The MECE framework is an exhaustive expression of information that must account for all conceivable scenarios. While the framework is used in categorizing information and data processing, it is commonly used in formulating problems and then solving them. The MECE framework is a means of the exhaustive grouping of information into categories that are both mutually exclusive (ME) and collectively exhaustive (CE).
MECE Framework
Description
Analysis
Implications
Applications
Examples
1. Mutually Exclusive (M)
Mutually Exclusive means that categories or elements within a framework should not overlap or duplicate.
– Ensure that each category or element in the framework is distinct and does not share characteristics with others. – Avoid ambiguity or double-counting.
– Ensures clarity and precision in categorization, reducing the potential for confusion. – Prevents the risk of misclassification or duplication of information.
– Organizing data or information into distinct categories for analysis or presentation. – Creating clear product or service offerings without overlapping features.
Mutually Exclusive Example: Grouping customers into segments based on age (e.g., 18-24, 25-34, 35-44) without overlap.
2. Collectively Exhaustive (C)
Collectively Exhaustive means that the framework should encompass all possible elements or options without omission.
– Ensure that the framework covers all potential categories or elements within the scope of the analysis. – Avoid gaps or missing elements that may result in incomplete coverage.
– Guarantees comprehensive coverage of all relevant aspects, leaving no gaps in the analysis. – Supports thorough problem-solving and decision-making by considering all possibilities.
– Creating a list of all potential market segments to explore in a marketing strategy. – Identifying all possible causes for a specific issue during a root cause analysis.
Collectively Exhaustive Example: Enumerating all potential reasons for declining sales, leaving no potential causes unaddressed.
The MECE framework argues that to understand and solve any large problem, potential factors must be sorted into two categories.
The MECE framework was created in the late 1960s by Barbara Minto at McKinsey & Company.
Minto was the first female MBA professional McKinsey ever hired and worked at the company between 1963 and 1973. Over this exciting period in business consultancy history, Minto and her co-workers devised many of the major analytical frameworks still in use today.
The inspiration for the MECE framework itself came from the reports that constantly crossed Minto’s desk. She noticed that she tended to reorganize ideas into a pyramid shape, and later reflected that the shape was a way for her to discover what she thought about something.
In a piece on McKinsey’s website, Minto posited that there were three logical rules to obey when organizing ideas: “The point above has to be a summary of those below, because it is derived from them. You can’t derive an idea from a grouping unless the ideas in the grouping are logically the same, and in logical order.”
Minto’s concept required that groups of ideas be divided into pieces that were both mutually exclusive (ME) of each other and also collectively exhaustive (CE).
Today, the MECE framework is a process where ideas, topics, issues, and solutions are denoted as either mutually exclusive or collectively exhaustive. Each item can only be placed in one category such that there is no overlap between the categories, and both categories contain all the possible items relevant to the given context.
Mutually exclusive
Mutually exclusive means that each factor can only fit into one category at a time. In other words, there is no overlap.
Consider the example of a French cheese company, who is seeking to find the root cause of a problem with its distribution network.
A framework that is not mutually exclusive may identify two items: distribution networks in France and camembert product distribution networks.
The reason for this lack of mutual exclusivity is that there is overlap between the two items. Since camembert is distributed in France, the item is counted twice.
Thus, a mutually exclusive problem may choose to analyze camembert distribution in France and camembert distribution in Italy. Here, there is no overlap between each item because they occupy different geographic areas.
Collectively exhaustive
Collectively exhaustive means that each factor covers all possible causes of a problem.
Returning to the cheesemaker with a distribution problem, simply looking at France and Italy is not collectively exhaustive.
The company also exports to Spain and the UK, so assessing France and Italy in isolation may cause analysts to overlook the root cause of the problem.
Ultimately, the MECE framework allows businesses to investigate every potential cause in isolation.
They do not have to worry that a specific cause may potentially influence the role of another cause in creating the same problem.
