What happened to Friendster?

Friendster was a social networking service founded by Jonathan Abrams in 2002. Early versions of Friendster functioned in much the same way as eventual successor Facebook. As the social media market consolidated, by 2009, Friendster was purchased by Malaysian company MOL Global. That same year, MOL Global sold 18 Friendster patents to Facebook. Friendster remained relatively popular in southeast Asia for a few more years until it was shut down in 2015. 

Founding and LaunchFriendster was founded by Jonathan Abrams in March 2002 and was officially launched in June 2003. It was one of the first social networking sites that allowed users to create profiles, connect with friends, and interact online.
Early PopularityFriendster quickly gained popularity in Asia and the United States. At its peak, it had over 100 million registered users. The platform allowed users to connect with friends, post photos, and interact through messages and comments. It was seen as a pioneer in online social networking.
Technical Issues and ScalabilityFriendster experienced significant technical challenges as its user base grew rapidly. The platform faced issues related to scalability, leading to slow loading times and service disruptions. These technical issues frustrated users and contributed to the decline of the platform’s popularity.
Competition from MySpace and FacebookFriendster faced competition from emerging social networking platforms like MySpace and later, Facebook. MySpace, in particular, gained traction among younger users and offered more customization options. Facebook’s clean interface and focus on college students also posed a significant challenge to Friendster.
User MigrationMany Friendster users began migrating to MySpace and later to Facebook due to the technical issues and the appeal of new features on these platforms. The mass migration of users resulted in a decline in Friendster’s user base and overall engagement.
Relaunch as a Gaming PlatformIn 2011, Friendster was rebranded as a gaming platform called “Friendster Social Gaming Network.” The new focus was on providing online games and entertainment content. This transition marked the platform’s shift away from social networking.
Complete ShutdownIn 2011, Friendster ceased its social networking services entirely and officially shut down its platform. Users were given the opportunity to export their photos and data to other services. The decision to close Friendster marked the end of an era in social networking.
LegacyAlthough Friendster did not achieve long-term success as a social networking platform, it played a pioneering role in the early days of online social interaction. It set the stage for subsequent social media platforms, and its rise and fall provided valuable lessons for the development and scalability of online communities. Friendster’s legacy is a reminder of the dynamic nature of the tech industry.


Friendster was a social networking service founded by Jonathan Abrams in 2002.

It went live in 2003 and secured three million users in the first three months. Launched before the likes of Myspace and Facebook, Friendster was one of the earliest social media networks to gain mass appeal.

It was particularly popular in Asia where it boasted around 115 million registered users at its peak in 2011. 

Friendster was successful because it was more than a simple social networking site. It provided opportunities for its users to make new friends and stay in touch with old ones.

Users could also discover new events, brands, and hobbies in addition to sharing content. Early versions of Friendster functioned in much the same way as eventual successor Facebook.

This begs the question: why did Friendster close in 2015 while Facebook continues to be a social media juggernaut? In truth, it was due to a combination of reasons.

A change of direction

Near the peak of its popularity, Friendster made the fateful decision to transition from a social networking site into a gaming site.

They did this without consulting their current users, who lost the content they had placed on Friendster during the shift.

As a result, many became disenfranchised and began deserting the platform to competitors such as Facebook.

The gaming platform itself was well regarded and functional. But it appealed to a smaller section of Friendster’s original user base.

The company also missed a massive opportunity to profit from the rise of social media by deviating from its core offering at the worst possible time. 

What’s more, the gaming platform was enjoyable for users but only up to a certain point.

Sites such as Facebook incorporated news feeds into their social networks which continuously served fresh content to users.

This was a crucial addition that separated Facebook from Friendster and other such sites.

A lack of new features

Despite the lack of a news feed, it might be surprising to learn that Friendster had slated one for development. The company also had plans to launch a college edition and develop a social graph.

These plans never materialized because of constant tech issues and a lack of investor interest. Had these features been implemented, Friendster may have become the Facebook of today.

Venture capital funding 

Friendster turned down a lucrative acquisition offer from Google worth $30 million in 2003. It also received similar offers from AOL and Yahoo.

