Straw Man Fallacy
Gambler’s Fallacy
Base Rate Fallacy
Pygmalion Effect
Barnum Effect
Bottom-Dollar Effect
Bye-Now Effect
Butterfly Effect
IKEA Effect
Halo Effect
Dunning-Kruger Effect
Occam’s Razor
Mandela Effect
Crowding-Out Effect
Bandwagon Effect
Ringelmann Effect
Law of Unintended Consequences
House Money
Snowball Effect
Hawthorne Effect
Cognitive Biases and Psychological Phenomena
- Straw Man Fallacy: Misrepresenting an opponent’s argument to make it easier to rebut.
- Gambler’s Fallacy: Mistaken belief that past events influence future events in games of chance.
- Base Rate Fallacy: Inaccurately judging the likelihood of a situation by not considering all relevant data.
- Pygmalion Effect: Higher expectations lead to an increase in performance.
- Barnum Effect: Believing generic information is specifically tailored to oneself.
- Bottom-Dollar Effect: Disliking purchases that exhaust remaining budget.
- Bye-Now Effect: Mistaking the word “bye” for “buy” and paying more as a result.
- Butterfly Effect: Simple actions yield large rewards.
- IKEA Effect: Valuing something more if one has made it themselves.
- Halo Effect: Overall impression influences feelings and thoughts about a business, brand, or product.
- Dunning-Kruger Effect: People with low ability overestimate their competence.
- Occam’s Razor: The simplest solution is often the best one.
- Mandela Effect: Large groups remember an event differently from reality.
- Crowding-Out Effect: Public sector spending reduces private sector spending.
- Bandwagon Effect: More people adopting a belief increases individual adoption within a group.
- Ringelmann Effect: Individuals become less productive as group size increases.
- Law of Unintended Consequences: Actions can have unexpected and unintended effects.
- House Money Effect: Investors take higher risks with reinvested capital than with initial investment.
- Snowball Effect: Any action or event evolves from something small to something larger and significant.
- Hawthorne Effect: People work harder or perform better when they know they are being observed.
User Manual to Fallacies and Biases
Cognitive Bias/Phenomenon | Description | When to Use | Advantages | Drawbacks |
---|---|---|---|---|
Straw Man Fallacy | Misrepresents an opponent’s stance to facilitate rebuttal. | When critiquing arguments and identifying flawed reasoning. | Helps in exposing weak arguments and logical flaws. | Can lead to misunderstandings and miscommunication if not used carefully. |
Gambler’s Fallacy | Belief that past events influence future events. | When analyzing probability and randomness in decision-making. | Raises awareness about the fallacy of relying on past outcomes to predict future ones. | May lead to poor decisions based on unfounded expectations. |
Base Rate Fallacy | Inaccurate judgment of likelihood by neglecting relevant data. | When making decisions involving probabilities and statistics. | Highlights the importance of considering base rates in decision-making. | Can result in decisions that ignore critical data and context. |
Pygmalion Effect | Higher expectations lead to improved performance. | When managing and motivating teams or individuals. | Encourages leaders to set high expectations and foster self-fulfilling prophecies. | Unrealistic expectations may create undue pressure and stress. |
Barnum Effect | Belief that generic information applies specifically to oneself. | When analyzing marketing and psychological influences on behavior. | Raises awareness about susceptibility to personalized marketing tactics. | Can lead to misinterpretation and misguided beliefs. |
Bottom-Dollar Effect | Disliking purchases that deplete the remaining budget. | When analyzing consumer behavior and budgeting decisions. | Provides insights into the emotional impact of budget constraints on purchases. | May not apply to all consumer decisions and contexts. |
Bye-Now Effect | Confusing “bye” with “buy,” affecting consumer behavior. | When studying language and its influence on decision-making. | Demonstrates the impact of subtle linguistic cues on behavior. | Limited applicability outside of specific linguistic contexts. |
Butterfly Effect | Small actions can lead to significant consequences. | When discussing the impact of minor decisions and events. | Raises awareness about the potential ripple effects of seemingly insignificant actions. | Can be challenging to predict and measure the actual impact. |
IKEA Effect | Valuing self-made products more than others. | When analyzing consumer preferences and product customization. | Provides insights into the psychological attachment to self-created items. | May not apply universally to all products and contexts. |
Halo Effect | Overall impression influences perceptions of specific attributes. | When studying brand perception and its impact on consumer behavior. | Highlights the importance of holistic brand management and image. | Can lead to biased judgments and oversimplification of evaluations. |
Dunning-Kruger Effect | Low-ability individuals overestimate their competence. | When assessing individual or team performance and self-awareness. | Emphasizes the need for accurate self-assessment and continuous learning. | May lead to overconfidence and resistance to feedback. |
Occam’s Razor | Simplicity in explanations is preferred when possible. | When analyzing complex problems and seeking efficient solutions. | Promotes efficiency and parsimony in problem-solving and decision-making. | May not apply to situations requiring nuanced or detailed explanations. |
Mandela Effect | Collective memory of an event differs from reality. | When exploring memory and shared beliefs about historical events. | Raises awareness about the fallibility of human memory and shared misconceptions. | Limited practical application outside of memory research. |
Crowding-Out Effect | Public sector spending reduces private sector spending. | When evaluating the economic impact of public policies and interventions. | Highlights the potential consequences of government interventions on markets. | Simplifies complex economic interactions and may not always hold true. |
Bandwagon Effect | Belief or idea adoption influenced by group behavior. | When studying social influence and herd mentality in decision-making. | Demonstrates the power of peer pressure and social conformity. | May lead to irrational decision-making in pursuit of group approval. |
Ringelmann Effect | Reduced individual productivity in larger groups. | When examining group dynamics and productivity. | Raises awareness about potential productivity challenges in larger teams. | May not apply uniformly to all group situations. |
Law of Unintended Consequences | Unanticipated outcomes of actions or policies. | When evaluating the broader impact of decisions and policies. | Encourages consideration of unintended effects and side effects. | Can complicate decision-making and planning due to uncertainty. |
House Money Effect | Investors take higher risks with gains than initial capital. | When analyzing investment behavior and risk-taking. | Offers insights into the psychological factors influencing investment decisions. | Can lead to irrational risk-taking behavior in specific situations. |
Snowball Effect | Actions or events evolve from insignificant to significant. | When discussing cumulative effects and amplification of consequences. | Highlights the potential for exponential growth or escalation of outcomes. | May not apply to all scenarios and situations. |
Hawthorne Effect | Individuals work harder when observed. | When conducting experiments or studies involving human behavior. | Demonstrates the influence of awareness and attention on performance. | May not hold true in all settings, and its effects can vary. |
Main Guides:
- Business Models
- Business Strategy
- Business Development
- Distribution Channels
- Marketing Strategy
- Platform Business Models
- Network Effects
Main Case Studies: