Chi-squared

Chi-squared Test

The chi-squared (χ²) test, pronounced as “kai-squared” test, is a statistical test used to assess the association or independence between two categorical variables in a contingency table. It provides a way to determine whether the observed frequencies of categories in the table are significantly different from what would be expected under the assumption of independence. In other words, the chi-squared test helps answer the question: “Are these two categorical variables related or unrelated?”

Key Characteristics of the Chi-Squared Test:

  1. Type of Variables: The chi-squared test is used when both variables under investigation are categorical in nature, meaning they involve distinct categories or groups.
  2. Objective: The primary objective of the test is to determine whether there is a statistically significant association between the two categorical variables.
  3. Hypothesis Testing: The test involves the formulation of null and alternative hypotheses, allowing researchers to make inferential decisions based on the data.
  4. Degrees of Freedom: The number of degrees of freedom for the chi-squared test is determined by the dimensions of the contingency table and the specific test variation being used.

Variations of the Chi-Squared Test

There are two main variations of the chi-squared test:

1. Chi-Squared Test for Independence (χ² Test for Independence):

  • This variation assesses whether there is a significant association or independence between two categorical variables. It is commonly used with contingency tables, where data is cross-tabulated to examine the relationship between the variables.

2. Chi-Squared Goodness-of-Fit Test (χ² Goodness-of-Fit Test):

  • The goodness-of-fit test determines whether observed data fits a particular theoretical distribution or expected proportions. It is often used to compare observed and expected frequencies in one categorical variable.

Conducting the Chi-Squared Test for Independence

Let’s walk through the steps to conduct a chi-squared test for independence:

Step 1: Formulate Hypotheses

  • Null Hypothesis (H0): There is no significant association between the two categorical variables; they are independent.
  • Alternative Hypothesis (Ha): There is a significant association between the two categorical variables; they are not independent.

Step 2: Create a Contingency Table

  • Construct a contingency table that displays the observed frequencies of each category for both variables. The table will have rows and columns corresponding to the categories of the two variables.

Step 3: Calculate Expected Frequencies

  • Calculate the expected frequencies for each cell in the contingency table under the assumption of independence. This is typically done using the formula: Expected Frequency = (Row Total × Column Total) / Grand Total

Step 4: Calculate the Chi-Squared Statistic

  • Compute the chi-squared (χ²) statistic using the formula: χ² = Σ [(Observed Frequency – Expected Frequency)² / Expected Frequency] where Σ denotes summation over all cells in the table.

Step 5: Determine Degrees of Freedom

  • Determine the degrees of freedom (df) for the chi-squared test. The degrees of freedom depend on the dimensions of the contingency table and are calculated as: df = (Number of Rows – 1) × (Number of Columns – 1)

Step 6: Set the Significance Level

  • Choose a significance level (α) to determine the threshold for statistical significance. Commonly used values are 0.05 and 0.01, but the choice depends on the specific research question and context.

Step 7: Compare the Chi-Squared Statistic

  • Compare the calculated chi-squared statistic to the critical value from the chi-squared distribution table at the chosen significance level (α) and degrees of freedom (df).

Step 8: Make a Decision

  • If the calculated chi-squared statistic is greater than the critical value, reject the null hypothesis (H0) and conclude that there is a significant association between the two categorical variables.
  • If the calculated chi-squared statistic is less than or equal to the critical value, fail to reject the null hypothesis (H0) and conclude that there is no significant association between the two categorical variables.

Step 9: Interpret Results

  • Interpret the results in the context of the research question. Describe the nature and strength of the association, if significant, and provide practical insights.

Real-Life Applications of the Chi-Squared Test

The chi-squared test is a versatile tool with applications across various fields:

1. Medical Research:

  • In clinical trials, researchers may use the chi-squared test to determine if there is a significant association between a treatment and a specific outcome, such as the effectiveness of a new drug in reducing symptoms.

2. Market Research:

  • Market analysts use chi-squared tests to investigate the relationship between customer demographics (e.g., age, gender) and purchasing behavior (e.g., product preferences).

3. Social Sciences:

  • Sociologists and political scientists use chi-squared tests to examine the association between variables like political affiliation and voting behavior.

4. Quality Control:

  • Manufacturing industries use the chi-squared test to assess whether the observed quality of products conforms to expected standards.

