paradox-of-thrift

What Is The Paradox of Thrift? The Paradox of Thrift In A Nutshell

The paradox of thrift was popularised by British economist John Maynard Keynes and is a central component of Keynesian economics. Proponents of Keynesian economics believe the proper response to a recession is more spending, more risk-taking, and less saving. They also believe that spending, otherwise known as consumption, drives economic growth. The paradox of thrift, therefore, is an economic theory arguing that personal savings are a net drag on the economy during a recession.

Understanding the paradox of thrift

When consumers choose to save their money over spending it in a recession, this harms the businesses that sell goods and services. The business experiences fewer sales and a decrease in productivity and cannot sustain as many employees as a result. When some of these employees lose their jobs, they have less disposable income to spend and the recession may deepen.

This disconnect between individual and group rationality is the basis of the paradox of thrift. Consumers reduce their consumption and attempt to increase their savings during a recession because it makes sense for them to do so. But it does not make sense for the broader economy since consumer savings are removed from the circular flow of income. This means they cannot contribute to an increase in consumption and demand.

The paradox of thrift and the circular flow model

circular-flow-of-income
The circular flow of income model was first introduced by French-Irish economist Richard Cantillon in the 18th century. Cantillon’s initial model was relatively primitive and was progressively expanded upon by Karl Marx and John Maynard Keynes, among others. The circular flow of income is a model that illustrates how money, goods, and services move between sectors in an economic system.

The paradox of thrift can be explained by the circular flow model which demonstrates how money moves through society. In general terms, money flows from producers to workers as wages and then from workers to producers as payment for a product or service. 

The circular flow model starts with the household sector and consumer spending. To boost this spending, Keynes said banks needed to lower interest rates to make saving money in a bank account less attractive. If this strategy was ineffective, the government could use deficit spending to take on debt and use its power to stimulate demand in the economy.

Criticisms of the paradox of thrift

The paradox of thrift has been criticized by neo-classical economists. 

These economists believe that a consumer saving their money sends a signal to the market that they do not want to consume any goods or services at current prices. To counteract this scenario, producers can lower their prices or change the goods and services being produced. In essence, the lack of consumption forces the market to optimize and does not, as Keynes suggested, reduce future output.

To a lesser extent, the paradox of thrift also ignores the ability of a bank to lend out consumer savings to other consumers or companies to stimulate demand. Neoclassical theorists also suggest that consumer savings are essential to growth and technological innovation, with a capital threshold reached before such innovation can raise the total output of an economy.

Lastly, the paradox of thrift ignores Say’s Law of Markets, a classical economic theory that states that goods must be produced before they can be exchanged. In other words, the source of demand in an economy is due to the production and sale of goods for money and not from money (spending) itself.

Key takeaways:

  • The paradox of thrift is an economic theory arguing that personal savings are a net drag on the economy during a recession.
  • The paradox of thrift is based on a disconnect between individual and group rationality. Consumers reduce their consumption and attempt to increase their savings during a recession, but this removes money from the circular flow of income and exacerbates the problem in the broader economy.
  • The paradox of thrift has attracted criticism from neo-classical economists who suggest that markets will self-correct when faced with low consumer demand. The paradox of thrift also ignores the ability of banks to lend out consumer savings to stimulate demand in the economy.

Read Next: Circular Flow Model.

Main Free Guides:

Connected Business Concepts

Economies of Scale

economies-of-scale
In Economics, Economies of Scale is a theory for which, as companies grow, they gain cost advantages. More precisely, companies manage to benefit from these cost advantages as they grow, due to increased efficiency in production. Thus, as companies scale and increase production, a subsequent decrease in the costs associated with it will help the organization scale further.

Diseconomies of Scale

diseconomies-of-scale
In Economics, a Diseconomy of Scale happens when a company has grown so large that its costs per unit will start to increase. Thus, losing the benefits of scale. That can happen due to several factors arising as a company scales. From coordination issues to management inefficiencies and lack of proper communication flows.

Network Effects

network-effects
A network effect is a phenomenon in which as more people or users join a platform, the more the value of the service offered by the platform improves for those joining afterward.

Negative Network Effects

negative-network-effects
In a negative network effect as the network grows in usage or scale, the value of the platform might shrink. In platform business models network effects help the platform become more valuable for the next user joining. In negative network effects (congestion or pollution) reduce the value of the platform for the next user joining. 

Creative Destruction

creative-destruction
Creative destruction was first described by Austrian economist Joseph Schumpeter in 1942, who suggested that capital was never stationary and constantly evolving. To describe this process, Schumpeter defined creative destruction as the “process of industrial mutation that incessantly revolutionizes the economic structure from within, incessantly destroying the old one, incessantly creating a new one.” Therefore, creative destruction is the replacing of long-standing practices or procedures with more innovative, disruptive practices in capitalist markets.

Happiness Economics

happiness-economics
Happiness economics seeks to relate economic decisions to wider measures of individual welfare than traditional measures which focus on income and wealth. Happiness economics, therefore, is the formal study of the relationship between individual satisfaction, employment, and wealth.

Command Economy

command-economy
In a command economy, the government controls the economy through various commands, laws, and national goals which are used to coordinate complex social and economic systems. In other words, a social or political hierarchy determines what is produced, how it is produced, and how it is distributed. Therefore, the command economy is one in which the government controls all major aspects of the economy and economic production.

Animal Spirits

animal-spirits
The term “animal spirits” is derived from the Latin spiritus animalis, loosely translated as “the breath that awakens the human mind”. As far back as 300 B.C., animal spirits were used to explain psychological phenomena such as hysterias and manias. Animal spirits also appeared in literature where they exemplified qualities such as exuberance, gaiety, and courage.  Thus, the term “animal spirits” is used to describe how people arrive at financial decisions during periods of economic stress or uncertainty.

State Capitalism

state-capitalism
State capitalism is an economic system where business and commercial activity is controlled by the state through state-owned enterprises. In a state capitalist environment, the government is the principal actor. It takes an active role in the formation, regulation, and subsidization of businesses to divert capital to state-appointed bureaucrats. In effect, the government uses capital to further its political ambitions or strengthen its leverage on the international stage.

Boom And Bust Cycle

boom-and-bust-cycle
The boom and bust cycle describes the alternating periods of economic growth and decline common in many capitalist economies. The boom and bust cycle is a phrase used to describe the fluctuations in an economy in which there is persistent expansion and contraction. Expansion is associated with prosperity, while the contraction is associated with either a recession or a depression.
Scroll to Top
FourWeekMBA
[class^="wpforms-"]
[class^="wpforms-"]