What happened to Vine?

Vine was an American video social networking platform with a focus on looping video clips of six seconds in length, founded by Dom Hofmann, Rus Yusupov, and Colin Kroll in 2012 to help people capture casual moments in their lives and share them with their friends. Vine went on to become a massively popular platform. Yet, by 2016, Twitter discontinued the mobile app while allowing users to view or download content on the Vine website. It then announced a reconfigured app allowing creators to share content to a connected Twitter account only. This marked the end of Vine.

Founding and LaunchVine was founded in June 2012 by Dom Hofmann, Rus Yusupov, and Colin Kroll. It was officially launched in January 2013. Vine’s unique feature was its restriction to six-second videos, which led to the creation of creative and often humorous content.
Acquisition by TwitterJust a few months after its launch, in October 2012, Vine was acquired by Twitter for an estimated $30 million. This acquisition gave Vine access to Twitter’s user base and resources, contributing to its rapid growth and integration with the social media platform.
Rise of Vine CelebritiesVine quickly gained popularity, and it fostered the rise of “Vine celebrities” who became famous for their creative and entertaining six-second videos. These individuals gained massive followings on the platform and often transitioned to careers in entertainment, advertising, or other creative fields.
Competition and Copycat ServicesVine faced competition from other short-form video platforms, most notably Instagram, which introduced video sharing in June 2013. Additionally, other platforms like TikTok emerged, offering similar short-video features. The competition challenged Vine’s growth and user retention.
Closure by TwitterDespite its early success, Vine faced challenges in terms of monetization and retaining top content creators. In October 2016, Twitter announced that it would be discontinuing the Vine mobile app. This decision came as a surprise to many, especially to the creators who had built substantial followings on the platform. Vine was officially shut down in January 2017.
Legacy and InfluenceVine’s legacy can be seen in the way it popularized short-form video content and paved the way for platforms like TikTok. Many Vine creators continued their careers on YouTube, Instagram, and other social media platforms. The concept of creating short, engaging videos for online audiences remains a dominant form of content creation today.


Vine was an American video social networking platform with a focus on looping video clips of six seconds in length.

The platform was founded by Dom Hofmann, Rus Yusupov, and Colin Kroll in 2012, who had the vision to help people capture casual moments in their lives and share them with their friends.

Hofmann, Yusupov, and Kroll pitched the idea for Vine to Twitter because they believed the short-form vlogging service would complement Twitter’s short-form microblogging platform.

Twitter acquired Vine for $30 million before the app was even launched.

Vine became a massively popular platform, attracting 200 million users in the first two years, including countless celebrities.

Just four years after it was founded, Twitter discontinued the mobile app, allowing users to view or download content on the Vine website.

It then announced a reconfigured app allowing creators to share content to a connected Twitter account only.

The original app was renamed Vine Camera but faded into obscurity after suffering poor reviews and usage.

The reason for Vine’s demise is due to multiple factors. Let’s take a look at them now.

Growing competition

In the words of a former Vine executive, ”Instagram video was the beginning of the end.

When Instagram launched its video feature in 2013, users could create and share short-form videos of a maximum duration of fifteen seconds. 

This caused a mass migration of users from Vine to Instagram for nothing else but increased video length.

Failure to understand the market

As noted earlier, Vine was initially conceived as a microvlogging platform where users could share short videos with friends.

After the platform was launched, it became clear that Vine was an entertainment media platform.

It was predominantly comprised of passive viewers who preferred to consume content similar to YouTube platforms. 

This left the job of content creation to a very small percentage of users who would compromise the integrity of the whole platform if they decided to leave. 

Unfortunately, Vine gave content creators two reasons to leave the platform and take their followers with them.

First, it stubbornly adhered to a maximum video length of six seconds which was too short for a so-called microvlogging service.

Second, Vine did not allow creators to monetize their sometimes large audiences.

Platform monetization

Monetization issues were not restricted to creators. Vine, as a business, was not making any money either. 

Executives were reluctant to experiment with potential monetization methods during rapid growth periods.

Funds flowing into the Vine ecosystem were mostly sponsorship deals for the top content creators – there was no attempt to sponsor the platform itself.

Twitter made a belated attempt to monetize Vine by purchasing a social media talent agency. Still, the agency could not incentivize clients to remain on Vine in the face of better monetization on other platforms.

Parent company strategic direction

Twitter acquired Vine before it was launched to use the platform to grow its own brand and business.