Instead, Abrams chose to fund the growth of the company through venture capitalists.

This populated the company board of directors with individuals who channeled funds into low-impact initiatives and not technology-focused development.

Tech issues and patent sales

Friendster gradually fell by the wayside as it continued to lose market share to Facebook. 

Inadequate investment of company funds meant the user experience was poor and neglected, with pages routinely slow to load or not loading at all.

Friendster also had difficulty in managing the new subscribers it did manage to obtain.

In 2009, Friendster was purchased by Malaysian company MOL Global. That same year, MOL Global sold 18 Friendster patents to Facebook. 

Friendster remained relatively popular in southeast Asia for a few more years until it was shut down in 2015. 

Key takeaways:

  • Friendster was a social networking site that then transitioned to a gaming platform. Ultimately, Friendster failed to capitalize on its early success as one of the first social media platforms to experience mass uptake. 
  • When Friendster became a gaming platform, it failed to notify its user base. This set in motion the migration of users to Facebook which would continue for some years.
  • Friendster’s decision to raise funds via venture capital funding populated its board with investors who were not interested in technology or innovation. The company was acquired by MOL Global in 2009 who then sold its patents to Facebook soon after.

Quick Timeline

  • Friendster was a social networking service founded in 2002, one of the earliest social media networks with mass appeal.
  • It was popular in Asia, boasting around 115 million registered users at its peak in 2011.
  • Friendster’s downfall can be attributed to a change of direction when it transitioned from a social networking site to a gaming platform without consulting its users.
  • The gaming platform, though functional, appealed to a smaller segment of Friendster’s original user base, causing many users to switch to competitors like Facebook.
  • Friendster missed opportunities to develop new features, such as a news feed and social graph, which could have helped it compete with Facebook.
  • The company’s choice to fund growth through venture capital led to a board focused on low-impact initiatives rather than technology development.
  • Technical issues and inadequate user experience, along with the sale of patents to Facebook, contributed to Friendster’s decline.
  • Friendster remained relatively popular in southeast Asia for a few more years until it was shut down in 2015.

Other Failure Stories

What Happened to WeWork

WeWork is a commercial real estate company providing shared workspaces for tech start-ups and other enterprise services. It was founded by Adam Neumann and Miguel McKelvey in 2010. WeWork’s business model was built on complex arrangements between the company and its landlords. There were also several conflicts of interest between Neumann and WeWork, which provided the impetus for the failed IPO and significant devaluation that would follow.

What Happened to Netscape

Netscape – or Netscape Communications Corporation – was a computer services company best known for its web browser. The company was founded in 1994 by Marc Andreessen and James H. Clark as one of the internet’s first and most important start-ups. The Netscape Navigator web browser was released in 1995 and became the browser of choice for the users of the time. By November 1998, it had been acquired by AOL, which tried unsuccessfully to revive the popularity of the web browser. Ten years later, Netscape was shut down entirely.

What Happened to Musical.ly

Musically, or Musical.ly as it is officially known, was a Chinese social media platform headquartered in Shanghai. After passing 200 million users in May 2017, the platform was shut down by tech company ByteDance in November. After its acquisition, ByteDance suggested Musical.ly would continue to operate as a standalone platform. Company representatives noted that it would be able to leverage ByteDance’s AI technology and enormous reach in the Chinese market. Musically was ultimately absorbed into TikTok in June 2018, with the app no longer available in August of the same year. Existing users were offered technical support and several new features as a sweetener.

What Happened to Vine

Vine was an American video social networking platform with a focus on looping video clips of six seconds in length, founded by Dom Hofmann, Rus Yusupov, and Colin Kroll in 2012 to help people capture casual moments in their lives and share them with their friends. Vine went on to become a massively popular platform. Yet by 2016, Twitter discontinued the mobile app, allowing users to view or download content on the Vine website. It then announced a reconfigured app allowing creators to share content to a connected Twitter account only. This marked the end of Vine.

