kruger-effect
The Dunning-Kruger effect describes a cognitive bias where people with low ability in a task overestimate their ability to perform that task well. Consumers or businesses that do not possess the requisite knowledge make bad decisions. What’s more, knowledge gaps prevent the person or business from seeing their mistakes.

Occam’s Razor

occams-razor
Occam’s Razor states that one should not increase (beyond reason) the number of entities required to explain anything. All things being equal, the simplest solution is often the best one. The principle is attributed to 14th-century English theologian William of Ockham.

Lindy Effect

lindy-effect
The Lindy Effect is a theory about the ageing of non-perishable things, like technology or ideas. Popularized by author Nicholas Nassim Taleb, the Lindy Effect states that non-perishable things like technology age – linearly – in reverse. Therefore, the older an idea or a technology, the same will be its life expectancy.

Antifragility

antifragility
Antifragility was first coined as a term by author, and options trader Nassim Nicholas Taleb. Antifragility is a characteristic of systems that thrive as a result of stressors, volatility, and randomness. Therefore, Antifragile is the opposite of fragile. Where a fragile thing breaks up to volatility; a robust thing resists volatility. An antifragile thing gets stronger from volatility (provided the level of stressors and randomness doesn’t pass a certain threshold).

Systems Thinking

systems-thinking
Systems thinking is a holistic means of investigating the factors and interactions that could contribute to a potential outcome. It is about thinking non-linearly, and understanding the second-order consequences of actions and input into the system.

Vertical Thinking

vertical-thinking
Vertical thinking, on the other hand, is a problem-solving approach that favors a selective, analytical, structured, and sequential mindset. The focus of vertical thinking is to arrive at a reasoned, defined solution.

Maslow’s Hammer

einstellung-effect
Maslow’s Hammer, otherwise known as the law of the instrument or the Einstellung effect, is a cognitive bias causing an over-reliance on a familiar tool. This can be expressed as the tendency to overuse a known tool (perhaps a hammer) to solve issues that might require a different tool. This problem is persistent in the business world where perhaps known tools or frameworks might be used in the wrong context (like business plans used as planning tools instead of only investors’ pitches).

Peter Principle

peter-principle
The Peter Principle was first described by Canadian sociologist Lawrence J. Peter in his 1969 book The Peter Principle. The Peter Principle states that people are continually promoted within an organization until they reach their level of incompetence.

Straw Man Fallacy

straw-man-fallacy
The straw man fallacy describes an argument that misrepresents an opponent’s stance to make rebuttal more convenient. The straw man fallacy is a type of informal logical fallacy, defined as a flaw in the structure of an argument that renders it invalid.

Streisand Effect

streisand-effect
The Streisand Effect is a paradoxical phenomenon where the act of suppressing information to reduce visibility causes it to become more visible. In 2003, Streisand attempted to suppress aerial photographs of her Californian home by suing photographer Kenneth Adelman for an invasion of privacy. Adelman, who Streisand assumed was paparazzi, was instead taking photographs to document and study coastal erosion. In her quest for more privacy, Streisand’s efforts had the opposite effect.

Heuristic

heuristic
As highlighted by German psychologist Gerd Gigerenzer in the paper “Heuristic Decision Making,” the term heuristic is of Greek origin, meaning “serving to find out or discover.” More precisely, a heuristic is a fast and accurate way to make decisions in the real world, which is driven by uncertainty.

Recognition Heuristic

recognition-heuristic
The recognition heuristic is a psychological model of judgment and decision making. It is part of a suite of simple and economical heuristics proposed by psychologists Daniel Goldstein and Gerd Gigerenzer. The recognition heuristic argues that inferences are made about an object based on whether it is recognized or not.

Representativeness Heuristic

representativeness-heuristic
The representativeness heuristic was first described by psychologists Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky. The representativeness heuristic judges the probability of an event according to the degree to which that event resembles a broader class. When queried, most will choose the first option because the description of John matches the stereotype we may hold for an archaeologist.

Take-The-Best Heuristic

take-the-best-heuristic
The take-the-best heuristic is a decision-making shortcut that helps an individual choose between several alternatives. The take-the-best (TTB) heuristic decides between two or more alternatives based on a single good attribute, otherwise known as a cue. In the process, less desirable attributes are ignored.

Bundling Bias

bundling-bias
The bundling bias is a cognitive bias in e-commerce where a consumer tends not to use all of the products bought as a group, or bundle. Bundling occurs when individual products or services are sold together as a bundle. Common examples are tickets and experiences. The bundling bias dictates that consumers are less likely to use each item in the bundle. This means that the value of the bundle and indeed the value of each item in the bundle is decreased.

Barnum Effect

barnum-effect
The Barnum Effect is a cognitive bias where individuals believe that generic information – which applies to most people – is specifically tailored for themselves.

First-Principles Thinking

first-principles-thinking
First-principles thinking – sometimes called reasoning from first principles – is used to reverse-engineer complex problems and encourage creativity. It involves breaking down problems into basic elements and reassembling them from the ground up. Elon Musk is among the strongest proponents of this way of thinking.

Ladder Of Inference

ladder-of-inference
The ladder of inference is a conscious or subconscious thinking process where an individual moves from a fact to a decision or action. The ladder of inference was created by academic Chris Argyris to illustrate how people form and then use mental models to make decisions.

Goodhart’s Law

goodharts-law
Goodhart’s Law is named after British monetary policy theorist and economist Charles Goodhart. Speaking at a conference in Sydney in 1975, Goodhart said that “any observed statistical regularity will tend to collapse once pressure is placed upon it for control purposes.” Goodhart’s Law states that when a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure.

Six Thinking Hats Model

six-thinking-hats-model
The Six Thinking Hats model was created by psychologist Edward de Bono in 1986, who noted that personality type was a key driver of how people approached problem-solving. For example, optimists view situations differently from pessimists. Analytical individuals may generate ideas that a more emotional person would not, and vice versa.

Mandela Effect

mandela-effect
The Mandela effect is a phenomenon where a large group of people remembers an event differently from how it occurred. The Mandela effect was first described in relation to Fiona Broome, who believed that former South African President Nelson Mandela died in prison during the 1980s. While Mandela was released from prison in 1990 and died 23 years later, Broome remembered news coverage of his death in prison and even a speech from his widow. Of course, neither event occurred in reality. But Broome was later to discover that she was not the only one with the same recollection of events.

Crowding-Out Effect

crowding-out-effect
The crowding-out effect occurs when public sector spending reduces spending in the private sector.

Bandwagon Effect

bandwagon-effect
The bandwagon effect tells us that the more a belief or idea has been adopted by more people within a group, the more the individual adoption of that idea might increase within the same group. This is the psychological effect that leads to herd mentality. What in marketing can be associated with social proof.

Moore’s Law

moores-law
Moore’s law states that the number of transistors on a microchip doubles approximately every two years. This observation was made by Intel co-founder Gordon Moore in 1965 and it become a guiding principle for the semiconductor industry and has had far-reaching implications for technology as a whole.

Disruptive Innovation

disruptive-innovation
Disruptive innovation as a term was first described by Clayton M. Christensen, an American academic and business consultant whom The Economist called “the most influential management thinker of his time.” Disruptive innovation describes the process by which a product or service takes hold at the bottom of a market and eventually displaces established competitors, products, firms, or alliances.

Value Migration

value-migration
Value migration was first described by author Adrian Slywotzky in his 1996 book Value Migration – How to Think Several Moves Ahead of the Competition. Value migration is the transferal of value-creating forces from outdated business models to something better able to satisfy consumer demands.

Bye-Now Effect

bye-now-effect
The bye-now effect describes the tendency for consumers to think of the word “buy” when they read the word “bye”. In a study that tracked diners at a name-your-own-price restaurant, each diner was asked to read one of two phrases before ordering their meal. The first phrase, “so long”, resulted in diners paying an average of $32 per meal. But when diners recited the phrase “bye bye” before ordering, the average price per meal rose to $45.

Groupthink

groupthink
Groupthink occurs when well-intentioned individuals make non-optimal or irrational decisions based on a belief that dissent is impossible or on a motivation to conform. Groupthink occurs when members of a group reach a consensus without critical reasoning or evaluation of the alternatives and their consequences.

Stereotyping

stereotyping
A stereotype is a fixed and over-generalized belief about a particular group or class of people. These beliefs are based on the false assumption that certain characteristics are common to every individual residing in that group. Many stereotypes have a long and sometimes controversial history and are a direct consequence of various political, social, or economic events. Stereotyping is the process of making assumptions about a person or group of people based on various attributes, including gender, race, religion, or physical traits.

Murphy’s Law

murphys-law
Murphy’s Law states that if anything can go wrong, it will go wrong. Murphy’s Law was named after aerospace engineer Edward A. Murphy. During his time working at Edwards Air Force Base in 1949, Murphy cursed a technician who had improperly wired an electrical component and said, “If there is any way to do it wrong, he’ll find it.”

Law of Unintended Consequences

law-of-unintended-consequences
The law of unintended consequences was first mentioned by British philosopher John Locke when writing to parliament about the unintended effects of interest rate rises. However, it was popularized in 1936 by American sociologist Robert K. Merton who looked at unexpected, unanticipated, and unintended consequences and their impact on society.

Fundamental Attribution Error

fundamental-attribution-error
Fundamental attribution error is a bias people display when judging the behavior of others. The tendency is to over-emphasize personal characteristics and under-emphasize environmental and situational factors.

Outcome Bias

outcome-bias
Outcome bias describes a tendency to evaluate a decision based on its outcome and not on the process by which the decision was reached. In other words, the quality of a decision is only determined once the outcome is known. Outcome bias occurs when a decision is based on the outcome of previous events without regard for how those events developed.

Hindsight Bias

hindsight-bias
Hindsight bias is the tendency for people to perceive past events as more predictable than they actually were. The result of a presidential election, for example, seems more obvious when the winner is announced. The same can also be said for the avid sports fan who predicted the correct outcome of a match regardless of whether their team won or lost. Hindsight bias, therefore, is the tendency for an individual to convince themselves that they accurately predicted an event before it happened.

Read Next: BiasesBounded RationalityMandela EffectDunning-Kruger EffectLindy EffectCrowding Out EffectBandwagon Effect.

Main Guides:

Scroll to Top

Discover more from FourWeekMBA

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

FourWeekMBA