internal-locus-of-control

What is an internal locus of control?

Those with an internal locus of control believe they have control over what happens in their life. In other words, they believe the interactions they have with their environment will produce predictable results. Individuals with an internal locus of control believe the events in their lives are mostly the result of their own actions.

ComponentDescription
DefinitionInternal Locus of Control is a psychological concept that refers to an individual’s belief or perception that they have control over their own life, actions, and outcomes. People with a strong internal locus of control tend to attribute their successes and failures to their own efforts, decisions, and abilities rather than external factors or luck. It is a key dimension of personality and a fundamental aspect of individual psychology.
Key CharacteristicsPersonal Responsibility: Individuals with an internal locus of control take personal responsibility for their actions and outcomes. – Self-Determination: They believe they have the power to influence events and shape their future. – Autonomy: They tend to be more independent and self-reliant in decision-making. – Problem-Solving Orientation: They approach challenges with a problem-solving mindset, believing they can overcome obstacles. – Higher Self-Efficacy: Internal locus of control is associated with higher self-efficacy and confidence in one’s abilities.
MeasurementInternal Locus of Control is typically assessed using psychological assessments and questionnaires. One common instrument is the Rotter’s Locus of Control Scale, which asks individuals to rate the extent to which they agree or disagree with statements related to control over life events. The scale provides a numerical score that reflects the degree of internal or external locus of control.
ImplicationsMotivation: Individuals with an internal locus of control are often more motivated to set and achieve personal goals. – Resilience: They tend to cope better with stress and adversity, viewing challenges as opportunities for growth. – Health Behavior: Research suggests that people with an internal locus of control are more likely to engage in healthy behaviors and take proactive steps to maintain their well-being. – Career Success: Internal locus of control can be associated with career success as individuals take initiative and seek opportunities. – Personal Growth: It is linked to personal development and a sense of empowerment.
Contrast with ExternalExternal Locus of Control: In contrast, individuals with an external locus of control believe that external forces, luck, fate, or other people primarily determine their life events and outcomes. They may feel less in control of their lives and decisions. – Internal-External Locus of Control Continuum: Locus of control is often viewed as a continuum, with varying degrees of internal and external beliefs. Most individuals fall somewhere between the two extremes.
Development and ChangeLocus of control can evolve over time and is influenced by a combination of genetic, environmental, and experiential factors. Psychological interventions, such as cognitive-behavioral therapy, can help individuals shift from an external to an internal locus of control through cognitive restructuring and self-empowerment techniques.
ExamplesPersonal Finance: Someone with an internal locus of control might diligently save money and invest, believing they can shape their financial future. – Academic Success: Students with an internal locus of control are more likely to attribute good grades to their efforts and study habits. – Health and Wellness: Someone with an internal locus of control may adopt a healthy lifestyle, believing they can prevent illness through their choices. – Career Advancement: A professional with an internal locus of control may actively seek promotions and career growth opportunities. – Entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurs often have a strong internal locus of control, believing they can build successful businesses through their efforts.

Understanding an internal locus of control

The concept of a locus of control was first proposed by American psychologist Julian B. Rotter in 1954.

Then known as the locus of control of reinforcement, the theory posited that the level of autonomy (or control) one had over their life influenced their behavior.

Rotter described his idea in terms of social learning theory and whether the individual believed that rewards and punishments in their life were dictated to them by external factors.

Later work by Rotter in the 1960s defined the locus of control as the degree to which someone perceived an outcome as being the result of their own actions.

Importantly, this perception exists on a spectrum which is still used today.

On one end of the spectrum is an internal locus of control where individuals believe life outcomes are dependent on their own actions and personal characteristics.

Opposite is the external locus of control, where the individual believes that outcomes are determined by forces beyond their control such as chance or fate. 

Characteristics of an internal locus of control

Some of the characteristics of an internal locus of control include:

  • Higher life satisfaction.
  • Less influenced by the opinions of others.
  • The ability to approach challenges with confidence and purpose.
  • The tendency to be happier, healthier, and more independent.
  • Equate hard work and motivation with goal achievement. 
  • Lower stress levels, and
  • Low neuroticism.

Impacts of an internal locus of control

Unsurprisingly, individuals with a strong internal locus of control tend to be more content and find themselves in better-paid jobs.

Those with this mindset possess a strong sense of personal agency, which means they can make deliberate decisions and act intentionally. 

The internal locus of control is also related to aspects of self-determination theory.

The theory, which was first introduced in 1985 by psychologists Richard Ryan and Edward Deci, posits that individuals are motivated by three high-level psychological needs: competence, connection (relatedness), and autonomy. 

When these needs are fulfilled, they form the basis of intrinsic motivation where the individual engages in an activity for the inherent satisfaction or fun of it.

Unlike those with an external locus of control, they are not motivated by some external reward or punishment. 

Potential negative impacts

Despite the obvious benefits of an internal locus of control, the individual who believes they are the sole masters of their destiny will experience disappointment sooner or later.

Since these individuals believe they can control the outcome of any situation, they work hard to reach their objectives and strive to ensure there is no room for error.

Left unchecked, this can result in perfectionist tendencies which may be projected onto co-workers or friends and family.

When an inevitable failure occurs, those with an internal locus of control may also experience low self-esteem and anxiety because they attribute the loss to an action they performed or a decision they made.

Some may even be incapable of considering that an external factor was behind the failure.

Examples of Internal Locus of Control

  • Academic Performance: A student with an internal locus of control believes that their good grades are a result of their own efforts, study habits, and dedication to learning.
  • Career Advancement: An employee who receives a promotion at work attributes it to their hard work, skills, and performance, believing that they have control over their career progression.
  • Health and Wellness: A person with an internal locus of control takes responsibility for their health and believes that their lifestyle choices and behaviors directly influence their well-being and longevity.
  • Financial Success: An individual who saves money regularly and manages their finances responsibly believes that their financial security is a result of their own money management skills and discipline.
  • Athletic Achievement: An athlete with an internal locus of control attributes their success in sports to their training regimen, dedication, and skill development rather than luck or external factors.
  • Relationship Satisfaction: A person in a healthy and fulfilling relationship believes that their efforts in communication, understanding, and compromise contribute to the strength and happiness of the relationship.
  • Entrepreneurial Success: An entrepreneur with an internal locus of control believes that their business’s growth and success are a direct result of their strategic decisions, innovation, and hard work.
  • Personal Growth: A person who actively seeks self-improvement and personal development believes that their growth and achievements are a result of their own efforts and determination.
  • Conflict Resolution: When faced with a problem or disagreement, an individual with an internal locus of control takes initiative in finding solutions and believes they can influence the outcome positively.
  • Life Satisfaction: Someone with an internal locus of control generally feels content and fulfilled in life, attributing their overall well-being to their own actions, choices, and attitudes.

Key takeaways:

  • Individuals with an internal locus of control believe the events in their lives are mostly the result of their own actions.
  • Some of the characteristics of an internal locus of control include higher life satisfaction, lower stress levels, and low neuroticism. Individuals also tend to be goal-oriented, happier, healthier, and more independent.
  • Despite the clear benefits of an internal locus of control, the individual who believes they are the sole masters of their destiny will inevitably experience disappointment. This can cause perfectionism and associated anxiety and low self-esteem.
Related FrameworkDescriptionWhen to Apply
Internal Locus of ControlInternal Locus of Control refers to the belief that individuals have control over their own lives and experiences, attributing outcomes to their own actions, choices, and efforts rather than external factors or luck. It is associated with feelings of empowerment, self-efficacy, and responsibility for one’s circumstances. Understanding and fostering an internal locus of control can promote resilience, motivation, and proactive problem-solving.When encouraging personal growth or supporting resilience, emphasizing an internal locus of control can empower individuals and promote self-efficacy by highlighting personal agency and responsibility, thus enhancing motivation and fostering proactive behavior in personal development, goal-setting, or coping with challenges, ultimately cultivating a sense of ownership and promoting positive outcomes through self-determination and belief in one’s abilities.
Self-Efficacy TheorySelf-Efficacy Theory, proposed by Albert Bandura, suggests that individuals’ beliefs in their own ability to succeed in specific situations influence their behavior, motivation, and perseverance. High self-efficacy is associated with setting challenging goals, exerting effort, and persisting in the face of obstacles, while low self-efficacy may lead to avoidance, procrastination, or giving up easily. Building self-efficacy involves mastery experiences, social modeling, verbal persuasion, and physiological states. Understanding and nurturing self-efficacy can enhance performance and well-being.When building confidence or enhancing performance, applying Self-Efficacy Theory can boost motivation and improve outcomes by providing opportunities for success, offering positive feedback, and setting achievable goals, thus increasing self-belief and encouraging persistence in education, work settings, or personal challenges, ultimately empowering individuals to overcome obstacles and achieve their aspirations through belief in their capabilities and effective goal-setting.
Attribution TheoryAttribution Theory examines how individuals explain the causes of events or outcomes, whether to internal factors (e.g., abilities, effort) or external factors (e.g., luck, task difficulty). It explores how attributions affect emotions, motivation, and behavior. Internal attributions tend to foster a sense of control and responsibility, while external attributions may lead to feelings of helplessness or resentment. Understanding attribution processes can provide insight into individuals’ reactions and motivations, guiding interventions to promote adaptive attributions and resilience.When interpreting behavior or addressing performance, considering Attribution Theory can inform feedback and motivate improvement by highlighting causal beliefs and evaluating controllability, thus shaping perceptions and encouraging adaptive responses in performance evaluations, coaching sessions, or conflict resolution, ultimately fostering accountability and promoting psychological well-being through balanced attributional patterns and positive self-reflection.
Sense of ControlSense of Control refers to individuals’ subjective perception of their ability to influence events and outcomes in their lives. It encompasses feelings of autonomy, mastery, and predictability, contributing to psychological well-being and adaptive coping. A strong sense of control is associated with lower stress levels, greater resilience, and improved health outcomes. Cultivating a sense of control involves enhancing perceived agency, promoting self-determination, and providing opportunities for meaningful choice and autonomy. Understanding and nurturing a sense of control can enhance individuals’ quality of life and overall functioning.When promoting well-being or supporting adaptive coping, fostering a sense of control can reduce stress and enhance resilience by empowering individuals and promoting autonomy, thus improving mental health and facilitating effective coping strategies in clinical interventions, healthcare settings, or community programs, ultimately enhancing individuals’ quality of life and promoting positive outcomes through perceived agency and personal empowerment.
Self-Determination TheorySelf-Determination Theory posits that humans have three basic psychological needs: autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Fulfilling these needs is essential for intrinsic motivation, personal growth, and well-being. Autonomy involves feeling in control of one’s choices and actions, competence relates to feeling effective and capable, and relatedness pertains to feeling connected to others and valued. Understanding and supporting these psychological needs can foster intrinsic motivation, positive relationships, and psychological flourishing.When nurturing motivation or promoting well-being, applying Self-Determination Theory can enhance satisfaction and promote engagement by supporting autonomy, building competence, and fostering connection, thus facilitating intrinsic motivation and promoting positive relationships in education, work environments, or personal development, ultimately cultivating psychological flourishing and sustained fulfillment through fulfillment of basic psychological needs and supportive social contexts.
Internal Control PsychologyInternal Control Psychology focuses on individuals’ beliefs about their ability to control events and outcomes in their lives. It examines how perceptions of control influence behavior, emotions, and mental health. Internal control beliefs are associated with greater resilience, adaptive coping, and psychological well-being, while external control beliefs may lead to learned helplessness or maladaptive coping strategies. Understanding and promoting internal control beliefs can empower individuals and improve their ability to manage stress and adversity effectively.When supporting resilience or enhancing coping skills, considering Internal Control Psychology can promote empowerment and improve mental health by addressing perceptions of control and encouraging adaptive coping strategies, thus building resilience and facilitating effective stress management in clinical interventions, psychotherapy, or stress reduction programs, ultimately empowering individuals to navigate challenges and achieve psychological well-being through belief in their capacity for control and active coping behaviors.
Mastery OrientationMastery Orientation refers to individuals’ tendency to approach tasks with a focus on learning, improvement, and mastery rather than solely on performance outcomes or social comparison. It involves embracing challenges, persisting in the face of setbacks, and seeking opportunities for growth and development. Cultivating a mastery orientation involves fostering a growth mindset, emphasizing effort over innate ability, and providing constructive feedback and support. Understanding and promoting mastery orientation can enhance motivation, resilience, and learning outcomes in various domains.When fostering learning or promoting growth mindset, emphasizing Mastery Orientation can enhance motivation and improve performance by encouraging effort and celebrating progress, thus cultivating resilience and facilitating skill development in educational settings, professional development, or personal pursuits, ultimately promoting lifelong learning and nurturing a culture of continuous improvement through focus on mastery and commitment to growth.
Personal AgencyPersonal Agency refers to individuals’ capacity to act independently and make choices that influence their lives. It encompasses a sense of control, self-direction, and responsibility for one’s actions and decisions. Cultivating personal agency involves developing self-awareness, setting meaningful goals, and taking proactive steps to achieve them. Personal agency is essential for autonomy, empowerment, and pursuing one’s aspirations. Understanding and nurturing personal agency can empower individuals to navigate life’s challenges, pursue their passions, and create meaningful outcomes.When empowering individuals or supporting goal attainment, fostering Personal Agency can promote autonomy and encourage initiative by cultivating self-awareness and encouraging proactive behavior, thus enhancing personal fulfillment and facilitating goal achievement in career development, personal growth initiatives, or life transitions, ultimately empowering individuals to shape their own destinies and realize their potential through self-directed action and personal accountability.
Resilience FrameworkThe Resilience Framework encompasses individuals’ capacity to adapt and thrive in the face of adversity, stress, or significant life challenges. It involves bouncing back from setbacks, maintaining emotional balance, and finding meaning and purpose in difficult circumstances. Resilience is influenced by various factors, including social support, coping strategies, and personal attributes. Cultivating resilience involves fostering coping skills, building supportive relationships, and reframing adversity as an opportunity for growth. Understanding and fostering resilience can enhance individuals’ ability to navigate life’s ups and downs effectively.When building coping skills or nurturing emotional well-being, applying the Resilience Framework can enhance adaptability and promote psychological strength by providing support and encouraging positive coping strategies, thus facilitating recovery and fostering personal growth in mental health interventions, trauma recovery, or stress management programs, ultimately empowering individuals to thrive in the face of adversity and find meaning in life challenges through resilient attitudes and effective coping behaviors.

Read Next: Heuristics, Biases.

Connected Thinking Frameworks

Convergent vs. Divergent Thinking

convergent-vs-divergent-thinking
Convergent thinking occurs when the solution to a problem can be found by applying established rules and logical reasoning. Whereas divergent thinking is an unstructured problem-solving method where participants are encouraged to develop many innovative ideas or solutions to a given problem. Where convergent thinking might work for larger, mature organizations where divergent thinking is more suited for startups and innovative companies.

Critical Thinking

critical-thinking
Critical thinking involves analyzing observations, facts, evidence, and arguments to form a judgment about what someone reads, hears, says, or writes.

Systems Thinking

systems-thinking
Systems thinking is a holistic means of investigating the factors and interactions that could contribute to a potential outcome. It is about thinking non-linearly, and understanding the second-order consequences of actions and input into the system.

Vertical Thinking

vertical-thinking
Vertical thinking, on the other hand, is a problem-solving approach that favors a selective, analytical, structured, and sequential mindset. The focus of vertical thinking is to arrive at a reasoned, defined solution.

Maslow’s Hammer

einstellung-effect
Maslow’s Hammer, otherwise known as the law of the instrument or the Einstellung effect, is a cognitive bias causing an over-reliance on a familiar tool. This can be expressed as the tendency to overuse a known tool (perhaps a hammer) to solve issues that might require a different tool. This problem is persistent in the business world where perhaps known tools or frameworks might be used in the wrong context (like business plans used as planning tools instead of only investors’ pitches).

Peter Principle

peter-principle
The Peter Principle was first described by Canadian sociologist Lawrence J. Peter in his 1969 book The Peter Principle. The Peter Principle states that people are continually promoted within an organization until they reach their level of incompetence.

Straw Man Fallacy

straw-man-fallacy
The straw man fallacy describes an argument that misrepresents an opponent’s stance to make rebuttal more convenient. The straw man fallacy is a type of informal logical fallacy, defined as a flaw in the structure of an argument that renders it invalid.

Streisand Effect

streisand-effect
The Streisand Effect is a paradoxical phenomenon where the act of suppressing information to reduce visibility causes it to become more visible. In 2003, Streisand attempted to suppress aerial photographs of her Californian home by suing photographer Kenneth Adelman for an invasion of privacy. Adelman, who Streisand assumed was paparazzi, was instead taking photographs to document and study coastal erosion. In her quest for more privacy, Streisand’s efforts had the opposite effect.

Heuristic

heuristic
As highlighted by German psychologist Gerd Gigerenzer in the paper “Heuristic Decision Making,” the term heuristic is of Greek origin, meaning “serving to find out or discover.” More precisely, a heuristic is a fast and accurate way to make decisions in the real world, which is driven by uncertainty.

Recognition Heuristic

recognition-heuristic
The recognition heuristic is a psychological model of judgment and decision making. It is part of a suite of simple and economical heuristics proposed by psychologists Daniel Goldstein and Gerd Gigerenzer. The recognition heuristic argues that inferences are made about an object based on whether it is recognized or not.

Representativeness Heuristic

representativeness-heuristic
The representativeness heuristic was first described by psychologists Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky. The representativeness heuristic judges the probability of an event according to the degree to which that event resembles a broader class. When queried, most will choose the first option because the description of John matches the stereotype we may hold for an archaeologist.

Take-The-Best Heuristic

take-the-best-heuristic
The take-the-best heuristic is a decision-making shortcut that helps an individual choose between several alternatives. The take-the-best (TTB) heuristic decides between two or more alternatives based on a single good attribute, otherwise known as a cue. In the process, less desirable attributes are ignored.

Biases

biases
The concept of cognitive biases was introduced and popularized by the work of Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman in 1972. Biases are seen as systematic errors and flaws that make humans deviate from the standards of rationality, thus making us inept at making good decisions under uncertainty.

Bundling Bias

bundling-bias
The bundling bias is a cognitive bias in e-commerce where a consumer tends not to use all of the products bought as a group, or bundle. Bundling occurs when individual products or services are sold together as a bundle. Common examples are tickets and experiences. The bundling bias dictates that consumers are less likely to use each item in the bundle. This means that the value of the bundle and indeed the value of each item in the bundle is decreased.

Barnum Effect

barnum-effect
The Barnum Effect is a cognitive bias where individuals believe that generic information – which applies to most people – is specifically tailored for themselves.

First-Principles Thinking

first-principles-thinking
First-principles thinking – sometimes called reasoning from first principles – is used to reverse-engineer complex problems and encourage creativity. It involves breaking down problems into basic elements and reassembling them from the ground up. Elon Musk is among the strongest proponents of this way of thinking.

Ladder Of Inference

ladder-of-inference
The ladder of inference is a conscious or subconscious thinking process where an individual moves from a fact to a decision or action. The ladder of inference was created by academic Chris Argyris to illustrate how people form and then use mental models to make decisions.

Six Thinking Hats Model

six-thinking-hats-model
The Six Thinking Hats model was created by psychologist Edward de Bono in 1986, who noted that personality type was a key driver of how people approached problem-solving. For example, optimists view situations differently from pessimists. Analytical individuals may generate ideas that a more emotional person would not, and vice versa.

Second-Order Thinking

second-order-thinking
Second-order thinking is a means of assessing the implications of our decisions by considering future consequences. Second-order thinking is a mental model that considers all future possibilities. It encourages individuals to think outside of the box so that they can prepare for every and eventuality. It also discourages the tendency for individuals to default to the most obvious choice.

Lateral Thinking

lateral-thinking
Lateral thinking is a business strategy that involves approaching a problem from a different direction. The strategy attempts to remove traditionally formulaic and routine approaches to problem-solving by advocating creative thinking, therefore finding unconventional ways to solve a known problem. This sort of non-linear approach to problem-solving, can at times, create a big impact.

Bounded Rationality

bounded-rationality
Bounded rationality is a concept attributed to Herbert Simon, an economist and political scientist interested in decision-making and how we make decisions in the real world. In fact, he believed that rather than optimizing (which was the mainstream view in the past decades) humans follow what he called satisficing.

Dunning-Kruger Effect

dunning-kruger-effect
The Dunning-Kruger effect describes a cognitive bias where people with low ability in a task overestimate their ability to perform that task well. Consumers or businesses that do not possess the requisite knowledge make bad decisions. What’s more, knowledge gaps prevent the person or business from seeing their mistakes.

Occam’s Razor

occams-razor
Occam’s Razor states that one should not increase (beyond reason) the number of entities required to explain anything. All things being equal, the simplest solution is often the best one. The principle is attributed to 14th-century English theologian William of Ockham.

Mandela Effect

mandela-effect
The Mandela effect is a phenomenon where a large group of people remembers an event differently from how it occurred. The Mandela effect was first described in relation to Fiona Broome, who believed that former South African President Nelson Mandela died in prison during the 1980s. While Mandela was released from prison in 1990 and died 23 years later, Broome remembered news coverage of his death in prison and even a speech from his widow. Of course, neither event occurred in reality. But Broome was later to discover that she was not the only one with the same recollection of events.

Crowding-Out Effect

crowding-out-effect
The crowding-out effect occurs when public sector spending reduces spending in the private sector.

Bandwagon Effect

bandwagon-effect
The bandwagon effect tells us that the more a belief or idea has been adopted by more people within a group, the more the individual adoption of that idea might increase within the same group. This is the psychological effect that leads to herd mentality. What in marketing can be associated with social proof.

Read Next: BiasesBounded RationalityMandela EffectDunning-Kruger EffectLindy EffectCrowding Out EffectBandwagon Effect.

Main Guides:

Scroll to Top

Discover more from FourWeekMBA

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

FourWeekMBA