hyper-competition

What is hyper-competition?

Hyper-competition describes competition in a market that is rapid and dynamic and characterized by unsustainable advantage. In short, technology, changing consumer behaviors, lower entry barriers, and cheap capital might be enabling many companies to get started, thus creating a context of hyper-competition, where it’s hard to establish market dominance.

AspectExplanation
Concept OverviewHyper-competition is an advanced stage of competition characterized by intense rivalry among firms, where competitors aggressively seek sustainable competitive advantages and continuously challenge one another. It is a concept introduced by management scholars Richard A. D’Aveni and Robert Gunther and signifies a rapid and dynamic form of competition beyond traditional market competition. In hyper-competition, firms constantly innovate, adapt, and disrupt to gain an edge in the market.
Key Characteristics– Hyper-competition is marked by several key characteristics: 1. Short Product Lifecycles: Products or services have very brief lifespans, making innovation and speed to market critical. 2. Frequent Strategic Moves: Firms frequently change strategies, alliances, and tactics in response to market shifts. 3. Continuous Innovation: Ongoing innovation is essential to maintain competitiveness. 4. Market Fragmentation: Markets become fragmented as niche players emerge. 5. Globalization: Competition extends beyond local and national boundaries. 6. Technological Disruption: Rapid technological advances continually reshape industries. 7. Increased M&A Activity: Firms engage in frequent mergers and acquisitions to gain advantages.
Drivers of Hyper-competition– Several factors contribute to the emergence of hyper-competition: 1. Technology: Technological advancements, especially digital technology, enable rapid innovation and global connectivity. 2. Globalization: The ease of global trade and communication expands the competitive landscape. 3. Information Flow: Access to real-time data and information empowers firms to make quick decisions. 4. Customer Expectations: Evolving customer preferences and demands drive firms to adapt swiftly. 5. Regulatory Changes: Changes in regulations can disrupt established market structures. 6. Competitive Aggressiveness: A proactive competitive stance by firms fuels rivalry.
Strategies in Hyper-competition– In a hyper-competitive environment, firms adopt various strategies to thrive: 1. Continuous Innovation: Rapid product development and innovation to stay ahead of competitors. 2. Strategic Alliances: Forming partnerships and alliances to access resources and capabilities. 3. Cost Leadership: Achieving cost efficiencies to maintain competitive pricing. 4. Market Niche Focus: Concentrating on specific customer segments or niches. 5. Agility: The ability to adapt quickly to changing conditions and seize opportunities. 6. Disruptive Technologies: Leveraging emerging technologies to disrupt existing markets. 7. Customer-Centricity: Focusing on delivering exceptional customer experiences.
Challenges and Risks– While hyper-competition offers opportunities, it also poses challenges and risks: 1. Resource Drain: Constant competition can strain resources and lead to burnout. 2. Short-Term Focus: Firms may prioritize short-term gains over long-term sustainability. 3. Market Saturation: Markets can become saturated with products and offerings. 4. Regulatory Issues: Rapid changes may lead to regulatory challenges. 5. Uncertainty: The dynamic nature of hyper-competition introduces uncertainty. 6. Competitive Turbulence: Frequent changes in competitive landscapes can be disruptive.

Understanding hyper-competition

In many industries, there has been a general shift in the nature of competition in recent years.

Once the domain of slow-moving, stable oligopolies, these industries are now comprised of companies who strike quickly and unconventionally as a means of gaining competitive advantage.

Indeed, so-called “hypercompetitors” have upset the status quo by generating a competitive advantage that destroys, neutralizes, or makes obsolete the advantage enjoyed by industry leaders.

This results in unstable and volatile markets where competitive advantage frequently changes hands.

The fundamental driving forces of hyper-competition

The driving forces of hyper-competition are so overwhelming that no business has the power to stop them.

Following is a look at four major drivers of hyper-competitive industries:

Consumers have become accustomed to high-value products

This has created a buyer’s market where consumers expect more for less and in a timely fashion.

Well-known brands such as Tampax, Gerber, and Kraft have fallen victim to low-priced, private-label goods of similar quality.

Technology is causing paradigm shifts in almost every industry

In computing, IBM has lost market leadership to software designers and chip manufactures who now capture most of the value the company used to offer.

The ubiquitous convenience of eCommerce continues to threaten the market share and very existence of traditional retail brands.

Diminishing entry barriers within nations or industries

Before the collapse of the USSR, a McDonald’s restaurant in Moscow was impossible.

Now it is a case of how many fast-food franchises the city can support. Industry entry barriers have also fallen because of advances in information processing.

Financial services are one example where competitors can easily disrupt an established player – regardless of their background or expertise.

After enjoying success in the U.S. credit card market, Citibank now has to contend with a telecommunications company (AT&T) and an automobile company (GM) as its primary competitors.

Money is the last driver of hyper-competition

Disrupters often make their moves backed by Big Money or as a collection of hundreds of different firms in the same supply chain.

Some companies opt to enter into partnerships with companies in a different industry with a large bank at the center.

When profits are down, they simply cross-subsidize each other – often with governmental assistance.

How can businesses manage a hyper-competitive market?

In the previous section, we noted that the driving forces of hyper-competition could not be overcome. 

However, there are several ways that decision-makers can manage a hyper-competitive market and stay competitive for longer:

Think carefully about pricing strategy

What is the appropriate cost for customer acquisition?

What are the downstream implications for low costs?

Businesses who undercut a competitor to gain an edge invariably end up in a price war that isn’t sustainable.

Find and then dominate the most profitable market segments

That is, which are the segments with high revenue per user and low churn rate?

Finding these segments allows the business to double down on profitable opportunities that a competitor will find extremely difficult to penetrate. 

Use capital as a competitive weapon

Capital is an effective differentiator in a market because every product that can be copied will be copied.

Invariably, gaining a competitive advantage comes down to which company can raise the most funds.

Key takeaways

  • Hyper-competition describes competition in a market that is rapid and dynamic. As a result, competitive advantage is unsustainable for any one company.
  • Hyper-competition is driven by four forces that have the power to overwhelm even the largest organizations. They include a consumer preference for high-value products, advancing technology, diminishing entry barriers, and Big Money.
  • Hyper-competition can be managed to some extent. Businesses in competitive markets should consider their pricing strategies and endeavor to identify the most profitable market segments.

