What happened to Clubhouse?

  • Clubhouse is a social app that allows thousands of people to communicate with each other in audio chat rooms. At one point the company was worth $4 billion and boasted users such as Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk.
  • Clubhouse fell into decline because it rode the wave of pandemic lockdowns and suffered when people resumed their normal routines. The decision to remove the invite-only feature also caused a rapid influx of new members and removed any exclusivity. 
  • Clubhouse management also failed to define a business model and was unaware of the components of a successful social media site.

Introduction of ClubhouseClubhouse, launched in March 2020 by Paul Davison and Rohan Seth, was a social networking platform that gained significant attention for its audio-based, invite-only format. It allowed users to create and participate in live audio conversations, often referred to as “rooms.” Clubhouse was initially available only to iOS users and gained popularity for its unique concept, attracting a diverse user base and high-profile celebrities and influencers.
Early Success and FundingClubhouse experienced rapid growth and attracted considerable investment. Its invite-only approach created a sense of exclusivity, driving curiosity and demand. The platform’s audio-centric format facilitated real-time discussions, interviews, and panel sessions on various topics, from entertainment and technology to business and politics. High-profile users, including Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg, hosted rooms, further boosting its popularity. Clubhouse secured funding rounds from venture capital firms, valuing the company at hundreds of millions of dollars. These investments underscored the platform’s potential as a new form of social networking.
Expansion and Android LaunchClubhouse expanded its user base and influence in early 2021. It introduced an Android app in May 2021, making the platform accessible to a wider audience beyond iOS users. This move aimed to accelerate its growth and compete with emerging competitors, including Twitter Spaces and other audio-based social features on existing platforms. The Android launch marked a significant milestone in Clubhouse’s efforts to diversify its user demographics and establish itself as a mainstream social networking platform.
Challenges and CompetitionWhile Clubhouse enjoyed early success, it faced several challenges. The novelty of its audio-based format led to questions about its long-term viability and retention of users. Competition intensified as major tech companies, including Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn, introduced their audio-based features or platforms to rival Clubhouse. These competing platforms leveraged their existing user bases and resources to quickly enter the audio social networking space. The increased competition posed a threat to Clubhouse’s user acquisition and retention efforts.
Monetization EffortsClubhouse explored various monetization strategies to generate revenue. It introduced a tipping feature that allowed users to financially support content creators and hosts. Additionally, Clubhouse announced the “Creator First” program, which provided funding to selected creators to produce exclusive content for the platform. The company also explored subscription models and brand partnerships to diversify its revenue streams. These efforts aimed to make Clubhouse financially sustainable and reward content creators for their contributions to the platform.
Decline in PopularityClubhouse’s rapid rise in popularity eventually showed signs of decline. User engagement decreased, and the initial hype surrounding the platform waned. The exclusivity associated with invite-only access also diminished over time. As the COVID-19 pandemic eased, some users returned to in-person social activities, reducing the time spent on audio-based platforms. Critics argued that Clubhouse struggled to address content moderation and privacy concerns, affecting its user experience. Moreover, competition from established social media giants intensified, diverting user attention from Clubhouse. These factors contributed to a decline in the platform’s overall appeal.
Pivoting and AdaptationIn response to these challenges, Clubhouse began to pivot and adapt. It continued to explore new features and monetization options while acknowledging the changing landscape of social networking. The company recognized the need to evolve beyond the exclusive audio-only format and announced plans to introduce additional media types, such as text-based messaging and short-form audio clips. These changes aimed to diversify the platform’s content and better compete with rivals offering multimedia experiences. Clubhouse also explored partnerships and collaborations with creators and brands to revitalize its community and content offerings.
Future OutlookThe future of Clubhouse remains uncertain, but it has demonstrated resilience and adaptability in the face of evolving challenges. Its success and ultimate fate may depend on its ability to differentiate itself from competitors, offer compelling content, and address user concerns. The platform’s evolution into a multi-format social networking app will likely determine its long-term viability. Whether Clubhouse can regain its earlier momentum or maintain a niche audience in the social media landscape remains to be seen. The story of Clubhouse serves as a reminder of the dynamic nature of the tech industry, where innovation, competition, and user preferences can quickly shape the fate of emerging platforms.

Origin Story

Clubhouse is a social app that allows thousands of people to communicate with each other in audio chat rooms. It was founded as a social-media start-up in 2019 by Paul Davison and Rohan Seth who initially intended to host podcasts under the name Talkshow.

Clubhouse was valued at $100 million soon after it was launched in 2020 with investors such as Ryan Hoover and VC firm Andreessen Horowitz involved in Series A funding.

By February 2021, the platform surpassed 10 million followers. Interest in Clubhouse accelerated thereafter thanks to the invite-only nature of the platform and notable users such as Elon Musk, Naval Ravikant, and Mark Zuckerberg increasing its attractiveness further.

However, after reaching a peak valuation of around $4 billion, Clubhouse slipped to the 60th most popular social media app in December 2021 behind no-names such as Skout and Chispa. 

So what happened to Clubhouse? Its decline is down to a few main factors.

Loss of initial appeal

Clubhouse was successful early on because it appealed to those who wanted to discuss topics with like-minded individuals.

Over time, however, sensible and mature discussions became polluted with commentary that was divisive, racist, false, and unsubstantiated. 

With the platform also set up to encourage conversations around controversial topics and no system to monitor or moderate them, it was inevitable that users would lose confidence and trust. 

The platform become more unattractive when the company decided to remove the invite-only feature and open up the platform to anyone.

In response, the quality of conversations deteriorated and users jumped to the next interesting platform once Clubhouse lost its exclusivity.

Post pandemic emergence

Much of Clubhouse’s popularity was due to the pandemic with users stuck at home and unable to interact with others in person.

As restrictions eased and people went back to their pre-pandemic routines, the number of daily active users decreased dramatically.

This drop in users was no doubt exacerbated by the hype of the invite-only system and celebrities who were known to use the app.

Once celebrities (and the users who follow them) deserted the app, there was little need for anyone else to use it either. Eventually, the time and effort to find a worthwhile conversation became too much to bother with.

Failure to define a business model

The meteoric rise of Clubhouse surprised the company’s management to such an extent that it was not prepared for it.

As the platform became larger, they could not devise a way to establish stronger relationships with users or scale self-sustaining communities. 

Management also failed to understand the fundamental nature of a social media platform and lacked a clear path to profitability. It did not provide user, creator, or room analytics data to users which resulted in millions in lost advertising revenue at its peak. 

Further to this point is the idea of curation. While platforms like YouTube and Instagram use likes and shares to provide users with curated content, this was simply not possible on Clubhouse.

Perhaps through no fault of its own, it was impossible to curate live conversations to determine the content most worth sharing.

What’s more, in a failed attempt to grow the user base, management hoped to encourage social media influencers to become part of Clubhouse.

The only problem was that most influencers were unaccustomed to interacting with live audiences via audio and thus could not provide the quality content the platform so desperately needed.

Key Highlights

  • Clubhouse is a social app that allows thousands of people to communicate in audio chat rooms and was founded in 2019 by Paul Davison and Rohan Seth.
  • It gained popularity during the pandemic as it offered a platform for discussions on various topics with notable users like Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg.
  • The initial appeal of Clubhouse declined due to the influx of divisive and unsubstantiated discussions and the removal of the invite-only feature, leading to a loss of exclusivity.
  • As pandemic restrictions eased, the number of daily active users decreased significantly.
  • Clubhouse management failed to define a clear business model, leading to difficulties in establishing strong user relationships and scaling self-sustaining communities.
  • The platform lacked essential features like user, creator, or room analytics, resulting in lost advertising revenue.
  • Clubhouse’s inability to curate live conversations made it challenging to determine the most valuable content for sharing.
  • An attempt to attract social media influencers to the platform was unsuccessful, as many were not familiar with interacting with live audiences via audio.

Other Failure Stories

What Happened to WeWork

WeWork is a commercial real estate company providing shared workspaces for tech start-ups and other enterprise services. It was founded by Adam Neumann and Miguel McKelvey in 2010. WeWork’s business model was built on complex arrangements between the company and its landlords. There were also several conflicts of interest between Neumann and WeWork, which provided the impetus for the failed IPO and significant devaluation that would follow.

What Happened to Netscape

Netscape – or Netscape Communications Corporation – was a computer services company best known for its web browser. The company was founded in 1994 by Marc Andreessen and James H. Clark as one of the internet’s first and most important start-ups. The Netscape Navigator web browser was released in 1995 and became the browser of choice for the users of the time. By November 1998, it had been acquired by AOL, which tried unsuccessfully to revive the popularity of the web browser. Ten years later, Netscape was shut down entirely.

What Happened to Musical.ly

Musically, or Musical.ly as it is officially known, was a Chinese social media platform headquartered in Shanghai. After passing 200 million users in May 2017, the platform was shut down by tech company ByteDance in November. After its acquisition, ByteDance suggested Musical.ly would continue to operate as a standalone platform. Company representatives noted that it would be able to leverage ByteDance’s AI technology and enormous reach in the Chinese market. Musically was ultimately absorbed into TikTok in June 2018, with the app no longer available in August of the same year. Existing users were offered technical support and several new features as a sweetener.

What Happened to Vine

Vine was an American video social networking platform with a focus on looping video clips of six seconds in length, founded by Dom Hofmann, Rus Yusupov, and Colin Kroll in 2012 to help people capture casual moments in their lives and share them with their friends. Vine went on to become a massively popular platform. Yet by 2016, Twitter discontinued the mobile app, allowing users to view or download content on the Vine website. It then announced a reconfigured app allowing creators to share content to a connected Twitter account only. This marked the end of Vine.

What Happened to CNN Plus

CNN Plus was a video streaming service and offshoot of CNN’s cable TV news network that was launched on March 29, 2022. The service was ultimately shut down just one month after it was launched. Trouble began for the platform when parent company WarnerMedia merged with Discovery. The latter was unimpressed with paltry viewer data and, with $55 billion in debt to clear, was not interested in funding CNN+ moving forward. Other contributing factors to CNN Plus’s demise include a lack of compelling content and streaming service market saturation.

What Happened to Clubhouse

Clubhouse is a social app that allows thousands of people to communicate with each other in audio chat rooms. At one point, the company was worth $4 billion and boasted users such as Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk. Clubhouse declined because it rode the wave of pandemic lockdowns and suffered when people resumed their normal routines. The decision to remove the invite-only feature also caused a rapid influx of new members and removed any exclusivity. Clubhouse management also failed to define a business model and was unaware of the components of a successful social media site.

What Happened to Facebook


What Happened To Carvana

Carvana is an American online used car retailer headquartered in Tempe, Arizona. The company – which sells cars in unique vending machines – was the fastest-growing used vehicle retailer in the United States, with revenue of $3.94 billion in 2019. Yet by 2022, on $12.8 billion in revenue, the company reported almost $2.9 billion in net losses.

What Happened To Houseparty

Houseparty was an app-based group video chat platform for mobile and desktop. Released in February 2016, the platform rapidly grew to hundreds of millions of users and was the #1 social app in 82 countries by May 2020. Less than 18 months later, however, owner Epic Games announced that it would be shutting down the app in October 2021. Let’s explain the reasons for Houseparty’s demise below.

What Happened To ChaCha

ChaCha was a human-guided search engine founded in 2006. The platform provided a valuable service at a time when traditional search engine algorithms were unreliable and less developed. When algorithms did become sufficiently developed, they provided answers to questions for free and much more rapidly than ChaCha could. The ChaCha business model was also unscalable, with employees overworked as the company tried to stay ahead of innovation. ChaCha’s demise was also compounded by the smartphone, which provided another avenue for consumers to find information. A belated attempt to restructure and cut costs followed, but the company could not service its debt past 2016.

What Happened To RadioShack

RadioShack is an American electronics retailer founded by brothers Milton and Theodore Deutschmann in 1921. The company enjoyed market dominance in the 70s and 80s but faded fast after a slew of missed opportunities. RadioShack operated over four thousand stores in the USA, but many were placed too close together which caused sales cannibalization. These stores were also often small and had a confusing inventory mix. RadioShack sold the first mass-produced personal computer with much success. However, the company saw no future in personal computers because of the high cost of hardware. It then instructed sales managers to intentionally keep PC sales under a certain threshold.

What Happened To Compaq

Compaq was an American developer and producer of computer products and services. After strong initial success, the company was acquired by HP in 2002 with the Compaq brand retired in 2013. Compaq’s short-sighted acquisition of DEC provided the catalyst for its decline. While the company was dealing with the ramifications of the acquisition, competitors such as Dell and Gateway increased their market share. Compaq also experienced a loss in revenue after the dot-com bubble burst. This was exacerbated by the standardization of chipsets and motherboards by Intel.

What Happened To Kodak

Kodak is an American photography product and service company founded in 1892 by George Eastman and Henry A. Strong. After dominating the photographic film industry for decades, the company filed for bankruptcy in 2012. Kodak was not ignorant of digital camera technology. But it did fail at various stages to commit to digital products entirely despite overwhelming evidence that the technology would prove profitable. Kodak was also the victim of the changing retail landscape and consumer sentiment toward foreign products in the United States. Blind in its devotion to printing, it also missed an opportunity to create a Facebook-style photo-sharing website three years before Facebook itself was conceived.

What Happened To Friendster

Friendster was a social networking site that then transitioned to a gaming platform. Ultimately, Friendster failed to capitalize on its early success as one of the first social media platforms to experience mass uptake. When Friendster became a gaming platform, it failed to notify its user base. This set in motion the migration of users to Facebook which would continue for some years. Friendster’s decision to raise funds via venture capital funding populated its board with investors who were not interested in technology or innovation. The company was acquired by MOL Global in 2009 who then sold its patents to Facebook soon after.

What Happened To StumbleUpon

xStumbleUpon was an early social network founded by Garrett Camp, Geoff Smith, Justin LaFrance, and Eric Boyd. At one point, the platform was responsible for half of all social media traffic in the United States. StumbleUpon suffered intense competition from the likes of Pinterest, Digg, and Reddit – both in terms of site functionality and monetization strategy. After a failed partnership with eBay, Camp bought back the company and instituted a major redesign to limited success. The StumbleUpon user experience became outdated as consumers preferred to waste time scrolling through news feeds. Upon this realization, Camp shut down the service in 2018 to focus on a more modern iteration called Mix.com

What Happened To Altavista

Altavista was a pioneering search engine developed by a group of Digital Equipment (DEC) researchers. It was originally created to showcase the power of a then-revolutionary DEC supercomputer. After an ominous partnership with Yahoo in 1996, AltaVista underwent a series of acquisitions and format charges as several companies tried to make it profitable. In the process, the search engine lost market share to up-and-comer Google. Yahoo acquired AltaVista in 2003 and absorbed the technology behind the search engine into its own platform. AltaVista was formally put to rest ten years later.

What Happened To Blockbuster

Blockbuster was an American movie and video game rental chain. The company went from industry leader to filing for bankruptcy with $1 billion in debt in less than a decade. Blockbuster relied on late fees to drive a high proportion of revenue. This strategy proved uncompetitive after Netflix offered fee-free movie rentals by mail. Blockbuster lost significant market share to Netflix in the ensuing years and experienced a decline in profit after abolishing late fees in an attempt to remain competitive. Blockbuster’s demise is mostly due to an inability to innovate. Although passing on the offer to purchase Netflix is noteworthy, the company failed because of a myopic focus on its outdated rental franchise model.

What Happened To Napster

Napster was a peer-to-peer music-sharing software application. It was the first such platform to provide free access to the full history of recorded music online. Napster quickly attracted the attention of music artists, with Metallica instigating court proceedings against the company for copyright infringement and the distribution of unreleased music. Napster was forced to shut down after the Recording Industry Association of America won a court injunction. Mounting legal fees and compensation costs led to the company filing for bankruptcy in 2002.

What Happened To BlackBerry

BlackBerry is an iconic smartphone brand owned by Canadian company BlackBerry Limited. The company enjoyed first-mover status in the smartphone industry, but ultimately squandered its advantage. BlackBerry was ignorant and in some ways disrespectful of competitors in the industry. It was more concerned with protecting its proprietary technology than innovating to stay relevant. Though profitable to some extent, BlackBerry’s focus on enterprise customers came at the expense of the far more lucrative consumer market. Government opposition to censoring information also eroded one of the core strengths of the company’s smartphone.

Why Nokia Failed

Nokia is a Finnish telecommunications, consumer technology, and information technology company founded in 1865. It enjoyed 51% of the global market share for mobile phones in 1998. Nokia’s device-based hardware system was cumbersome and outdated, but the company persisted with it while competitors developed the software-based iOS and Android operating systems. By the time Nokia phones offered Android, the company had been left behind. Corporate mismanagement within Nokia was rife and culture suffered as a result. Internally and externally, the company failed to acknowledge its diminishing relevance and market share.

What Happened To Xerox

Xerox is an American corporation selling print and digital document products and services worldwide. The company failed to capitalize on revolutionary research performed at its PARC R&D center. Xerox was visited by Steve Jobs in 1979 who gained access to PARC in exchange for Xerox receiving shares in Apple. He then purchased the rights to a Xerox GUI and used it to produce the Apple Macintosh. Xerox released the Xerox Star personal computer in 1981 in a rare example of the company selling an innovative product commercially. However, the Star was prohibitively expensive, targeted the wrong market, and was a decade ahead of its time.

What Happened To Quibi

Quibi was an American short-form streaming service for smartphones. Unfortunate timing with the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic is at least partly responsible for the failure of the platform. Despite billions being invested in securing high-end talent and production studios, Quibi content was generally poor quality. In any case, there was no way for consumers to share or engage with the content they did enjoy. Quibi was not helped by its pricing strategy and the presence of established competitors offering more for less. It was also improperly and inadequately marketed.

About The Author

Scroll to Top