competitive-analysis-matrix

Competitive Analysis Matrix In A Nutshell

The Competitive Analysis Matrix is a tool that allows businesses to define new growth opportunities. As the name suggests, the matrix is used to critically profile a company against its main competitors. The purpose of the Competitive Analysis Matrix is to provide a broad overview of the competitive landscape in a given industry. It helps businesses quickly identify gaps in product or service features and develop a point of differentiation as a result.

Understanding the Competitive Analysis Matrix

The matrix itself is simply a spreadsheet with specific features of an industry assigned to each row and the players (or competitors) of an industry assigned to each column. Then, each player is given a score based on how well they satisfy each feature. In most matrices, 1 is the lowest score and 5 is the highest. 

For example, a budget airline may score a 5 for affordability but a 3 for customer service and a 2 for in-flight dining. A competitor may then use the matrix to see if it might be able to offer better customer service and food choices while remaining competitive in the budget airline industry.

Four elements of a basic Competitive Analysis Matrix

  1. Grouped feature sets. To simplify the matrix, it’s important to group related features into a single row. Some large and complex industries may have hundreds of assessable features, which can quickly lead to overwhelm for analysts.
  2. A holistic view. Although the matrix is touted as identifying gaps in the features of products or services, businesses should not stop there. Instead, they should look at attributes that affect the entire business to consumer process. These include delivery, installation, distribution, and after-sales support. 
  3. Accurate measurements. Remember that the Competitive Analysis Matrix is a qualitative comparison. Refrain from giving yes or no answers.
  4. Customer focus. Resist the urge to assess product features that competitors are offering, since many of these features are superfluous to consumer needs. Indeed, the best approach is to determine what the consumer wants and then measure success against those features.

Disadvantages of the Competitive Analysis Matrix

Like many adaptable competitive matrices, there are some limitations to using the Competitive Analysis Matrix.

These include:

  • Subjective scores. Given that the scores for each attribute are subjectively assigned, there is likely to be some degree of inaccuracy. This is particularly prevalent when a business assigns scores to its competitors.
  • Incomplete information. While one business may know its distribution network inside and out, it may be difficult to obtain sufficient publicly available information on the network of a competitor. 
  • Dependent attributes. In some cases, a strength in one attribute may result in the weakness of another within the same organization. For example, the low-fare model (strength) of a budget airline may be diluted if the airline opts to increase the poor standard of their food (weakness). In this case, the fixing of the weakness creates another competitive disadvantage if the airline cannot maintain its low prices.

Key takeaways:

  • The Competitive Analysis Matrix allows businesses to quickly assess their market positioning and determine where their competitive strengths lie.
  • The Competitive Analysis Matrix should have four elements as a bare minimum: grouped feature sets, a holistic view, accurate measurements, and a focus on consumer needs.
  • The Competitive Analysis Matrix has several limitations, owing to subjective and sometimes dependent attributes and also a lack of publicly available information.

Connected Analysis Frameworks

Cynefin Framework

cynefin-framework
The Cynefin Framework gives context to decision making and problem-solving by providing context and guiding an appropriate response. The five domains of the Cynefin Framework comprise obvious, complicated, complex, chaotic domains and disorder if a domain has not been determined at all.

SWOT Analysis

swot-analysis
A SWOT Analysis is a framework used for evaluating the business’s Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats. It can aid in identifying the problematic areas of your business so that you can maximize your opportunities. It will also alert you to the challenges your organization might face in the future.

Personal SWOT Analysis

personal-swot-analysis
The SWOT analysis is commonly used as a strategic planning tool in business. However, it is also well suited for personal use in addressing a specific goal or problem. A personal SWOT analysis helps individuals identify their strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats.

Pareto Analysis

pareto-principle-pareto-analysis
The Pareto Analysis is a statistical analysis used in business decision making that identifies a certain number of input factors that have the greatest impact on income. It is based on the similarly named Pareto Principle, which states that 80% of the effect of something can be attributed to just 20% of the drivers.

