A public-private partnership (PPP) involves collaboration between the public and private sectors that can be used to finance, build, or operate infrastructure projects. Public-private partnerships are unique to some extent, but many share common characteristics such as service orientation, whole life costing, risk allocation, long-term relationships, and transparency.
Aspect
Explanation
Definition
Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) are collaborative arrangements between public sector entities, such as government agencies or municipalities, and private sector organizations, including businesses and investors. These partnerships are formed to jointly plan, finance, develop, implement, and operate projects or services that traditionally fall within the purview of the public sector. PPPs aim to leverage the strengths of both sectors, with the public sector providing public goods and services while the private sector contributes resources, expertise, and efficiency. PPPs can encompass a wide range of projects, including infrastructure development (e.g., roads, bridges, airports), public services (e.g., healthcare, education), and social infrastructure (e.g., housing, utilities). The main goal of PPPs is to deliver value to the public through innovative, cost-effective, and sustainable solutions.
Key Concepts
– Collaboration: PPPs emphasize collaboration between the public and private sectors to achieve common goals. – Risk Sharing: Risk sharing is a fundamental concept, where risks and responsibilities are allocated between the parties based on their expertise and capacity to manage them. – Value for Money: PPPs seek to provide value for money by optimizing resource utilization and delivering high-quality services efficiently. – Long-Term Partnerships: These partnerships often involve long-term commitments, sometimes spanning decades, to plan, develop, and operate projects. – Innovation: The private sector’s innovative capabilities are harnessed to find more efficient and cost-effective solutions.
Characteristics
– Contractual Agreements: PPPs are typically governed by legally binding contracts that outline the roles, responsibilities, and obligations of each party. – Financing Arrangements: The private sector often provides financing for the project’s development and operation. – Performance-Based: Many PPP contracts include performance-based payment mechanisms, where the private sector’s compensation is tied to meeting predefined performance targets. – Transfer of Risk: Risks associated with the project, including financial, construction, and operational risks, are allocated to the party best equipped to manage them. – Asset Ownership: Ownership and control of the project or service may transfer to the public sector at the end of the contract period.
Implications
– Infrastructure Development: PPPs can accelerate infrastructure development by tapping into private sector resources and expertise. – Improved Service Delivery: They can lead to enhanced public service delivery by introducing efficiency and innovation. – Risk Mitigation: Risks are distributed to the party best suited to manage them, reducing the burden on the public sector. – Economic Growth: PPPs can stimulate economic growth by generating employment and boosting investment in public projects. – Public Accountability: Managing PPPs requires transparency and accountability to ensure that public interests are protected.
Advantages
– Efficiency: PPPs often result in more efficient project development and operation. – Innovation: The private sector’s innovation and technology expertise can lead to creative solutions. – Risk Management: Risks are allocated to the party that can best manage them, reducing the burden on the public sector. – Resource Mobilization: PPPs leverage private sector investment and funding, reducing the strain on public budgets. – Faster Implementation: Projects can be completed more quickly due to streamlined processes and private sector efficiency.
Drawbacks
– Complexity: PPPs can be complex to negotiate, implement, and manage. – Cost: The involvement of the private sector may result in higher costs for the public sector over the long term. – Accountability: Ensuring transparency and accountability in PPPs can be challenging. – Political Sensitivity: They can be politically sensitive, especially if they involve the privatization of public assets or services. – Risk Transfer: In some cases, risk transfer to the private sector may lead to disputes and litigation.
Applications
– Transportation: PPPs are frequently used for building and operating highways, bridges, airports, and public transit systems. – Energy: The private sector is involved in developing energy infrastructure, including power plants and renewable energy projects. – Healthcare: Hospitals and medical facilities are often developed and managed through PPPs. – Education: PPPs are used to construct and operate schools and educational institutions. – Utilities: Water treatment plants, wastewater systems, and utilities can be managed through PPPs.
Use Cases
– Indiana Toll Road: In the United States, the Indiana Finance Authority entered into a long-term lease agreement with a private consortium to operate and maintain the Indiana Toll Road. – London Underground: The London Underground’s infrastructure and services are partially managed through PPPs, involving private sector companies responsible for certain lines and services. – School Construction: In many countries, private companies partner with public entities to design, build, and operate schools and educational facilities. – Water Treatment: The private sector may be responsible for constructing and operating water treatment plants, ensuring clean water supply to the public. – Hospital Management: PPPs are employed to build and manage hospitals, combining private healthcare expertise with public funding.
Table of Contents
Understanding public-private partnerships
Public-private partnerships are defined by a long-term contract between a private party and a government agency where the aim is to provide a public asset or service.
In most cases, a private company provides the capital for government projects and services up-front and then collects a fee from taxpayers or the government over the duration of the contract. The private sector also tends to be responsible for the design, construction, and operation of the asset in addition to the maintenance required over its useful life.
The PPP model is entrenched in many countries and is used for:
Economic infrastructure – such as roads, airports, dams, bridges, sewerage systems, and public transportation systems, and
Social infrastructure – such as schools, hospitals, sports facilities, entertainment centers, and prisons.
The fundamental characteristics of a public-private partnership
While every PPP has unique characteristics, there are a few principle features that are common to almost every contract. These include:
Service-orientation
The PPP approach has a core focus on delivering long-term public services including transportation, electricity, and water. There must always be adequate and prior consultation with end-users and other stakeholders before the commencement of project construction.
Whole life costing
The total cost of the project is computed for its entire life span, encompassing initial capital expenditure, maintenance, modification, and decommissioning costs.
Risk allocation
Since many infrastructure projects involve high risk, both the private and public sectors are allocated a share of the risk to reduce their respective exposure.
Long-term relationships
Public-private partnerships may last for decades because of the time required to construct the asset and its longer useful life. The private company is paid for services rendered so long as it continues to meet key performance indicators.
Transparency
As a funding tool, PPPs are no stranger to controversy as many believe the public return on investment is lower than the ROI enjoyed by the private funder. World-class standards of transparency concerning public and corporate governance are thus important to enhance the credibility of a public-private partnership.
Examples of a public-private partnership
In this section, we’ll take a look at some specific public-private partnership examples in the United States:
Gateway Arch
When the Gateway Arch in St. Louis, Missouri experienced a decline in visitors, the Gateway Arch Park Foundation raised $250 million in conjunction with an $86 million government grant to upgrade the monument. The partnership resulted in a 30% increase in attendance.
Puerto Rico
A consortium of United States and Canada-based firms partnered with Puerto Rican electricity provider Luma. The provider had failed to improve or maintain the power network which resulted in frequent power outages. The consortium now oversees transmission, distribution, billing, capital improvements, and human resources.
The Merced 2020 Project
The University of California Merced partnered with a coalition of local entities in a deal worth $1.3 billion. The funds went toward the expansion of the university with projects such as student housing, classrooms, research space, recreational facilities, and counseling services.
Key takeaways:
Public-private partnerships involve collaboration between the public and private sectors that are used to finance, build, or operate infrastructure projects.
Public-private partnerships are unique to some extent, but many share common characteristics such as service orientation, whole life costing, risk allocation, long-term relationships, and transparency.
Examples of public-private partnerships involving American companies include the Gateway Arch and Puerto Rican power network revitalization. A PPP was also used to secure $1.2 billion to fund the expansion of UC Merced.
Key Highlights
Definition and Purpose: A public-private partnership (PPP) is a collaboration between the public and private sectors to finance, construct, or operate infrastructure projects with the aim of providing public assets or services.
Funding Model: In PPPs, private companies provide the upfront capital for government projects and services. They then recover their investment through fees from taxpayers or the government over the contract’s duration. Private entities often handle design, construction, operation, and maintenance of the asset.
Types of Projects: PPPs are used for both economic infrastructure (e.g., roads, airports, dams, public transportation) and social infrastructure (e.g., schools, hospitals, sports facilities).
Core Characteristics:
Service-Orientation: Focus on delivering long-term public services, with consultation from stakeholders before project construction begins.
Whole Life Costing: Consideration of the project’s entire lifecycle cost, including initial investment, maintenance, modifications, and decommissioning.
Risk Allocation: Sharing of project risks between the public and private sectors to mitigate exposure.
Long-Term Relationships: PPPs can span decades due to construction time and asset lifespan. Payments are tied to performance indicators.
Transparency: High standards of transparency in governance to maintain credibility and address concerns about ROI.
Examples of PPPs:
Gateway Arch: Upgraded through a partnership between the Gateway Arch Park Foundation and government grant, resulting in increased visitor attendance.
Puerto Rico Power Network: A consortium of firms partnered with the electricity provider Luma to improve power network maintenance and reduce outages.
Merced 2020 Project: Collaboration between the University of California Merced and local entities, funding expansion and various facilities.
Key Takeaways:
PPPs involve collaboration between public and private sectors for infrastructure projects.
Shared characteristics include service focus, whole life costing, risk sharing, long-term commitments, and transparency.
Examples include the Gateway Arch, Puerto Rico’s power network, and UC Merced’s expansion.
The idea of a market economy first came from classical economists, including David Ricardo, Jean-Baptiste Say, and Adam Smith. All three of these economists were advocates for a free market. They argued that the “invisible hand” of market incentives and profit motives were more efficient in guiding economic decisions to prosperity than strict government planning.
Positive economics is concerned with describing and explaining economic phenomena; it is based on facts and empirical evidence. Normative economics, on the other hand, is concerned with making judgments about what “should be” done. It contains value judgments and recommendations about how the economy should be.
When there is an increased price of goods and services over a long period, it is called inflation. In these times, currency shows less potential to buy products and services. Thus, general prices of goods and services increase. Consequently, decreases in the purchasing power of currency is called inflation.
Asymmetric information as a concept has probably existed for thousands of years, but it became mainstream in 2001 after Michael Spence, George Akerlof, and Joseph Stiglitz won the Nobel Prize in Economics for their work on information asymmetry in capital markets. Asymmetric information, otherwise known as information asymmetry, occurs when one party in a business transaction has access to more information than the other party.
Autarky comes from the Greek words autos (self)and arkein (to suffice) and in essence, describes a general state of self-sufficiency. However, the term is most commonly used to describe the economic system of a nation that can operate without support from the economic systems of other nations. Autarky, therefore, is an economic system characterized by self-sufficiency and limited trade with international partners.
Creative destruction was first described by Austrian economist Joseph Schumpeter in 1942, who suggested that capital was never stationary and constantly evolving. To describe this process, Schumpeter defined creative destruction as the “process of industrial mutation that incessantly revolutionizes the economic structure from within, incessantly destroying the old one, incessantly creating a new one.” Therefore, creative destruction is the replacing of long-standing practices or procedures with more innovative, disruptive practices in capitalist markets.
Happiness economics seeks to relate economic decisions to wider measures of individual welfare than traditional measures which focus on income and wealth. Happiness economics, therefore, is the formal study of the relationship between individual satisfaction, employment, and wealth.
An oligopsony is a market form characterized by the presence of only a small number of buyers. These buyers have market power and can lower the price of a good or service because of a lack of competition. In other words, the seller loses its bargaining power because it is unable to find a buyer outside of the oligopsony that is willing to pay a better price.
The term “animal spirits” is derived from the Latin spiritus animalis, loosely translated as “the breath that awakens the human mind”. As far back as 300 B.C., animal spirits were used to explain psychological phenomena such as hysterias and manias. Animal spirits also appeared in literature where they exemplified qualities such as exuberance, gaiety, and courage. Thus, the term “animal spirits” is used to describe how people arrive at financial decisions during periods of economic stress or uncertainty.
State capitalism is an economic system where business and commercial activity is controlled by the state through state-owned enterprises. In a state capitalist environment, the government is the principal actor. It takes an active role in the formation, regulation, and subsidization of businesses to divert capital to state-appointed bureaucrats. In effect, the government uses capital to further its political ambitions or strengthen its leverage on the international stage.
The boom and bust cycle describes the alternating periods of economic growth and decline common in many capitalist economies. The boom and bust cycle is a phrase used to describe the fluctuations in an economy in which there is persistent expansion and contraction. Expansion is associated with prosperity, while the contraction is associated with either a recession or a depression.
The paradox of thrift was popularised by British economist John Maynard Keynes and is a central component of Keynesian economics. Proponents of Keynesian economics believe the proper response to a recession is more spending, more risk-taking, and less saving. They also believe that spending, otherwise known as consumption, drives economic growth. The paradox of thrift, therefore, is an economic theory arguing that personal savings are a net drag on the economy during a recession.
In simplistic terms, the circular flow model describes the mutually beneficial exchange of money between the two most vital parts of an economy: households, firms and how money moves between them. The circular flow model describes money as it moves through various aspects of society in a cyclical process.
Trade deficits occur when a country’s imports outweigh its exports over a specific period. Experts also refer to this as a negative balance of trade. Most of the time, trade balances are calculated based on a variety of different categories.
A market type is a way a given group of consumers and producers interact, based on the context determined by the readiness of consumers to understand the product, the complexity of the product; how big is the existing market and how much it can potentially expand in the future.
Rational choice theory states that an individual uses rational calculations to make rational choices that are most in line with their personal preferences. Rational choice theory refers to a set of guidelines that explain economic and social behavior. The theory has two underlying assumptions, which are completeness (individuals have access to a set of alternatives among they can equally choose) and transitivity.
The peer-to-peer (P2P) economy is one where buyers and sellers interact directly without the need for an intermediary third party or other business. The peer-to-peer economy is a business model where two individuals buy and sell products and services directly. In a peer-to-peer company, the seller has the ability to create the product or offer the service themselves.
The term “knowledge economy” was first coined in the 1960s by Peter Drucker. The management consultant used the term to describe a shift from traditional economies, where there was a reliance on unskilled labor and primary production, to economies reliant on service industries and jobs requiring more thinking and data analysis. The knowledge economy is a system of consumption and production based on knowledge-intensive activities that contribute to scientific and technical innovation.
In a command economy, the government controls the economy through various commands, laws, and national goals which are used to coordinate complex social and economic systems. In other words, a social or political hierarchy determines what is produced, how it is produced, and how it is distributed. Therefore, the command economy is one in which the government controls all major aspects of the economy and economic production.
How do you protect your rights as a worker? Who is there to help defend you against unfair and unjust work conditions? Both of these questions have an answer, and it’s a solution that many are familiar with. The answer is a labor union. From construction to teaching, there are labor unions out there for just about any field of work.
The bottom of the pyramid is a term describing the largest and poorest global socio-economic group. Franklin D. Roosevelt first used the bottom of the pyramid (BOP) in a 1932 public address during the Great Depression. Roosevelt noted that – when talking about the ‘forgotten man:’ “these unhappy times call for the building of plans that rest upon the forgotten, the unorganized but the indispensable units of economic power.. that build from the bottom up and not from the top down, that put their faith once more in the forgotten man at the bottom of the economic pyramid.”
Glocalization is a portmanteau of the words “globalization” and “localization.” It is a concept that describes a globally developed and distributed product or service that is also adjusted to be suitable for sale in the local market. With the rise of the digital economy, brands now can go global by building a local footprint.
Market fragmentation is most commonly seen in growing markets, which fragment and break away from the parent market to become self-sustaining markets with different products and services. Market fragmentation is a concept suggesting that all markets are diverse and fragment into distinct customer groups over time.
The L-shaped recovery refers to an economy that declines steeply and then flatlines with weak or no growth. On a graph plotting GDP against time, this precipitous fall combined with a long period of stagnation looks like the letter “L”. The L-shaped recovery is sometimes called an L-shaped recession because the economy does not return to trend line growth. The L-shaped recovery, therefore, is a recession shape used by economists to describe different types of recessions and their subsequent recoveries. In an L-shaped recovery, the economy is characterized by a severe recession with high unemployment and near-zero economic growth.
Comparative advantage was first described by political economist David Ricardo in his book Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. Ricardo used his theory to argue against Great Britain’s protectionist laws which restricted the import of wheat from 1815 to 1846. Comparative advantage occurs when a country can produce a good or service for a lower opportunity cost than another country.
The Easterlin paradox was first described by then professor of economics at the University of Pennsylvania Richard Easterlin. In the 1970s, Easterlin found that despite the American economy experiencing growth over the previous few decades, the average level of happiness seen in American citizens remained the same. He called this the Easterlin paradox, where income and happiness correlate with each other until a certain point is reached after at least ten years or so. After this point, income and happiness levels are not significantly related. The Easterlin paradox states that happiness is positively correlated with income, but only to a certain extent.
In Economics, Economies of Scale is a theory for which, as companies grow, they gain cost advantages. More precisely, companies manage to benefit from these cost advantages as they grow, due to increased efficiency in production. Thus, as companies scale and increase production, a subsequent decrease in the costs associated with it will help the organizationscale further.
In Economics, a Diseconomy of Scale happens when a company has grown so large that its costs per unit will start to increase. Thus, losing the benefits of scale. That can happen due to several factors arising as a company scales. From coordination issues to management inefficiencies and lack of proper communication flows.
An economy of scope means that the production of one good reduces the cost of producing some other related good. This means the unit cost to produce a product will decline as the variety of manufactured products increases. Importantly, the manufactured products must be related in some way.
Price sensitivity can be explained using the price elasticity of demand, a concept in economics that measures the variation in product demand as the price of the product itself varies. In consumer behavior, price sensitivity describes and measures fluctuations in product demand as the price of that product changes.
Gennaro is the creator of FourWeekMBA, which reached about four million business people, comprising C-level executives, investors, analysts, product managers, and aspiring digital entrepreneurs in 2022 alone | He is also Director of Sales for a high-tech scaleup in the AI Industry | In 2012, Gennaro earned an International MBA with emphasis on Corporate Finance and Business Strategy.
