360-degree-feedback

360-Degree Feedback

360-degree feedback is a comprehensive performance feedback strategy for employees. Traditionally, performance feedback was solely given by the employee’s direct superior. In 360-degree feedback, however, anonymous feedback is given by a range of individuals that the employee has a working relationship with. These include managers, colleagues, and in some cases, customers.

TypeDescriptionExample
Reinforcing FeedbackPositive feedback to motivate employees to maintain good performance.– Recognizing an employee for exceeding sales targets consistently.
– Appreciating an employee’s initiative in problem-solving.
– Acknowledging an employee’s innovative ideas that benefit the company.
Redirecting FeedbackFeedback addressing issues or concerns constructively, guiding employees toward improvement.– Addressing a subordinate’s consistent lateness and missed deadlines.
– Encouraging a colleague who prefers to work independently to occasionally collaborate with the team.
– Supporting a withdrawn colleague to contribute more in meetings.
Appreciative FeedbackEmphasizing an employee’s strengths and achievements to boost morale and motivation.– Highlighting an employee’s excellent communication skills in team meetings.
– Celebrating an employee’s successful project completion and its positive impact.
– Commending an employee for their leadership during challenging times.
Developmental FeedbackIdentifying areas for improvement and offering suggestions to enhance skills and performance.– Providing feedback on a colleague’s presentation skills and recommending public speaking training.
– Discussing a subordinate’s time management issues and suggesting strategies for improvement.
– Identifying a team member’s need for better delegation skills and offering guidance.
Coaching FeedbackProviding ongoing guidance and support to help employees reach their full potential.– Regularly coaching a team member on effective conflict resolution strategies.
– Mentoring a colleague to improve their project management skills.
– Offering continuous coaching to enhance leadership abilities in a subordinate.
Recognition FeedbackAcknowledging and appreciating employees’ contributions and efforts to boost morale.– Recognizing an employee’s dedication during a challenging project.
– Thanking a team member for consistently meeting project deadlines.
– Celebrating an employee’s years of service with the company.
Corrective FeedbackAddressing specific performance issues or errors that require immediate attention.– Discussing a colleague’s inappropriate behavior in the workplace and the need for change.
– Providing feedback on a subordinate’s repeated errors in data entry and the importance of accuracy.
– Addressing a team member’s violation of company policies and the consequences.

Understanding 360-degree feedback

In the evaluation itself, the employee is judged against certain behavioral, competency, and result-based criteria. Since this form of feedback involves consulting many people, a well-rounded opinion of the employee in question is formed. In turn, this guides future decisions in human resource management – such as who should be promoted, transferred, terminated, or earn a performance bonus.

Implementing 360-degree feedback

A performance questionnaire should first be distributed to the relevant participants by following these steps:

  1. Select 6-10 participants who can give an accurate and detailed evaluation of the employee. Remember to keep the evaluation anonymous.
  2. Group participants according to the nature of their relationship with the employee. For example, clients, colleagues, and customers.
  3. Survey questions should be open-ended and address core competencies such as leadership and communication. 
  4. The employee receiving evaluation should also answer the same set of questions. For best results, consider hiring an external agency to manage the evaluation process.

After the evaluation has been completed, it’s important that:

  1. Feedback is presented in a report highlighting areas for improvement.
  2. The information is used to provide direction for employee development plans.
  3. Survey participants must be adept at providing objective and constructive criticism.
  4. Support is offered to the employee to assist in professional development.

Strengths and weaknesses of 360-degree feedback

There are many strengths to this comprehensive strategy. Some of the more pertinent are listed below.

  • Increases employee self-awareness. Instead of simply being judged according to predetermined performance metrics, employees gain valuable insight into their personality, motivations, and strengths and weaknesses.
  • Encourages continuous improvement. 360-degree feedback emphasizes an incremental and collaborative approach to performance improvement. With less of a focus on hitting large milestones, the employee feels confident and empowered to meet personal goals gradually.
  • Suitable for large organizations with decentralized workforces. In larger businesses, many employees are autonomous and do not have much interaction with direct supervisors. This form of feedback ensures that employees get access to fair and constructive feedback.

However, there are some weaknesses to 360-degree feedback:

  • Conflicting feedback. With such a wide and varied range of participants consulted, it is perhaps inevitable that survey answers will contradict each other.
  • Non-specific questions. If survey questions are poorly designed, then the questions do not give any valuable insights that can be assessed quantitatively. In some cases, employees may also not be adequately trained in giving performance evaluation.
  • Vulnerable to manipulation. Some employees may deliberately target colleagues they’ve not enjoyed a sound working relationship with. Others may provide answers with the sole intent of winning the employee in question a promotion or raise.

360-degree feedback examples

In this section, we’ll describe some examples of 360-degree feedback for common workplace scenarios. 

Reinforcing feedback

Reinforcing feedback is a way to motivate employees and reinforce that their performance is beneficial for themselves and the company. In other words, this sort of feedback is given when the organization wants the employee to keep up the good work. 

  • A subordinate achieves a significant milestone – “Congratulations on exceeding your sales targets for the ninth month in a row. As a result of your great work, we have overtaken our main competitor to win dominant market share in your region. Your passion and commitment to your work and our company is very much appreciated.
  • A co-worker uses their initiative – “We want to thank you for taking the initiative to address the root cause of this problem instead of pretending that it didn’t exist. Your leadership in this situation will improve the efficiency of the process in future.”
  • An employee comes up with a great idea – “We’d like to recognize the idea you shared in yesterday’s meeting as a viable way for the company to cut costs this quarter. We appreciate you researching the idea and having the courage to put it forward. Your actions will inspire others to do the same.”

Redirecting feedback

Redirecting feedback is a way to facilitate the hard, uncomfortable conversations that sometimes occur in a workplace. While the 360-degree feedback method requires that feedback be anonymous, it’s important for individuals completing the survey to remember that their feedback will be read by a real person who has real feelings.

Here are a few ways someone can provide proper directing feedback:

  • A subordinate who is consistently late and misses an important deadline – “The delay you caused on this project caused inefficiencies in subsequent steps and resulted in extra completion time the company had not budgeted for. For future projects, could you ensure that deadlines are met and if delays are anticipated, let us know in advance?
  • A co-worker who is not a team player and prefers to go it alone. In this case, it’s important to respect that some people prefer one approach over another while still emphasizing the need for some degree of workplace flexibility – “We love that you have the ability to solve problems alone and power ahead. Sometimes, however, others are stuck and would benefit from your help. We rely on the collaborative nature of teamwork to offer support when needed and thrive as an organization.
  • A colleague seems withdrawn and does not communicate in meetings – “I’ve noticed that you have a tendency to remain silent in our team meetings. Is there something that is stopping you from speaking up, or are you naturally one to observe rather than take part? If it’s the former, we encourage you to reach out to us so we can offer assistance. If it’s the latter, we want you to know that your expertise and perspective is valued and that the organization cannot reach its full potential without diverse contributions.

Key takeaways:

  • 360-degree feedback allows an employee to receive a comprehensive performance evaluation from managers, peers, colleagues, and customers.
  • 360-degree feedback relies on quantitative data in survey answers to guide future direction on human resource management.
  • 360-degree feedback is process-centric and gives employees valuable personal insights. However, it is not immune to exploitation and manipulation by interested parties.

Key Highlights:

  • Introduction to 360-Degree Feedback:
    • 360-degree feedback is a comprehensive performance feedback strategy for employees.
    • Unlike traditional feedback from direct superiors, this approach involves anonymous input from various sources including managers, colleagues, and customers.
    • It aims to provide a well-rounded assessment of an employee’s performance and guide HR decisions.
  • Components and Implementation:
    • The model evaluates employees against behavioral, competency, and result-based criteria.
    • The process involves distributing performance questionnaires to participants.
    • Participants are categorized based on their relationship with the employee.
    • Open-ended survey questions focus on core competencies like leadership and communication.
    • Both participants and the employee in question answer the same set of questions.
    • The feedback is presented in a report for improvement and employee development.
  • Strengths and Weaknesses:
    • Strengths:
      • Enhances employee self-awareness and encourages continuous improvement.
      • Suitable for large organizations with decentralized workforces.
    • Weaknesses:
      • May result in conflicting feedback.
      • Poorly designed questions could yield non-specific insights.
      • Vulnerable to manipulation by biased participants.
  • Examples of 360-Degree Feedback:
    • Reinforcing Feedback Examples:
      • Recognizing an employee’s consistent sales performance.
      • Appreciating initiative taken to address problems.
      • Acknowledging and encouraging innovative ideas.
    • Redirecting Feedback Examples:
      • Addressing consistent lateness and missed deadlines.
      • Encouraging collaboration in a team player.
      • Supporting a withdrawn colleague to contribute in meetings.

Connected Business Frameworks

OKR

what-is-okr
Andy Grove, helped Intel become among the most valuable companies by 1997. In his years at Intel, he conceived a management and goal-setting system, called OKR, standing for “objectives and key results.” Venture capitalist and early investor in Google, John Doerr, systematized in the book “Measure What Matters.”

Balanced Scorecard

balanced-scorecard
First proposed by accounting academic Robert Kaplan, the balanced scorecard is a management system that allows an organization to focus on big-picture strategic goals. The four perspectives of the balanced scorecard include financial, customer, business process, and organizational capacity. From there, according to the balanced scorecard, it’s possible to have a holistic view of the business.

Lightning Decision Jam

lockes-goal-setting-theory
The theory was developed by psychologist Edwin Locke who also has a background in motivation and leadership research. Locke’s goal-setting theory of motivation provides a framework for setting effective and motivating goals. Locke was able to demonstrate that goal setting was linked to performance.

SMART Goals

smart-goals
A SMART goal is any goal with a carefully planned, concise, and trackable objective. To be such a goal needs to be specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-based. Bringing structure and trackability to goal setting increases the chances goals will be achieved, and it helps align the organization around those goals.

Backcasting

backcasting
Businesses use backcasting to plan for a desired future by determining the steps required to achieve that future. Backcasting is the opposite of forecasting, where a business sets future goals and works toward them by maintaining the status quo.

Moonshot Thinking

moonshot-thinking
Moonshot thinking is an approach to innovation, and it can be applied to business or any other discipline where you target at least 10X goals. That shifts the mindset, and it empowers a team of people to look for unconventional solutions, thus starting from first principles, by leveraging on fast-paced experimentation.

Connected Agile Frameworks

AIOps

aiops
AIOps is the application of artificial intelligence to IT operations. It has become particularly useful for modern IT management in hybridized, distributed, and dynamic environments. AIOps has become a key operational component of modern digital-based organizations, built around software and algorithms.

AgileSHIFT

AgileSHIFT
AgileSHIFT is a framework that prepares individuals for transformational change by creating a culture of agility.

Agile Methodology

agile-methodology
Agile started as a lightweight development method compared to heavyweight software development, which is the core paradigm of the previous decades of software development. By 2001 the Manifesto for Agile Software Development was born as a set of principles that defined the new paradigm for software development as a continuous iteration. This would also influence the way of doing business.

Agile Program Management

agile-program-management
Agile Program Management is a means of managing, planning, and coordinating interrelated work in such a way that value delivery is emphasized for all key stakeholders. Agile Program Management (AgilePgM) is a disciplined yet flexible agile approach to managing transformational change within an organization.

Agile Project Management

agile-project-management
Agile project management (APM) is a strategy that breaks large projects into smaller, more manageable tasks. In the APM methodology, each project is completed in small sections – often referred to as iterations. Each iteration is completed according to its project life cycle, beginning with the initial design and progressing to testing and then quality assurance.

Agile Modeling

agile-modeling
Agile Modeling (AM) is a methodology for modeling and documenting software-based systems. Agile Modeling is critical to the rapid and continuous delivery of software. It is a collection of values, principles, and practices that guide effective, lightweight software modeling.

Agile Business Analysis

agile-business-analysis
Agile Business Analysis (AgileBA) is certification in the form of guidance and training for business analysts seeking to work in agile environments. To support this shift, AgileBA also helps the business analyst relate Agile projects to a wider organizational mission or strategy. To ensure that analysts have the necessary skills and expertise, AgileBA certification was developed.

Agile Leadership

agile-leadership
Agile leadership is the embodiment of agile manifesto principles by a manager or management team. Agile leadership impacts two important levels of a business. The structural level defines the roles, responsibilities, and key performance indicators. The behavioral level describes the actions leaders exhibit to others based on agile principles. 

Bimodal Portfolio Management

bimodal-portfolio-management
Bimodal Portfolio Management (BimodalPfM) helps an organization manage both agile and traditional portfolios concurrently. Bimodal Portfolio Management – sometimes referred to as bimodal development – was coined by research and advisory company Gartner. The firm argued that many agile organizations still needed to run some aspects of their operations using traditional delivery models.

Business Innovation Matrix

business-innovation
Business innovation is about creating new opportunities for an organization to reinvent its core offerings, revenue streams, and enhance the value proposition for existing or new customers, thus renewing its whole business model. Business innovation springs by understanding the structure of the market, thus adapting or anticipating those changes.

Business Model Innovation

business-model-innovation
Business model innovation is about increasing the success of an organization with existing products and technologies by crafting a compelling value proposition able to propel a new business model to scale up customers and create a lasting competitive advantage. And it all starts by mastering the key customers.

Constructive Disruption

constructive-disruption
A consumer brand company like Procter & Gamble (P&G) defines “Constructive Disruption” as: a willingness to change, adapt, and create new trends and technologies that will shape our industry for the future. According to P&G, it moves around four pillars: lean innovation, brand building, supply chain, and digitalization & data analytics.

Continuous Innovation

continuous-innovation
That is a process that requires a continuous feedback loop to develop a valuable product and build a viable business model. Continuous innovation is a mindset where products and services are designed and delivered to tune them around the customers’ problem and not the technical solution of its founders.

Design Sprint

design-sprint
A design sprint is a proven five-day process where critical business questions are answered through speedy design and prototyping, focusing on the end-user. A design sprint starts with a weekly challenge that should finish with a prototype, test at the end, and therefore a lesson learned to be iterated.

Design Thinking

design-thinking
Tim Brown, Executive Chair of IDEO, defined design thinking as “a human-centered approach to innovation that draws from the designer’s toolkit to integrate the needs of people, the possibilities of technology, and the requirements for business success.” Therefore, desirability, feasibility, and viability are balanced to solve critical problems.

DevOps

devops-engineering
DevOps refers to a series of practices performed to perform automated software development processes. It is a conjugation of the term “development” and “operations” to emphasize how functions integrate across IT teams. DevOps strategies promote seamless building, testing, and deployment of products. It aims to bridge a gap between development and operations teams to streamline the development altogether.

Dual Track Agile

dual-track-agile
Product discovery is a critical part of agile methodologies, as its aim is to ensure that products customers love are built. Product discovery involves learning through a raft of methods, including design thinking, lean start-up, and A/B testing to name a few. Dual Track Agile is an agile methodology containing two separate tracks: the “discovery” track and the “delivery” track.

Feature-Driven Development

feature-driven-development
Feature-Driven Development is a pragmatic software process that is client and architecture-centric. Feature-Driven Development (FDD) is an agile software development model that organizes workflow according to which features need to be developed next.

eXtreme Programming

extreme-programming
eXtreme Programming was developed in the late 1990s by Ken Beck, Ron Jeffries, and Ward Cunningham. During this time, the trio was working on the Chrysler Comprehensive Compensation System (C3) to help manage the company payroll system. eXtreme Programming (XP) is a software development methodology. It is designed to improve software quality and the ability of software to adapt to changing customer needs.

ICE Scoring

ice-scoring-model
The ICE Scoring Model is an agile methodology that prioritizes features using data according to three components: impact, confidence, and ease of implementation. The ICE Scoring Model was initially created by author and growth expert Sean Ellis to help companies expand. Today, the model is broadly used to prioritize projects, features, initiatives, and rollouts. It is ideally suited for early-stage product development where there is a continuous flow of ideas and momentum must be maintained.

Innovation Funnel

innovation-funnel
An innovation funnel is a tool or process ensuring only the best ideas are executed. In a metaphorical sense, the funnel screens innovative ideas for viability so that only the best products, processes, or business models are launched to the market. An innovation funnel provides a framework for the screening and testing of innovative ideas for viability.

Innovation Matrix

types-of-innovation
According to how well defined is the problem and how well defined the domain, we have four main types of innovations: basic research (problem and domain or not well defined); breakthrough innovation (domain is not well defined, the problem is well defined); sustaining innovation (both problem and domain are well defined); and disruptive innovation (domain is well defined, the problem is not well defined).

Innovation Theory

innovation-theory
The innovation loop is a methodology/framework derived from the Bell Labs, which produced innovation at scale throughout the 20th century. They learned how to leverage a hybrid innovation management model based on science, invention, engineering, and manufacturing at scale. By leveraging individual genius, creativity, and small/large groups.

Lean vs. Agile

lean-methodology-vs-agile
The Agile methodology has been primarily thought of for software development (and other business disciplines have also adopted it). Lean thinking is a process improvement technique where teams prioritize the value streams to improve it continuously. Both methodologies look at the customer as the key driver to improvement and waste reduction. Both methodologies look at improvement as something continuous.

Lean Startup

startup-company
A startup company is a high-tech business that tries to build a scalable business model in tech-driven industries. A startup company usually follows a lean methodology, where continuous innovation, driven by built-in viral loops is the rule. Thus, driving growth and building network effects as a consequence of this strategy.

Kanban

kanban
Kanban is a lean manufacturing framework first developed by Toyota in the late 1940s. The Kanban framework is a means of visualizing work as it moves through identifying potential bottlenecks. It does that through a process called just-in-time (JIT) manufacturing to optimize engineering processes, speed up manufacturing products, and improve the go-to-market strategy.

Rapid Application Development

rapid-application-development
RAD was first introduced by author and consultant James Martin in 1991. Martin recognized and then took advantage of the endless malleability of software in designing development models. Rapid Application Development (RAD) is a methodology focusing on delivering rapidly through continuous feedback and frequent iterations.

Scaled Agile

scaled-agile-lean-development
Scaled Agile Lean Development (ScALeD) helps businesses discover a balanced approach to agile transition and scaling questions. The ScALed approach helps businesses successfully respond to change. Inspired by a combination of lean and agile values, ScALed is practitioner-based and can be completed through various agile frameworks and practices.

Spotify Model

spotify-model
The Spotify Model is an autonomous approach to scaling agile, focusing on culture communication, accountability, and quality. The Spotify model was first recognized in 2012 after Henrik Kniberg, and Anders Ivarsson released a white paper detailing how streaming company Spotify approached agility. Therefore, the Spotify model represents an evolution of agile.

Test-Driven Development

test-driven-development
As the name suggests, TDD is a test-driven technique for delivering high-quality software rapidly and sustainably. It is an iterative approach based on the idea that a failing test should be written before any code for a feature or function is written. Test-Driven Development (TDD) is an approach to software development that relies on very short development cycles.

Timeboxing

timeboxing
Timeboxing is a simple yet powerful time-management technique for improving productivity. Timeboxing describes the process of proactively scheduling a block of time to spend on a task in the future. It was first described by author James Martin in a book about agile software development.

Scrum

what-is-scrum
Scrum is a methodology co-created by Ken Schwaber and Jeff Sutherland for effective team collaboration on complex products. Scrum was primarily thought for software development projects to deliver new software capability every 2-4 weeks. It is a sub-group of agile also used in project management to improve startups’ productivity.

Scrumban

scrumban
Scrumban is a project management framework that is a hybrid of two popular agile methodologies: Scrum and Kanban. Scrumban is a popular approach to helping businesses focus on the right strategic tasks while simultaneously strengthening their processes.

Scrum Anti-Patterns

scrum-anti-patterns
Scrum anti-patterns describe any attractive, easy-to-implement solution that ultimately makes a problem worse. Therefore, these are the practice not to follow to prevent issues from emerging. Some classic examples of scrum anti-patterns comprise absent product owners, pre-assigned tickets (making individuals work in isolation), and discounting retrospectives (where review meetings are not useful to really make improvements).

Scrum At Scale

scrum-at-scale
Scrum at Scale (Scrum@Scale) is a framework that Scrum teams use to address complex problems and deliver high-value products. Scrum at Scale was created through a joint venture between the Scrum Alliance and Scrum Inc. The joint venture was overseen by Jeff Sutherland, a co-creator of Scrum and one of the principal authors of the Agile Manifesto.

Stretch Objectives

stretch-objectives
Stretch objectives describe any task an agile team plans to complete without expressly committing to do so. Teams incorporate stretch objectives during a Sprint or Program Increment (PI) as part of Scaled Agile. They are used when the agile team is unsure of its capacity to attain an objective. Therefore, stretch objectives are instead outcomes that, while extremely desirable, are not the difference between the success or failure of each sprint.

Waterfall

waterfall-model
The waterfall model was first described by Herbert D. Benington in 1956 during a presentation about the software used in radar imaging during the Cold War. Since there were no knowledge-based, creative software development strategies at the time, the waterfall method became standard practice. The waterfall model is a linear and sequential project management framework. 

Read Also: Continuous InnovationAgile MethodologyLean StartupBusiness Model InnovationProject Management.

Read Next: Agile Methodology, Lean Methodology, Agile Project Management, Scrum, Kanban, Six Sigma.

Main Guides:

Main Case Studies:

Discover more from FourWeekMBA

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Scroll to Top
FourWeekMBA