The Kano Model was developed by Dr. Noriaki Kano, a professor of quality management at the Tokyo University of Science. The Kano Model prioritizes features on a product roadmap according to the degree to which they are likely to satisfy customers. The Kano Model is one of a suite of prioritization frameworks that help product teams prioritize product features. However, it has a strict focus on prioritizing features based on user satisfaction.
Aspect
Explanation
Concept Overview
The Kano Model is a framework for understanding and prioritizing customer needs and preferences in product or service development. It was developed by Professor Noriaki Kano in the 1980s and categorizes features into five different categories based on their impact on customer satisfaction. The model helps organizations make informed decisions about which features to prioritize to enhance customer satisfaction.
Five Categories
The Kano Model categorizes features into five main categories: 1. Basic Needs: These are essential features that customers expect as a minimum requirement. Their absence results in dissatisfaction, but their presence does not necessarily lead to high satisfaction. 2. Performance Needs: These features have a direct relationship with satisfaction—more is better. Improving them increases customer satisfaction. 3. Excitement Needs: These are unexpected, delightful features that can significantly increase satisfaction when present but do not lead to dissatisfaction when absent. They can differentiate a product in the market. 4. Indifferent Needs: Features that neither significantly increase nor decrease satisfaction, often seen as neutral. 5. Reverse Needs: Features that, when present, lead to dissatisfaction, but when absent, increase satisfaction. These are rare but important to avoid.
Application
The Kano Model is applied in product and service design, marketing, and customer experience improvement. It helps organizations understand customer expectations, prioritize features, and make strategic decisions about resource allocation.
Methodology
To apply the Kano Model, organizations typically follow these steps: 1. Identify Customer Needs: Gather customer feedback through surveys, interviews, or other methods to identify their needs and expectations. 2. Categorize Features: Classify product or service features into the five Kano categories based on customer responses. 3. Prioritize Features: Prioritize features based on their Kano category and the impact on customer satisfaction. 4. Make Strategic Decisions: Decide which features to focus on for development or improvement based on their category and strategic goals.
Benefits
Implementing the Kano Model offers several benefits: 1. Customer-Centric Design: Ensures that customer needs and preferences are central to product or service development. 2. Prioritization: Helps prioritize features based on their impact on satisfaction. 3. Competitive Advantage: Identifying and delivering excitement needs can differentiate a product in the market. 4. Resource Allocation: Informs resource allocation and development priorities. 5. Enhanced Customer Satisfaction: Ultimately leads to higher customer satisfaction and loyalty.
Challenges and Risks
Challenges in using the Kano Model include the need for accurate customer data and interpretation of customer feedback. The model is most effective when used in conjunction with other market research and design methodologies.
Through extensive research, Dr. Kano determined the factors most responsible for customer loyalty and satisfaction with the creation of five categories. Each category describes the potential reaction of a customer to a product or service feature – ranging from dissatisfaction to delight.
As a result, teams using the Kano Model must consider new product features according to the potential of each to satisfy customers based on functionality.
Key Concepts
Basic Features: Basic features are essential requirements that customers expect as a minimum standard. They do not necessarily lead to increased satisfaction when fulfilled, but their absence can result in dissatisfaction. Basic features are often considered mandatory and are assumed to be present in the product.
Performance Features: Performance features are directly correlated with customer satisfaction and can lead to increased satisfaction when enhanced or improved. Unlike basic features, performance features go beyond minimum expectations and provide additional value or benefits to customers.
Delighter Features: Delighter features are unexpected or innovative features that exceed customer expectations and can lead to delight or positive surprise. While not essential for basic functionality, delighter features have the potential to differentiate a product from competitors and create a memorable user experience.
The Kano Model feature categories
As noted earlier, the Kano Model identifies five category features based on the reaction of a customer. It’s important to note that customer reactions are based on whether a given product feature is absent (dysfunctional) or present (functional).
With that in mind, let’s take a look at each in more detail:
Dissatisfaction features – customers are likely to be upset by the presence of these features, but not dissatisfied if they are absent.
Indifferent features – the presence or absence of these features does not make a perceptible difference in the reaction of the customer. If present, they are simply tolerated.
Basic (threshold) features – or features a product needs to be competitive that customers expect. Turn signals on a new car are one such example. These features are not generally desired by customers but they may dislike not having them. In many situations, these product features are compulsory in that they are essential to the operation of the product.
Excitement features – Kano called these features “delighters” because of their ability to delight and excite customers who weren’t expecting to have them. They often provide an increase in customer delight that is disproportional to the investment required to implement them. Delighters can drive brand loyalty and increase word-of-mouth advertising.
Performance features – encompassing features that where investment is proportionally related to customer satisfaction. Performance features are those that the customer likes having and dislikes not having. As a result of the linear relationship between investment and satisfaction, Kano noted that these features were one-dimensional. Nevertheless, customers use these features to weigh up buying decisions. A phone company that invests in a better network to offer consumers faster browsing speeds is one example of a performance feature.
Benefits of the Kano Model
Adopting the Kano Model offers several benefits for product development and marketing efforts:
Improved Customer Satisfaction: By understanding and prioritizing customer preferences, businesses can focus on enhancing performance and delighter features that drive customer satisfaction and loyalty. This targeted approach ensures that resources are allocated to areas that have the greatest impact on customer experience.
Competitive Advantage: Identifying delighter features that exceed customer expectations allows businesses to differentiate their products from competitors and gain a competitive edge in the market. Delighter features can become key selling points and contribute to brand loyalty and customer advocacy.
Resource Optimization: The Kano Model helps businesses prioritize feature development and allocation of resources based on customer preferences and the expected impact on satisfaction. By focusing on performance and delighter features that offer the most value to customers, businesses can optimize resource utilization and maximize return on investment.
Challenges in Applying the Kano Model
Despite its benefits, applying the Kano Model can pose certain challenges and considerations:
Customer Understanding: Accurately identifying and understanding customer preferences and expectations requires comprehensive market research, customer feedback, and data analysis. Businesses need to invest time and resources in gathering and interpreting customer insights to effectively apply the Kano Model.
Feature Prioritization: Prioritizing features and allocating resources can be challenging, especially when faced with competing priorities and limited resources. Businesses must balance customer preferences, market trends, technical feasibility, and business objectives when making decisions about feature development and implementation.
Dynamic Nature: Customer preferences and market conditions are dynamic and may change over time. Continuous monitoring and adaptation are necessary to ensure that product features remain aligned with evolving customer needs and expectations. Businesses need to remain agile and responsive to changes in the market landscape.
Strategies for Applying the Kano Model
To overcome challenges and maximize the benefits of the Kano Model, businesses can adopt several strategies:
Customer Feedback and Research: Invest in ongoing customer feedback mechanisms, surveys, interviews, and market research to gather insights into customer preferences, expectations, and satisfaction levels. Use qualitative and quantitative data to identify patterns and trends that inform feature development and prioritization.
Segmentation and Personalization: Recognize that customer preferences may vary across different segments and demographics. Use segmentation techniques to tailor product features and experiences to specific customer groups and personalize offerings to meet individual needs and preferences.
Continuous Improvement: Embrace a culture of continuous improvement and innovation by regularly evaluating and refining product features based on customer feedback and market dynamics. Iterate on existing features, experiment with new ideas, and stay attuned to emerging trends and technologies that may impact customer satisfaction.
Real-World Examples
The Kano Model has been applied in various industries and product domains:
Technology Products: Tech companies use the Kano Model to prioritize software features, user interface design elements, and hardware specifications based on customer preferences and satisfaction levels. For example, smartphone manufacturers may focus on enhancing performance features such as camera quality and battery life while also introducing delighter features such as facial recognition or augmented reality capabilities.
Hospitality Services: Hotels and resorts apply the Kano Model to identify and prioritize guest amenities, room features, and service offerings that contribute to overall guest satisfaction and loyalty. By understanding guest preferences and expectations, hospitality providers can tailor their offerings to create memorable experiences that exceed customer expectations.
Automotive Industry: Car manufacturers use the Kano Model to design and develop vehicle features, safety technologies, and in-car entertainment systems that enhance the driving experience and differentiate their products in the competitive automotive market. Features such as adaptive cruise control, lane departure warning systems, and voice-activated controls may serve as performance or delighter features depending on customer preferences and market trends.
Key takeaways:
The Kano Model is a product feature prioritising framework based on potential customer reaction and satisfaction.
The Kano Model is unique among prioritization frameworks because it is solely focused on assessing product features based on their presence (functionality) or absence (dysfunctionality).
The Kano Model splits customer reactions to a product feature into five categories: dissatisfaction, indifferent, basic, excitement, and performance. Businesses must avoid the first two categories and focus on categories likely to drive customer loyalty and retention.
Key Highlights
Introduction to the Kano Model:
Developed by Dr. Noriaki Kano, a professor of quality management at the Tokyo University of Science.
Focuses on prioritizing product features based on their potential to satisfy customers.
Aims to determine which features contribute most to customer loyalty and satisfaction.
Understanding the Kano Model:
The Kano Model categorizes features based on customer reactions to their presence or absence.
There are five categories, ranging from dissatisfaction to delight, depending on the impact of a feature on customer satisfaction.
Kano Model Feature Categories:
Dissatisfaction Features: Upset customers if present, but not dissatisfied if absent.
Indifferent Features: Presence or absence doesn’t significantly affect customer reaction.
Basic (Threshold) Features: Essential for competitiveness, expected by customers, absence disliked.
Excitement Features (Delighters): Unexpected features that delight customers and drive loyalty.
Performance Features: Proportional relationship between investment and customer satisfaction.
Key Takeaways:
The Kano Model focuses on assessing product features based on their presence or absence.
Five categories of customer reactions: dissatisfaction, indifference, basic, excitement, and performance.
Businesses should prioritize features that drive customer loyalty and retention.
Related Frameworks
Description
When to Apply
Quality Function Deployment (QFD)
– A structured approach to product development that translates customer needs (voice of the customer) into specific product features and requirements. Quality Function Deployment (QFD) complements the Kano Model by providing a systematic method for prioritizing customer requirements based on their importance and impact.
– When designing new products or services based on customer preferences and expectations. – Applying Quality Function Deployment (QFD) to prioritize features, align product development efforts, and ensure customer satisfaction effectively.
Customer Journey Mapping
– A technique for visualizing and analyzing the customer’s experience across various touchpoints and interactions with a product or service. Customer Journey Mapping helps identify customer needs, pain points, and opportunities for improvement, aligning with the Kano Model’s focus on understanding customer preferences.
– When gaining insights into the end-to-end customer experience and identifying areas for enhancing satisfaction. – Creating Customer Journey Maps to empathize with users, prioritize features, and design products or services that meet or exceed customer expectations effectively.
Voice of the Customer (VoC)
– A process for capturing, analyzing, and incorporating customer feedback and preferences into product development decisions. Voice of the Customer (VoC) methods, such as surveys, interviews, and observations, provide valuable insights into customer needs and desires, aligning with the Kano Model’s emphasis on understanding customer requirements.
– When gathering feedback from customers to inform product development or improvement efforts. – Utilizing Voice of the Customer (VoC) techniques to identify customer preferences, prioritize features, and enhance product value effectively.
Conjoint Analysis
– A statistical technique for measuring and analyzing consumer preferences for different product attributes or features. Conjoint Analysis helps quantify the relative importance of product attributes and their impact on customer satisfaction, complementing the Kano Model’s focus on understanding customer preferences and trade-offs.
– When conducting market research or product design studies to assess customer preferences and willingness to pay. – Employing Conjoint Analysis to identify key product features, optimize product configurations, and maximize customer satisfaction effectively.
Customer Segmentation
– The process of dividing customers into distinct groups based on shared characteristics, preferences, or behaviors. Customer Segmentation enables organizations to tailor products, services, and marketing strategies to specific customer segments, aligning with the Kano Model’s recognition of diverse customer needs and preferences.
– When targeting specific customer segments with tailored products, services, or marketing campaigns. – Employing Customer Segmentation to understand different customer needs, prioritize features, and deliver personalized experiences effectively.
Product Roadmapping
– A strategic planning tool for visualizing and communicating the evolution of a product over time, including key features, enhancements, and milestones. Product Roadmapping aligns with the Kano Model by providing a framework for prioritizing and sequencing product features based on customer value and strategic objectives.
– When planning and communicating product development priorities and timelines. – Creating Product Roadmaps to align cross-functional teams, prioritize feature development, and deliver value to customers effectively.
Usability Testing
– A method for evaluating the usability and user experience of a product or service by observing how users interact with it. Usability Testing helps identify usability issues, pain points, and opportunities for improvement, aligning with the Kano Model’s focus on understanding and addressing customer needs.
– When assessing the ease of use and effectiveness of a product or service from the user’s perspective. – Conducting Usability Testing to identify usability problems, validate design decisions, and improve user satisfaction effectively.
Market Segmentation
– The process of dividing a market into distinct groups of customers with similar needs, characteristics, or behaviors. Market Segmentation helps organizations identify target markets, tailor marketing strategies, and develop products that meet specific customer requirements, aligning with the Kano Model’s recognition of diverse customer preferences.
– When identifying and targeting profitable market segments with tailored products or services. – Applying Market Segmentation to understand customer needs, prioritize features, and differentiate offerings effectively.
Product-Market Fit
– The degree to which a product meets the needs and preferences of a target market, resulting in strong customer demand and satisfaction. Product-Market Fit aligns with the Kano Model’s focus on delivering value to customers by addressing their unmet needs and preferences effectively.
– When validating product concepts or prototypes with target customers to assess market demand and acceptance. – Achieving Product-Market Fit by aligning product features, value propositions, and market needs to maximize customer satisfaction and business success effectively.
Competitive Analysis
– A process for assessing and comparing a company’s products, services, and strategies against those of competitors. Competitive Analysis helps identify strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats in the market landscape, informing product development decisions and differentiation strategies, aligning with the Kano Model’s emphasis on understanding customer preferences and competitive dynamics.
– When evaluating market trends, competitive positioning, and opportunities for differentiation. – Conducting Competitive Analysis to identify competitive strengths, benchmark against rivals, and prioritize feature development effectively.
AIOps is the application of artificial intelligence to IT operations. It has become particularly useful for modern IT management in hybridized, distributed, and dynamic environments. AIOps has become a key operational component of modern digital-based organizations, built around software and algorithms.
Agile started as a lightweight development method compared to heavyweight software development, which is the core paradigm of the previous decades of software development. By 2001 the Manifesto for Agile Software Development was born as a set of principles that defined the new paradigm for software development as a continuous iteration. This would also influence the way of doing business.
Agile Program Management is a means of managing, planning, and coordinating interrelated work in such a way that value delivery is emphasized for all key stakeholders. Agile Program Management (AgilePgM) is a disciplined yet flexible agile approach to managing transformational change within an organization.
Agile project management (APM) is a strategy that breaks large projects into smaller, more manageable tasks. In the APM methodology, each project is completed in small sections – often referred to as iterations. Each iteration is completed according to its project life cycle, beginning with the initial design and progressing to testing and then quality assurance.
Agile Modeling (AM) is a methodology for modeling and documenting software-based systems. Agile Modeling is critical to the rapid and continuous delivery of software. It is a collection of values, principles, and practices that guide effective, lightweight software modeling.
Agile Business Analysis (AgileBA) is certification in the form of guidance and training for business analysts seeking to work in agile environments. To support this shift, AgileBA also helps the business analyst relate Agile projects to a wider organizational mission or strategy. To ensure that analysts have the necessary skills and expertise, AgileBA certification was developed.
Agile leadership is the embodiment of agile manifesto principles by a manager or management team. Agile leadership impacts two important levels of a business. The structural level defines the roles, responsibilities, and key performance indicators. The behavioral level describes the actions leaders exhibit to others based on agile principles.
The andon system alerts managerial, maintenance, or other staff of a production process problem. The alert itself can be activated manually with a button or pull cord, but it can also be activated automatically by production equipment. Most Andon boards utilize three colored lights similar to a traffic signal: green (no errors), yellow or amber (problem identified, or quality check needed), and red (production stopped due to unidentified issue).
Bimodal Portfolio Management (BimodalPfM) helps an organization manage both agile and traditional portfolios concurrently. Bimodal Portfolio Management – sometimes referred to as bimodal development – was coined by research and advisory company Gartner. The firm argued that many agile organizations still needed to run some aspects of their operations using traditional delivery models.
Business innovation is about creating new opportunities for an organization to reinvent its core offerings, revenue streams, and enhance the value proposition for existing or new customers, thus renewing its whole business model. Business innovation springs by understanding the structure of the market, thus adapting or anticipating those changes.
Business modelinnovation is about increasing the success of an organization with existing products and technologies by crafting a compelling value proposition able to propel a new business model to scale up customers and create a lasting competitive advantage. And it all starts by mastering the key customers.
A consumer brand company like Procter & Gamble (P&G) defines “Constructive Disruption” as: a willingness to change, adapt, and create new trends and technologies that will shape our industry for the future. According to P&G, it moves around four pillars: lean innovation, brand building, supply chain, and digitalization & data analytics.
That is a process that requires a continuous feedback loop to develop a valuable product and build a viable business model. Continuous innovation is a mindset where products and services are designed and delivered to tune them around the customers’ problem and not the technical solution of its founders.
A design sprint is a proven five-day process where critical business questions are answered through speedy design and prototyping, focusing on the end-user. A design sprint starts with a weekly challenge that should finish with a prototype, test at the end, and therefore a lesson learned to be iterated.
Tim Brown, Executive Chair of IDEO, defined design thinking as “a human-centered approach to innovation that draws from the designer’s toolkit to integrate the needs of people, the possibilities of technology, and the requirements for business success.” Therefore, desirability, feasibility, and viability are balanced to solve critical problems.
DevOps refers to a series of practices performed to perform automated software development processes. It is a conjugation of the term “development” and “operations” to emphasize how functions integrate across IT teams. DevOps strategies promote seamless building, testing, and deployment of products. It aims to bridge a gap between development and operations teams to streamline the development altogether.
Product discovery is a critical part of agile methodologies, as its aim is to ensure that products customers love are built. Product discovery involves learning through a raft of methods, including design thinking, lean start-up, and A/B testing to name a few. Dual Track Agile is an agile methodology containing two separate tracks: the “discovery” track and the “delivery” track.
eXtreme Programming was developed in the late 1990s by Ken Beck, Ron Jeffries, and Ward Cunningham. During this time, the trio was working on the Chrysler Comprehensive Compensation System (C3) to help manage the company payroll system. eXtreme Programming (XP) is a software development methodology. It is designed to improve software quality and the ability of software to adapt to changing customer needs.
Feature-Driven Development is a pragmatic software process that is client and architecture-centric. Feature-Driven Development (FDD) is an agile software development model that organizes workflow according to which features need to be developed next.
A Gemba Walk is a fundamental component of lean management. It describes the personal observation of work to learn more about it. Gemba is a Japanese word that loosely translates as “the real place”, or in business, “the place where value is created”. The Gemba Walk as a concept was created by Taiichi Ohno, the father of the Toyota Production System of lean manufacturing. Ohno wanted to encourage management executives to leave their offices and see where the real work happened. This, he hoped, would build relationships between employees with vastly different skillsets and build trust.