Key Highlights

  • Hyper-Competition Overview:
    • Hyper-competition refers to rapid and dynamic competition in a market, where sustaining a competitive advantage becomes challenging.
    • Traditional stable industries have transformed into volatile markets with quick and unconventional moves by hypercompetitors.
  • Driving Forces of Hyper-Competition:
    • Consumer Expectations: Consumers demand high-value products at lower costs, challenging established brands.
    • Technological Paradigm Shifts: Technology disrupts industries, shifting value and leadership. E.g., IBM’s market position changed due to software and chip manufacturers.
    • Lower Entry Barriers: Entry barriers within industries and nations have diminished, enabling new competitors to disrupt established players. Advances in information processing contribute.
    • Financial Influence: Disruptive moves are often backed by significant capital. Companies form partnerships across industries and use capital as a competitive advantage.
  • Managing Hyper-Competitive Markets:
    • Pricing Strategy: Businesses should carefully consider pricing strategies, avoiding unsustainable price wars that harm profitability.
    • Target Profitable Segments: Identify and dominate high-revenue, low-churn market segments to focus on profitable opportunities.
    • Capital as a Weapon: Capital becomes a key differentiator, as replicable products require financial support. Competitive advantage often hinges on fundraising capabilities.
Related ConceptsDescriptionWhen to Apply
Hyper-competitionHyper-competition is a state of intense rivalry and rapid, ongoing competitive dynamics characterized by frequent strategic maneuvering, innovation, and disruptive change within an industry or market. It involves aggressive competitive behaviors, such as price wars, product differentiation, rapid product development cycles, and continuous innovation, driven by a relentless pursuit of competitive advantage and market leadership. Hyper-competition results from factors such as globalization, technological advancements, deregulation, and changing consumer preferences, which accelerate market dynamics and intensify competitive pressures, leading to shorter product life cycles, increased market volatility, and heightened uncertainty for businesses. Managing hyper-competition requires organizations to be agile, innovative, and adaptive, constantly scanning the competitive landscape, anticipating industry shifts, and responding proactively to emerging threats and opportunities to sustain competitiveness and thrive in turbulent business environments.– When operating in industries or markets characterized by intense rivalry, rapid change, and heightened competitive pressures. – Particularly in dynamic or disruptive industries, digital markets, or globalized sectors, where competitive dynamics are volatile, and traditional business strategies may be insufficient to maintain relevance or competitiveness. Recognizing hyper-competition prompts organizations to adopt agile, innovative, and adaptive strategies that enable them to anticipate market shifts, respond rapidly to changes, and differentiate themselves effectively to thrive in highly competitive environments by leveraging technological advancements, exploiting market opportunities, and outmaneuvering rivals through continuous innovation and strategic agility.
Game TheoryGame Theory is a mathematical framework for analyzing strategic interactions and decision-making among rational actors in competitive situations. It models scenarios where participants’ choices impact each other’s outcomes, and outcomes depend on the collective strategies chosen by all players. Game Theory explores various concepts, such as equilibrium, payoff matrices, and Nash equilibria, to predict behavior, optimize decision-making, and understand competitive dynamics in contexts like economics, business, politics, and military strategy. Understanding Game Theory helps organizations anticipate competitors’ moves, formulate optimal strategies, and mitigate risks by considering potential outcomes and response scenarios in competitive environments.– When analyzing strategic interactions or decision-making processes in competitive environments. – Particularly in industries or markets characterized by intense rivalry, uncertainty, or strategic interdependence among competitors, where understanding competitors’ behaviors and predicting outcomes is critical for formulating effective strategies. Applying Game Theory enables organizations to assess competitive dynamics, identify strategic options, and optimize decision-making by considering potential outcomes, anticipating rival responses, and strategically positioning themselves to maximize benefits or minimize risks in competitive scenarios.
Strategic ManagementStrategic Management is the process of formulating, implementing, and evaluating long-term objectives and action plans to achieve organizational goals and sustain competitive advantage in dynamic business environments. It involves assessing internal strengths and weaknesses, analyzing external opportunities and threats, and aligning resources, capabilities, and strategies to create value and achieve strategic objectives. Strategic management encompasses various activities, such as environmental scanning, strategy formulation, strategy implementation, and performance evaluation, aimed at enhancing organizational effectiveness, adaptability, and competitiveness over time. Adopting strategic management practices enables organizations to navigate uncertainty, exploit opportunities, and mitigate threats by developing clear vision, mission, and goals, aligning strategies with market realities, and fostering a culture of strategic thinking, innovation, and continuous improvement throughout the organization.– When setting long-term objectives, formulating strategies, or making strategic decisions to sustain competitiveness. – Particularly in dynamic or competitive industries, where organizations face constant pressures to adapt to market changes, exploit opportunities, and mitigate risks. Applying strategic management principles helps organizations assess their competitive position, identify strategic options, and develop action plans to achieve their goals by aligning resources, capabilities, and strategies with market dynamics, customer needs, and industry trends, ultimately enhancing organizational resilience, performance, and competitiveness in dynamic business environments.
Competitive AdvantageCompetitive Advantage refers to the unique strengths, capabilities, or assets that enable organizations to outperform rivals, differentiate themselves in the marketplace, and sustain superior performance over time. It may stem from various sources, such as technological leadership, product innovation, cost efficiency, brand reputation, or strategic positioning, that provide organizations with a sustainable edge over competitors. Competitive advantages enable organizations to attract customers, generate value, and achieve profitability by offering superior products, services, or solutions that meet customer needs or preferences better than competitors. Maintaining competitive advantage requires organizations to continually invest in innovation, quality, and customer value while adapting to changing market conditions and competitive threats to preserve their market leadership and profitability over the long term.– When assessing organizational strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, or threats to determine competitive positioning. – Particularly in strategic planning, marketing, or business development activities, where understanding competitive advantages is essential for formulating effective strategies, allocating resources, and positioning products or services in the marketplace. Identifying competitive advantages enables organizations to leverage their unique strengths, differentiate themselves from competitors, and create value propositions that resonate with customers, ultimately driving market success, revenue growth, and sustainable profitability by capitalizing on their distinctive capabilities, assets, or market positioning to outperform rivals and maintain market leadership in competitive environments.
Strategic PositioningStrategic Positioning involves defining and establishing a unique market position or competitive stance that differentiates an organization’s products, services, or brand from competitors and resonates with target customers’ needs or preferences. It encompasses identifying market opportunities, assessing competitive landscapes, and crafting value propositions or market offerings that exploit organizational strengths and address customer pain points more effectively than competitors. Strategic positioning may involve various approaches, such as cost leadership, differentiation, niche targeting, or innovation, depending on market dynamics, competitive pressures, and organizational capabilities. Effective strategic positioning enables organizations to build strong market presence, capture customer mindshare, and sustain competitive advantage by offering unique value propositions or solutions that meet customer needs better than rivals and resonate with target markets’ preferences or aspirations.– When defining market strategies, developing value propositions, or positioning products or services in competitive markets. – Particularly in marketing, brand management, or business development initiatives, where strategic positioning is critical for establishing market presence, differentiating offerings, and attracting target customers. Implementing strategic positioning requires organizations to assess market dynamics, understand customer needs, and leverage organizational strengths to craft compelling value propositions or market offerings that resonate with target audiences, ultimately driving market success, customer loyalty, and sustainable profitability by establishing unique market positions that differentiate them from competitors and capture value in competitive environments.
Market SegmentationMarket Segmentation is the process of dividing a heterogeneous market into distinct groups or segments based on shared characteristics, needs, or behaviors to tailor marketing strategies, messages, and offerings more effectively to target customers. It involves identifying relevant segmentation criteria, such as demographics, psychographics, or buying behaviors, and clustering customers into homogeneous segments that exhibit similar preferences, motivations, or purchase patterns. Market segmentation enables organizations to understand and address diverse customer needs, preferences, and pain points more precisely, customize marketing messages or product features, and allocate resources more efficiently to maximize customer acquisition, retention, and satisfaction. Implementing market segmentation strategies enhances marketing effectiveness, improves customer engagement, and drives revenue growth by aligning marketing efforts with target segments’ needs and delivering tailored solutions or experiences that resonate with their specific requirements or aspirations.– When developing marketing strategies, designing products, or targeting customer segments in competitive markets. – Particularly in marketing, sales, or product development activities, where understanding customer needs and preferences is essential for effective targeting and engagement. Applying market segmentation helps organizations identify viable customer segments, tailor marketing messages or product features, and allocate resources more effectively to maximize customer acquisition, retention, and satisfaction by aligning marketing efforts with target segments’ needs and delivering personalized solutions or experiences that resonate with their unique characteristics, ultimately driving customer loyalty, revenue growth, and market success in competitive environments.