5. Genetics:

  • Geneticists employ chi-squared tests to analyze the inheritance patterns of genetic traits and determine if observed outcomes match expected Mendelian ratios.

Limitations and Considerations

While the chi-squared test is a valuable statistical tool, it has certain limitations and considerations:

1. Categorical Data:

  • The chi-squared test is suitable only for categorical data. It cannot be used to analyze continuous or interval data.

2. Assumption of Independence:

  • The test assumes that the variables are independent. If there is a true association, but the sample size is small, the test may fail to detect it.

3. Large Sample Size:

  • In cases with a large sample size, the test may detect small, practically insignificant associations as statistically significant.

4. Cell Frequencies:

  • When applying the test, it is essential to ensure that the expected frequencies in each cell are not too small. For very small expected frequencies, an alternative test like Fisher’s exact test may be more appropriate.

5. Post-Hoc Analysis:

  • If the chi-squared test indicates a significant association, further post-hoc analyses may be needed to understand the nature of the relationship.

Conclusion: Deciphering Relationships in Data

The chi-squared test is a fundamental statistical tool for assessing the association or independence between two categorical variables. By following a structured process, researchers and analysts can use this test to draw meaningful conclusions from data, make informed decisions, and uncover valuable insights across a wide range of fields and applications.

Related ConceptsDescriptionPurposeKey Components/Steps
Chi-squared TestThe Chi-squared Test is a statistical test used to determine whether there is a significant association between two categorical variables. It compares the observed frequencies of categories with the expected frequencies under the null hypothesis of independence.To assess the independence or association between two categorical variables in a contingency table, allowing researchers to determine if there is a significant relationship between the variables based on observed data, providing evidence for making inferences about population parameters or relationships.1. Construction of Contingency Table: Organize observed frequencies of categories into a contingency table based on the two categorical variables. 2. Calculation of Expected Frequencies: Calculate the expected frequencies for each cell of the contingency table under the assumption of independence. 3. Calculation of Chi-squared Statistic: Compute the Chi-squared statistic using the observed and expected frequencies. 4. Determination of Degrees of Freedom: Determine the degrees of freedom based on the dimensions of the contingency table. 5. Comparison with Critical Value or p-value: Compare the calculated Chi-squared statistic with the critical value from the Chi-squared distribution or calculate the p-value. 6. Conclusion: Make a decision regarding the null hypothesis based on the comparison, considering the significance level.
Pearson’s Chi-squared TestPearson’s Chi-squared Test is a specific form of the Chi-squared Test used when analyzing contingency tables with categorical data. It compares observed frequencies with expected frequencies to assess the goodness-of-fit between the observed data and the expected distribution specified by the null hypothesis.To evaluate the goodness-of-fit between observed frequencies of categories in a contingency table and the expected frequencies specified by the null hypothesis, allowing researchers to determine if there is a significant discrepancy between observed and expected distributions, providing evidence for or against the null hypothesis.1. Construction of Contingency Table: Organize observed frequencies of categories into a contingency table based on the categorical variable. 2. Calculation of Expected Frequencies: Calculate the expected frequencies for each category under the assumption of the specified distribution. 3. Calculation of Chi-squared Statistic: Compute the Chi-squared statistic using the observed and expected frequencies. 4. Determination of Degrees of Freedom: Determine the degrees of freedom based on the dimensions of the contingency table. 5. Comparison with Critical Value or p-value: Compare the calculated Chi-squared statistic with the critical value from the Chi-squared distribution or calculate the p-value. 6. Conclusion: Make a decision regarding the null hypothesis based on the comparison, considering the significance level.
McNemar’s TestMcNemar’s Test is a statistical test used to analyze paired categorical data obtained from before-and-after or matched-pair experimental designs. It assesses whether there is a significant change or association between the two categorical variables over time or conditions.To evaluate changes or associations between paired categorical variables in a before-and-after or matched-pair design, allowing researchers to determine if there is a significant difference in proportions or frequencies between the paired observations, providing evidence for analyzing interventions or treatments.1. Construction of Contingency Table: Organize paired categorical data into a 2×2 contingency table based on the before-and-after or matched-pair design. 2. Calculation of McNemar’s Statistic: Compute McNemar’s statistic using the observed frequencies in the contingency table. 3. Determination of Degrees of Freedom: Determine the degrees of freedom based on the dimensions of the contingency table. 4. Comparison with Critical Value or p-value: Compare the calculated McNemar’s statistic with the critical value from the Chi-squared distribution or calculate the p-value. 5. Conclusion: Make a decision regarding the null hypothesis based on the comparison, considering the significance level.
Fisher’s Exact TestFisher’s Exact Test is a statistical test used to analyze contingency tables with small sample sizes or sparse data. It calculates the exact probability of observing a particular distribution of frequencies under the null hypothesis of independence, providing a more accurate assessment of significance compared to Chi-squared tests in such cases.To assess the association or independence between two categorical variables in a contingency table with small sample sizes or sparse data, allowing researchers to determine if there is a significant relationship based on exact probabilities, providing robust evidence for hypothesis testing in situations where Chi-squared tests may be unreliable.1. Construction of Contingency Table: Organize observed frequencies of categories into a contingency table based on the two categorical variables. 2. Calculation of Exact Probability: Compute the exact probability of observing the contingency table distribution under the null hypothesis using combinatorial methods. 3. Comparison with Critical Value or p-value: Compare the calculated exact probability with the significance level to determine significance. 4. Conclusion: Make a decision regarding the null hypothesis based on the comparison, considering the significance level.

Connected Analysis Frameworks

Failure Mode And Effects Analysis

failure-mode-and-effects-analysis
A failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) is a structured approach to identifying design failures in a product or process. Developed in the 1950s, the failure mode and effects analysis is one the earliest methodologies of its kind. It enables organizations to anticipate a range of potential failures during the design stage.

Agile Business Analysis

agile-business-analysis
Agile Business Analysis (AgileBA) is certification in the form of guidance and training for business analysts seeking to work in agile environments. To support this shift, AgileBA also helps the business analyst relate Agile projects to a wider organizational mission or strategy. To ensure that analysts have the necessary skills and expertise, AgileBA certification was developed.

Business Valuation

valuation
Business valuations involve a formal analysis of the key operational aspects of a business. A business valuation is an analysis used to determine the economic value of a business or company unit. It’s important to note that valuations are one part science and one part art. Analysts use professional judgment to consider the financial performance of a business with respect to local, national, or global economic conditions. They will also consider the total value of assets and liabilities, in addition to patented or proprietary technology.

Paired Comparison Analysis

paired-comparison-analysis
A paired comparison analysis is used to rate or rank options where evaluation criteria are subjective by nature. The analysis is particularly useful when there is a lack of clear priorities or objective data to base decisions on. A paired comparison analysis evaluates a range of options by comparing them against each other.

Monte Carlo Analysis

monte-carlo-analysis
The Monte Carlo analysis is a quantitative risk management technique. The Monte Carlo analysis was developed by nuclear scientist Stanislaw Ulam in 1940 as work progressed on the atom bomb. The analysis first considers the impact of certain risks on project management such as time or budgetary constraints. Then, a computerized mathematical output gives businesses a range of possible outcomes and their probability of occurrence.

Cost-Benefit Analysis

cost-benefit-analysis
A cost-benefit analysis is a process a business can use to analyze decisions according to the costs associated with making that decision. For a cost analysis to be effective it’s important to articulate the project in the simplest terms possible, identify the costs, determine the benefits of project implementation, assess the alternatives.

CATWOE Analysis

catwoe-analysis
The CATWOE analysis is a problem-solving strategy that asks businesses to look at an issue from six different perspectives. The CATWOE analysis is an in-depth and holistic approach to problem-solving because it enables businesses to consider all perspectives. This often forces management out of habitual ways of thinking that would otherwise hinder growth and profitability. Most importantly, the CATWOE analysis allows businesses to combine multiple perspectives into a single, unifying solution.

VTDF Framework

competitor-analysis
It’s possible to identify the key players that overlap with a company’s business model with a competitor analysis. This overlapping can be analyzed in terms of key customers, technologies, distribution, and financial models. When all those elements are analyzed, it is possible to map all the facets of competition for a tech business model to understand better where a business stands in the marketplace and its possible future developments.

Pareto Analysis

pareto-principle-pareto-analysis
The Pareto Analysis is a statistical analysis used in business decision making that identifies a certain number of input factors that have the greatest impact on income. It is based on the similarly named Pareto Principle, which states that 80% of the effect of something can be attributed to just 20% of the drivers.

Comparable Analysis

comparable-company-analysis
A comparable company analysis is a process that enables the identification of similar organizations to be used as a comparison to understand the business and financial performance of the target company. To find comparables you can look at two key profiles: the business and financial profile. From the comparable company analysis it is possible to understand the competitive landscape of the target organization.

SWOT Analysis

swot-analysis
A SWOT Analysis is a framework used for evaluating the business’s Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats. It can aid in identifying the problematic areas of your business so that you can maximize your opportunities. It will also alert you to the challenges your organization might face in the future.

PESTEL Analysis

pestel-analysis
The PESTEL analysis is a framework that can help marketers assess whether macro-economic factors are affecting an organization. This is a critical step that helps organizations identify potential threats and weaknesses that can be used in other frameworks such as SWOT or to gain a broader and better understanding of the overall marketing environment.

Business Analysis

business-analysis
Business analysis is a research discipline that helps driving change within an organization by identifying the key elements and processes that drive value. Business analysis can also be used in Identifying new business opportunities or how to take advantage of existing business opportunities to grow your business in the marketplace.

Financial Structure

financial-structure
In corporate finance, the financial structure is how corporations finance their assets (usually either through debt or equity). For the sake of reverse engineering businesses, we want to look at three critical elements to determine the model used to sustain its assets: cost structure, profitability, and cash flow generation.

Financial Modeling

financial-modeling
Financial modeling involves the analysis of accounting, finance, and business data to predict future financial performance. Financial modeling is often used in valuation, which consists of estimating the value in dollar terms of a company based on several parameters. Some of the most common financial models comprise discounted cash flows, the M&A model, and the CCA model.

Value Investing

value-investing
Value investing is an investment philosophy that looks at companies’ fundamentals, to discover those companies whose intrinsic value is higher than what the market is currently pricing, in short value investing tries to evaluate a business by starting by its fundamentals.

Buffet Indicator

buffet-indicator
The Buffet Indicator is a measure of the total value of all publicly-traded stocks in a country divided by that country’s GDP. It’s a measure and ratio to evaluate whether a market is undervalued or overvalued. It’s one of Warren Buffet’s favorite measures as a warning that financial markets might be overvalued and riskier.

Financial Analysis

financial-accounting
Financial accounting is a subdiscipline within accounting that helps organizations provide reporting related to three critical areas of a business: its assets and liabilities (balance sheet), its revenues and expenses (income statement), and its cash flows (cash flow statement). Together those areas can be used for internal and external purposes.

Post-Mortem Analysis

post-mortem-analysis
Post-mortem analyses review projects from start to finish to determine process improvements and ensure that inefficiencies are not repeated in the future. In the Project Management Book of Knowledge (PMBOK), this process is referred to as “lessons learned”.

Retrospective Analysis

retrospective-analysis
Retrospective analyses are held after a project to determine what worked well and what did not. They are also conducted at the end of an iteration in Agile project management. Agile practitioners call these meetings retrospectives or retros. They are an effective way to check the pulse of a project team, reflect on the work performed to date, and reach a consensus on how to tackle the next sprint cycle.

Root Cause Analysis

root-cause-analysis
In essence, a root cause analysis involves the identification of problem root causes to devise the most effective solutions. Note that the root cause is an underlying factor that sets the problem in motion or causes a particular situation such as non-conformance.

Blindspot Analysis

blindspot-analysis

Break-even Analysis

break-even-analysis
A break-even analysis is commonly used to determine the point at which a new product or service will become profitable. The analysis is a financial calculation that tells the business how many products it must sell to cover its production costs.  A break-even analysis is a small business accounting process that tells the business what it needs to do to break even or recoup its initial investment. 

Decision Analysis

decision-analysis
Stanford University Professor Ronald A. Howard first defined decision analysis as a profession in 1964. Over the ensuing decades, Howard has supervised many doctoral theses on the subject across topics including nuclear waste disposal, investment planning, hurricane seeding, and research strategy. Decision analysis (DA) is a systematic, visual, and quantitative decision-making approach where all aspects of a decision are evaluated before making an optimal choice.

DESTEP Analysis

destep-analysis
A DESTEP analysis is a framework used by businesses to understand their external environment and the issues which may impact them. The DESTEP analysis is an extension of the popular PEST analysis created by Harvard Business School professor Francis J. Aguilar. The DESTEP analysis groups external factors into six categories: demographic, economic, socio-cultural, technological, ecological, and political.

STEEP Analysis

steep-analysis
The STEEP analysis is a tool used to map the external factors that impact an organization. STEEP stands for the five key areas on which the analysis focuses: socio-cultural, technological, economic, environmental/ecological, and political. Usually, the STEEP analysis is complementary or alternative to other methods such as SWOT or PESTEL analyses.

STEEPLE Analysis

steeple-analysis
The STEEPLE analysis is a variation of the STEEP analysis. Where the step analysis comprises socio-cultural, technological, economic, environmental/ecological, and political factors as the base of the analysis. The STEEPLE analysis adds other two factors such as Legal and Ethical.

Activity-Based Management

activity-based-management-abm
Activity-based management (ABM) is a framework for determining the profitability of every aspect of a business. The end goal is to maximize organizational strengths while minimizing or eliminating weaknesses. Activity-based management can be described in the following steps: identification and analysis, evaluation and identification of areas of improvement.

PMESII-PT Analysis

pmesii-pt
PMESII-PT is a tool that helps users organize large amounts of operations information. PMESII-PT is an environmental scanning and monitoring technique, like the SWOT, PESTLE, and QUEST analysis. Developed by the United States Army, used as a way to execute a more complex strategy in foreign countries with a complex and uncertain context to map.

SPACE Analysis

space-analysis
The SPACE (Strategic Position and Action Evaluation) analysis was developed by strategy academics Alan Rowe, Richard Mason, Karl Dickel, Richard Mann, and Robert Mockler. The particular focus of this framework is strategy formation as it relates to the competitive position of an organization. The SPACE analysis is a technique used in strategic management and planning. 

Lotus Diagram

lotus-diagram
A lotus diagram is a creative tool for ideation and brainstorming. The diagram identifies the key concepts from a broad topic for simple analysis or prioritization.

Functional Decomposition

functional-decomposition
Functional decomposition is an analysis method where complex processes are examined by dividing them into their constituent parts. According to the Business Analysis Body of Knowledge (BABOK), functional decomposition “helps manage complexity and reduce uncertainty by breaking down processes, systems, functional areas, or deliverables into their simpler constituent parts and allowing each part to be analyzed independently.”

Multi-Criteria Analysis

multi-criteria-analysis
The multi-criteria analysis provides a systematic approach for ranking adaptation options against multiple decision criteria. These criteria are weighted to reflect their importance relative to other criteria. A multi-criteria analysis (MCA) is a decision-making framework suited to solving problems with many alternative courses of action.

Stakeholder Analysis

stakeholder-analysis
A stakeholder analysis is a process where the participation, interest, and influence level of key project stakeholders is identified. A stakeholder analysis is used to leverage the support of key personnel and purposefully align project teams with wider organizational goals. The analysis can also be used to resolve potential sources of conflict before project commencement.

Strategic Analysis

strategic-analysis
Strategic analysis is a process to understand the organization’s environment and competitive landscape to formulate informed business decisions, to plan for the organizational structure and long-term direction. Strategic planning is also useful to experiment with business model design and assess the fit with the long-term vision of the business.

Related Strategy Concepts: Go-To-Market StrategyMarketing StrategyBusiness ModelsTech Business ModelsJobs-To-Be DoneDesign ThinkingLean Startup CanvasValue ChainValue Proposition CanvasBalanced ScorecardBusiness Model CanvasSWOT AnalysisGrowth HackingBundlingUnbundlingBootstrappingVenture CapitalPorter’s Five ForcesPorter’s Generic StrategiesPorter’s Five ForcesPESTEL AnalysisSWOTPorter’s Diamond ModelAnsoffTechnology Adoption CurveTOWSSOARBalanced ScorecardOKRAgile MethodologyValue PropositionVTDF FrameworkBCG MatrixGE McKinsey MatrixKotter’s 8-Step Change Model.

Main Guides:

Scroll to Top

Discover more from FourWeekMBA

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

FourWeekMBA