Ultimately, Vine, as a standalone brand, was not a priority of Twitter shareholders.

This was exemplified when Twitter launched its own video creation feature, invalidating the need for Vine entirely.

Key takeaways:

  • Vine was a microvlogging platform founded in 2012. It quickly rose to prominence after acquiring 200 million users in the first two years of operation.
  • Four years later, the service was progressively discontinued by Twitter. Competition from Instagram was one of the primary reasons for Vine’s demise because it offered longer video length for creators.
  • Vine’s popularity was also unsustainable because of the high proportion of passive viewers when compared to content creators. Many such creators migrated to other platforms and took their audiences with them because of a lack of monetization functionality.

What if it survived?

Sometimes, an idea might be good, but the timing is wrong.

And when the market is ready for a format, things might take off quickly.

By 2018-19, the short video format exploded.

And by the 2020s, platforms like TikTok built an incredible success.

TikTok is a creative Chinese social media platform driven by short-form video content enabling users to interact and generate content at scale. TikTok primarily makes money through advertising, generating $4.6 billion in advertising revenues in 2021, thus making it among the most popular attention-based business models or attention merchants.

So much so that TikTok is taking over the digital advertising space, which for a decade had been dominated by the Google-Facebook duopoly.


Is Twitter resurrecting Vine?

As Elon Musk took over Twitter, he proposed a revival of the short-form video app!

As Axios reported, it seems Musk wants to try to revive Vine to make it compete against TikTok!

In a conversation over Twitter, Mr. Beast seemed intrigued by the idea.


Might Vine become a TikTok competitor?

Quick Timeline

  • Vine was a short-form video social networking platform founded in 2012, known for looping video clips of six seconds in length.
  • Twitter acquired Vine for $30 million before its official launch and the platform quickly gained popularity, attracting 200 million users in its first two years.
  • Vine’s demise can be attributed to several factors, including growing competition from Instagram, which offered longer video length and attracted users away from Vine.
  • Vine initially positioned itself as a microvlogging platform but failed to understand that its user base preferred consuming entertainment content similar to YouTube rather than short personal videos.
  • The platform lacked effective monetization strategies for both content creators and the company itself, leading to challenges in retaining top creators and generating revenue.
  • Twitter’s strategic direction shifted away from prioritizing Vine as a standalone brand, leading to its eventual discontinuation in 2016.
  • If Vine had survived, it might have faced opportunities in the rising popularity of short-form video content, as seen with the success of platforms like TikTok.
  • As of my last update in September 2021, there were rumors of Twitter’s founder, Elon Musk, considering a revival of Vine to compete against TikTok. However, there were no concrete plans or official announcements at that time.

Read Next: Who Owns Twitter, Twitter Business Model.

Other Failure Stories

What Happened to WeWork

WeWork is a commercial real estate company providing shared workspaces for tech start-ups and other enterprise services. It was founded by Adam Neumann and Miguel McKelvey in 2010. WeWork’s business model was built on complex arrangements between the company and its landlords. There were also several conflicts of interest between Neumann and WeWork, which provided the impetus for the failed IPO and significant devaluation that would follow.

What Happened to Netscape

Netscape – or Netscape Communications Corporation – was a computer services company best known for its web browser. The company was founded in 1994 by Marc Andreessen and James H. Clark as one of the internet’s first and most important start-ups. The Netscape Navigator web browser was released in 1995 and became the browser of choice for the users of the time. By November 1998, it had been acquired by AOL, which tried unsuccessfully to revive the popularity of the web browser. Ten years later, Netscape was shut down entirely.

What Happened to Musical.ly

Musically, or Musical.ly as it is officially known, was a Chinese social media platform headquartered in Shanghai. After passing 200 million users in May 2017, the platform was shut down by tech company ByteDance in November. After its acquisition, ByteDance suggested Musical.ly would continue to operate as a standalone platform. Company representatives noted that it would be able to leverage ByteDance’s AI technology and enormous reach in the Chinese market. Musically was ultimately absorbed into TikTok in June 2018, with the app no longer available in August of the same year. Existing users were offered technical support and several new features as a sweetener.

What Happened to Vine

Vine was an American video social networking platform with a focus on looping video clips of six seconds in length, founded by Dom Hofmann, Rus Yusupov, and Colin Kroll in 2012 to help people capture casual moments in their lives and share them with their friends. Vine went on to become a massively popular platform. Yet by 2016, Twitter discontinued the mobile app, allowing users to view or download content on the Vine website. It then announced a reconfigured app allowing creators to share content to a connected Twitter account only. This marked the end of Vine.

What Happened to CNN Plus

CNN Plus was a video streaming service and offshoot of CNN’s cable TV news network that was launched on March 29, 2022. The service was ultimately shut down just one month after it was launched. Trouble began for the platform when parent company WarnerMedia merged with Discovery. The latter was unimpressed with paltry viewer data and, with $55 billion in debt to clear, was not interested in funding CNN+ moving forward. Other contributing factors to CNN Plus’s demise include a lack of compelling content and streaming service market saturation.

What Happened to Clubhouse

Clubhouse is a social app that allows thousands of people to communicate with each other in audio chat rooms. At one point, the company was worth $4 billion and boasted users such as Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk. Clubhouse declined because it rode the wave of pandemic lockdowns and suffered when people resumed their normal routines. The decision to remove the invite-only feature also caused a rapid influx of new members and removed any exclusivity. Clubhouse management also failed to define a business model and was unaware of the components of a successful social media site.

What Happened to Facebook


What Happened To Carvana

Carvana is an American online used car retailer headquartered in Tempe, Arizona. The company – which sells cars in unique vending machines – was the fastest-growing used vehicle retailer in the United States, with revenue of $3.94 billion in 2019. Yet by 2022, on $12.8 billion in revenue, the company reported almost $2.9 billion in net losses.

What Happened To Houseparty

Houseparty was an app-based group video chat platform for mobile and desktop. Released in February 2016, the platform rapidly grew to hundreds of millions of users and was the #1 social app in 82 countries by May 2020. Less than 18 months later, however, owner Epic Games announced that it would be shutting down the app in October 2021. Let’s explain the reasons for Houseparty’s demise below.

What Happened To ChaCha

ChaCha was a human-guided search engine founded in 2006. The platform provided a valuable service at a time when traditional search engine algorithms were unreliable and less developed. When algorithms did become sufficiently developed, they provided answers to questions for free and much more rapidly than ChaCha could. The ChaCha business model was also unscalable, with employees overworked as the company tried to stay ahead of innovation. ChaCha’s demise was also compounded by the smartphone, which provided another avenue for consumers to find information. A belated attempt to restructure and cut costs followed, but the company could not service its debt past 2016.

What Happened To RadioShack

RadioShack is an American electronics retailer founded by brothers Milton and Theodore Deutschmann in 1921. The company enjoyed market dominance in the 70s and 80s but faded fast after a slew of missed opportunities. RadioShack operated over four thousand stores in the USA, but many were placed too close together which caused sales cannibalization. These stores were also often small and had a confusing inventory mix. RadioShack sold the first mass-produced personal computer with much success. However, the company saw no future in personal computers because of the high cost of hardware. It then instructed sales managers to intentionally keep PC sales under a certain threshold.

What Happened To Compaq

Compaq was an American developer and producer of computer products and services. After strong initial success, the company was acquired by HP in 2002 with the Compaq brand retired in 2013. Compaq’s short-sighted acquisition of DEC provided the catalyst for its decline. While the company was dealing with the ramifications of the acquisition, competitors such as Dell and Gateway increased their market share. Compaq also experienced a loss in revenue after the dot-com bubble burst. This was exacerbated by the standardization of chipsets and motherboards by Intel.

What Happened To Kodak

Kodak is an American photography product and service company founded in 1892 by George Eastman and Henry A. Strong. After dominating the photographic film industry for decades, the company filed for bankruptcy in 2012. Kodak was not ignorant of digital camera technology. But it did fail at various stages to commit to digital products entirely despite overwhelming evidence that the technology would prove profitable. Kodak was also the victim of the changing retail landscape and consumer sentiment toward foreign products in the United States. Blind in its devotion to printing, it also missed an opportunity to create a Facebook-style photo-sharing website three years before Facebook itself was conceived.

What Happened To Friendster

Friendster was a social networking site that then transitioned to a gaming platform. Ultimately, Friendster failed to capitalize on its early success as one of the first social media platforms to experience mass uptake. When Friendster became a gaming platform, it failed to notify its user base. This set in motion the migration of users to Facebook which would continue for some years. Friendster’s decision to raise funds via venture capital funding populated its board with investors who were not interested in technology or innovation. The company was acquired by MOL Global in 2009 who then sold its patents to Facebook soon after.

