what-happened-to-wework

What happened to WeWork?

WeWork is a commercial real estate company providing shared workspaces for tech start-ups and other enterprise services. It was founded by Adam Neumann and Miguel McKelvey in 2010. WeWork’s business model was built on complex arrangements between the company and its landlords. There were also several conflicts of interest between Neumann and WeWork, which provided the impetus for the failed IPO and significant devaluation that would follow.

YearEvent
2010WeWork is founded by Adam Neumann and Miguel McKelvey, providing shared workspaces for tech start-ups and other enterprises.
2017Doubts emerge over Neumann’s business acumen, with accusations of unconventional behavior and questionable leadership practices.
2019WeWork files for an IPO, but the paperwork raises concerns about Neumann’s actions, conflicts of interest, and lack of understanding. The IPO is ultimately unsuccessful, leading to a significant devaluation of the company.
2019SoftBank acquires an 80% stake in WeWork, valuing the company at around $8 billion, and Neumann receives a substantial payout to step down.
2019WeWork undergoes layoffs and cost-cutting measures, including phasing out free beer in its workspaces, to stabilize its position.

Background

The full WeWork story, told by Eliot Brown, the WSJ reporter who followed the evolution of Adam Neumann’s story since the early days!

WeWork is a commercial real estate company providing shared workspaces for tech start-ups and other enterprise services.

It was founded by Adam Neumann and Miguel McKelvey in 2010.

Few companies have had a dramatic and convoluted rise and fall than WeWork.

For years, the company was at the mercy of Neumann’s unconventional leadership style and questionable behavior. 

In a strange duality, both traits contributed to the success and also downfall of WeWork.

So intriguing is the company’s story it spurned a documentary entitled WeWork: Or the Making and Breaking of a $47 Billion Unicorn.

Some of this story is told below.

Company culture and questionable leadership

WeWork was built on a simple premise: it provided a place where start-up employees and freelancers could find like-minded individuals and discuss ideas.

Employees worked long hours but were well compensated with glamorous parties and extravagant perks.

Neumann’s approach blurred the line between work and pleasure, but most stakeholders fully supported an idea he believed represented the future of work.

However, doubts began to emerge over Neumann’s business acumen in 2017 after he told Forbes that WeWork’s valuation was “more based on our energy and spirituality than it is on a multiple of revenue.

He was also accused of purchasing a private jet with company funds and filling it with marijuana smoke to the detriment of others.

Together with his wife, he may also have fired employees for giving off bad vibes.  

In the end, many former employees accused him of being a toxic individual akin to a cult leader.

They frequently recounted him arriving at meetings intoxicated and claiming he would become the President, the Israeli Prime Minister, or a trillionaire.

Unsustainable business model

WeWork’s business model provided little scope for attaining profitability.

In a nutshell, the company leased office buildings, transformed them into shared workspaces, and provided free beer to tenants.

Rent would be paid by a rotating cast of freelancers, venture-funded start-ups, and larger corporations. 

However, it’s important to reiterate that WeWork leases buildings and does not own them.

To make a profit, it had to charge workers more than it paid landlords.

When the company started leasing office space in 2010, post-GFC rent prices sustained the business for a while.

Once the market recovered and hit record highs, WeWork started negotiating with its landlords for concessions, including reduced or free rent and capital infusions to refurbish certain locations.

Essentially, the company relied on landlords to keep the lights on while trying to build its revenue streams.

This was a risky strategy that, to some extent, relied on the charisma of Neumann and the novelty of WeWork’s company vision.

Furthermore, the strategy made the company vulnerable to any downturn in the tech start-up industry.

In early 2019, a Wall Street Journal article outed Neumann for a potential conflict of interest after it was discovered he purchased commercial properties and then leased them back to WeWork.

Failed IPO

In August 2019, the company publicly filed documents for an impending IPO after making a $2 billion loss the previous year

The paperwork was criticized for its dramatic, floury epitaph, which read, “We dedicate this to the energy of we – greater than any one of us but inside each of us”.

It also included several damning admissions made by Neumann, including that he sold a trademark for millions back to his own company and gave interviews contravening the IPO quiet period. 

Alarmingly, he did not seem to grasp the magnitude of his actions or that they reflected poorly on him and the company.

WeWork then went into crisis mode as $37 billion was wiped from the company’s valuation. 

Acquisition and restructuring

Fortunately, WeWork was saved by a Japanese tech investment fund, SoftBank, headed by one of Neumann’s closest allies.

SoftBank paid Neumann $1.7 billion to step down as part of the deal and took an 80% stake in the company, now worth around $8 billion.

SoftBank later reneged on a deal to buy $3 billion in WeWork shares after the scale and magnitude of Neumann’s indiscretions took their toll.

In late 2019, WeWork embarked on a cost-cutting mission.

It laid off almost 20% of its global workforce in November, with more terminations in March and April 2020.

It also phased out free beer in its workspaces.

While the move to ban beer is arguably less significant than the mass terminations, it does hint at a new WeWork normal post-Neumann.

Key takeaways:

  • WeWork is a commercial real estate company providing shared workspaces for tech start-ups and other enterprise services. Once valued at $47 billion, the company became embroiled in controversy and was acquired for the more modest sum of $8 billion.
  • WeWork’s company culture promoted excessive spending, long working hours, and partying. CEO Adam Neumann was accused of being a toxic and bizarre leader who made wild, baseless, and sexist claims about himself and his employees. Company IPO documents show he was unaware of the consequences or magnitude of his actions.
  • WeWork’s business model was built on complex arrangements between the company and its landlords. There were also several conflicts of interest between Neumann and WeWork, which provided the impetus for the failed IPO and significant devaluation that would follow.

Key Highlights

  • WeWork’s Concept: WeWork was founded in 2010 by Adam Neumann and Miguel McKelvey. It offered shared workspaces for tech start-ups and other enterprises, creating a community for like-minded individuals.
  • Unconventional Leadership: Adam Neumann’s leadership style combined long working hours with extravagant perks and parties. He blurred the line between work and pleasure, contributing to the company’s initial success and later downfall.
  • Questionable Behavior: Neumann’s questionable behavior included making statements about WeWork’s valuation being based on “energy and spirituality.” He was also accused of using company funds to purchase a private jet and engaging in bizarre actions, like filling the jet with marijuana smoke.
  • Unsustainable Business Model: WeWork leased office buildings and transformed them into shared workspaces. However, its business model relied on charging more to tenants than it paid to landlords. The company’s profitability was challenging, especially when faced with high rent prices and market fluctuations.
  • Failed IPO: WeWork filed for an IPO in 2019, but the documents raised concerns about Neumann’s actions, conflicts of interest, and lack of understanding about the implications. The IPO was ultimately unsuccessful, leading to a significant devaluation of the company.
  • Acquisition and Restructuring: SoftBank, a Japanese tech investment fund, stepped in to acquire an 80% stake in WeWork, valuing the company at around $8 billion. Neumann received a substantial payout to step down. WeWork underwent layoffs and cost-cutting measures to stabilize its position.
  • Change in Culture: The acquisition and restructuring led to changes in WeWork’s company culture. The excessive spending, partying, and lavish perks were reined in, hinting at a new post-Neumann era for the company.

Main Free Guides:

Other Failure Stories

What Happened to WeWork

what-happened-to-wework
WeWork is a commercial real estate company providing shared workspaces for tech start-ups and other enterprise services. It was founded by Adam Neumann and Miguel McKelvey in 2010. WeWork’s business model was built on complex arrangements between the company and its landlords. There were also several conflicts of interest between Neumann and WeWork, which provided the impetus for the failed IPO and significant devaluation that would follow.

What Happened to Netscape

what-happened-to-netscape
Netscape – or Netscape Communications Corporation – was a computer services company best known for its web browser. The company was founded in 1994 by Marc Andreessen and James H. Clark as one of the internet’s first and most important start-ups. The Netscape Navigator web browser was released in 1995 and became the browser of choice for the users of the time. By November 1998, it had been acquired by AOL, which tried unsuccessfully to revive the popularity of the web browser. Ten years later, Netscape was shut down entirely.

What Happened to Musical.ly

what-happened-to-musically
Musically, or Musical.ly as it is officially known, was a Chinese social media platform headquartered in Shanghai. After passing 200 million users in May 2017, the platform was shut down by tech company ByteDance in November. After its acquisition, ByteDance suggested Musical.ly would continue to operate as a standalone platform. Company representatives noted that it would be able to leverage ByteDance’s AI technology and enormous reach in the Chinese market. Musically was ultimately absorbed into TikTok in June 2018, with the app no longer available in August of the same year. Existing users were offered technical support and several new features as a sweetener.

What Happened to Vine

what-happened-to-vine
Vine was an American video social networking platform with a focus on looping video clips of six seconds in length, founded by Dom Hofmann, Rus Yusupov, and Colin Kroll in 2012 to help people capture casual moments in their lives and share them with their friends. Vine went on to become a massively popular platform. Yet by 2016, Twitter discontinued the mobile app, allowing users to view or download content on the Vine website. It then announced a reconfigured app allowing creators to share content to a connected Twitter account only. This marked the end of Vine.

What Happened to CNN Plus

what-happened-to-cnn-plus
CNN Plus was a video streaming service and offshoot of CNN’s cable TV news network that was launched on March 29, 2022. The service was ultimately shut down just one month after it was launched. Trouble began for the platform when parent company WarnerMedia merged with Discovery. The latter was unimpressed with paltry viewer data and, with $55 billion in debt to clear, was not interested in funding CNN+ moving forward. Other contributing factors to CNN Plus’s demise include a lack of compelling content and streaming service market saturation.

What Happened to Clubhouse

what-happened-to-clubhouse
Clubhouse is a social app that allows thousands of people to communicate with each other in audio chat rooms. At one point, the company was worth $4 billion and boasted users such as Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk. Clubhouse declined because it rode the wave of pandemic lockdowns and suffered when people resumed their normal routines. The decision to remove the invite-only feature also caused a rapid influx of new members and removed any exclusivity. Clubhouse management also failed to define a business model and was unaware of the components of a successful social media site.

What Happened to Facebook

what-happened-to-facebook

Discover more from FourWeekMBA

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Scroll to Top
FourWeekMBA