Proof of Concept And Why It Matters In Business

A proof of concept is a document that provides a visual representation of what your idea is and how it would work. It’s a tangible way to show off your idea to a potential collaborator, investor, or customer. Therefore, it shows how a pilot project might help a larger project scale if there is “proof” that the first concept worked out.

Concept Overview– A Proof of Concept (PoC) is a preliminary demonstration or experiment conducted to validate the feasibility, viability, and potential success of a new idea, concept, product, technology, or process. It serves as a practical test to determine whether the proposed solution or innovation can be implemented effectively and whether it will achieve its intended goals. PoCs are often a crucial step in innovation and product development. The primary goal is to minimize risks and uncertainties before committing significant resources to a full-scale project.
Key Elements– The Proof of Concept process includes the following key elements: – Objective Setting: Clearly define the objectives and goals of the PoC, including what needs to be proven or tested. – Resource Allocation: Allocate the necessary resources, including personnel, time, and budget, to conduct the PoC effectively. – Experimentation: Design and conduct experiments or tests to validate critical aspects of the concept. – Data Collection: Gather data and evidence to support or refute the feasibility and viability of the concept. – Analysis and Evaluation: Analyze the results, evaluate the findings, and make informed decisions based on the PoC’s outcomes. – Decision-Making: Determine whether to proceed with the concept, modify it, or abandon it based on the PoC’s success or failure.
Applications– PoCs are widely used across industries and domains: – Technology Development: In the tech sector, PoCs are conducted to assess the feasibility and functionality of new software, hardware, or systems before full-scale development. – Product Prototyping: In product development, PoCs are used to create prototypes and test product concepts for functionality and market fit. – Biomedical Research: In healthcare and biotechnology, PoCs help validate the effectiveness of new drugs, medical devices, or treatment approaches. – Process Improvement: Organizations use PoCs to optimize existing processes, test new workflows, or implement automation solutions. – Environmental Initiatives: PoCs are conducted to explore sustainable technologies, renewable energy sources, and eco-friendly practices.
Benefits– The benefits of conducting PoCs are numerous: – Risk Mitigation: PoCs help organizations identify and mitigate risks early in the development process, reducing the chances of costly failures later on. – Cost Efficiency: By testing a concept on a small scale, organizations save resources compared to full-scale development or implementation. – Informed Decision-Making: PoCs provide valuable data and insights that inform decision-makers about the concept’s feasibility and potential. – Accelerated Innovation: PoCs expedite the innovation process by quickly validating or discarding ideas, enabling organizations to focus on promising concepts. – Competitive Advantage: Successful PoCs can give organizations a competitive advantage by bringing innovative solutions to market faster.
Challenges– Challenges in conducting PoCs may include defining clear success criteria, securing necessary resources, avoiding bias in data interpretation, and ensuring that the PoC environment accurately reflects real-world conditions. Additionally, the transition from a successful PoC to full-scale implementation can pose challenges, such as scalability and integration issues.
Prevention and Mitigation– To address challenges in PoCs, organizations can: – Clearly Define Success Criteria: Establish clear, measurable success criteria at the outset to avoid ambiguity. – Resource Planning: Ensure adequate resource allocation, including personnel with relevant expertise and access to required tools and infrastructure. – Independent Evaluation: Consider independent evaluation and peer review to mitigate bias and confirm results. – Realism: Strive to create a PoC environment that closely mirrors real-world conditions to ensure the findings are applicable and accurate. – Transition Planning: Develop a well-defined plan for transitioning from a successful PoC to full-scale implementation, addressing scalability and integration issues proactively.

What is a proof of concept and why is it so important in business?

In business, a proof of concept is critical to validate an idea. Therefore it helps achieve a better understanding of whether to undertake a larger project.

A proof of concept is different from a minimum viable product, which instead is the complete version of your product that is good enough to attract its potential audience and improve on that.

In simple terms, a proof of concept is a document that allows to get an idea funded, either by an investor, partner or perhaps to a potential customer.

The idea of the proof of concept is to simplify your project, at the point of creating a smaller, viable one, that can prove the viability of a larger project, with less risk, budget, and a more focused timeline.

In fact, in most cases, in business ideas fail because there is not enough interest from the market, or because the timing is wrong, or perhaps the team, funding and business model aren’t good enpough.

Thus, a proof of concept helps business people simplify a larger, and more ambitious project, into something that can be tested in a shorter time span and with less effort, in terms of budget and time.

According to Bill Gross, founder of Idealab, the five key factors influencing startups’ success are the idea, team, business model, funding, and timing. Among them, timing is extremely important but can’t be controlled. That is why startups often need enough funds to keep going until the business becomes viable.

