The Kolb reflective cycle was created by American educational theorist David Kolb. In 1984, Kolb created the Experiential Learning Theory (ELT) based on the premise that learning is facilitated by direct experience. In other words, the individual learns through action. The Kolb reflective cycle is a holistic learning and development process based on the reflection of active experiences.
Understanding the Kolb reflective cycle
Experiential learning is common during internships and other forms of on-the-job training designed to complement conventional educational programs.
With the rise of massive open online courses (MOOCs) and competency-based degrees, however, educators are also turning to experiential learning to help students develop skills based on real-world experiences.
The Kolb reflective cycle is based on two components of experiential learning theory: a four-stage cycle together with four resultant learning styles.
For the rest of this article, we will discuss these components in more detail.
The four stages of the Kolb reflective cycle
Kolb sees learning as a cyclical, four-stage process where the student acquires knowledge from each new experience. As a result, learning is a holistic process where the student applies new insights and ideas toward continuous improvement.
Following is a look at each stage:
During the first stage, the student has an experience representing a learning opportunity.
During the experience, the student should take notes on what they see, how they feel, and what they think.
Critically, the individual must actively participate in the experience to learn.
There are no advantages to observing or reading, for example.
Then, the student reflects on their experience without judgment by noting any contradictions between the experience and their notes.
What worked? What failed? How did the individual act? Why did the situation arise?
Here, the student must analyze and create meaning from the experience.
The goal here is to develop theories from recurring themes, problems, or situations that can be used for similar situations in the future.
Colleagues and relevant literature are good sources of support and inspiration.
Describing the application of the newly acquired theories in a practical setting.
Some theories will succeed, while others will inevitably fail.
However, failure should be seen as the impetus to run through the cycle once more.
The four distinct learning styles of the Kolb reflective cycle
Kolb also defined four distinct learning styles based on each stage of the cycle.
Most individuals embody one style, with their choice determined by the social environment, previous educational experiences, and their unique personalities.
For the sake of simplicity, the four learning styles can be displayed in a 2×2 matrix. Each style represents a combination of two of the stages mentioned in the previous section:
Accommodating (Concrete experience/Active experimentation)
This learning style relies on intuition over logic, with individuals preferring a practical, experiential approach.
Using gut instinct, they are frequently attracted to new challenges and experiences with a reliance on others to provide detailed analysis.
Diverging (Concrete experience/Reflective observation)
The diverging learning style (through divergent thinking) encompasses those who can look at a topic from multiple perspectives.
As a result, they perform well in situations requiring idea generation such as brainstorming.
Divergent learners are people and group-oriented, have broad cultural interests and tend to be imaginative and emotional.
Converging (Abstract conceptualization/Active experimentation)
Converging learners (through convergent thinking)prefer technical tasks where they can solve problems using their knowledge.
They are much less concerned with working collaboratively and are most effective where specialist or technological ability is required.
Finally, this style loves to experiment and stimulate new ideas and theories.
Assimilating (Abstract conceptualization/Reflective observation)
A preference for assimilating learning involves a logical and concise approach. Concepts and ideas are more important than people.
These learners excel at organizing diverse information into a clear and logical format and are enthused by ideas and abstract concepts.
They have a preference for analytical models (through vertical thinking), readings, lectures, and the time and space to think deeply.
Advantages of Kolb’s reflective cycle
Kolb’s model is an experiential learning framework skewed toward real-world experiences to form learning.
This makes it extremely useful in business, where having an iterative approach to learning through experience can help speed up the process while retaining more in the long term.
Kolb’s model is also straightforward as it enables learning through four simple phases:
- Concrete experience.
- Reflective observation.
- Abstract conceptualization.
- And active experimentation.
The active experimentation phase is extremely valuable as it enables to development of business skills quickly.
The main advantage of Kolb’s model is its ability to follow an iterative learning process.
While enabling professionals to do it still deliberately.
Thus, iteration based on experience and deliberate learning can be extremely powerful in mastering new business skills quickly.
Disadvantages of Kolb’s reflective cycle
While Kolb’s model proves extremely effective for individual learning.
It can be more challenging to execute group learning.
In short, the iterative and deliberate approach to learning, if used correctly by the individual, can prove very effective.
Yet, for group learning, it might be less appropriate, as it needs to consider the various ways individuals within the group learn.
Thus, Kolb’s model proves effective for individual professional learning, less so for group learning.
Kolb vs. Gibbs’ reflective cycle
Whereas Kolb’s reflective cycle comprises four simple phases. The Gybbs’ reflective cycle consists of six stages:
- and action plan.
In short, Gibbs’ reflective cycle adds an action plan to the mix, which makes it effective to execute the learnings.
Thus, Gibbs’ cycle might be a bit more suited for group learning, as it helps individuals execute on their experience, by following an action plan.
- The Kolb reflective cycle is a holistic learning and development process based on the reflection of active experiences. It was created by educational theorist David Kolb.
- The Kolb reflective cycle is based on four cyclical stages: concrete experience, reflective observation, abstract conceptualization, and active experiment.
- From each stage of the Kolb reflective cycle, four learning styles can be derived: accommodating, diverging, converging, and assimilating. Each style is influenced by the social environment, educational experience, or the basic cognitive structure of the learner.
Connected Learning Frameworks
McKinsey’s Seven Degrees Of Freedom
Related Strategy Concepts: Read Next: Mental Models, Biases, Bounded Rationality, Mandela Effect, Dunning-Kruger Effect, Lindy Effect, Crowding Out Effect, Bandwagon Effect, Decision-Making Matrix.
Main Free Guides: