PFOF: Payment For Order Flow

Payment for order flow consists of a “kickback” or commission that the broker routing customers to a market maker (in charge of enabling the bid and ask price) will pay a commission to the broker as a sort of market-making fee.

Table of Contents

How does the payment for order floe work?

In an interview to Bernie Madoff back on May 2000, asked why his firm was “paying brokerages to ship trades your way” Madoff explained:

It’s a relatively small part, maybe 20 percent, of our business today. Payment for order flow was only an issue as it related to best execution. Does inducing someone to send an order to you present a problem as far as getting the right price goes? Quite honestly that depends on the firm. You’re all fiduciaries. As long as you operate in the proper fiduciary capacity, and you’re dealing with a reputable firm, it wasn’t a problem.

At the question “Will payment for order flow ever disappear?” Madoff replied:

No. I think it will get lower and lower as the spreads get lower and lower with decimals. No one tells a firm how they can advertise. If I want to hire salesmen to generate order flow, no one is going to object. I don’t have them. So if I want to use Fidelity’s salesmen and pay part of my trading profits in the form of a rebate, why shouldn’t I be allowed to do it? It was characterized as this bribe and kickback and something sinister, which was very easy to do. But if your girlfriend goes to buy stockings at a supermarket, the racks that display those stockings are usually paid for by the company that manufactured the stockings. Order flow is an issue that attracted a lot of attention but is grossly overrated.

Component	Description
Definition	Payment for Order Flow (PFOF) is a practice in financial markets where brokerage firms receive compensation from market makers or trading firms in exchange for directing customer orders to them for execution. It involves routing customer orders to external parties rather than executing them within the brokerage.
Origin	Payment for Order Flow began in the United States in the 1980s as a response to commission deregulation. It aimed to provide brokerage firms with an additional revenue stream by selling order flow to market makers. The practice gained popularity as electronic trading became more prevalent.
Implications	– Conflicts of Interest: PFOF raises concerns about potential conflicts of interest, as brokers may prioritize payment over obtaining the best execution for their customers. – Market Liquidity: PFOF can contribute to market liquidity as it encourages market makers to trade with retail orders. – Commission Reduction: It has allowed brokers to offer commission-free trading to retail investors.
Examples	– Robinhood: The popular online brokerage has faced scrutiny for its reliance on PFOF as a revenue source. – Market Makers: Firms like Citadel Securities and Virtu Financial are examples of market makers that pay for order flow.
Regulation	PFOF is regulated by financial authorities such as the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Regulations require brokers to disclose their PFOF practices and ensure best execution for customer orders.
Benefits	– Commission-Free Trading: Retail investors often benefit from commission-free trading, thanks to PFOF. – Brokerage Revenue: Brokerage firms generate income through PFOF, which can support their business models. – Market Efficiency: PFOF can contribute to tighter bid-ask spreads and increased market liquidity.
Concerns	– Conflicts of Interest: Brokers may have an incentive to route orders to the highest bidder, potentially compromising customer interests. – Execution Quality: Some argue that PFOF could lead to suboptimal execution for retail traders. – Lack of Transparency: Critics say that the practice lacks transparency, making it hard for customers to assess its impact.
Recent Developments	In early 2021, the GameStop trading frenzy drew significant attention to PFOF and market dynamics. This led to discussions and regulatory scrutiny regarding the practice’s impact on market integrity and investor protection.

The Robinhood Saga

how-does-robinhood-make-money — Robinhood is an app that helps to invest in stocks, ETFs, options, and cryptocurrencies, all commission-free. Robinhood earns money by offering: Robinhood Gold, a margin trading service, which starts at $6 a month, earn interest from customer cash and stocks, and rebates from market makers and trading venues.

The payment for order flow issue got a major interest in 2021, as meme investors targeted various stocks, and some of them were backed by hedge funds, which were squeezed out.

Robinhood stopped trading these stocks, and the suspect from some was that the platform was acting in favor of these players instead of its retail investors. And some claimed this might be due to the fact Robinhood earns money also through payments for order flow.

Indeed, brokerage firms like Robinhood pass along their customers’ trades to other market makers are compensated on top of the spread between the bid and ask price with a fee for each trade as a “market maker fee” (the largest market maker for options in the US is called Citadel Securities – owned by Citadel LLC, which during the short squeeze from Redditors bailed out the hedge fund Melvin Capital).

meme-investing — Meme stocks are securities that go viral online and attract the attention of the younger generation of retail investors. Meme investing, therefore, is a bottom-up, community-driven approach to investing that positions itself as the antonym to Wall Street investing. Also, meme investing often looks at attractive opportunities with lower liquidity that might be easier to overtake, thus enabling wide speculation, as “meme investors” often look for disproportionate short-term returns.

Understanding The Issue

The CEO of Robinhood highlighted that the main issue with payment for order flow was the limitation posed by Rule 612:

In general, the Rule prohibits market participants from displaying, ranking, or accepting quotations, orders, or indications of interest in any NMS stock priced in an increment smaller than $0.01 if the quotation, order, or indication of interest is priced equal to or greater than $1.00 per share.

As Robinhood’s CEO highlighted:

Back in 2005, when Rule 612 was adopted, the consensus was that price increments of $0.0001 were economically insignificant. Supporters of the rule argued that sophisticated investors may use these smaller increments to step ahead of retail investors by trivial amounts. Some also argued that technology hadn’t advanced enough to properly handle an enormous increase in on-exchange quoting.

Key Highlights:

Payment for Order Flow (PFOF) Definition: PFOF is a practice in financial markets where brokerage firms receive compensation from market makers or trading firms in exchange for directing customer orders to them for execution. It originated in the 1980s in response to commission deregulation and has become prevalent in electronic trading.
Bernie Madoff’s Perspective: Bernie Madoff, in a 2000 interview, discussed the practice of PFOF, highlighting that it constituted a small part of business and was primarily related to best execution concerns. He emphasized the importance of operating as fiduciaries and dealing with reputable firms.
Predictions about PFOF: Madoff suggested that while PFOF might decrease over time as spreads narrow, it is unlikely to disappear entirely. He likened it to common marketing practices in other industries, emphasizing that it was often mischaracterized as sinister.
Implementation of Round-Robin Brainstorming: Round-robin brainstorming is a structured approach to idea generation that promotes equal participation and collaboration. It involves arranging team members in a circle, articulating the problem clearly, and allowing each participant to contribute ideas in turn, building on each other’s contributions iteratively.
Advantages of Round-Robin Brainstorming: This method offers benefits such as equal participation, collaborative environment, diverse perspectives, and a structured process. It ensures that all ideas are considered and encourages creativity and innovation.
Disadvantages of Round-Robin Brainstorming: Despite its benefits, round-robin brainstorming may have drawbacks such as a lack of idea anonymity and limited input from each participant. These limitations can impact the effectiveness of the brainstorming session.
Recent Developments and Robinhood Saga: The GameStop trading frenzy in early 2021 drew attention to PFOF and market dynamics. Robinhood, a popular brokerage app, faced scrutiny for its reliance on PFOF as a revenue source and its handling of meme stock trading. This raised concerns about conflicts of interest and market integrity.
Meme Investing: Meme investing involves bottom-up, community-driven approaches to investing, often targeting securities that gain viral attention online. This approach contrasts with traditional Wall Street investing and can involve speculation and disproportionate short-term returns.
CEO of Robinhood’s Concerns about Rule 612: The CEO of Robinhood highlighted concerns about Rule 612, which limits price increments in trading. He argued that technological advancements had rendered these limitations outdated and hindered innovation in the market.
Regulatory Considerations: PFOF is regulated by financial authorities such as the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Regulations require brokers to disclose their PFOF practices and ensure best execution for customer orders, addressing concerns about conflicts of interest and transparency.

Related Frameworks	Description	When to Apply
Market Maker Model	– The Market Maker Model involves market makers executing trades on behalf of clients by buying and selling securities at quoted bid and ask prices. Market makers profit from the spread between bid and ask prices and may also receive payment for order flow from executing brokers, which can affect execution quality and market liquidity.	– When analyzing the dynamics of market making and order execution in financial markets, understanding the impact of payment for order flow on execution quality and market efficiency.
Best Execution Framework	– Best Execution Framework is a regulatory requirement for brokers to seek the best possible outcome for client orders in terms of price, speed, and likelihood of execution. Brokers must consider factors such as execution quality, liquidity, and market impact when routing orders and executing trades, including the potential impact of payment for order flow on order execution quality and client outcomes.	– When evaluating brokers’ compliance with best execution obligations, assessing the impact of payment for order flow on execution quality and client outcomes, and ensuring fair treatment of client orders.
Transparency and Disclosure Standards	– Transparency and Disclosure Standards involve regulatory requirements for brokers and market makers to disclose their practices, including payment for order flow arrangements, to clients and regulators. Transparency enables clients to understand how their orders are executed, including any potential conflicts of interest or incentives that may arise from payment for order flow.	– When developing disclosure policies and practices to inform clients about order execution practices, including payment for order flow arrangements, and ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements and industry standards.
Order Routing and Execution Policies	– Order Routing and Execution Policies are internal guidelines and procedures adopted by brokers and market makers to route and execute client orders in compliance with best execution obligations and regulatory requirements. These policies may address factors such as order handling, routing protocols, and the consideration of payment for order flow arrangements in order execution decisions.	– When designing and implementing order routing and execution policies to ensure compliance with best execution obligations, managing conflicts of interest related to payment for order flow, and optimizing execution quality for client orders.
Regulatory Oversight and Enforcement	– Regulatory Oversight and Enforcement refers to the role of regulators in monitoring and enforcing compliance with rules and regulations related to order execution, payment for order flow, and market integrity. Regulators may conduct examinations, investigations, and enforcement actions to ensure that brokers and market participants adhere to applicable laws and standards.	– When overseeing compliance with regulatory requirements governing order execution and payment for order flow, conducting examinations and audits of brokers and market makers, and enforcing rules and regulations to promote market integrity and investor protection.
Conflicts of Interest Management	– Conflicts of Interest Management involves identifying, mitigating, and managing conflicts of interest that may arise from payment for order flow arrangements, such as the potential incentive for brokers to prioritize order flow revenue over best execution for clients. Firms may implement policies, controls, and disclosures to address conflicts and ensure fair treatment of client orders.	– When developing conflict of interest policies and procedures to address risks associated with payment for order flow, implementing controls to mitigate conflicts, and disclosing conflicts to clients and regulators in accordance with regulatory requirements and industry best practices.
Market Quality Metrics	– Market Quality Metrics are quantitative measures used to assess the quality, efficiency, and fairness of financial markets. These metrics may include bid-ask spreads, price impact, execution speed, and market liquidity, which can be influenced by factors such as payment for order flow arrangements and market maker activities. Market quality metrics help evaluate the impact of order execution practices on market integrity and investor outcomes.	– When evaluating market quality and efficiency, analyzing the impact of payment for order flow on market liquidity and price discovery, and assessing the effectiveness of regulatory policies and market structure reforms in promoting fair and orderly markets.
Client Education and Communication	– Client Education and Communication involve informing clients about order execution practices, including payment for order flow arrangements, and educating them about the factors that may affect order execution quality and outcomes. Firms may provide disclosures, educational materials, and client communications to promote transparency and help clients make informed decisions about their trading activities.	– When communicating with clients about order execution practices and potential conflicts of interest related to payment for order flow, providing educational resources and disclosures to help clients understand the implications for their trading experience, and fostering trust and transparency in client relationships.
Market Surveillance and Analysis	– Market Surveillance and Analysis involves monitoring and analyzing market data and trading activity to detect potential misconduct, manipulation, or abusive practices. Surveillance systems may track order flow, execution quality, and market trends to identify anomalies or patterns that may indicate improper behavior, including potential issues related to payment for order flow arrangements.	– When conducting market surveillance and analysis, monitoring order execution practices and market maker activities, and detecting any irregularities or abuses that may arise from payment for order flow arrangements or other market structure features.
Market Structure and Regulation Research	– Market Structure and Regulation Research involves studying the design, operation, and regulation of financial markets to understand how different market structures and regulatory frameworks impact market quality, efficiency, and integrity. Research may explore topics such as payment for order flow, maker-taker pricing, and order routing practices to inform policy discussions and regulatory reforms.	– When conducting research on market structure and regulation, analyzing the impact of payment for order flow on market dynamics and investor outcomes, and informing policymakers, regulators, and market participants about potential risks and opportunities associated with order execution practices.