Two popular MECE frameworks
Note that consultancies such as McKinsey use different interpretations of the MECE principle to segregate client data into categories before it is systematically analyzed.
Here are a couple of different MECE frameworks.
Decision tree
A decision tree is a visual tool used to analyze and make decisions based on multiple possible options and their potential outcomes.
It provides a step-by-step process for evaluating options and enables the practitioner to compare the pros and cons of each decision or outcome.
A decision tree is structured like a tree with:
Nodes or squares representing each decision point. Each decision point represents a choice between two or more alternatives
Branches denoting the possible outcomes.
Circles drawn at the end of each branch if the option is unclear.
Blank branches if the option leads to a decision that fosters a solution. In other words, the final outcome is reached by following the branches to the end of the tree.
Decision trees are exhaustive in the sense that the company can select the best option from all decisions, outcomes, scenarios, and options.
Issue tree
Consultancies also use issue trees to arrange a client’s information into issues and sub-issues. Issue trees are well suited to large or complex problems that can be split into smaller problems that are more solvable.
This particular MECE framework is named after the shape of a tree: narrow at the top (with the problem statement) and wider towards the bottom as each successive level accommodates more issues and sub-issues.
Issue trees are commonly used when clients want to increase profitability. For example, consider a client with the following problem statement: My restaurant is not profitable.
On the first level, two measures are defined:
Increase revenue, and
Reduce costs.
On the second level, the sub-issues of the first level are defined:
Increase revenue – Increase the number of orders, Increase menu prices.
Reduce costs – Reduce rental costs, Reduce raw material costs, Reduce salary expenses.
On the third level, the issue tree enables the restaurant to consider all its options separately and exclusively in the form of a question. For instance:
How can the business increase the number of orders? – Move to a mall location with more foot traffic.
How can the business reduce raw material costs? – Renegotiate terms with suppliers or change suppliers.
In the process, the consultant may need to “trim branches” from the tree if the stakeholders believe a course of action is not worth pursuing.
While the above example is relatively simple, in the real world, issue trees would be underpinned by hard data to ensure they satisfy the logical requirements of all MECE frameworks.
Five steps to developing a MECE hypothesis
Understand the problem in detail. What outcome does the business hope to achieve?
Write down the problem statement, ensuring that there is no room for ambiguity.
Then, list potential options (solutions) to the problem using a MECE idea tree. In the case of the cheesemaker, each option must be both mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive.
With a list of potential solutions illustrated on the idea tree, consider the pros and cons of each individually. Remove any that seem illogical or add new solutions gleaned from greater insight into the problem itself.
Select the best option and then present it to internal or external stakeholders. At this stage, it’s important that the option is proven, not obvious, and can be performed with a set of predetermined actions.
Drawbacks of the MECE Framework
Potential Oversimplification
One of the main drawbacks is the risk of oversimplifying complex issues. By forcing information into non-overlapping categories, important nuances and interdependencies might be missed.
Inflexibility
The MECE framework is highly structured, which can sometimes lead to inflexibility in problem-solving. It may not be well-suited to dynamic or evolving situations where a more adaptive approach is required.
Difficulty in Achieving Both Criteria
Achieving both mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive categorization can be challenging, especially in complex or ambiguous situations. There’s a risk of either omitting crucial information or creating artificial separations.
Overemphasis on Structure
There can be an overemphasis on creating a structured framework, potentially at the expense of deeper analysis or creative thinking.
Time-Consuming Process
Developing a MECE framework can be time-consuming, requiring meticulous planning and consideration to ensure all elements fit neatly into the categories.
When to Use the MECE Framework
In Problem Solving and Analysis
MECE is particularly useful in the initial stages of problem-solving and analysis, where it can help in organizing thoughts and breaking down complex problems into manageable parts.
For Communication and Presentation
The framework is effective for organizing information in a clear and logical manner, making it valuable for communication, especially in presentations and reports.