How to create a simple proof of concept

There isn’t a single way to create a proof of concept. It all starts by understanding what minimum viable option will prove the project successful and, therefore, it will help us scale the overall project.

Proof of Concept Vs. MVP

However, where a minimum viable product has the scope of defining whether there is a market for an idea, thus scoping that market and delivering a fully functional (yet minimal) product.

A proof of concept is more focused on understanding whether that is a good idea in the first place.

Instead, an MVP flips the logic upside down, and it asks, “how can we kick off a valuable, iterative, feedback loop, with customers, to make a product valuable, over time?”

As pointed out by Eric Ries, a minimum viable product is that version of a new product that allows a team to collect the maximum amount of validated learning about customers with the least effort through a cycle of build, measure, learn; that is the foundation of the lean startup methodology.

In short, with an MVP, even if you launch a product, and it fails, it’s fine, as long as it fails fast.

Yet, to ensure you can kick off valuable feedback loops, you have to target a very narrow niche, or what’s known in buzzy terms a minimum viable audience.

The minimum viable audience (MVA) represents the smallest possible audience that can sustain your business as you get it started from a microniche (the smallest subset of a market). The main aspect of the MVA is to zoom into existing markets to find those people which needs are unmet by existing players.

A minimum viable audience will help you find the way toward a successful product, even though that might not be successful as of now.

Therefore, it starts by narrowing down what’s the fastest and simplest way to prove whether the idea is feasible in the first place.

Proof of Concept Vs. Prototype

A prototype is a sample version or simulation of a product that is used to evaluate a process or concept. The intention of creating a prototype is to test and validate ideas before they are communicated to stakeholders and ultimately, the product development team. Prototypes can be as simple as a storyboard sketch drawn on paper that captures the user experience or as detailed as a full-scale mock-up.

A prototype addresses the feasibility of the idea.

Whereas a proof of concept tries to address whether the idea is a good one in the first place.

Both, though, are too risky.

Indeed, the prototype is risky because it addresses the market question (will people want it?) too far down the road, potentially making the project’s costs too high and failure too expensive.

The proof of concept, on the other side, tries to address whether the idea is a good one, but without testing the market in the first place.

In short, it relies on theoretical assumptions, which are also too risky, as we might embark on a road that is too risky to undertake.

So what’s a middle ground?

Proof of Concept vs. Pretotype

Pretotyping is a mixture of the words “pretend” and “prototype” and it is a methodology used to validate business ideas to improve the chances of building a product or service that people want. 

A great way to test is through pretotyping.

Coined by Alberto Savoia, which I interviewed on the blog, pretotyping is about “finding the right it” by addressing the market risk (will people want it?) with an approach that reduces the assumptions of the market.

In other words, before embarking on an expensive and risky project, we want to understand if people will want to use that if we were to create that product.

How do we do it? According to pretotype we fake to build a viable prototype and test it as if it was the real product.

As Alberto Savoia explained to me:

Many many years ago IBM thought “we want everyone to have personal computers,” but there was no way (think about this is like 1980) that most people are going to learn how to use a keyboard.

In those days who used a keyboard? Secretaries, programmers, and writers. So they thought, we need people to be able to operate the computer without using the keyboard, just by using speech to text into a microphone.

Of course, they could not build the technology, they could not build the prototype for years because the technology was not there, computers were not fast enough.

But they thought, okay, maybe we want to make this investment, how do we actually make sure that people will want to use a microphone exclusively to interact with a computer?

So they did a very clever thing, they brought people in the room, they gave them a microphone, and there was a screen in front of that microphone and told them,

“Look, this a new way of running a computer, there’s no keyboard, you just speak to it, and give it a shot and tell us what you think.”

And the interesting thing, this is when I came up with the name pretotyping, originally I called it a pretendotype, because I thought, they haven’t built something that actually works, they’re pretending to have a prototype, so let’s go with pretendotype. Then I shortened the name to pretotype.

With this simple trick, the IBM team found out that even if they were going to build it, they assumed that most people would not use a keyboard, and this proved utterly wrong.

Yet they didn’t embark on a multi-billion dollar project to figure this out, as they realized that the speech-to-text was not fit for a work environment, as there were too many issues that they had not thought about in the prototyping stage!

Key Highlights

  • Proof of Concept (PoC) Defined:
    • A Proof of Concept is a document or tangible representation that illustrates the feasibility and potential of an idea, product, or project.
    • It provides a way to demonstrate the viability of an idea to potential collaborators, investors, or customers.
    • PoC aims to simplify a larger project into a smaller, manageable version that showcases its core functionality and value.
  • Importance in Business:
    • PoC plays a crucial role in securing funding or partnership for an idea.
    • By presenting a working model of the idea, businesses can reduce risk, budget, and time associated with larger-scale projects.
    • It serves as a means to validate market interest, test assumptions, and refine concepts before committing extensive resources.
  • Elements of a Simple Proof of Concept:
    • Identifying the minimal viable version that demonstrates the project’s key aspects.
    • Focusing on core functionalities to prove feasibility.
    • Streamlining the concept to be tested within a shorter timeframe and budget.
  • Proof of Concept vs. MVP:
    • A Minimum Viable Product (MVP) focuses on delivering a functional but minimal version of a product to assess market demand and gather feedback.
    • PoC aims to demonstrate the potential of an idea or concept, even before building a complete product.
    • MVP emphasizes iterative development based on user feedback, while PoC seeks to establish the idea’s viability first.
  • Minimum Viable Audience (MVA):
    • MVA identifies the smallest subset of a market that can sustain a business during its initial stages.
    • It helps businesses target a specific niche with unmet needs, guiding them towards building a successful product.
  • Proof of Concept vs. Prototype:
    • A Prototype is a sample version used to test and validate specific design or process concepts.
    • A PoC, while similar in testing, focuses on whether the idea itself is worth pursuing.
  • Pretotyping – A Middle Ground:
    • Pretotyping combines “pretend” and “prototype” and aims to validate ideas with minimal investment.
    • It involves creating a mock version of a product and testing it with potential users to gauge interest before investing heavily in development.
  • Pretotyping Example – IBM:
    • IBM used pretotyping to test the idea of users interacting with computers through speech-to-text technology.
    • Rather than building an actual product, they brought users into a room, gave them a microphone, and gauged their reactions.
    • This approach revealed user discomfort with the concept, preventing a potentially expensive project from proceeding.

Connected Agile Frameworks


AIOps is the application of artificial intelligence to IT operations. It has become particularly useful for modern IT management in hybridized, distributed, and dynamic environments. AIOps has become a key operational component of modern digital-based organizations, built around software and algorithms.

Agile Methodology

Agile started as a lightweight development method compared to heavyweight software development, which is the core paradigm of the previous decades of software development. By 2001 the Manifesto for Agile Software Development was born as a set of principles that defined the new paradigm for software development as a continuous iteration. This would also influence the way of doing business.

Agile Project Management

Agile project management (APM) is a strategy that breaks large projects into smaller, more manageable tasks. In the APM methodology, each project is completed in small sections – often referred to as iterations. Each iteration is completed according to its project life cycle, beginning with the initial design and progressing to testing and then quality assurance.

Agile Modeling

Agile Modeling (AM) is a methodology for modeling and documenting software-based systems. Agile Modeling is critical to the rapid and continuous delivery of software. It is a collection of values, principles, and practices that guide effective, lightweight software modeling.

Agile Business Analysis

Agile Business Analysis (AgileBA) is certification in the form of guidance and training for business analysts seeking to work in agile environments. To support this shift, AgileBA also helps the business analyst relate Agile projects to a wider organizational mission or strategy. To ensure that analysts have the necessary skills and expertise, AgileBA certification was developed.

Business Model Innovation

Business model innovation is about increasing the success of an organization with existing products and technologies by crafting a compelling value proposition able to propel a new business model to scale up customers and create a lasting competitive advantage. And it all starts by mastering the key customers.

Continuous Innovation

That is a process that requires a continuous feedback loop to develop a valuable product and build a viable business model. Continuous innovation is a mindset where products and services are designed and delivered to tune them around the customers’ problem and not the technical solution of its founders.

Design Sprint

A design sprint is a proven five-day process where critical business questions are answered through speedy design and prototyping, focusing on the end-user. A design sprint starts with a weekly challenge that should finish with a prototype, test at the end, and therefore a lesson learned to be iterated.

Design Thinking

Tim Brown, Executive Chair of IDEO, defined design thinking as “a human-centered approach to innovation that draws from the designer’s toolkit to integrate the needs of people, the possibilities of technology, and the requirements for business success.” Therefore, desirability, feasibility, and viability are balanced to solve critical problems.


DevOps refers to a series of practices performed to perform automated software development processes. It is a conjugation of the term “development” and “operations” to emphasize how functions integrate across IT teams. DevOps strategies promote seamless building, testing, and deployment of products. It aims to bridge a gap between development and operations teams to streamline the development altogether.

Dual Track Agile

Product discovery is a critical part of agile methodologies, as its aim is to ensure that products customers love are built. Product discovery involves learning through a raft of methods, including design thinking, lean start-up, and A/B testing to name a few. Dual Track Agile is an agile methodology containing two separate tracks: the “discovery” track and the “delivery” track.

