Contingency contracting is a behavioral intervention and goal-setting technique commonly employed in psychology, education, and therapy. This approach involves the creation of explicit, written agreements (contracts) that outline the conditions, behaviors, and consequences related to achieving specific goals or desired behaviors. Contingency contracting is grounded in the principles of operant conditioning and behavioral psychology, emphasizing the role of reinforcement in promoting behavior change.
Contingency contracting is rooted in the principles of behaviorism, which posit that behavior is shaped and maintained by its consequences. The technique was initially developed as a means of facilitating behavior change in various settings, including education, clinical therapy, and applied behavior analysis. It provides a structured and systematic approach to achieving desired outcomes by specifying the conditions under which reinforcement (rewards or consequences) will be delivered based on the individual’s performance or compliance with the contract.
Key Components of Contingency Contracting
Contingency contracting involves several key components that define the structure and implementation of the intervention:
1. Goal Specification
The first step in contingency contracting is defining the specific goal or desired behavior that the individual or group aims to achieve. The goal should be clear, measurable, and achievable within a reasonable timeframe.
2. Contractual Agreement
Contingency contracting requires the creation of a written agreement or contract that outlines the terms and conditions of the arrangement. This contract serves as a formal agreement between the person responsible for implementing the intervention (e.g., a teacher, therapist, or parent) and the individual or group working towards the goal.
3. Target Behaviors
The contract specifies the target behaviors or actions that the individual must perform to achieve the goal. These behaviors should be observable, measurable, and directly related to the desired outcome.
4. Reinforcement System
Contingency contracting establishes a reinforcement system that defines the consequences (reinforcers) contingent upon the individual’s performance of the target behaviors. Reinforcers can be positive (rewarding) or negative (removing aversive stimuli) and should be selected based on their effectiveness in motivating the individual.
5. Schedule of Reinforcement
The contract specifies the schedule of reinforcement, indicating when and how often reinforcement will be provided based on the individual’s behavior. Reinforcement schedules can be continuous (provided every time the behavior occurs) or intermittent (provided periodically or after a certain number of behaviors).
6. Monitoring and Evaluation
Monitoring and evaluation are essential components of contingency contracting. The person responsible for implementing the contract tracks the individual’s performance, ensuring that the terms of the agreement are met. Regular assessments and data collection are used to determine whether the goal is being achieved and whether adjustments to the contract are needed.
7. Contingency Modification
Contingency contracting allows for modifications to the contract if necessary. If the individual’s progress is not meeting the desired outcome, the contract can be adjusted by changing the reinforcement system, target behaviors, or other contract components.
Real-World Applications
Contingency contracting has a wide range of real-world applications in various settings:
1. Education
In educational settings, teachers and students may use contingency contracting to improve academic performance and classroom behavior. Contracts can be created to reinforce studying, completing assignments, and following classroom rules.
2. Clinical Therapy
Contingency contracting is frequently employed in clinical therapy, particularly in behavior therapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT). It is used to address various mental health issues, such as anxiety disorders, substance abuse, and eating disorders. Contracts can be designed to promote healthier behaviors and reduce maladaptive ones.
3. Parenting
Parents may utilize contingency contracting to encourage positive behaviors in children, such as chores, homework completion, and adhering to household rules. By reinforcing desired behaviors, parents can promote a more harmonious family environment.
4. Rehabilitation
In rehabilitation and healthcare settings, contingency contracting can help individuals recover from injuries or surgeries by encouraging adherence to rehabilitation exercises, medications, and lifestyle changes.
5. Workplace
Employers can implement contingency contracts to motivate employees to achieve performance goals and meet deadlines. These contracts may include bonuses, recognition, or other incentives tied to specific achievements.
6. Weight Management
Contingency contracting is used in weight management programs to reinforce healthy eating and exercise habits. Individuals may create contracts with themselves or work with a coach or therapist to set and achieve weight-related goals.
Significance of Contingency Contracting
Contingency contracting holds significance for several reasons:
1. Clarity and Accountability
By formalizing agreements in written contracts, contingency contracting provides clarity and accountability for all parties involved. It eliminates ambiguity and ensures that expectations are explicit.
2. Behavior Modification
Contingency contracting is a powerful tool for behavior modification. It allows individuals to reinforce positive behaviors while discouraging undesirable ones, promoting
long-term behavior change.
3. Customization
Contracts can be customized to address the unique needs and goals of individuals. This flexibility makes the approach applicable across various domains and populations.
4. Empowerment
Contingency contracting empowers individuals to take an active role in their own behavior change process. It gives them a sense of control and ownership over their goals and actions.
5. Data-Driven Decision-Making
The data collection and monitoring aspect of contingency contracting enable data-driven decision-making. This evidence-based approach allows for the assessment of progress and the refinement of strategies as needed.
Challenges and Considerations
While contingency contracting offers numerous benefits, it is not without challenges:
1. Compliance
The effectiveness of contingency contracting relies on the individual’s willingness and ability to comply with the contract’s terms. Resistance or noncompliance can undermine the intervention’s success.
2. Reinforcer Selection
Selecting appropriate reinforcers that are genuinely motivating to the individual can be challenging. What is reinforcing for one person may not be for another.
3. Generalization
Ensuring that the behaviors reinforced under the contract generalize to other contexts and settings can be a concern. The goal is to promote lasting behavior change, not just compliance within the contract’s scope.
4. Ethical Considerations
Ethical considerations related to reinforcement and consequences should be carefully addressed, especially in sensitive areas such as therapy and education.
Conclusion
Contingency contracting is a behaviorally based intervention and goal-setting technique that plays a vital role in promoting behavior change and goal attainment. By formalizing written contracts that specify target behaviors, consequences, and monitoring procedures, contingency contracting provides structure, clarity, and accountability. It has wide-ranging applications across education, therapy, parenting, rehabilitation, and the workplace. While challenges and ethical considerations exist, the significance of contingency contracting lies in its ability to empower individuals to take control of their behavior change process and achieve desired outcomes. It remains a valuable tool in the toolbox of psychologists, educators, therapists, and individuals seeking to modify behavior and reach their goals.
Key Highlights:
Introduction: Contingency contracting is a behaviorally based intervention commonly employed in psychology, education, and therapy, rooted in operant conditioning principles.
Key Components:
Goal Specification: Clear, measurable, and achievable goals are defined.
Contractual Agreement: A written contract outlines terms, conditions, and consequences.
Target Behaviors: Observable, measurable behaviors related to the goal are identified.
Reinforcement System: Rewards or consequences are contingent upon behavior.
Schedule of Reinforcement: Specifies when and how often reinforcement will be provided.
Monitoring and Evaluation: Progress is tracked, and adjustments are made as needed.
Contingency Modification: Contracts can be modified based on progress.
Real-World Applications:
Education, clinical therapy, parenting, rehabilitation, workplace, weight management, etc.
Significance:
Provides clarity, accountability, and empowerment.
Facilitates behavior modification through customized contracts.
Supports data-driven decision-making and long-term behavior change.
Challenges and Considerations:
Compliance, reinforcer selection, generalization, and ethical considerations.
Conclusion:
Contingency contracting empowers individuals to achieve behavior change and goal attainment through structured contracts and reinforcement strategies, making it a valuable tool in various fields.
Convergent thinking occurs when the solution to a problem can be found by applying established rules and logical reasoning. Whereas divergent thinking is an unstructured problem-solving method where participants are encouraged to develop many innovative ideas or solutions to a given problem. Where convergent thinking might work for larger, mature organizations where divergent thinking is more suited for startups and innovative companies.
The concept of cognitive biases was introduced and popularized by the work of Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman in 1972. Biases are seen as systematic errors and flaws that make humans deviate from the standards of rationality, thus making us inept at making good decisions under uncertainty.
Second-order thinking is a means of assessing the implications of our decisions by considering future consequences. Second-order thinking is a mental model that considers all future possibilities. It encourages individuals to think outside of the box so that they can prepare for every and eventuality. It also discourages the tendency for individuals to default to the most obvious choice.
Lateral thinking is a business strategy that involves approaching a problem from a different direction. The strategy attempts to remove traditionally formulaic and routine approaches to problem-solving by advocating creative thinking, therefore finding unconventional ways to solve a known problem. This sort of non-linear approach to problem-solving, can at times, create a big impact.
Bounded rationality is a concept attributed to Herbert Simon, an economist and political scientist interested in decision-making and how we make decisions in the real world. In fact, he believed that rather than optimizing (which was the mainstream view in the past decades) humans follow what he called satisficing.
The Dunning-Kruger effect describes a cognitive bias where people with low ability in a task overestimate their ability to perform that task well. Consumers or businesses that do not possess the requisite knowledge make bad decisions. What’s more, knowledge gaps prevent the person or business from seeing their mistakes.
Occam’s Razor states that one should not increase (beyond reason) the number of entities required to explain anything. All things being equal, the simplest solution is often the best one. The principle is attributed to 14th-century English theologian William of Ockham.
The Lindy Effect is a theory about the ageing of non-perishable things, like technology or ideas. Popularized by author Nicholas Nassim Taleb, the Lindy Effect states that non-perishable things like technology age – linearly – in reverse. Therefore, the older an idea or a technology, the same will be its life expectancy.
Antifragility was first coined as a term by author, and options trader Nassim Nicholas Taleb. Antifragility is a characteristic of systems that thrive as a result of stressors, volatility, and randomness. Therefore, Antifragile is the opposite of fragile. Where a fragile thing breaks up to volatility; a robust thing resists volatility. An antifragile thing gets stronger from volatility (provided the level of stressors and randomness doesn’t pass a certain threshold).
Systems thinking is a holistic means of investigating the factors and interactions that could contribute to a potential outcome. It is about thinking non-linearly, and understanding the second-order consequences of actions and input into the system.
Vertical thinking, on the other hand, is a problem-solving approach that favors a selective, analytical, structured, and sequential mindset. The focus of vertical thinking is to arrive at a reasoned, defined solution.
Maslow’s Hammer, otherwise known as the law of the instrument or the Einstellung effect, is a cognitive bias causing an over-reliance on a familiar tool. This can be expressed as the tendency to overuse a known tool (perhaps a hammer) to solve issues that might require a different tool. This problem is persistent in the business world where perhaps known tools or frameworks might be used in the wrong context (like business plans used as planning tools instead of only investors’ pitches).
The Peter Principle was first described by Canadian sociologist Lawrence J. Peter in his 1969 book The Peter Principle. The Peter Principle states that people are continually promoted within an organization until they reach their level of incompetence.
The straw man fallacy describes an argument that misrepresents an opponent’s stance to make rebuttal more convenient. The straw man fallacy is a type of informal logical fallacy, defined as a flaw in the structure of an argument that renders it invalid.
The Streisand Effect is a paradoxical phenomenon where the act of suppressing information to reduce visibility causes it to become more visible. In 2003, Streisand attempted to suppress aerial photographs of her Californian home by suing photographer Kenneth Adelman for an invasion of privacy. Adelman, who Streisand assumed was paparazzi, was instead taking photographs to document and study coastal erosion. In her quest for more privacy, Streisand’s efforts had the opposite effect.
As highlighted by German psychologist Gerd Gigerenzer in the paper “Heuristic Decision Making,” the term heuristic is of Greek origin, meaning “serving to find out or discover.” More precisely, a heuristic is a fast and accurate way to make decisions in the real world, which is driven by uncertainty.
The recognition heuristic is a psychological model of judgment and decision making. It is part of a suite of simple and economical heuristics proposed by psychologists Daniel Goldstein and Gerd Gigerenzer. The recognition heuristic argues that inferences are made about an object based on whether it is recognized or not.
The representativeness heuristic was first described by psychologists Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky. The representativeness heuristic judges the probability of an event according to the degree to which that event resembles a broader class. When queried, most will choose the first option because the description of John matches the stereotype we may hold for an archaeologist.
The take-the-best heuristic is a decision-making shortcut that helps an individual choose between several alternatives. The take-the-best (TTB) heuristic decides between two or more alternatives based on a single good attribute, otherwise known as a cue. In the process, less desirable attributes are ignored.
The bundling bias is a cognitive bias in e-commerce where a consumer tends not to use all of the products bought as a group, or bundle. Bundling occurs when individual products or services are sold together as a bundle. Common examples are tickets and experiences. The bundling bias dictates that consumers are less likely to use each item in the bundle. This means that the value of the bundle and indeed the value of each item in the bundle is decreased.
The Barnum Effect is a cognitive bias where individuals believe that generic information – which applies to most people – is specifically tailored for themselves.
First-principles thinking – sometimes called reasoning from first principles – is used to reverse-engineer complex problems and encourage creativity. It involves breaking down problems into basic elements and reassembling them from the ground up. Elon Musk is among the strongest proponents of this way of thinking.
The ladder of inference is a conscious or subconscious thinking process where an individual moves from a fact to a decision or action. The ladder of inference was created by academic Chris Argyris to illustrate how people form and then use mental models to make decisions.
Goodhart’s Law is named after British monetary policy theorist and economist Charles Goodhart. Speaking at a conference in Sydney in 1975, Goodhart said that “any observed statistical regularity will tend to collapse once pressure is placed upon it for control purposes.” Goodhart’s Law states that when a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure.
The Six Thinking Hats model was created by psychologist Edward de Bono in 1986, who noted that personality type was a key driver of how people approached problem-solving. For example, optimists view situations differently from pessimists. Analytical individuals may generate ideas that a more emotional person would not, and vice versa.
The Mandela effect is a phenomenon where a large group of people remembers an event differently from how it occurred. The Mandela effect was first described in relation to Fiona Broome, who believed that former South African President Nelson Mandela died in prison during the 1980s. While Mandela was released from prison in 1990 and died 23 years later, Broome remembered news coverage of his death in prison and even a speech from his widow. Of course, neither event occurred in reality. But Broome was later to discover that she was not the only one with the same recollection of events.
The bandwagon effect tells us that the more a belief or idea has been adopted by more people within a group, the more the individual adoption of that idea might increase within the same group. This is the psychological effect that leads to herd mentality. What in marketing can be associated with social proof.
Moore’s law states that the number of transistors on a microchip doubles approximately every two years. This observation was made by Intel co-founder Gordon Moore in 1965 and it become a guiding principle for the semiconductor industry and has had far-reaching implications for technology as a whole.
Disruptive innovation as a term was first described by Clayton M. Christensen, an American academic and business consultant whom The Economist called “the most influential management thinker of his time.” Disruptive innovation describes the process by which a product or service takes hold at the bottom of a market and eventually displaces established competitors, products, firms, or alliances.
Value migration was first described by author Adrian Slywotzky in his 1996 book Value Migration – How to Think Several Moves Ahead of the Competition. Value migration is the transferal of value-creating forces from outdated business models to something better able to satisfy consumer demands.
The bye-now effect describes the tendency for consumers to think of the word “buy” when they read the word “bye”. In a study that tracked diners at a name-your-own-price restaurant, each diner was asked to read one of two phrases before ordering their meal. The first phrase, “so long”, resulted in diners paying an average of $32 per meal. But when diners recited the phrase “bye bye” before ordering, the average price per meal rose to $45.
Groupthink occurs when well-intentioned individuals make non-optimal or irrational decisions based on a belief that dissent is impossible or on a motivation to conform. Groupthink occurs when members of a group reach a consensus without critical reasoning or evaluation of the alternatives and their consequences.
A stereotype is a fixed and over-generalized belief about a particular group or class of people. These beliefs are based on the false assumption that certain characteristics are common to every individual residing in that group. Many stereotypes have a long and sometimes controversial history and are a direct consequence of various political, social, or economic events. Stereotyping is the process of making assumptions about a person or group of people based on various attributes, including gender, race, religion, or physical traits.
Murphy’s Law states that if anything can go wrong, it will go wrong. Murphy’s Law was named after aerospace engineer Edward A. Murphy. During his time working at Edwards Air Force Base in 1949, Murphy cursed a technician who had improperly wired an electrical component and said, “If there is any way to do it wrong, he’ll find it.”
The law of unintended consequences was first mentioned by British philosopher John Locke when writing to parliament about the unintended effects of interest rate rises. However, it was popularized in 1936 by American sociologist Robert K. Merton who looked at unexpected, unanticipated, and unintended consequences and their impact on society.
Fundamental attribution error is a bias people display when judging the behavior of others. The tendency is to over-emphasize personal characteristics and under-emphasize environmental and situational factors.
Outcome bias describes a tendency to evaluate a decision based on its outcome and not on the process by which the decision was reached. In other words, the quality of a decision is only determined once the outcome is known. Outcome bias occurs when a decision is based on the outcome of previous events without regard for how those events developed.
Hindsight bias is the tendency for people to perceive past events as more predictable than they actually were. The result of a presidential election, for example, seems more obvious when the winner is announced. The same can also be said for the avid sports fan who predicted the correct outcome of a match regardless of whether their team won or lost. Hindsight bias, therefore, is the tendency for an individual to convince themselves that they accurately predicted an event before it happened.
Gennaro is the creator of FourWeekMBA, which reached about four million business people, comprising C-level executives, investors, analysts, product managers, and aspiring digital entrepreneurs in 2022 alone | He is also Director of Sales for a high-tech scaleup in the AI Industry | In 2012, Gennaro earned an International MBA with emphasis on Corporate Finance and Business Strategy.
Discover more from FourWeekMBA
Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.
