Happiness economics seeks to relate economic decisions to wider measures of individual welfare than traditional measures which focus on income and wealth. Happiness economics, therefore, is the formal study of the relationship between individual satisfaction, employment, and wealth.
|Definition||Happiness Economics, also known as the Economics of Happiness or Well-being Economics, is an interdisciplinary field that studies the relationship between economic factors and people’s well-being, life satisfaction, and happiness. It goes beyond traditional economic indicators like GDP (Gross Domestic Product) and examines how various economic and social factors influence individuals’ subjective well-being. Researchers in this field use surveys, behavioral economics, and other methods to measure and analyze happiness and its determinants. The goal is to inform policymakers and improve the overall quality of life by considering well-being as a key component of economic progress. Happiness Economics challenges the conventional notion that economic growth alone is a sufficient indicator of societal progress and advocates for a more holistic approach to policy-making.|
|Key Concepts||– Subjective Well-being: The central focus of Happiness Economics is individuals’ self-reported well-being and happiness. – Happiness Factors: It examines factors that contribute to happiness, including income, employment, health, social relationships, and environmental quality. – Quality of Life: Happiness Economics considers overall quality of life, encompassing physical, mental, and emotional well-being. – Policy Implications: The field explores how policies can be designed to enhance people’s well-being and happiness. – Measuring Happiness: Researchers use surveys and assessments to measure and analyze happiness and well-being.|
|Characteristics||– Multi-Dimensional: Happiness Economics recognizes that well-being is influenced by various dimensions of life, not just economic factors. – Policy-Relevant: It provides insights that can inform policy decisions related to education, healthcare, income distribution, and more. – Interdisciplinary: Happiness Economics draws from economics, psychology, sociology, and other fields. – Global Perspective: Researchers analyze happiness across countries and cultures to identify common determinants and variations. – Sustainability: The field considers the sustainability of well-being over time and its impact on future generations.|
|Implications||– Policy Guidance: Happiness Economics can guide policymakers in designing policies that prioritize well-being and happiness. – Reevaluation of Success: It challenges the sole reliance on economic growth as a measure of societal success. – Healthcare and Education: Insights from this field can lead to improvements in healthcare and education systems. – Income Inequality: Addressing income inequality is a key focus, as it can impact happiness levels. – Environmental Concerns: Environmental sustainability is important to ensure long-term well-being.|
|Advantages||– Holistic Policy Approach: Happiness Economics advocates for a more holistic approach to policymaking that considers the well-being of citizens. – Improved Quality of Life: Policies informed by this field can lead to improved quality of life for individuals and communities. – Balancing Economic Goals: It helps balance economic goals with the well-being of citizens. – Evidence-Based Policy: Policymakers can make informed decisions based on empirical evidence about what contributes to happiness. – Greater Life Satisfaction: A focus on well-being can lead to greater life satisfaction and happiness among citizens.|
|Drawbacks||– Subjectivity: Measuring happiness is subjective and can be influenced by cultural and individual factors. – Data Limitations: Gathering reliable data on well-being can be challenging. – Policy Complexity: Implementing policies based on happiness economics can be complex and may require trade-offs. – Economic Growth: Critics argue that too much emphasis on well-being could hinder economic growth. – Interdisciplinary Challenges: Collaboration between different disciplines can be challenging.|
|Applications||– Government Policy: Governments can use insights from happiness economics to shape policies related to education, healthcare, social welfare, and taxation. – Corporate Practices: Businesses can adopt practices that prioritize employee well-being and job satisfaction. – Urban Planning: City planners can design cities and communities that promote happiness and well-being. – International Comparisons: Researchers compare happiness levels and determinants across countries to inform global policies. – Mental Health: Insights from this field contribute to mental health initiatives and interventions.|
|Use Cases||– Bhutan’s Gross National Happiness: Bhutan is known for its adoption of Gross National Happiness (GNH) as a measure of progress instead of GDP. Policies in Bhutan prioritize well-being, environmental conservation, and cultural preservation. – Happiness Indexes: Various countries and organizations have developed happiness indexes to measure and track well-being. For example, the World Happiness Report ranks countries based on happiness indicators. – Well-being at Work: Companies like Google have implemented practices that prioritize employee well-being and job satisfaction, which can improve productivity and retention. – Mental Health Initiatives: Governments and organizations worldwide are investing in mental health programs based on well-being research. – Urban Planning: Cities like Copenhagen and Amsterdam focus on urban design that promotes cycling, green spaces, and community engagement to enhance residents’ well-being.|
Understanding happiness economics
The study of happiness economics involves surveys that ask participants to evaluate their level of happiness according to various quality-of-life traits, including economic security, leisure time, literacy level, relationships, income level, and freedom and control.
Study organizers then collate results and arrive at a score that measures the overall happiness of a demographic, region, or country.
While happiness economics measures more subjective aspects of an economy, supporters of the strategy suggest these factors make happiness economies more representative of real life.
Why should this be the case?
Neo-classical economic theory assumes higher income levels correlate with higher levels of utility and economic welfare.
This is certainly true for poorer individuals because increasing their income gives them access to food, shelter, and healthcare.
After a certain income is reached, however, there are diminishing returns on happiness as each dollar is added.
The precise point where this occurs is open to debate, but a Princeton University study found that the happiness of participants increased until they earned $75,000 per year.
Perhaps the most eloquent argument for happiness as an economic measure over metrics such as gross domestic product (GDP) came from Robert F. Kennedy, who once noted that GDP:
Does not allow for the health of our children, the quality of their education, or the joy of their play. It does not include the beauty of our poetry or the strength of our marriages, the intelligence of our public debate or the integrity of our public officials. It measures neither wit nor courage, neither our wisdom nor our learning, neither our compassion nor our devotion to our country. It measures everything, in short, except that which makes life worthwhile.
Countries that incorporate happiness economics
To reflect this new paradigm in economic theory, happiness economics metrics such as Gross Domestic Happiness (GDH) have emerged in the past few decades.
According to the 2021 World Happiness Report compiled by a group of independent experts, the ten happiest countries in the world are Finland, Denmark, Switzerland, Iceland, Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, Luxembourg, New Zealand, and Austria.
The fact that European countries occupy nine of the top ten spots is due to the region’s engagement in happiness economies.
The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) gathers data from 35 member nations by assessing such indicators as housing, income, civic engagement, environment, and health.
Outside of the top ten, the countries most associated with happiness economics include:
The Bhutanese were the first to consider happiness as an economic measure, with the Gross National Happiness (GNH) Index first mentioned by King Jigme Singye Wangchuck in 1972.
The country measures nine quality-of-life factors, including health, education, use of time, psychological well-being, good governance, cultural diversity and resilience, ecological diversity and resilience, community vitality, and living standards.
In recent years, French economic happiness has been outpacing traditional GDP growth.
French organizations regularly hold masterclasses on positive business, the science of wellbeing, “happy culture” dinners, and “positive lobbying” to encourage political leaders to prioritize citizen well-being.
There are also groups within France looking to spread the message of happiness economics and campaign for related criteria to be included in governmental policy.
- Happiness economics is the formal study of the relationship between individual satisfaction, employment, and wealth. The study of happiness economics involves surveys that ask participants to evaluate their level of happiness according to various quality-of-life traits.
- Happiness economics contradicts neo-classical economic theory, which suggests higher income levels correlate with higher levels of utility and economic welfare. This is only true to a certain extent and has less relevance in advanced countries with higher average incomes.
- Happiness economics is a mainstay of European nations, with many of them scoring well in the recent World Happiness Report. Countries placing outside the top ten but with a strong happiness culture include Bhutan and France.
- Definition and Scope: Happiness economics seeks to go beyond traditional economic measures like income and wealth and focuses on broader indicators of individual welfare, such as happiness and well-being. It formally studies the relationship between individual satisfaction, employment, and wealth.
- Measurement of Happiness: Happiness economics involves surveys that ask participants to evaluate their happiness levels based on various quality-of-life factors, including economic security, leisure time, literacy level, relationships, income, and freedom. The collected data is used to calculate an overall happiness score for demographics, regions, or countries.
- Subjective vs. Objective Measures: Supporters of happiness economics argue that it provides a more holistic view of an economy by considering subjective well-being. This approach challenges the traditional economic theory that assumes higher income directly translates to higher utility and well-being.
- Diminishing Returns on Income: The theory suggests that while increasing income is crucial for individuals in poverty to access necessities, there are diminishing returns on happiness beyond a certain income level. Research, like the Princeton University study, indicates that increased happiness plateaus after reaching a certain income threshold (around $75,000 per year).
- Critique of GDP: Happiness economics challenges the sole reliance on Gross Domestic Product (GDP) as a measure of a country’s success. Critics argue that GDP fails to capture essential elements of well-being, such as health, education, relationships, and overall life satisfaction.
- Robert F. Kennedy’s Perspective: Robert F. Kennedy eloquently criticized the limitations of GDP, stating that it fails to measure the aspects of life that truly matter, including health, education, beauty, and compassion.
- Happiness Metrics: Countries like Bhutan and several European nations have adopted happiness economics metrics as part of their approach to measuring societal well-being. Bhutan introduced the Gross National Happiness (GNH) Index in 1972, evaluating factors like health, education, cultural diversity, and living standards.
- Happiest Countries: The World Happiness Report, compiled by independent experts, ranks the happiest countries. European nations, like Finland, Denmark, and Switzerland, often dominate the top rankings due to their focus on happiness economics and well-being.
- Case Studies: Bhutan is known for pioneering the concept of Gross National Happiness, assessing various factors contributing to citizens’ well-being. France has also embraced happiness economics, with organizations promoting positive business practices and advocating for citizen well-being in governmental policies.
Connected Economic Concepts
Main Free Guides: