The Fogg Behavior Model explains user behavior with motivation, ability, and triggers. Different types of behavior emerge from their combination. Strategies leverage motivation and ability to prompt desired actions. Balancing these factors poses challenges, but when effectively applied, the model enhances user engagement and behavior change.
The Fogg Behavior Model is a psychological framework developed by Dr. B.J. Fogg, a renowned researcher in the fields of human-computer interaction and persuasive technology. This model explains the factors that influence human behavior, emphasizing three core elements: Motivation, Ability, and Triggers. These elements interact to predict whether a behavior will occur.
Key Elements of the Fogg Behavior Model:
Motivation: Motivation represents an individual’s desire or willingness to perform a specific behavior. It varies across individuals and can change over time.
Ability: Ability refers to an individual’s capability to perform a behavior. It takes into account factors such as skills, resources, time, and effort required to complete the behavior.
Triggers: Triggers are external or internal cues that prompt a person to take action. Triggers can be categorized as facilitators (making a behavior easier) or sparks (providing motivation).
Why the Fogg Behavior Model Matters:
Understanding the Fogg Behavior Model is essential for recognizing its impact on digital design, marketing strategies, and behavior change initiatives. Recognizing the benefits and limitations of this model informs strategies for effectively influencing behavior.
The Impact of the Fogg Behavior Model:
Digital Design: The model is used to design user interfaces and experiences that encourage desired user behaviors.
Marketing: Marketers apply the model to craft persuasive messages and campaigns that drive consumer actions.
Behavior Change: Health professionals and educators use the model to design interventions that promote positive behaviors.
Benefits of Understanding the Fogg Behavior Model:
Precision in Design: The model provides a systematic approach to designing products and experiences that drive user engagement.
Effective Communication: Marketers can use the model to create messages that resonate with their target audience and drive conversions.
Behavior Change Success: Interventions designed using the Fogg Behavior Model have been successful in promoting health and well-being.
Challenges of Understanding the Fogg Behavior Model:
Complexity of Behavior: Human behavior is influenced by numerous factors beyond motivation, ability, and triggers, making behavior prediction challenging.
Individual Differences: People have diverse motivations and abilities, and triggers may not work uniformly for everyone.
Types of Behavior in the Fogg Model:
The Fogg Behavior Model categorizes behaviors into four types based on users’ motivation and ability levels:
High Motivation, Low Ability: Users are highly motivated but lack the necessary ability to perform the behavior. They may be eager to act but face significant barriers or challenges.
High Ability, Low Motivation: Users have the ability to perform the behavior, but their motivation is low. They possess the required skills and resources but may not be interested or motivated to take action.
High Motivation, High Ability: These users are both motivated and capable of performing the behavior. They have the desire and the necessary skills and resources to act.
Low Motivation, Low Ability: Users in this category lack both motivation and ability to engage in the behavior. They are neither motivated nor equipped to perform the desired action.
Strategies for Behavior Change:
To drive behavior change, the Fogg Behavior Model suggests several strategies:
Increase Motivation: Boost motivation through incentives, rewards, or persuasive messaging to make the behavior more appealing.
Simplify Behavior: Remove barriers and make the behavior easier to perform by simplifying steps, providing guidance, or reducing friction.
Provide Triggers: Use effective triggers, whether external (e.g., notifications) or internal (e.g., setting personal goals), to prompt users to take action.
Challenges in Understanding the Fogg Behavior Model:
Understanding the limitations and challenges associated with the Fogg Behavior Model is essential for designers, marketers, and behavior change practitioners aiming to leverage its benefits effectively.
Complexity of Behavior:
Multifaceted Behavior: Many behaviors involve complex decision-making processes influenced by personal values, emotions, and external factors.
Behavioral Overload: Overloading users with triggers and information can lead to decision fatigue and reduced effectiveness.
Individual Differences:
Motivational Variability: People have varying levels of motivation for the same behavior, making it difficult to predict how an individual will respond to triggers.
Cultural Factors: Cultural norms and values can significantly impact motivation and behavior, challenging the universality of the model.
The Fogg Behavior Model in Action:
To understand the Fogg Behavior Model better, let’s explore how it operates in real-world scenarios and what it reveals about its impact on digital design, marketing, and behavior change initiatives.
Digital Design:
Scenario: A UX designer is tasked with increasing user engagement on a mobile app.
Fogg Behavior Model in Action:
Motivation: The designer identifies that users are motivated to use the app for entertainment and social interaction.
Ability: The app is redesigned to simplify navigation and enhance user-friendliness.
Triggers: Push notifications (sparks) are strategically employed to remind users of app features and social interactions.
Result: User engagement increases, with more users spending time on the app and sharing content.
Marketing:
Scenario: A digital marketing agency is running a campaign to boost online sales.
Fogg Behavior Model in Action:
Motivation: The agency identifies that consumers are motivated by discounts and limited-time offers.
Ability: The website is optimized for quick and easy purchasing, with a streamlined checkout process.
Triggers: Email marketing campaigns and banner ads (sparks) are deployed to notify consumers of time-limited discounts.
Result: The campaign drives an increase in online sales, with a higher conversion rate.
Behavior Change Initiatives:
Scenario: A public health organization aims to encourage people to adopt healthier eating habits.
Fogg Behavior Model in Action:
Motivation: The organization identifies that individuals are motivated to eat healthier for long-term well-being.
Ability: Cooking classes and recipe resources are made available to improve cooking skills.
Triggers: Social media campaigns and community events (sparks) promote healthy recipes and cooking tips.
Result: Participants in the program report healthier eating habits and improved overall health.
Legacy and Relevance Today:
In conclusion, the Fogg Behavior Model remains a valuable framework for understanding and influencing human behavior in digital design, marketing, and behavior change initiatives. Its focus on motivation, ability, and triggers provides a structured approach to designing experiences and campaigns that drive desired actions.
The legacy of the Fogg Behavior Model continues to shape discussions about user-centered design, persuasive communication, and effective behavior change interventions. While challenges such as the complexity of behavior and individual differences exist, its role in guiding designers, marketers, and practitioners toward successful outcomes remains as relevant today as ever. By considering the Fogg Behavior Model, professionals can create engaging experiences, craft persuasive messages, and design interventions that lead to positive behavior change, ultimately contributing to improved user satisfaction, marketing success, and public well-being.
Examples of the Fogg Behavior Model in Practice:
Fitness Apps: Fitness apps often use the Fogg model to motivate users to exercise regularly. They provide triggers (reminders and notifications), simplify behavior (offering guided workouts), and increase motivation (offering rewards and tracking progress).
Social Media Notifications: Social media platforms leverage triggers (notifications for new messages or updates) to encourage user engagement. By providing timely cues, they aim to maintain user motivation and sustain user activity.
Fogg Behavior Model Highlights:
Behavior Components: Comprises motivation, ability, and triggers as essential elements that drive user behavior.
Behavior Types: Categorizes behavior into four types based on varying levels of motivation and ability.
Strategies for Behavior Change: Offers strategies to influence behavior, including increasing motivation, simplifying tasks, and providing triggers.
Design for User Engagement: Guides user experience design by aligning motivation and ability to achieve desired actions.
Real-world Applications: Applicable to diverse scenarios, from fitness apps to digital marketing, for effective user engagement.
Challenge Considerations: Acknowledges challenges in balancing motivation and ability and ensuring sustained behavior change.
Related Frameworks
Description
When to Apply
Behavioral Economics
– Behavioral economics combines insights from psychology and economics to understand how individuals make decisions. The Fogg Behavior Model aligns with principles of behavioral economics by emphasizing the role of motivation, ability, and triggers in shaping behavior. Behavioral economics helps marketers and policymakers design interventions that influence behavior by leveraging psychological biases and heuristics.
– When designing interventions to nudge behavior change or influence decision-making. – Applying principles of behavioral economics to design marketing campaigns, user experiences, or policy interventions that encourage desired behaviors and outcomes.
Psychological Triggers
– Psychological triggers are stimuli or cues that prompt individuals to take specific actions or behaviors. The Fogg Behavior Model identifies triggers as one of the key elements that can motivate behavior when individuals have sufficient motivation and ability. Psychological triggers can be internal (e.g., emotions, thoughts) or external (e.g., cues, prompts) and play a crucial role in influencing behavior change and decision-making.
– When designing persuasive messages, user interfaces, or marketing campaigns to prompt desired behaviors. – Identifying and leveraging psychological triggers to design interventions or experiences that effectively motivate individuals to take specific actions or adopt desired behaviors.
Choice Architecture
– Choice architecture refers to the design of decision environments to influence individuals’ choices and behaviors. The Fogg Behavior Model aligns with principles of choice architecture by emphasizing the importance of context and environmental factors in shaping behavior. Choice architecture techniques, such as default options, framing effects, and salient cues, can influence behavior by making desired options more visible, accessible, and appealing to individuals.
– When designing product displays, website layouts, or user interfaces to encourage desired behaviors. – Applying choice architecture principles to design environments or contexts that facilitate desired behaviors and steer individuals toward preferred choices or actions.
Social Influence
– Social influence refers to the impact that others’ behavior, opinions, and norms have on individuals’ own behavior and decision-making. The Fogg Behavior Model acknowledges the role of social factors in shaping behavior, particularly through social facilitation and social norms. Social influence mechanisms, such as social proof, conformity, and social comparison, can motivate individuals to adopt or mimic behaviors observed in others.
– When designing social marketing campaigns, peer-to-peer interventions, or community-based programs to promote behavior change. – Leveraging social influence principles to design interventions that harness social networks, peer support, and social norms to encourage desired behaviors and foster social change.
Habit Formation
– Habit formation involves the process by which behaviors become automatic and ingrained through repetition and reinforcement. The Fogg Behavior Model recognizes the importance of habits in driving behavior, particularly when motivation is low or ability is high. Habit formation techniques, such as cue-routine-reward loops and habit stacking, can be used to establish and reinforce desired behaviors over time.
– When designing behavior change interventions aimed at promoting habit formation or breaking existing habits. – Implementing habit formation strategies to facilitate the adoption of desired behaviors and sustain behavior change over the long term.
Gamification
– Gamification involves the integration of game elements and mechanics into non-game contexts to engage users, motivate behavior, and drive desired outcomes. The Fogg Behavior Model can inform gamification strategies by highlighting the importance of motivation, ability, and triggers in shaping behavior change. Gamification techniques, such as points, badges, leaderboards, and challenges, can leverage intrinsic and extrinsic motivators to encourage engagement and participation in desired behaviors.
– When designing digital platforms, apps, or online experiences to promote user engagement and behavior change. – Incorporating gamification elements into interventions or interventions to enhance motivation, engagement, and adherence to desired behaviors or goals.
Nudge Theory
– Nudge theory proposes that individuals can be influenced to make better choices or adopt desired behaviors through subtle changes in choice architecture and decision environments. The Fogg Behavior Model aligns with principles of nudge theory by emphasizing the role of context, prompts, and social influences in shaping behavior. Nudge techniques, such as defaults, framing, and social comparisons, can steer individuals toward preferred choices or actions without restricting their freedom of choice.
– When designing policies, interventions, or communications to encourage desired behaviors or improve decision-making outcomes. – Applying nudge techniques to design choice environments or interventions that make desired options more visible, attractive, and accessible to individuals.
Persuasion Techniques
– Persuasion techniques involve strategies and tactics used to influence individuals’ attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors. The Fogg Behavior Model provides insights into the factors that influence behavior change, including motivation, ability, and triggers, which can inform persuasion techniques. Persuasion techniques, such as social proof, scarcity, authority, and reciprocity, can be used to persuade individuals to take specific actions or adopt desired behaviors.
– When crafting persuasive messages, marketing communications, or sales pitches to influence behavior or decision-making. – Leveraging persuasion techniques to design interventions or interventions that appeal to individuals’ motivations, address barriers to action, and prompt desired behaviors or outcomes.
Feedback Loops
– Feedback loops provide individuals with information about their performance, progress, or outcomes, which can influence subsequent behaviors and decisions. The Fogg Behavior Model emphasizes the importance of feedback in shaping behavior change, particularly by providing immediate and actionable feedback to individuals. Feedback loops, such as performance feedback, progress tracking, and rewards, can reinforce desired behaviors and encourage continued engagement and improvement.
– When designing behavior change interventions, apps, or systems that provide feedback to users. – Implementing feedback loops to monitor progress, reinforce desired behaviors, and motivate individuals to achieve their goals or objectives.
Goal Setting Theory
– Goal setting theory posits that individuals are motivated to achieve specific goals or targets, which can drive behavior change and performance improvement. The Fogg Behavior Model aligns with principles of goal setting theory by emphasizing the importance of setting clear, achievable goals to motivate behavior change. Goal setting techniques, such as SMART goals (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound), can provide individuals with direction, focus, and motivation to pursue desired behaviors and outcomes.