What Happened To StumbleUpon

xStumbleUpon was an early social network founded by Garrett Camp, Geoff Smith, Justin LaFrance, and Eric Boyd. At one point, the platform was responsible for half of all social media traffic in the United States. StumbleUpon suffered intense competition from the likes of Pinterest, Digg, and Reddit – both in terms of site functionality and monetization strategy. After a failed partnership with eBay, Camp bought back the company and instituted a major redesign to limited success. The StumbleUpon user experience became outdated as consumers preferred to waste time scrolling through news feeds. Upon this realization, Camp shut down the service in 2018 to focus on a more modern iteration called Mix.com

What Happened To Altavista

Altavista was a pioneering search engine developed by a group of Digital Equipment (DEC) researchers. It was originally created to showcase the power of a then-revolutionary DEC supercomputer. After an ominous partnership with Yahoo in 1996, AltaVista underwent a series of acquisitions and format charges as several companies tried to make it profitable. In the process, the search engine lost market share to up-and-comer Google. Yahoo acquired AltaVista in 2003 and absorbed the technology behind the search engine into its own platform. AltaVista was formally put to rest ten years later.

What Happened To Blockbuster

Blockbuster was an American movie and video game rental chain. The company went from industry leader to filing for bankruptcy with $1 billion in debt in less than a decade. Blockbuster relied on late fees to drive a high proportion of revenue. This strategy proved uncompetitive after Netflix offered fee-free movie rentals by mail. Blockbuster lost significant market share to Netflix in the ensuing years and experienced a decline in profit after abolishing late fees in an attempt to remain competitive. Blockbuster’s demise is mostly due to an inability to innovate. Although passing on the offer to purchase Netflix is noteworthy, the company failed because of a myopic focus on its outdated rental franchise model.

What Happened To Napster

Napster was a peer-to-peer music-sharing software application. It was the first such platform to provide free access to the full history of recorded music online. Napster quickly attracted the attention of music artists, with Metallica instigating court proceedings against the company for copyright infringement and the distribution of unreleased music. Napster was forced to shut down after the Recording Industry Association of America won a court injunction. Mounting legal fees and compensation costs led to the company filing for bankruptcy in 2002.

What Happened To BlackBerry

BlackBerry is an iconic smartphone brand owned by Canadian company BlackBerry Limited. The company enjoyed first-mover status in the smartphone industry, but ultimately squandered its advantage. BlackBerry was ignorant and in some ways disrespectful of competitors in the industry. It was more concerned with protecting its proprietary technology than innovating to stay relevant. Though profitable to some extent, BlackBerry’s focus on enterprise customers came at the expense of the far more lucrative consumer market. Government opposition to censoring information also eroded one of the core strengths of the company’s smartphone.

Why Nokia Failed

Nokia is a Finnish telecommunications, consumer technology, and information technology company founded in 1865. It enjoyed 51% of the global market share for mobile phones in 1998. Nokia’s device-based hardware system was cumbersome and outdated, but the company persisted with it while competitors developed the software-based iOS and Android operating systems. By the time Nokia phones offered Android, the company had been left behind. Corporate mismanagement within Nokia was rife and culture suffered as a result. Internally and externally, the company failed to acknowledge its diminishing relevance and market share.

What Happened To Xerox

Xerox is an American corporation selling print and digital document products and services worldwide. The company failed to capitalize on revolutionary research performed at its PARC R&D center. Xerox was visited by Steve Jobs in 1979 who gained access to PARC in exchange for Xerox receiving shares in Apple. He then purchased the rights to a Xerox GUI and used it to produce the Apple Macintosh. Xerox released the Xerox Star personal computer in 1981 in a rare example of the company selling an innovative product commercially. However, the Star was prohibitively expensive, targeted the wrong market, and was a decade ahead of its time.

What Happened To Quibi

Quibi was an American short-form streaming service for smartphones. Unfortunate timing with the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic is at least partly responsible for the failure of the platform. Despite billions being invested in securing high-end talent and production studios, Quibi content was generally poor quality. In any case, there was no way for consumers to share or engage with the content they did enjoy. Quibi was not helped by its pricing strategy and the presence of established competitors offering more for less. It was also improperly and inadequately marketed.

About The Author

Scroll to Top