Failure Mode And Effects Analysis

failure-mode-and-effects-analysis
A failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) is a structured approach to identifying design failures in a product or process. Developed in the 1950s, the failure mode and effects analysis is one the earliest methodologies of its kind. It enables organizations to anticipate a range of potential failures during the design stage.

Blindspot Analysis

blindspot-analysis
A Blindspot Analysis is a means of unearthing incorrect or outdated assumptions that can harm decision making in an organization. The term “blindspot analysis” was first coined by American economist Michael Porter. Porter argued that in business, outdated ideas or strategies had the potential to stifle modern ideas and prevent them from succeeding. Furthermore, decisions a business thought were made with care caused projects to fail because major factors had not been duly considered.

Comparable Company Analysis

comparable-company-analysis
A comparable company analysis is a process that enables the identification of similar organizations to be used as a comparison to understand the business and financial performance of the target company. To find comparables you can look at two key profiles: the business and financial profile. From the comparable company analysis it is possible to understand the competitive landscape of the target organization.

Cost-Benefit Analysis

cost-benefit-analysis
A cost-benefit analysis is a process a business can use to analyze decisions according to the costs associated with making that decision. For a cost analysis to be effective it’s important to articulate the project in the simplest terms possible, identify the costs, determine the benefits of project implementation, assess the alternatives.

Agile Business Analysis

agile-business-analysis
Agile Business Analysis (AgileBA) is certification in the form of guidance and training for business analysts seeking to work in agile environments. To support this shift, AgileBA also helps the business analyst relate Agile projects to a wider organizational mission or strategy. To ensure that analysts have the necessary skills and expertise, AgileBA certification was developed.

SOAR Analysis

soar-analysis
A SOAR analysis is a technique that helps businesses at a strategic planning level to: Focus on what they are doing right. Determine which skills could be enhanced. Understand the desires and motivations of their stakeholders.

STEEPLE Analysis

steeple-analysis
The STEEPLE analysis is a variation of the STEEP analysis. Where the step analysis comprises socio-cultural, technological, economic, environmental/ecological, and political factors as the base of the analysis. The STEEPLE analysis adds other two factors such as Legal and Ethical.

Pestel Analysis

pestel-analysis
The PESTEL analysis is a framework that can help marketers assess whether macro-economic factors are affecting an organization. This is a critical step that helps organizations identify potential threats and weaknesses that can be used in other frameworks such as SWOT or to gain a broader and better understanding of the overall marketing environment.

DESTEP Analysis

destep-analysis
A DESTEP analysis is a framework used by businesses to understand their external environment and the issues which may impact them. The DESTEP analysis is an extension of the popular PEST analysis created by Harvard Business School professor Francis J. Aguilar. The DESTEP analysis groups external factors into six categories: demographic, economic, socio-cultural, technological, ecological, and political.

Paired Comparison Analysis

paired-comparison-analysis
A paired comparison analysis is used to rate or rank options where evaluation criteria are subjective by nature. The analysis is particularly useful when there is a lack of clear priorities or objective data to base decisions on. A paired comparison analysis evaluates a range of options by comparing them against each other.

Related Strategy Concepts: Go-To-Market StrategyMarketing StrategyBusiness ModelsTech Business ModelsJobs-To-Be DoneDesign ThinkingLean Startup CanvasValue ChainValue Proposition CanvasBalanced ScorecardBusiness Model CanvasSWOT AnalysisGrowth HackingBundlingUnbundlingBootstrappingVenture CapitalPorter’s Five ForcesPorter’s Generic StrategiesPorter’s Five ForcesPESTEL AnalysisSWOTPorter’s Diamond ModelAnsoffTechnology Adoption CurveTOWSSOARBalanced ScorecardOKRAgile MethodologyValue PropositionVTDF FrameworkBCG MatrixGE McKinsey MatrixKotter’s 8-Step Change Model.

Other strategy frameworks:

Additional resources:

Scroll to Top
FourWeekMBA