Feature-Driven Development

Feature-Driven Development is a pragmatic software process that is client and architecture-centric. Feature-Driven Development (FDD) is an agile software development model that organizes workflow according to which features need to be developed next.

eXtreme Programming

eXtreme Programming was developed in the late 1990s by Ken Beck, Ron Jeffries, and Ward Cunningham. During this time, the trio was working on the Chrysler Comprehensive Compensation System (C3) to help manage the company payroll system. eXtreme Programming (XP) is a software development methodology. It is designed to improve software quality and the ability of software to adapt to changing customer needs.

Lean vs. Agile

The Agile methodology has been primarily thought of for software development (and other business disciplines have also adopted it). Lean thinking is a process improvement technique where teams prioritize the value streams to improve it continuously. Both methodologies look at the customer as the key driver to improvement and waste reduction. Both methodologies look at improvement as something continuous.

Lean Startup

A startup company is a high-tech business that tries to build a scalable business model in tech-driven industries. A startup company usually follows a lean methodology, where continuous innovation, driven by built-in viral loops is the rule. Thus, driving growth and building network effects as a consequence of this strategy.


Kanban is a lean manufacturing framework first developed by Toyota in the late 1940s. The Kanban framework is a means of visualizing work as it moves through identifying potential bottlenecks. It does that through a process called just-in-time (JIT) manufacturing to optimize engineering processes, speed up manufacturing products, and improve the go-to-market strategy.

Rapid Application Development

RAD was first introduced by author and consultant James Martin in 1991. Martin recognized and then took advantage of the endless malleability of software in designing development models. Rapid Application Development (RAD) is a methodology focusing on delivering rapidly through continuous feedback and frequent iterations.

Scaled Agile

Scaled Agile Lean Development (ScALeD) helps businesses discover a balanced approach to agile transition and scaling questions. The ScALed approach helps businesses successfully respond to change. Inspired by a combination of lean and agile values, ScALed is practitioner-based and can be completed through various agile frameworks and practices.

Spotify Model

The Spotify Model is an autonomous approach to scaling agile, focusing on culture communication, accountability, and quality. The Spotify model was first recognized in 2012 after Henrik Kniberg, and Anders Ivarsson released a white paper detailing how streaming company Spotify approached agility. Therefore, the Spotify model represents an evolution of agile.

Test-Driven Development

As the name suggests, TDD is a test-driven technique for delivering high-quality software rapidly and sustainably. It is an iterative approach based on the idea that a failing test should be written before any code for a feature or function is written. Test-Driven Development (TDD) is an approach to software development that relies on very short development cycles.


Timeboxing is a simple yet powerful time-management technique for improving productivity. Timeboxing describes the process of proactively scheduling a block of time to spend on a task in the future. It was first described by author James Martin in a book about agile software development.


Scrum is a methodology co-created by Ken Schwaber and Jeff Sutherland for effective team collaboration on complex products. Scrum was primarily thought for software development projects to deliver new software capability every 2-4 weeks. It is a sub-group of agile also used in project management to improve startups’ productivity.

Scrum Anti-Patterns

Scrum anti-patterns describe any attractive, easy-to-implement solution that ultimately makes a problem worse. Therefore, these are the practice not to follow to prevent issues from emerging. Some classic examples of scrum anti-patterns comprise absent product owners, pre-assigned tickets (making individuals work in isolation), and discounting retrospectives (where review meetings are not useful to really make improvements).

Scrum At Scale

Scrum at Scale (Scrum@Scale) is a framework that Scrum teams use to address complex problems and deliver high-value products. Scrum at Scale was created through a joint venture between the Scrum Alliance and Scrum Inc. The joint venture was overseen by Jeff Sutherland, a co-creator of Scrum and one of the principal authors of the Agile Manifesto.

Read Also: Business Models Guide, Sumo Logic Business Model, Snowflake

InnovationAgile MethodologyLean StartupBusiness Model InnovationProject Management.

Read Next: SWOT AnalysisPersonal SWOT AnalysisTOWS MatrixPESTEL


New Product Development, Storyboarding, Story Mapping, Business AnalysisCompetitor Analysis, Continuous InnovationAgile MethodologyLean StartupBusiness Model InnovationProject Management.

Agile Methodology, Lean Methodology, Agile Project Management, Scrum, Kanban, Six Sigma.

Business AnalysisCompetitor Analysis, Continuous InnovationAgile MethodologyLean StartupBusiness Model InnovationProject Management.

Main Free Guides:

About The Author

Scroll to Top