During Strategic Planning
In strategic planning, MECE can be used to ensure that all potential strategies and scenarios are considered without overlap.
In Decision Making
MECE can aid decision-making processes by clearly laying out all options and ensuring that no potential solutions are overlooked.
How to Implement the MECE Framework
Identify the Main Problem or Objective
Clearly define the problem or objective that needs to be addressed.
Break Down into Categories
Divide the problem or objective into distinct, non-overlapping categories. Ensure that these categories are mutually exclusive.
Ensure Comprehensive Coverage
Check that the categories collectively cover all aspects of the problem. They should be collectively exhaustive.
Analyze Each Category Separately
Conduct an in-depth analysis of each category independently to ensure a thorough examination of the problem.
Synthesize Findings
Combine the insights from each category to form a comprehensive understanding or solution.
What to Expect from Implementing the MECE Framework
Clarity in Problem-Solving
MECE provides clarity and structure in problem-solving, helping to simplify and organize complex issues.
Comprehensive Analysis
The framework ensures a comprehensive analysis by covering all aspects of a problem or decision.
Improved Communication
Using MECE can enhance the clarity and effectiveness of communication, particularly in business and consulting environments.
Efficient Decision-Making
By organizing information logically and exhaustively, MECE can lead to more efficient and informed decision-making.
Structured Thinking
Implementing the MECE framework encourages structured thinking, which can be beneficial in various business and strategic contexts.
Applications of the MECE framework
Several frameworks across various disciplines have MECE principles at their core, including the:
A cost-benefit analysis is a process a business can use to analyze decisions according to the costs associated with making that decision. For a cost analysis to be effective it’s important to articulate the project in the simplest terms possible, identify the costs, determine the benefits of project implementation, assess the alternatives.
Which involves the systematic evaluation of the costs or benefits of a project, policy, or program.
Porter’s Five Forces is a model that helps organizations to gain a better understanding of their industries and competition. Published for the first time by Professor Michael Porter in his book “Competitive Strategy” in the 1980s. The model breaks down industries and markets by analyzing them through five forces
Which is a powerful tool for understanding the competitiveness in a given industry.
4C Model
A tool for analyzing workplace psychology using core components of motivational theory.
MECE framework examples
To conclude this article, we’ll discuss some hypothetical MECE framework examples below.
Electronics company expansion
Consider the example of an electronics company that has the three major revenue streams of tablets, smartphones, and computers.
Imagine that the company now wants to sell televisions and has hired a consultant to determine which geographic market to enter first.
The consultant starts by listing the following categories: North America, South America, Europe, Asia, and Oceania. These geographical categories satisfy the requirements of the MECE framework since:
They are mutually exclusive. For example, there is no overlap between the European and Asian markets.
They are collectively exhaustive. This is because the five geographic regions cover every conceivable market in which televisions are sold.
To determine which of these markets should be entered first, the consultant collects data related to the following:
Growth of the television market (historical and predicted).
Profit margins.
Key competitors.
Customer segmentation.
Market size, and
Products.
With none of the geographic markets overlapping and each covering the entire global television market, the consultant can work with the company to compare these metrics to determine the most attractive market to enter.
Improving customer delivery times
The MECE framework can also be used in situations where a business wants to improve specific processes.
In this example, we have an eCommerce company that is looking to make its order fulfillment more efficient and decrease its delivery times.
Using the MECE framework, decision-makers break down the entire process into separate, distinct components to identify potential areas for improvement.
These components include:
Collecting customer delivery information from the online store.
Selecting the appropriate warehouse to ship from.
Picking the item from the warehouse and packaging the item.
Transporting the product to a distribution center.
Selecting a local courier service and delivery route the product should take.
Delivering the product to the customer’s residence or business.
At a very simplistic level, the framework enables the eCommerce business to assess every step in the process without analyzing any step twice.
MECE can be used for almost any process and may be particularly suited to those that are complex or require exhaustive analysis.
Developing a proposal for a new stadium
The MECE framework can also be used in situations where a large number of stakeholders need to be consulted or identified.
A construction company that wants to build a new city stadium, for example, can use the framework to systematically address each stakeholder group and develop strategies that cater to each.
Here are some of the stakeholders that will need to be consulted:
Local residents.
Professional sports teams.
Labor unions.
Financiers.
Environmental organizations.
Real estate developers, and
Government officials.
Further work will need to be done to ensure that stakeholder groups are mutually exclusive. For example, some real estate developers may also hold positions in government or sit on the board of professional sports teams.
Market Segmentation for a Food Delivery App
Imagine a food delivery app seeking to segment its customer base for targeted marketing. The MECE framework can help identify mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive customer segments.
Demographic segments: Age groups (e.g., millennials, Gen Z), income levels, and family size.
Geographic segments: Urban, suburban, and rural areas.
Behavioral segments: Frequency of orders (e.g., occasional, regular), cuisine preferences (e.g., Italian, Asian), and dining occasions (e.g., weekday lunch, weekend dinner).
Psychographic segments: Health-conscious consumers, convenience seekers, and food enthusiasts.
This segmentation approach ensures that all potential customers can be categorized into distinct groups without overlap.
Inventory Management for a Retail Store
A retail store wants to optimize its inventory management to reduce costs and improve product availability. The MECE framework can be applied to analyze the inventory process:
Procurement: Sourcing products from suppliers.
Storage: Storing products in the warehouse.
Replenishment: Restocking products on store shelves.
Sales: Selling products to customers.
Returns: Managing customer returns.
Disposal: Handling expired or damaged items.
By breaking down the inventory process into these mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive components, the retail store can identify areas for improvement in each stage of inventory management.
Market Expansion for a Software Company
A software company wants to expand into new markets. The MECE framework can help identify potential target markets:
Geographic regions: North America, South America, Europe, Asia, Africa.
Industry sectors: Healthcare, finance, education, retail, manufacturing.
Company sizes: Small businesses, mid-sized enterprises, large corporations.
Customer types: B2B, B2C, government agencies.
Technology platforms: Mobile, web, desktop.
By considering these mutually exclusive categories, the company can systematically evaluate and prioritize its market expansion opportunities.
Employee Training Program Evaluation
An HR department wants to assess the effectiveness of its employee training program. The MECE framework can be used to evaluate the program’s impact on various aspects:
Knowledge acquisition: Assessing what employees have learned.
Skill development: Evaluating new skills acquired.
Job performance: Measuring changes in on-the-job performance.
Employee satisfaction: Gauging employees’ satisfaction with the training.
Cost-effectiveness: Analyzing the program’s cost-effectiveness.
By breaking down the evaluation into these categories, HR can ensure that all relevant aspects of the training program are considered without redundancy.
Product Development for a Tech Startup
A tech startup is developing a new software product and wants to ensure comprehensive feature planning. The MECE framework can help identify and categorize potential features:
Core functionalities: Essential features required for the product’s core purpose.
User experience enhancements: Improvements for ease of use and aesthetics.
Integration capabilities: Compatibility with other software or platforms.
Security features: Measures to protect user data and system integrity.
Analytics and reporting: Tools for tracking user behavior and system performance.
By organizing features into these mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive categories, the startup can prioritize development efforts effectively.
Key takeaways
The MECE framework allows businesses to assess large amounts of information according to mutual exclusivity and collective exhaustion.
The MECE framework forms the foundation of several other frameworks, but it is most commonly used in the rigorous and exhaustive solving of problems.
Solutions to problems derived from the MECE framework must have proven effectiveness and be realistically achievable. Crucially, they must not be the first or most obvious solution encountered.
Key Highlights:
MECE Framework: The MECE framework (Mutually Exclusive, Collectively Exhaustive) is a methodology used for categorizing and analyzing information, solving problems, and making decisions in a comprehensive and organized manner.