What Happened to CNN Plus

CNN Plus was a video streaming service and offshoot of CNN’s cable TV news network that was launched on March 29, 2022. The service was ultimately shut down just one month after it was launched. Trouble began for the platform when parent company WarnerMedia merged with Discovery. The latter was unimpressed with paltry viewer data and, with $55 billion in debt to clear, was not interested in funding CNN+ moving forward. Other contributing factors to CNN Plus’s demise include a lack of compelling content and streaming service market saturation.

What Happened to Clubhouse

Clubhouse is a social app that allows thousands of people to communicate with each other in audio chat rooms. At one point, the company was worth $4 billion and boasted users such as Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk. Clubhouse declined because it rode the wave of pandemic lockdowns and suffered when people resumed their normal routines. The decision to remove the invite-only feature also caused a rapid influx of new members and removed any exclusivity. Clubhouse management also failed to define a business model and was unaware of the components of a successful social media site.

What Happened to Facebook


What Happened To Carvana

Carvana is an American online used car retailer headquartered in Tempe, Arizona. The company – which sells cars in unique vending machines – was the fastest-growing used vehicle retailer in the United States, with revenue of $3.94 billion in 2019. Yet by 2022, on $12.8 billion in revenue, the company reported almost $2.9 billion in net losses.

What Happened To Houseparty

Houseparty was an app-based group video chat platform for mobile and desktop. Released in February 2016, the platform rapidly grew to hundreds of millions of users and was the #1 social app in 82 countries by May 2020. Less than 18 months later, however, owner Epic Games announced that it would be shutting down the app in October 2021. Let’s explain the reasons for Houseparty’s demise below.

What Happened To ChaCha

ChaCha was a human-guided search engine founded in 2006. The platform provided a valuable service at a time when traditional search engine algorithms were unreliable and less developed. When algorithms did become sufficiently developed, they provided answers to questions for free and much more rapidly than ChaCha could. The ChaCha business model was also unscalable, with employees overworked as the company tried to stay ahead of innovation. ChaCha’s demise was also compounded by the smartphone, which provided another avenue for consumers to find information. A belated attempt to restructure and cut costs followed, but the company could not service its debt past 2016.

What Happened To RadioShack

RadioShack is an American electronics retailer founded by brothers Milton and Theodore Deutschmann in 1921. The company enjoyed market dominance in the 70s and 80s but faded fast after a slew of missed opportunities. RadioShack operated over four thousand stores in the USA, but many were placed too close together which caused sales cannibalization. These stores were also often small and had a confusing inventory mix. RadioShack sold the first mass-produced personal computer with much success. However, the company saw no future in personal computers because of the high cost of hardware. It then instructed sales managers to intentionally keep PC sales under a certain threshold.

What Happened To Compaq

Compaq was an American developer and producer of computer products and services. After strong initial success, the company was acquired by HP in 2002 with the Compaq brand retired in 2013. Compaq’s short-sighted acquisition of DEC provided the catalyst for its decline. While the company was dealing with the ramifications of the acquisition, competitors such as Dell and Gateway increased their market share. Compaq also experienced a loss in revenue after the dot-com bubble burst. This was exacerbated by the standardization of chipsets and motherboards by Intel.

What Happened To Kodak

Kodak is an American photography product and service company founded in 1892 by George Eastman and Henry A. Strong. After dominating the photographic film industry for decades, the company filed for bankruptcy in 2012. Kodak was not ignorant of digital camera technology. But it did fail at various stages to commit to digital products entirely despite overwhelming evidence that the technology would prove profitable. Kodak was also the victim of the changing retail landscape and consumer sentiment toward foreign products in the United States. Blind in its devotion to printing, it also missed an opportunity to create a Facebook-style photo-sharing website three years before Facebook itself was conceived.

What Happened To Friendster

Friendster was a social networking site that then transitioned to a gaming platform. Ultimately, Friendster failed to capitalize on its early success as one of the first social media platforms to experience mass uptake. When Friendster became a gaming platform, it failed to notify its user base. This set in motion the migration of users to Facebook which would continue for some years. Friendster’s decision to raise funds via venture capital funding populated its board with investors who were not interested in technology or innovation. The company was acquired by MOL Global in 2009 who then sold its patents to Facebook soon after.

What Happened To StumbleUpon

xStumbleUpon was an early social network founded by Garrett Camp, Geoff Smith, Justin LaFrance, and Eric Boyd. At one point, the platform was responsible for half of all social media traffic in the United States. StumbleUpon suffered intense competition from the likes of Pinterest, Digg, and Reddit – both in terms of site functionality and monetization strategy. After a failed partnership with eBay, Camp bought back the company and instituted a major redesign to limited success. The StumbleUpon user experience became outdated as consumers preferred to waste time scrolling through news feeds. Upon this realization, Camp shut down the service in 2018 to focus on a more modern iteration called Mix.com

What Happened To Altavista

Altavista was a pioneering search engine developed by a group of Digital Equipment (DEC) researchers. It was originally created to showcase the power of a then-revolutionary DEC supercomputer. After an ominous partnership with Yahoo in 1996, AltaVista underwent a series of acquisitions and format charges as several companies tried to make it profitable. In the process, the search engine lost market share to up-and-comer Google. Yahoo acquired AltaVista in 2003 and absorbed the technology behind the search engine into its own platform. AltaVista was formally put to rest ten years later.

What Happened To Blockbuster

Blockbuster was an American movie and video game rental chain. The company went from industry leader to filing for bankruptcy with $1 billion in debt in less than a decade. Blockbuster relied on late fees to drive a high proportion of revenue. This strategy proved uncompetitive after Netflix offered fee-free movie rentals by mail. Blockbuster lost significant market share to Netflix in the ensuing years and experienced a decline in profit after abolishing late fees in an attempt to remain competitive. Blockbuster’s demise is mostly due to an inability to innovate. Although passing on the offer to purchase Netflix is noteworthy, the company failed because of a myopic focus on its outdated rental franchise model.

What Happened To Napster

Napster was a peer-to-peer music-sharing software application. It was the first such platform to provide free access to the full history of recorded music online. Napster quickly attracted the attention of music artists, with Metallica instigating court proceedings against the company for copyright infringement and the distribution of unreleased music. Napster was forced to shut down after the Recording Industry Association of America won a court injunction. Mounting legal fees and compensation costs led to the company filing for bankruptcy in 2002.

What Happened To BlackBerry

BlackBerry is an iconic smartphone brand owned by Canadian company BlackBerry Limited. The company enjoyed first-mover status in the smartphone industry, but ultimately squandered its advantage. BlackBerry was ignorant and in some ways disrespectful of competitors in the industry. It was more concerned with protecting its proprietary technology than innovating to stay relevant. Though profitable to some extent, BlackBerry’s focus on enterprise customers came at the expense of the far more lucrative consumer market. Government opposition to censoring information also eroded one of the core strengths of the company’s smartphone.

Why Nokia Failed

Nokia is a Finnish telecommunications, consumer technology, and information technology company founded in 1865. It enjoyed 51% of the global market share for mobile phones in 1998. Nokia’s device-based hardware system was cumbersome and outdated, but the company persisted with it while competitors developed the software-based iOS and Android operating systems. By the time Nokia phones offered Android, the company had been left behind. Corporate mismanagement within Nokia was rife and culture suffered as a result. Internally and externally, the company failed to acknowledge its diminishing relevance and market share.

What Happened To Xerox

Xerox is an American corporation selling print and digital document products and services worldwide. The company failed to capitalize on revolutionary research performed at its PARC R&D center. Xerox was visited by Steve Jobs in 1979 who gained access to PARC in exchange for Xerox receiving shares in Apple. He then purchased the rights to a Xerox GUI and used it to produce the Apple Macintosh. Xerox released the Xerox Star personal computer in 1981 in a rare example of the company selling an innovative product commercially. However, the Star was prohibitively expensive, targeted the wrong market, and was a decade ahead of its time.

What Happened To Quibi

Quibi was an American short-form streaming service for smartphones. Unfortunate timing with the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic is at least partly responsible for the failure of the platform. Despite billions being invested in securing high-end talent and production studios, Quibi content was generally poor quality. In any case, there was no way for consumers to share or engage with the content they did enjoy. Quibi was not helped by its pricing strategy and the presence of established competitors offering more for less. It was also improperly and inadequately marketed.

About The Author

Scroll to Top