– When designing behavior change interventions, personal development programs, or performance management systems. – Applying goal setting techniques to help individuals set meaningful goals, track progress, and stay motivated to adopt desired behaviors or achieve desired outcomes.
AIOps is the application of artificial intelligence to IT operations. It has become particularly useful for modern IT management in hybridized, distributed, and dynamic environments. AIOps has become a key operational component of modern digital-based organizations, built around software and algorithms.
Agile started as a lightweight development method compared to heavyweight software development, which is the core paradigm of the previous decades of software development. By 2001 the Manifesto for Agile Software Development was born as a set of principles that defined the new paradigm for software development as a continuous iteration. This would also influence the way of doing business.
Agile Program Management is a means of managing, planning, and coordinating interrelated work in such a way that value delivery is emphasized for all key stakeholders. Agile Program Management (AgilePgM) is a disciplined yet flexible agile approach to managing transformational change within an organization.
Agile project management (APM) is a strategy that breaks large projects into smaller, more manageable tasks. In the APM methodology, each project is completed in small sections – often referred to as iterations. Each iteration is completed according to its project life cycle, beginning with the initial design and progressing to testing and then quality assurance.
Agile Modeling (AM) is a methodology for modeling and documenting software-based systems. Agile Modeling is critical to the rapid and continuous delivery of software. It is a collection of values, principles, and practices that guide effective, lightweight software modeling.
Agile Business Analysis (AgileBA) is certification in the form of guidance and training for business analysts seeking to work in agile environments. To support this shift, AgileBA also helps the business analyst relate Agile projects to a wider organizational mission or strategy. To ensure that analysts have the necessary skills and expertise, AgileBA certification was developed.
Agile leadership is the embodiment of agile manifesto principles by a manager or management team. Agile leadership impacts two important levels of a business. The structural level defines the roles, responsibilities, and key performance indicators. The behavioral level describes the actions leaders exhibit to others based on agile principles.
The andon system alerts managerial, maintenance, or other staff of a production process problem. The alert itself can be activated manually with a button or pull cord, but it can also be activated automatically by production equipment. Most Andon boards utilize three colored lights similar to a traffic signal: green (no errors), yellow or amber (problem identified, or quality check needed), and red (production stopped due to unidentified issue).
Bimodal Portfolio Management (BimodalPfM) helps an organization manage both agile and traditional portfolios concurrently. Bimodal Portfolio Management – sometimes referred to as bimodal development – was coined by research and advisory company Gartner. The firm argued that many agile organizations still needed to run some aspects of their operations using traditional delivery models.
Business innovation is about creating new opportunities for an organization to reinvent its core offerings, revenue streams, and enhance the value proposition for existing or new customers, thus renewing its whole business model. Business innovation springs by understanding the structure of the market, thus adapting or anticipating those changes.
Business model innovation is about increasing the success of an organization with existing products and technologies by crafting a compelling value proposition able to propel a new business model to scale up customers and create a lasting competitive advantage. And it all starts by mastering the key customers.
A consumer brand company like Procter & Gamble (P&G) defines “Constructive Disruption” as: a willingness to change, adapt, and create new trends and technologies that will shape our industry for the future. According to P&G, it moves around four pillars: lean innovation, brand building, supply chain, and digitalization & data analytics.
That is a process that requires a continuous feedback loop to develop a valuable product and build a viable business model. Continuous innovation is a mindset where products and services are designed and delivered to tune them around the customers’ problem and not the technical solution of its founders.
A design sprint is a proven five-day process where critical business questions are answered through speedy design and prototyping, focusing on the end-user. A design sprint starts with a weekly challenge that should finish with a prototype, test at the end, and therefore a lesson learned to be iterated.
Tim Brown, Executive Chair of IDEO, defined design thinking as “a human-centered approach to innovation that draws from the designer’s toolkit to integrate the needs of people, the possibilities of technology, and the requirements for business success.” Therefore, desirability, feasibility, and viability are balanced to solve critical problems.
DevOps refers to a series of practices performed to perform automated software development processes. It is a conjugation of the term “development” and “operations” to emphasize how functions integrate across IT teams. DevOps strategies promote seamless building, testing, and deployment of products. It aims to bridge a gap between development and operations teams to streamline the development altogether.
Product discovery is a critical part of agile methodologies, as its aim is to ensure that products customers love are built. Product discovery involves learning through a raft of methods, including design thinking, lean start-up, and A/B testing to name a few. Dual Track Agile is an agile methodology containing two separate tracks: the “discovery” track and the “delivery” track.
eXtreme Programming was developed in the late 1990s by Ken Beck, Ron Jeffries, and Ward Cunningham. During this time, the trio was working on the Chrysler Comprehensive Compensation System (C3) to help manage the company payroll system. eXtreme Programming (XP) is a software development methodology. It is designed to improve software quality and the ability of software to adapt to changing customer needs.
Feature-Driven Development is a pragmatic software process that is client and architecture-centric. Feature-Driven Development (FDD) is an agile software development model that organizes workflow according to which features need to be developed next.
A Gemba Walk is a fundamental component of lean management. It describes the personal observation of work to learn more about it. Gemba is a Japanese word that loosely translates as “the real place”, or in business, “the place where value is created”. The Gemba Walk as a concept was created by Taiichi Ohno, the father of the Toyota Production System of lean manufacturing. Ohno wanted to encourage management executives to leave their offices and see where the real work happened. This, he hoped, would build relationships between employees with vastly different skillsets and build trust.
GIST Planning is a relatively easy and lightweight agile approach to product planning that favors autonomous working. GIST Planning is a lean and agile methodology that was created by former Google product manager Itamar Gilad. GIST Planning seeks to address this situation by creating lightweight plans that are responsive and adaptable to change. GIST Planning also improves team velocity, autonomy, and alignment by reducing the pervasive influence of management. It consists of four blocks: goals, ideas, step-projects, and tasks.
The ICE Scoring Model is an agile methodology that prioritizes features using data according to three components: impact, confidence, and ease of implementation. The ICE Scoring Model was initially created by author and growth expert Sean Ellis to help companies expand. Today, the model is broadly used to prioritize projects, features, initiatives, and rollouts. It is ideally suited for early-stage product development where there is a continuous flow of ideas and momentum must be maintained.
An innovation funnel is a tool or process ensuring only the best ideas are executed. In a metaphorical sense, the funnel screens innovative ideas for viability so that only the best products, processes, or business models are launched to the market. An innovation funnel provides a framework for the screening and testing of innovative ideas for viability.
According to how well defined is the problem and how well defined the domain, we have four main types of innovations: basic research (problem and domain or not well defined); breakthrough innovation (domain is not well defined, the problem is well defined); sustaining innovation (both problem and domain are well defined); and disruptive innovation (domain is well defined, the problem is not well defined).
The innovation loop is a methodology/framework derived from the Bell Labs, which produced innovation at scale throughout the 20th century. They learned how to leverage a hybrid innovation management model based on science, invention, engineering, and manufacturing at scale. By leveraging individual genius, creativity, and small/large groups.
The Agile methodology has been primarily thought of for software development (and other business disciplines have also adopted it). Lean thinking is a process improvement technique where teams prioritize the value streams to improve it continuously. Both methodologies look at the customer as the key driver to improvement and waste reduction. Both methodologies look at improvement as something continuous.
A startup company is a high-tech business that tries to build a scalable business model in tech-driven industries. A startup company usually follows a lean methodology, where continuous innovation, driven by built-in viral loops is the rule. Thus, driving growth and building network effects as a consequence of this strategy.
As pointed out by Eric Ries, a minimum viable product is that version of a new product which allows a team to collect the maximum amount of validated learning about customers with the least effort through a cycle of build, measure, learn; that is the foundation of the lean startup methodology.
Kanban is a lean manufacturing framework first developed by Toyota in the late 1940s. The Kanban framework is a means of visualizing work as it moves through identifying potential bottlenecks. It does that through a process called just-in-time (JIT) manufacturing to optimize engineering processes, speed up manufacturing products, and improve the go-to-market strategy.
Jidoka was first used in 1896 by Sakichi Toyoda, who invented a textile loom that would stop automatically when it encountered a defective thread. Jidoka is a Japanese term used in lean manufacturing. The term describes a scenario where machines cease operating without human intervention when a problem or defect is discovered.
The PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) cycle was first proposed by American physicist and engineer Walter A. Shewhart in the 1920s. The PDCA cycle is a continuous process and product improvement method and an essential component of the lean manufacturing philosophy.
RAD was first introduced by author and consultant James Martin in 1991. Martin recognized and then took advantage of the endless malleability of software in designing development models. Rapid Application Development (RAD) is a methodology focusing on delivering rapidly through continuous feedback and frequent iterations.
Retrospective analyses are held after a project to determine what worked well and what did not. They are also conducted at the end of an iteration in Agile project management. Agile practitioners call these meetings retrospectives or retros. They are an effective way to check the pulse of a project team, reflect on the work performed to date, and reach a consensus on how to tackle the next sprint cycle. These are the five stages of a retrospective analysis for effective Agile project management: set the stage, gather the data, generate insights, decide on the next steps, and close the retrospective.
Scaled Agile Lean Development (ScALeD) helps businesses discover a balanced approach to agile transition and scaling questions. The ScALed approach helps businesses successfully respond to change. Inspired by a combination of lean and agile values, ScALed is practitioner-based and can be completed through various agile frameworks and practices.
The SMED (single minute exchange of die) method is a lean production framework to reduce waste and increase production efficiency. The SMED method is a framework for reducing the time associated with completing an equipment changeover.
The Spotify Model is an autonomous approach to scaling agile, focusing on culture communication, accountability, and quality. The Spotify model was first recognized in 2012 after Henrik Kniberg, and Anders Ivarsson released a white paper detailing how streaming company Spotify approached agility. Therefore, the Spotify model represents an evolution of agile.
As the name suggests, TDD is a test-driven technique for delivering high-quality software rapidly and sustainably. It is an iterative approach based on the idea that a failing test should be written before any code for a feature or function is written. Test-Driven Development (TDD) is an approach to software development that relies on very short development cycles.
Timeboxing is a simple yet powerful time-management technique for improving productivity. Timeboxing describes the process of proactively scheduling a block of time to spend on a task in the future. It was first described by author James Martin in a book about agile software development.
Scrum is a methodology co-created by Ken Schwaber and Jeff Sutherland for effective team collaboration on complex products. Scrum was primarily thought for software development projects to deliver new software capability every 2-4 weeks. It is a sub-group of agile also used in project management to improve startups’ productivity.
Scrumban is a project management framework that is a hybrid of two popular agile methodologies: Scrum and Kanban. Scrumban is a popular approach to helping businesses focus on the right strategic tasks while simultaneously strengthening their processes.
Scrum anti-patterns describe any attractive, easy-to-implement solution that ultimately makes a problem worse. Therefore, these are the practice not to follow to prevent issues from emerging. Some classic examples of scrum anti-patterns comprise absent product owners, pre-assigned tickets (making individuals work in isolation), and discounting retrospectives (where review meetings are not useful to really make improvements).
Scrum at Scale (Scrum@Scale) is a framework that Scrum teams use to address complex problems and deliver high-value products. Scrum at Scale was created through a joint venture between the Scrum Alliance and Scrum Inc. The joint venture was overseen by Jeff Sutherland, a co-creator of Scrum and one of the principal authors of the Agile Manifesto.
Six Sigma is a data-driven approach and methodology for eliminating errors or defects in a product, service, or process. Six Sigma was developed by Motorola as a management approach based on quality fundamentals in the early 1980s. A decade later, it was popularized by General Electric who estimated that the methodology saved them $12 billion in the first five years of operation.
Stretch objectives describe any task an agile team plans to complete without expressly committing to do so. Teams incorporate stretch objectives during a Sprint or Program Increment (PI) as part of Scaled Agile. They are used when the agile team is unsure of its capacity to attain an objective. Therefore, stretch objectives are instead outcomes that, while extremely desirable, are not the difference between the success or failure of each sprint.
The Toyota Production System (TPS) is an early form of lean manufacturing created by auto-manufacturer Toyota. Created by the Toyota Motor Corporation in the 1940s and 50s, the Toyota Production System seeks to manufacture vehicles ordered by customers most quickly and efficiently possible.
The Total Quality Management (TQM) framework is a technique based on the premise that employees continuously work on their ability to provide value to customers. Importantly, the word “total” means that all employees are involved in the process – regardless of whether they work in development, production, or fulfillment.
The waterfall model was first described by Herbert D. Benington in 1956 during a presentation about the software used in radar imaging during the Cold War. Since there were no knowledge-based, creative software development strategies at the time, the waterfall method became standard practice. The waterfall model is a linear and sequential project management framework.
Gennaro is the creator of FourWeekMBA, which reached about four million business people, comprising C-level executives, investors, analysts, product managers, and aspiring digital entrepreneurs in 2022 alone | He is also Director of Sales for a high-tech scaleup in the AI Industry | In 2012, Gennaro earned an International MBA with emphasis on Corporate Finance and Business Strategy.