Purpose of MECE Framework: The MECE framework ensures that information is grouped into categories that are mutually exclusive (no overlap) and collectively exhaustive (all possibilities are covered).
Origin and Creator: The MECE framework was developed by Barbara Minto at McKinsey & Company in the late 1960s. Minto, the first female MBA professional hired by McKinsey, observed the pyramid-shaped organization of ideas in her reports and formalized the MECE concept.
Three Logical Rules: Minto proposed three logical rules for organizing ideas within the MECE framework: the point above must be a summary of those below, ideas in a grouping must be logically the same, and they must be in logical order.
Mutually Exclusive: Mutually exclusive means that each factor or idea can fit into only one category at a time, without overlap. This is important for ensuring clear categorization.
Collectively Exhaustive: Collectively exhaustive means that all possible causes or factors are considered within the framework, leaving no gaps.
Applications of MECE Framework:
Decision Tree: A visual tool used for decision-making and analyzing options and outcomes.
Issue Tree: Used to break down complex problems into smaller, more manageable sub-issues.
Cost-Benefit Analysis: Analyzing decisions based on costs and benefits.
Porter’s Five Forces: Analyzing industry competitiveness and market dynamics.
4C Model: Analyzing workplace psychology using motivational theory.
Steps to Developing a MECE Hypothesis:
Understand the problem and desired outcome.
Write a clear problem statement.
List potential solutions in a MECE idea tree.
Evaluate pros and cons of each solution.
Select the best solution and validate with stakeholders.
Examples of MECE Framework Application:
Electronics Company Expansion: Choosing a geographic market for product expansion.
Improving Delivery Times: Analyzing and improving an eCommerce delivery process.
Developing a Stadium Proposal: Addressing various stakeholder groups for a new stadium project.
Key Takeaway: The MECE framework is a structured approach to categorizing information, analyzing problems, and making decisions that ensures clarity, completeness, and logical organization of ideas. It has broad applications across different industries and problem-solving contexts.
A principle used for structuring information or categorizing data into groups that are mutually exclusive (no overlap) and collectively exhaustive (cover all possible options). MECE ensures that every element is placed into one category and that no element is omitted from consideration.
Focuses on organizing information or data into distinct and non-overlapping categories to facilitate clear analysis, decision-making, and problem-solving, ensuring comprehensive coverage and avoiding redundancy.
A principle stating that roughly 80% of effects come from 20% of causes. It suggests focusing efforts on the most significant factors that contribute to outcomes, as they typically yield the most substantial impact or results.
Focuses on identifying and prioritizing the vital few factors that have the most significant influence on outcomes, enabling organizations to allocate resources efficiently and achieve maximum results with minimal effort.
A time management and prioritization framework that categorizes tasks based on their urgency and importance into four quadrants: Important and Urgent, Important but Not Urgent, Urgent but Not Important, and Not Urgent and Not Important.
Focuses on prioritizing tasks based on their urgency and importance, helping individuals and teams allocate time and resources effectively, reduce stress, and focus on high-impact activities.
Time Management, Productivity Improvement, Task Prioritization
SWOT Analysis
A strategic planning tool used to identify Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats related to a business venture or project. SWOT analysis helps organizations assess internal capabilities and external factors to formulate strategies and make informed decisions.
Focuses on analyzing internal strengths and weaknesses and external opportunities and threats to develop strategies that leverage strengths, mitigate weaknesses, capitalize on opportunities, and address threats effectively.
Strategic Planning, Business Analysis, Decision-making
Decision Tree Analysis
A decision-making tool that uses a tree-like graph to model decisions and their possible consequences, including probabilities and payoffs. Decision trees help visualize complex decision scenarios and identify the most favorable courses of action.
Focuses on structuring decision-making by mapping out various decision alternatives, potential outcomes, and their associated probabilities and payoffs, enabling individuals to make informed decisions under uncertainty.
A creativity technique used to generate innovative ideas and solutions by prompting individuals to ask questions and make changes to existing products, processes, or services. SCAMPER stands for Substitute, Combine, Adapt, Modify, Put to another use, Eliminate, Reverse/Rearrange.
Focuses on stimulating creative thinking and problem-solving by encouraging individuals to explore different ways to modify or improve existing ideas, products, or processes, fostering innovation and generating novel solutions.
Innovation, Creativity, Problem-solving
Boston Consulting Group (BCG) Matrix
A portfolio analysis tool used to evaluate strategic business units (SBUs) or product lines based on their market growth rate and relative market share. The BCG matrix categorizes SBUs into four quadrants: Stars, Cash Cows, Question Marks, and Dogs, guiding resource allocation and strategic decision-making.
Focuses on managing a diversified portfolio of products or SBUs by categorizing them based on market growth rate and relative market share, helping organizations prioritize investments and allocate resources effectively.
A visualization tool used to identify and analyze potential causes contributing to a particular effect or problem. The Ishikawa diagram organizes causes into categories (such as People, Process, Environment, Equipment) to facilitate root cause analysis and problem-solving.
Focuses on identifying and categorizing potential causes of a problem to understand its root causes systematically, enabling teams to address underlying issues and implement effective solutions to prevent recurrence.
Problem-solving, Root Cause Analysis, Quality Improvement
The ADKAR model is a management tool designed to assist employees and businesses in transitioning through organizational change. To maximize the chances of employees embracing change, the ADKAR model was developed by author and engineer Jeff Hiatt in 2003. The model seeks to guide people through the change process and importantly, ensure that people do not revert to habitual ways of operating after some time has passed.
You can use the Ansoff Matrix as a strategic framework to understand what growthstrategy is more suited based on the market context. Developed by mathematician and business manager Igor Ansoff, it assumes a growthstrategy can be derived from whether the market is new or existing, and whether the product is new or existing.
The business model canvas is a framework proposed by Alexander Osterwalder and Yves Pigneur in Busines Model Generation enabling the design of business models through nine building blocks comprising: key partners, key activities, value propositions, customer relationships, customer segments, critical resources, channels, cost structure, and revenue streams.
The lean startup canvas is an adaptation by Ash Maurya of the business model canvas by Alexander Osterwalder, which adds a layer that focuses on problems, solutions, key metrics, unfair advantage based, and a unique value proposition. Thus, starting from mastering the problem rather than the solution.
The Blitzscaling business model canvas is a model based on the concept of Blitzscaling, which is a particular process of massive growth under uncertainty, and that prioritizes speed over efficiency and focuses on market domination to create a first-scaler advantage in a scenario of uncertainty.
A blue ocean is a strategy where the boundaries of existing markets are redefined, and new uncontested markets are created. At its core, there is valueinnovation, for which uncontested markets are created, where competition is made irrelevant. And the cost-value trade-off is broken. Thus, companies following a blue ocean strategy offer much more value at a lower cost for the end customers.
Business analysis is a research discipline that helps driving change within an organization by identifying the key elements and processes that drive value. Business analysis can also be used in Identifying new business opportunities or how to take advantage of existing business opportunities to grow your business in the marketplace.
In the 1970s, Bruce D. Henderson, founder of the Boston Consulting Group, came up with The Product Portfolio (aka BCG Matrix, or Growth-share Matrix), which would look at a successful business product portfolio based on potential growth and market shares. It divided products into four main categories: cash cows, pets (dogs), question marks, and stars.
First proposed by accounting academic Robert Kaplan, the balanced scorecard is a management system that allows an organization to focus on big-picture strategic goals. The four perspectives of the balanced scorecard include financial, customer, business process, and organizational capacity. From there, according to the balanced scorecard, it’s possible to have a holistic view of the business.
A blue ocean is a strategy where the boundaries of existing markets are redefined, and new uncontested markets are created. At its core, there is valueinnovation, for which uncontested markets are created, where competition is made irrelevant. And the cost-value trade-off is broken. Thus, companies following a blue ocean strategy offer much more value at a lower cost for the end customers.
A gap analysis helps an organization assess its alignment with strategic objectives to determine whether the current execution is in line with the company’s mission and long-term vision. Gap analyses then help reach a target performance by assisting organizations to use their resources better. A good gap analysis is a powerful tool to improve execution.
The GE McKinsey Matrix was developed in the 1970s after General Electric asked its consultant McKinsey to develop a portfolio management model. This matrix is a strategy tool that provides guidance on how a corporation should prioritize its investments among its business units, leading to three possible scenarios: invest, protect, harvest, and divest.
The McKinsey 7-S Model was developed in the late 1970s by Robert Waterman and Thomas Peters, who were consultants at McKinsey & Company. Waterman and Peters created seven key internal elements that inform a business of how well positioned it is to achieve its goals, based on three hard elements and four soft elements.
McKinsey’s Seven Degrees of Freedom for Growth is a strategy tool. Developed by partners at McKinsey and Company, the tool helps businesses understand which opportunities will contribute to expansion, and therefore it helps to prioritize those initiatives.
The McKinsey Horizon Model helps a business focus on innovation and growth. The model is a strategy framework divided into three broad categories, otherwise known as horizons. Thus, the framework is sometimes referred to as McKinsey’s Three Horizons of Growth.
Porter’s Five Forces is a model that helps organizations to gain a better understanding of their industries and competition. Published for the first time by Professor Michael Porter in his book “Competitive Strategy” in the 1980s. The model breaks down industries and markets by analyzing them through five forces.
According to Michael Porter, a competitive advantage, in a given industry could be pursued in two key ways: low cost (cost leadership), or differentiation. A third generic strategy is focus. According to Porter a failure to do so would end up stuck in the middle scenario, where the company will not retain a long-term competitive advantage.
In his 1985 book Competitive Advantage, Porter explains that a value chain is a collection of processes that a company performs to create value for its consumers. As a result, he asserts that value chain analysis is directly linked to competitive advantage. Porter’s Value Chain Model is a strategic management tool developed by Harvard Business School professor Michael Porter. The tool analyses a company’s value chain – defined as the combination of processes that the company uses to make money.
Porter’s Diamond Model is a diamond-shaped framework that explains why specific industries in a nation become internationally competitive while those in other nations do not. The model was first published in Michael Porter’s 1990 book The Competitive Advantage of Nations. This framework looks at the firm strategy, structure/rivalry, factor conditions, demand conditions, related and supporting industries.
A SWOT Analysis is a framework used for evaluating the business‘s Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats. It can aid in identifying the problematic areas of your business so that you can maximize your opportunities. It will also alert you to the challenges your organization might face in the future.
Businesses use scenario planning to make assumptions on future events and how their respective business environments may change in response to those future events. Therefore, scenario planning identifies specific uncertainties – or different realities and how they might affect future business operations. Scenario planning attempts at better strategic decision making by avoiding two pitfalls: underprediction, and overprediction.
The STEEPLE analysis is a variation of the STEEP analysis. Where the step analysis comprises socio-cultural, technological, economic, environmental/ecological, and political factors as the base of the analysis. The STEEPLE analysis adds other two factors such as Legal and Ethical.
A SWOT Analysis is a framework used for evaluating the business’s Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats. It can aid in identifying the problematic areas of your business so that you can maximize your opportunities. It will also alert you to the challenges your organization might face in the future.
Gennaro is the creator of FourWeekMBA, which reached about four million business people, comprising C-level executives, investors, analysts, product managers, and aspiring digital entrepreneurs in 2022 alone | He is also Director of Sales for a high-tech scaleup in the AI Industry | In 2012, Gennaro earned an International MBA with emphasis on Corporate Finance and Business Strategy.