GIST Planning is a relatively easy and lightweight agile approach to product planning that favors autonomous working. GIST Planning is a lean and agile methodology that was created by former Google product manager Itamar Gilad. GIST Planning seeks to address this situation by creating lightweight plans that are responsive and adaptable to change. GIST Planning also improves team velocity, autonomy, and alignment by reducing the pervasive influence of management. It consists of four blocks: goals, ideas, step-projects, and tasks.
The ICE Scoring Model is an agile methodology that prioritizes features using data according to three components: impact, confidence, and ease of implementation. The ICE Scoring Model was initially created by author and growth expert Sean Ellis to help companies expand. Today, the model is broadly used to prioritize projects, features, initiatives, and rollouts. It is ideally suited for early-stage product development where there is a continuous flow of ideas and momentum must be maintained.
An innovation funnel is a tool or process ensuring only the best ideas are executed. In a metaphorical sense, the funnel screens innovative ideas for viability so that only the best products, processes, or business models are launched to the market. An innovation funnel provides a framework for the screening and testing of innovative ideas for viability.
According to how well defined is the problem and how well defined the domain, we have four main types of innovations: basic research (problem and domain or not well defined); breakthrough innovation (domain is not well defined, the problem is well defined); sustaining innovation (both problem and domain are well defined); and disruptive innovation (domain is well defined, the problem is not well defined).
The innovation loop is a methodology/framework derived from the Bell Labs, which produced innovation at scale throughout the 20th century. They learned how to leverage a hybrid innovation management model based on science, invention, engineering, and manufacturing at scale. By leveraging individual genius, creativity, and small/large groups.
The Agile methodology has been primarily thought of for software development (and other business disciplines have also adopted it). Lean thinking is a process improvement technique where teams prioritize the value streams to improve it continuously. Both methodologies look at the customer as the key driver to improvement and waste reduction. Both methodologies look at improvement as something continuous.
A startup company is a high-tech business that tries to build a scalable business model in tech-driven industries. A startup company usually follows a lean methodology, where continuous innovation, driven by built-in viral loops is the rule. Thus, driving growth and building network effects as a consequence of this strategy.
As pointed out by Eric Ries, a minimum viable product is that version of a new product which allows a team to collect the maximum amount of validated learning about customers with the least effort through a cycle of build, measure, learn; that is the foundation of the lean startup methodology.
Kanban is a lean manufacturing framework first developed by Toyota in the late 1940s. The Kanban framework is a means of visualizing work as it moves through identifying potential bottlenecks. It does that through a process called just-in-time (JIT) manufacturing to optimize engineering processes, speed up manufacturing products, and improve the go-to-market strategy.
Jidoka was first used in 1896 by Sakichi Toyoda, who invented a textile loom that would stop automatically when it encountered a defective thread. Jidoka is a Japanese term used in lean manufacturing. The term describes a scenario where machines cease operating without human intervention when a problem or defect is discovered.
The PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) cycle was first proposed by American physicist and engineer Walter A. Shewhart in the 1920s. The PDCA cycle is a continuous process and product improvement method and an essential component of the lean manufacturing philosophy.
RAD was first introduced by author and consultant James Martin in 1991. Martin recognized and then took advantage of the endless malleability of software in designing development models. Rapid Application Development (RAD) is a methodology focusing on delivering rapidly through continuous feedback and frequent iterations.
Retrospective analyses are held after a project to determine what worked well and what did not. They are also conducted at the end of an iteration in Agile project management. Agile practitioners call these meetings retrospectives or retros. They are an effective way to check the pulse of a project team, reflect on the work performed to date, and reach a consensus on how to tackle the next sprint cycle. These are the five stages of a retrospective analysis for effective Agile project management: set the stage, gather the data, generate insights, decide on the next steps, and close the retrospective.
Scaled Agile Lean Development (ScALeD) helps businesses discover a balanced approach to agile transition and scaling questions. The ScALed approach helps businesses successfully respond to change. Inspired by a combination of lean and agile values, ScALed is practitioner-based and can be completed through various agile frameworks and practices.
The SMED (single minute exchange of die) method is a lean production framework to reduce waste and increase production efficiency. The SMED method is a framework for reducing the time associated with completing an equipment changeover.
The Spotify Model is an autonomous approach to scaling agile, focusing on culture communication, accountability, and quality. The Spotify model was first recognized in 2012 after Henrik Kniberg, and Anders Ivarsson released a white paper detailing how streaming company Spotify approached agility. Therefore, the Spotify model represents an evolution of agile.
As the name suggests, TDD is a test-driven technique for delivering high-quality software rapidly and sustainably. It is an iterative approach based on the idea that a failing test should be written before any code for a feature or function is written. Test-Driven Development (TDD) is an approach to software development that relies on very short development cycles.
Timeboxing is a simple yet powerful time-management technique for improving productivity. Timeboxing describes the process of proactively scheduling a block of time to spend on a task in the future. It was first described by author James Martin in a book about agile software development.
Scrum is a methodology co-created by Ken Schwaber and Jeff Sutherland for effective team collaboration on complex products. Scrum was primarily thought for software development projects to deliver new software capability every 2-4 weeks. It is a sub-group of agile also used in project management to improve startups’ productivity.
Scrumban is a project management framework that is a hybrid of two popular agile methodologies: Scrum and Kanban. Scrumban is a popular approach to helping businesses focus on the right strategic tasks while simultaneously strengthening their processes.
Scrum anti-patterns describe any attractive, easy-to-implement solution that ultimately makes a problem worse. Therefore, these are the practice not to follow to prevent issues from emerging. Some classic examples of scrum anti-patterns comprise absent product owners, pre-assigned tickets (making individuals work in isolation), and discounting retrospectives (where review meetings are not useful to really make improvements).
Scrum at Scale (Scrum@Scale) is a framework that Scrum teams use to address complex problems and deliver high-value products. Scrum at Scale was created through a joint venture between the Scrum Alliance and Scrum Inc. The joint venture was overseen by Jeff Sutherland, a co-creator of Scrum and one of the principal authors of the Agile Manifesto.
Six Sigma is a data-driven approach and methodology for eliminating errors or defects in a product, service, or process. Six Sigma was developed by Motorola as a management approach based on quality fundamentals in the early 1980s. A decade later, it was popularized by General Electric who estimated that the methodology saved them $12 billion in the first five years of operation.
Stretch objectives describe any task an agile team plans to complete without expressly committing to do so. Teams incorporate stretch objectives during a Sprint or Program Increment (PI) as part of Scaled Agile. They are used when the agile team is unsure of its capacity to attain an objective. Therefore, stretch objectives are instead outcomes that, while extremely desirable, are not the difference between the success or failure of each sprint.
The Toyota Production System (TPS) is an early form of lean manufacturing created by auto-manufacturer Toyota. Created by the Toyota Motor Corporation in the 1940s and 50s, the Toyota Production System seeks to manufacture vehicles ordered by customers most quickly and efficiently possible.
The Total Quality Management (TQM) framework is a technique based on the premise that employees continuously work on their ability to provide value to customers. Importantly, the word “total” means that all employees are involved in the process – regardless of whether they work in development, production, or fulfillment.
The waterfall model was first described by Herbert D. Benington in 1956 during a presentation about the software used in radar imaging during the Cold War. Since there were no knowledge-based, creative software development strategies at the time, the waterfall method became standard practice. The waterfall model is a linear and sequential project management framework.
Gennaro is the creator of FourWeekMBA, which reached about four million business people, comprising C-level executives, investors, analysts, product managers, and aspiring digital entrepreneurs in 2022 alone | He is also Director of Sales for a high-tech scaleup in the AI Industry | In 2012, Gennaro earned an International MBA with emphasis on Corporate Finance and Business Strategy.