Blue Ocean StrategyBlue Ocean Strategy is a strategic framework that advocates for creating uncontested market space and making competition irrelevant by pursuing innovation, differentiation, and value innovation. It involves identifying and capitalizing on untapped market opportunities, known as blue oceans, where demand is not yet satisfied, and competition is minimal or non-existent. Blue Ocean Strategy encourages organizations to shift focus from competing in crowded markets, known as red oceans, where competition is fierce and differentiation is challenging, to creating new market spaces or redefining industry boundaries through innovative value propositions, business models, or market segmentation strategies. By adopting a blue ocean mindset, organizations can unlock new growth avenues, attract non-customers, and capture value by offering unique value propositions that resonate with unmet customer needs or preferences, ultimately reshaping industry landscapes and achieving sustainable competitive advantage.– When formulating business strategies or seeking to unlock new growth opportunities in existing markets or industries. – Particularly in competitive markets or industries facing saturation, commoditization, or declining margins, where traditional competitive strategies may yield diminishing returns or limited differentiation. Applying Blue Ocean Strategy principles enables organizations to identify untapped market spaces, differentiate their offerings, and create new demand by innovating value propositions, business models, or market boundaries, ultimately reshaping industry dynamics, outperforming competitors, and achieving sustainable growth and profitability by making competition irrelevant and capturing new value from non-customers or underserved market segments.
Innovation ManagementInnovation Management is the systematic process of generating, capturing, and implementing new ideas, technologies, or business models to drive organizational growth, competitiveness, and value creation. It involves fostering a culture of innovation, establishing processes and structures to facilitate idea generation and evaluation, and aligning innovation efforts with strategic objectives and market opportunities. Innovation management encompasses various activities, such as ideation, experimentation, prototyping, and commercialization, aimed at translating creative insights into tangible products, services, or processes that deliver value to customers and stakeholders. Effective innovation management enables organizations to stay ahead of competitors, adapt to market changes, and capitalize on emerging trends by continuously innovating products, services, or business models that meet evolving customer needs or market demands.– When fostering a culture of innovation, driving product development, or pursuing growth opportunities through innovation. – Particularly in R&D, product management, or strategic planning functions, where innovation is a key driver of competitiveness and value creation. Implementing innovation management practices helps organizations cultivate creativity, streamline innovation processes, and align innovation efforts with strategic goals, ultimately fostering a culture of continuous improvement, agility, and value creation that drives sustainable growth and competitiveness in dynamic business environments characterized by rapid change and technological disruptions.
Digital DisruptionDigital Disruption refers to the transformative impact of digital technologies on industries, markets, and business models, leading to significant changes in how products are designed, produced, distributed, and consumed. It involves leveraging digital innovations, such as mobile technologies, cloud computing, artificial intelligence, or blockchain, to create new value propositions, disrupt traditional value chains, and redefine industry boundaries. Digital disruption challenges established players, incumbent business models, and industry norms by enabling new entrants, startups, or digital natives to gain competitive advantages, enter markets rapidly, and capture market share by offering innovative solutions or disruptive business models that address unmet customer needs or exploit market inefficiencies. Managing digital disruption requires organizations to embrace digital transformation, adapt to changing customer expectations, and innovate continuously to remain competitive and relevant in digital-first markets.– When responding to technological advancements, industry disruptions, or changing consumer behaviors driven by digital technologies. – Particularly in traditional industries, established companies, or legacy businesses facing threats from digital disruptors or market entrants leveraging digital innovations. Addressing digital disruption involves embracing digital transformation, fostering innovation, and reinventing business models to capitalize on digital opportunities, mitigate risks, and stay ahead of competitors in digital-first markets characterized by rapid change, uncertainty, and technological advancements that reshape industry landscapes and redefine competitive dynamics.
Strategic InnovationStrategic Innovation involves leveraging innovation to drive strategic objectives, competitive advantage, and business growth by creating new products, services, processes, or business models that differentiate an organization from competitors and meet evolving market needs. It encompasses aligning innovation efforts with organizational strategies, goals, and priorities to address market gaps, exploit emerging opportunities, or mitigate competitive threats effectively. Strategic innovation may involve various approaches, such as disruptive innovation, incremental innovation, open innovation, or collaborative innovation, depending on organizational capabilities, market dynamics, and strategic imperatives. Implementing strategic innovation enables organizations to foster a culture of creativity, experimentation, and value creation, drive continuous improvement, and achieve sustainable growth by innovating strategically to differentiate offerings, enhance customer experiences, and capture market opportunities that align with organizational goals and market realities.– When driving growth, differentiation, or competitiveness through innovation initiatives or strategic investments. – Particularly in strategic planning, product development, or corporate innovation functions, where innovation is integral to achieving organizational goals and sustaining competitive advantage. Implementing strategic innovation involves aligning innovation efforts with strategic objectives, prioritizing innovation initiatives, and fostering a culture of creativity, experimentation, and collaboration that enables organizations to drive value creation, differentiation, and growth by innovating strategically to meet market needs, address industry challenges, and outperform competitors in dynamic business environments characterized by rapid change and evolving customer expectations.

Connected Economic Concepts

Market Economy

market-economy
The idea of a market economy first came from classical economists, including David Ricardo, Jean-Baptiste Say, and Adam Smith. All three of these economists were advocates for a free market. They argued that the “invisible hand” of market incentives and profit motives were more efficient in guiding economic decisions to prosperity than strict government planning.

Positive and Normative Economics

positive-and-normative-economics
Positive economics is concerned with describing and explaining economic phenomena; it is based on facts and empirical evidence. Normative economics, on the other hand, is concerned with making judgments about what “should be” done. It contains value judgments and recommendations about how the economy should be.

Inflation

how-does-inflation-affect-the-economy
When there is an increased price of goods and services over a long period, it is called inflation. In these times, currency shows less potential to buy products and services. Thus, general prices of goods and services increase. Consequently, decreases in the purchasing power of currency is called inflation. 

Asymmetric Information

asymmetric-information
Asymmetric information as a concept has probably existed for thousands of years, but it became mainstream in 2001 after Michael Spence, George Akerlof, and Joseph Stiglitz won the Nobel Prize in Economics for their work on information asymmetry in capital markets. Asymmetric information, otherwise known as information asymmetry, occurs when one party in a business transaction has access to more information than the other party.

Autarky

autarky
Autarky comes from the Greek words autos (self)and arkein (to suffice) and in essence, describes a general state of self-sufficiency. However, the term is most commonly used to describe the economic system of a nation that can operate without support from the economic systems of other nations. Autarky, therefore, is an economic system characterized by self-sufficiency and limited trade with international partners.

Demand-Side Economics

demand-side-economics
Demand side economics refers to a belief that economic growth and full employment are driven by the demand for products and services.

Supply-Side Economics

supply-side-economics
Supply side economics is a macroeconomic theory that posits that production or supply is the main driver of economic growth.

Creative Destruction

creative-destruction
Creative destruction was first described by Austrian economist Joseph Schumpeter in 1942, who suggested that capital was never stationary and constantly evolving. To describe this process, Schumpeter defined creative destruction as the “process of industrial mutation that incessantly revolutionizes the economic structure from within, incessantly destroying the old one, incessantly creating a new one.” Therefore, creative destruction is the replacing of long-standing practices or procedures with more innovative, disruptive practices in capitalist markets.

Happiness Economics

happiness-economics
Happiness economics seeks to relate economic decisions to wider measures of individual welfare than traditional measures which focus on income and wealth. Happiness economics, therefore, is the formal study of the relationship between individual satisfaction, employment, and wealth.

Oligopsony

oligopsony
An oligopsony is a market form characterized by the presence of only a small number of buyers. These buyers have market power and can lower the price of a good or service because of a lack of competition. In other words, the seller loses its bargaining power because it is unable to find a buyer outside of the oligopsony that is willing to pay a better price.

Animal Spirits

animal-spirits
The term “animal spirits” is derived from the Latin spiritus animalis, loosely translated as “the breath that awakens the human mind”. As far back as 300 B.C., animal spirits were used to explain psychological phenomena such as hysterias and manias. Animal spirits also appeared in literature where they exemplified qualities such as exuberance, gaiety, and courage.  Thus, the term “animal spirits” is used to describe how people arrive at financial decisions during periods of economic stress or uncertainty.

State Capitalism

state-capitalism
State capitalism is an economic system where business and commercial activity is controlled by the state through state-owned enterprises. In a state capitalist environment, the government is the principal actor. It takes an active role in the formation, regulation, and subsidization of businesses to divert capital to state-appointed bureaucrats. In effect, the government uses capital to further its political ambitions or strengthen its leverage on the international stage.

Boom And Bust Cycle

boom-and-bust-cycle
The boom and bust cycle describes the alternating periods of economic growth and decline common in many capitalist economies. The boom and bust cycle is a phrase used to describe the fluctuations in an economy in which there is persistent expansion and contraction. Expansion is associated with prosperity, while the contraction is associated with either a recession or a depression.

Paradox of Thrift

paradox-of-thrift
The paradox of thrift was popularised by British economist John Maynard Keynes and is a central component of Keynesian economics. Proponents of Keynesian economics believe the proper response to a recession is more spending, more risk-taking, and less saving. They also believe that spending, otherwise known as consumption, drives economic growth. The paradox of thrift, therefore, is an economic theory arguing that personal savings are a net drag on the economy during a recession.

Circular Flow Model

circular-flow-model
In simplistic terms, the circular flow model describes the mutually beneficial exchange of money between the two most vital parts of an economy: households, firms and how money moves between them. The circular flow model describes money as it moves through various aspects of society in a cyclical process.

Trade Deficit

trade-deficit
Trade deficits occur when a country’s imports outweigh its exports over a specific period. Experts also refer to this as a negative balance of trade. Most of the time, trade balances are calculated based on a variety of different categories.

Market Types

market-types
A market type is a way a given group of consumers and producers interact, based on the context determined by the readiness of consumers to understand the product, the complexity of the product; how big is the existing market and how much it can potentially expand in the future.

Rational Choice Theory

rational-choice-theory
Rational choice theory states that an individual uses rational calculations to make rational choices that are most in line with their personal preferences. Rational choice theory refers to a set of guidelines that explain economic and social behavior. The theory has two underlying assumptions, which are completeness (individuals have access to a set of alternatives among they can equally choose) and transitivity.

Conflict Theory

conflict-theory
Conflict theory argues that due to competition for limited resources, society is in a perpetual state of conflict.

Peer-to-Peer Economy

peer-to-peer-economy
The peer-to-peer (P2P) economy is one where buyers and sellers interact directly without the need for an intermediary third party or other business. The peer-to-peer economy is a business model where two individuals buy and sell products and services directly. In a peer-to-peer company, the seller has the ability to create the product or offer the service themselves.

Knowledge-Economy

knowledge-economy
The term “knowledge economy” was first coined in the 1960s by Peter Drucker. The management consultant used the term to describe a shift from traditional economies, where there was a reliance on unskilled labor and primary production, to economies reliant on service industries and jobs requiring more thinking and data analysis. The knowledge economy is a system of consumption and production based on knowledge-intensive activities that contribute to scientific and technical innovation.

Command Economy

command-economy
In a command economy, the government controls the economy through various commands, laws, and national goals which are used to coordinate complex social and economic systems. In other words, a social or political hierarchy determines what is produced, how it is produced, and how it is distributed. Therefore, the command economy is one in which the government controls all major aspects of the economy and economic production.

Labor Unions

labor-unions
How do you protect your rights as a worker? Who is there to help defend you against unfair and unjust work conditions? Both of these questions have an answer, and it’s a solution that many are familiar with. The answer is a labor union. From construction to teaching, there are labor unions out there for just about any field of work.

Bottom of The Pyramid

bottom-of-the-pyramid
The bottom of the pyramid is a term describing the largest and poorest global socio-economic group. Franklin D. Roosevelt first used the bottom of the pyramid (BOP) in a 1932 public address during the Great Depression. Roosevelt noted that – when talking about the ‘forgotten man:’ “these unhappy times call for the building of plans that rest upon the forgotten, the unorganized but the indispensable units of economic power.. that build from the bottom up and not from the top down, that put their faith once more in the forgotten man at the bottom of the economic pyramid.”

Glocalization

glocalization
Glocalization is a portmanteau of the words “globalization” and “localization.” It is a concept that describes a globally developed and distributed product or service that is also adjusted to be suitable for sale in the local market. With the rise of the digital economy, brands now can go global by building a local footprint.

Market Fragmentation

market-fragmentation
Market fragmentation is most commonly seen in growing markets, which fragment and break away from the parent market to become self-sustaining markets with different products and services. Market fragmentation is a concept suggesting that all markets are diverse and fragment into distinct customer groups over time.

L-Shaped Recovery

l-shaped-recovery
The L-shaped recovery refers to an economy that declines steeply and then flatlines with weak or no growth. On a graph plotting GDP against time, this precipitous fall combined with a long period of stagnation looks like the letter “L”. The L-shaped recovery is sometimes called an L-shaped recession because the economy does not return to trend line growth.  The L-shaped recovery, therefore, is a recession shape used by economists to describe different types of recessions and their subsequent recoveries. In an L-shaped recovery, the economy is characterized by a severe recession with high unemployment and near-zero economic growth.

Comparative Advantage

comparative-advantage
Comparative advantage was first described by political economist David Ricardo in his book Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. Ricardo used his theory to argue against Great Britain’s protectionist laws which restricted the import of wheat from 1815 to 1846.  Comparative advantage occurs when a country can produce a good or service for a lower opportunity cost than another country.

Easterlin Paradox

easterlin-paradox
The Easterlin paradox was first described by then professor of economics at the University of Pennsylvania Richard Easterlin. In the 1970s, Easterlin found that despite the American economy experiencing growth over the previous few decades, the average level of happiness seen in American citizens remained the same. He called this the Easterlin paradox, where income and happiness correlate with each other until a certain point is reached after at least ten years or so. After this point, income and happiness levels are not significantly related. The Easterlin paradox states that happiness is positively correlated with income, but only to a certain extent.

Economies of Scale

economies-of-scale
In Economics, Economies of Scale is a theory for which, as companies grow, they gain cost advantages. More precisely, companies manage to benefit from these cost advantages as they grow, due to increased efficiency in production. Thus, as companies scale and increase production, a subsequent decrease in the costs associated with it will help the organization scale further.

Diseconomies of Scale

diseconomies-of-scale
In Economics, a Diseconomy of Scale happens when a company has grown so large that its costs per unit will start to increase. Thus, losing the benefits of scale. That can happen due to several factors arising as a company scales. From coordination issues to management inefficiencies and lack of proper communication flows.

Economies of Scope

economies-of-scope
An economy of scope means that the production of one good reduces the cost of producing some other related good. This means the unit cost to produce a product will decline as the variety of manufactured products increases. Importantly, the manufactured products must be related in some way.

Price Sensitivity

price-sensitivity
Price sensitivity can be explained using the price elasticity of demand, a concept in economics that measures the variation in product demand as the price of the product itself varies. In consumer behavior, price sensitivity describes and measures fluctuations in product demand as the price of that product changes.

Network Effects

negative-network-effects
In a negative network effect as the network grows in usage or scale, the value of the platform might shrink. In platform business models network effects help the platform become more valuable for the next user joining. In negative network effects (congestion or pollution) reduce the value of the platform for the next user joining. 

Negative Network Effects

negative-network-effects
In a negative network effect as the network grows in usage or scale, the value of the platform might shrink. In platform business models network effects help the platform become more valuable for the next user joining. In negative network effects (congestion or pollution) reduce the value of the platform for the next user joining. 

Main Free Guides:

Discover more from FourWeekMBA

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Scroll to Top
FourWeekMBA