cynefin-framework

What Is The Cynefin Framework And Why It Matters In Business

The Cynefin Framework gives context to decision making and problem-solving by providing context and guiding an appropriate response. The five domains of the Cynefin Framework comprise obvious, complicated, complex, chaotic domains and disorder if a domain has not been determined at all.

AspectDescription
DefinitionThe Cynefin Framework is a decision-making and sense-making model developed by Dave Snowden. It categorizes problems and situations into five domains, each requiring a different approach for problem-solving and decision-making. These domains are Complex, Complicated, Chaotic, Simple, and Disorder.
Framework DomainsComplex: In this domain, issues are uncertain and unpredictable, with multiple influencing factors. It requires experimentation, collaboration, and probing to understand the problem and find solutions. – Complicated: Problems in this domain have known cause-and-effect relationships but may be intricate. Expertise and analysis are needed to solve them effectively. – Chaotic: In chaotic situations, there is no clear cause and effect, and immediate action is required to stabilize the situation. – Simple: Simple problems have clear cause-and-effect relationships and can be addressed with best practices and established protocols. – Disorder: Disorder is the state of not knowing which of the other domains applies. It requires sense-making to determine the appropriate domain.
Use CasesThe Cynefin Framework is used in various fields, including business, government, healthcare, and project management, to classify and address different types of problems and challenges. It helps organizations choose appropriate approaches for decision-making and problem-solving.
Benefits– Provides a structured approach to problem classification – Helps avoid one-size-fits-all solutions – Encourages adaptability and flexibility in decision-making – Promotes a better understanding of the complexity of issues
Drawbacks– Requires expertise to correctly categorize issues – May lead to oversimplification if not used carefully – Some situations may fall in between domains, causing uncertainty
Examples– Product development often falls in the Complex domain, requiring experimentation and adaptation. – Aeronautical engineering problems may fall into the Complicated domain, requiring expert analysis. – Emergency response during a natural disaster often falls into the Chaotic domain, requiring immediate action. – Routine administrative tasks may belong to the Simple domain, following established procedures.

Understanding the Cynefin Framework

In decision making and problem-solving, a different approach is required depending on the situation. Indeed, solutions that were found to be effective in solving one problem may be ineffective or even counterproductive in solving another.

A framework that helps decision-makers consider context is the Cynefin Framework. The framework is derived from the Welsh word cynefin meaning “habitat” and was developed at IBM by David Snowden.

Snowden defined the framework as attempting to make sense of “the multiple factors in our environment and our experience that influence us in ways we can never understand.” Snowden also notes that the framework makes sense of complex problems where the correct action is less obvious.

The five domains of the Cynefin framework

The framework asserts that problems can be placed into one of five domains (contexts) that guide decision making and problem-solving.

DomainDescription
Complex– Issues are uncertain and unpredictable. – Multiple influencing factors. – Requires experimentation and probing.
Complicated– Known cause-and-effect relationships. – May be intricate. – Requires expertise and analysis for solutions.
Chaotic– No clear cause and effect. – Immediate action is required to stabilize.
Simple– Clear cause-and-effect relationships. – Addressed with best practices and established protocols.
Disorder– State of not knowing which domain applies. – Requires sense-making to determine the appropriate domain.

They are:

Obvious (in the domain of best practices)

The most simple of contexts where the relationship between cause and effect is obvious and undisputed.

A single, fact-based answer exists. Solutions are simple and universally understood, as are the methods in formulating the solutions. 

Complicated (good practices)

In a complicated context, there are often multiple solutions for a single problem.

There is also an understanding of the questions that need to be asked without knowing how to obtain the answers.

Cause and effect are less obvious and may require time or expert consultation to unearth. In this case, a quantitative approach such as Value Stream Mapping is useful.

Complex (emergent solutions)

Solutions in the complex domain are discovered through safe experimentation that lead to new (emergent) solutions.

Emergent solutions can then be evaluated and used to guide future experiments until a complete solution is found.

Problems and solutions may be unknown or less obvious in this domain and will require high levels of collaboration and innovative thinking.

Chaotic (rapid response)

In chaotic contexts, there is no relationship between cause and effect. Thus, the primary goal is to respond rapidly.

This establishes stability through acting to reduce damage, sensing where stability resides, and then responding to the problem.

For example, a bank whose customer account information has been hacked must first find the source of the intrusion before making compensation payments.

Disorder

If a domain has not been determined, then disorder is the result.

To move into a domain with more certainty, the problem should be broken down into constituent parts with each assigned to a domain individually.

Applications of the Cynefin Framework in business

The framework is useful in any situation where a problem or decision must be categorized and an appropriate response formulated.

The most obvious application for businesses is in emergency response or crisis management.

But the Cynefin framework can also be used in agile product development, marketing, and customer relations.

It has further applications in refreshing outdated management styles, encouraging organizations to become more adaptable to a wide variety of situations and contexts.

Examples

  • Emergency Response Planning: In disaster management, organizations can use the Cynefin Framework to categorize the type of crisis they are facing. Is it a chaotic situation (e.g., a natural disaster) requiring immediate response, or is it complex (e.g., a long-term public health crisis) where innovative solutions need to emerge through collaboration?
  • Product Development: When developing new products or services, teams can apply the framework to determine whether the problem is in the complicated domain (known solutions exist but require expertise) or complex domain (where novel solutions need to be discovered through experimentation).
  • Customer Relations: In addressing customer issues, companies can categorize problems based on their nature. Simple problems with well-known solutions can be addressed quickly, while complex problems might require collaboration with customers to find innovative solutions.
  • Marketing Campaigns: Marketers can use the framework to assess the type of market they are entering. Is it an obvious market (well-understood and straightforward) or a complex market (where consumer behavior is uncertain and requires experimentation)?
  • Change Management: When implementing organizational changes, leaders can categorize resistance from employees based on the framework. Some resistance might come from complicated problems (e.g., lack of expertise in new processes), while other resistance could be due to complex issues (e.g., cultural shifts).
  • Supply Chain Management: Organizations can use the framework to assess disruptions in the supply chain. A sudden supply chain disruption may require a rapid response (chaotic), while longer-term issues might require innovative solutions (complex).
  • Innovation Strategy: When developing an innovation strategy, companies can identify areas where innovation is needed and classify them based on the framework. This helps allocate resources effectively, knowing which areas require experimentation and which can benefit from best practices.
  • Customer Feedback: Businesses can use the framework to categorize customer feedback. Obvious issues with products can be addressed immediately, while complex issues might require deeper analysis and innovative solutions.
  • Project Management: Project managers can apply the framework to assess project complexity. Projects falling into the complicated domain may require specialized expertise, while those in the complex domain might need adaptive project management approaches.
  • Cybersecurity: When dealing with cybersecurity threats, organizations can categorize incidents based on their nature. A sudden and chaotic cyberattack may require a rapid response, while understanding and countering complex cyber threats might involve innovative strategies.

Drawbacks of the Cynefin Framework

Complexity and Misinterpretation:

  • Complex Conceptual Model: The Cynefin Framework is a complex model that can be difficult to grasp, especially for those unfamiliar with conceptual frameworks. This complexity can lead to misunderstandings or misapplications of the model.
  • Risk of Oversimplification: While offering a nuanced view of different problem contexts, there’s a risk of oversimplifying complex situations by trying to fit them neatly into one of the framework’s domains.

Subjectivity in Classification:

  • Ambiguity in Domain Classification: The process of classifying problems into specific Cynefin domains can be subjective and open to interpretation, leading to potential disagreements or inconsistencies in how situations are approached.
  • Fluidity of Domains: Problems may shift between domains over time or with the acquisition of new information, which can complicate decision-making and strategy development.

Implementation Challenges:

  • Requires Skilled Facilitation: Effective use of the Cynefin Framework often requires skilled facilitation, particularly in group settings, to guide participants through the process of understanding and applying the model.
  • Organizational Resistance: Organizations accustomed to traditional, linear problem-solving approaches may resist the more fluid and dynamic approach advocated by the Cynefin Framework.

Limited Prescriptive Guidance:

  • Not a Step-by-Step Guide: The Cynefin Framework provides a way to understand and categorize problems but does not offer specific, detailed guidance on how to address each type of problem.
  • Adaptation Required: Users of the framework must adapt its general principles to their specific context, which requires a good understanding of the model and the situation at hand.

When to Use the Cynefin Framework

Appropriate Scenarios:

  • Complex Decision-Making: The framework is particularly useful in complex environments where traditional problem-solving methods are ineffective.
  • Organizational Change and Development: It can help guide strategies and approaches during organizational change, innovation, and development initiatives.

Strategic Application:

  • Leadership and Management: Leaders and managers can use the framework to better understand the nature of the challenges they face and to tailor their decision-making and problem-solving approaches accordingly.
  • Policy Development: In policy-making, the Cynefin Framework can assist in understanding the complexity of societal issues and in devising appropriate interventions.

How to Use the Cynefin Framework

Implementing the Framework:

  1. Identify the Nature of the Problem: Determine whether the problem is simple, complicated, complex, chaotic, or disorder (the fifth domain, representing confusion about the state of the problem).
  2. Apply Appropriate Strategies: Use strategies that align with the nature of the problem: best practices for simple problems, good practices for complicated problems, emergent practices for complex problems, and novel practices for chaotic problems.
  3. Adapt as Situations Change: Be prepared to reevaluate and change your approach as the problem shifts between domains.

Best Practices:

  • Openness to Learning: Embrace a learning-oriented approach, especially in complex and chaotic domains where the path forward is less clear.
  • Collaborative Analysis: Engage diverse perspectives in analyzing and categorizing problems within the framework to enrich understanding and decision-making.
  • Context Sensitivity: Be aware that the framework is a guide, not a rigid set of rules, and always consider the specific context of the situation.

What to Expect from Implementing the Cynefin Framework

Enhanced Problem Understanding:

  • Better Grasp of Problem Complexity: Provides a clearer understanding of the complexity and nature of different problems, leading to more effective decision-making.
  • Improved Problem-Solving: Supports the development of more appropriate and effective strategies for different types of problems.

Organizational Impact:

  • Supports Adaptive Management: Encourages adaptive management and leadership styles that are responsive to the nature of the challenges faced.
  • Facilitates Knowledge Sharing: Promotes the sharing of knowledge and experiences across the organization, enhancing collective understanding and capabilities.

Challenges and Considerations:

  • Need for Continuous Evaluation: Situations may evolve, requiring continuous reassessment and adaptation of the approach.
  • Balancing Flexibility and Structure: While the framework encourages flexibility, it’s important to balance this with the need for structure and clear decision-making processes, especially in complex and chaotic contexts.

In summary, the Cynefin Framework offers a sophisticated approach to understanding and addressing different types of problems based on their complexity.

It provides a lens through which leaders and teams can view their challenges and tailor their strategies accordingly.

While it offers valuable insights, its effective application requires a deep understanding of the framework, skilled facilitation, and an openness to adapt and learn.

Organizations can benefit from using the Cynefin Framework to enhance decision-making, adapt to complex environments, and improve problem-solving capabilities, but they should be aware of the challenges related to its complexity and the need for contextual adaptation.

Key takeaways

  • The Cynefin Framework provides guidance for problem-solving in contexts where individuals tend to respond unconsciously.
  • The Cynefin Framework categorizes problems into five domains with an increasing level of complexity: obvious, complicated, complex, chaotic, and disorder. 
  • The Cynefin Framework is particularly useful in crisis or emergency scenarios and agile product development. It can also be used to reinvigorate businesses that have a rigid and outdated management structure.

Key Highlights

  • Cynefin Framework Overview:
    • The Cynefin Framework is a decision-making and problem-solving tool that provides context for appropriate responses.
    • It consists of five domains: Obvious, Complicated, Complex, Chaotic, and Disorder.
    • The framework helps understand and categorize problems based on their characteristics.
  • Framework’s Purpose and Origin:
    • The Cynefin Framework assists in making sense of complex environments where understanding is difficult.
    • It was developed by David Snowden at IBM and is derived from the Welsh word “cynefin,” meaning “habitat.”
  • Five Domains of the Framework:
    • Obvious (Best Practices): Clear cause-and-effect relationship, simple solutions, universally understood methods.
    • Complicated (Good Practices): Multiple solutions, requires expertise, cause-and-effect not immediately obvious.
    • Complex (Emergent Solutions): Solutions emerge through experimentation, collaboration, and innovative thinking.
    • Chaotic (Rapid Response): No clear cause-and-effect relationship, rapid response to establish stability.
    • Disorder: When the domain is uncertain, problem needs to be broken down for classification.
  • Applications in Business:
    • The framework is valuable for categorizing problems and formulating appropriate responses.
    • It is useful in emergency response, crisis management, agile product development, marketing, customer relations, and refreshing outdated management styles.
    • Helps organizations become adaptable to various situations and contexts.
  • Key Takeaways:
    • Cynefin Framework aids in problem-solving in situations where responses are often unconscious.
    • Problems are categorized into five domains: Obvious, Complicated, Complex, Chaotic, and Disorder.
    • Particularly beneficial in crisis situations, agile product development, and modernizing rigid management structures.

Connected Analysis Frameworks

Failure Mode And Effects Analysis

failure-mode-and-effects-analysis
A failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) is a structured approach to identifying design failures in a product or process. Developed in the 1950s, the failure mode and effects analysis is one the earliest methodologies of its kind. It enables organizations to anticipate a range of potential failures during the design stage.

Agile Business Analysis

agile-business-analysis
Agile Business Analysis (AgileBA) is certification in the form of guidance and training for business analysts seeking to work in agile environments. To support this shift, AgileBA also helps the business analyst relate Agile projects to a wider organizational mission or strategy. To ensure that analysts have the necessary skills and expertise, AgileBA certification was developed.

Business Valuation

valuation
Business valuations involve a formal analysis of the key operational aspects of a business. A business valuation is an analysis used to determine the economic value of a business or company unit. It’s important to note that valuations are one part science and one part art. Analysts use professional judgment to consider the financial performance of a business with respect to local, national, or global economic conditions. They will also consider the total value of assets and liabilities, in addition to patented or proprietary technology.

Paired Comparison Analysis

paired-comparison-analysis
A paired comparison analysis is used to rate or rank options where evaluation criteria are subjective by nature. The analysis is particularly useful when there is a lack of clear priorities or objective data to base decisions on. A paired comparison analysis evaluates a range of options by comparing them against each other.

Monte Carlo Analysis

monte-carlo-analysis
The Monte Carlo analysis is a quantitative risk management technique. The Monte Carlo analysis was developed by nuclear scientist Stanislaw Ulam in 1940 as work progressed on the atom bomb. The analysis first considers the impact of certain risks on project management such as time or budgetary constraints. Then, a computerized mathematical output gives businesses a range of possible outcomes and their probability of occurrence.

Cost-Benefit Analysis

cost-benefit-analysis
A cost-benefit analysis is a process a business can use to analyze decisions according to the costs associated with making that decision. For a cost analysis to be effective it’s important to articulate the project in the simplest terms possible, identify the costs, determine the benefits of project implementation, assess the alternatives.

CATWOE Analysis

catwoe-analysis
The CATWOE analysis is a problem-solving strategy that asks businesses to look at an issue from six different perspectives. The CATWOE analysis is an in-depth and holistic approach to problem-solving because it enables businesses to consider all perspectives. This often forces management out of habitual ways of thinking that would otherwise hinder growth and profitability. Most importantly, the CATWOE analysis allows businesses to combine multiple perspectives into a single, unifying solution.

VTDF Framework

competitor-analysis
It’s possible to identify the key players that overlap with a company’s business model with a competitor analysis. This overlapping can be analyzed in terms of key customers, technologies, distribution, and financial models. When all those elements are analyzed, it is possible to map all the facets of competition for a tech business model to understand better where a business stands in the marketplace and its possible future developments.

Pareto Analysis

pareto-principle-pareto-analysis
The Pareto Analysis is a statistical analysis used in business decision making that identifies a certain number of input factors that have the greatest impact on income. It is based on the similarly named Pareto Principle, which states that 80% of the effect of something can be attributed to just 20% of the drivers.

Comparable Analysis

comparable-company-analysis
A comparable company analysis is a process that enables the identification of similar organizations to be used as a comparison to understand the business and financial performance of the target company. To find comparables you can look at two key profiles: the business and financial profile. From the comparable company analysis it is possible to understand the competitive landscape of the target organization.

SWOT Analysis

swot-analysis
A SWOT Analysis is a framework used for evaluating the business’s Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats. It can aid in identifying the problematic areas of your business so that you can maximize your opportunities. It will also alert you to the challenges your organization might face in the future.

PESTEL Analysis

pestel-analysis
The PESTEL analysis is a framework that can help marketers assess whether macro-economic factors are affecting an organization. This is a critical step that helps organizations identify potential threats and weaknesses that can be used in other frameworks such as SWOT or to gain a broader and better understanding of the overall marketing environment.

Business Analysis

business-analysis
Business analysis is a research discipline that helps driving change within an organization by identifying the key elements and processes that drive value. Business analysis can also be used in Identifying new business opportunities or how to take advantage of existing business opportunities to grow your business in the marketplace.

Financial Structure

financial-structure
In corporate finance, the financial structure is how corporations finance their assets (usually either through debt or equity). For the sake of reverse engineering businesses, we want to look at three critical elements to determine the model used to sustain its assets: cost structure, profitability, and cash flow generation.

Financial Modeling

financial-modeling
Financial modeling involves the analysis of accounting, finance, and business data to predict future financial performance. Financial modeling is often used in valuation, which consists of estimating the value in dollar terms of a company based on several parameters. Some of the most common financial models comprise discounted cash flows, the M&A model, and the CCA model.

Value Investing

value-investing
Value investing is an investment philosophy that looks at companies’ fundamentals, to discover those companies whose intrinsic value is higher than what the market is currently pricing, in short value investing tries to evaluate a business by starting by its fundamentals.

Buffet Indicator

buffet-indicator
The Buffet Indicator is a measure of the total value of all publicly-traded stocks in a country divided by that country’s GDP. It’s a measure and ratio to evaluate whether a market is undervalued or overvalued. It’s one of Warren Buffet’s favorite measures as a warning that financial markets might be overvalued and riskier.

Financial Analysis

financial-accounting
Financial accounting is a subdiscipline within accounting that helps organizations provide reporting related to three critical areas of a business: its assets and liabilities (balance sheet), its revenues and expenses (income statement), and its cash flows (cash flow statement). Together those areas can be used for internal and external purposes.

Post-Mortem Analysis

post-mortem-analysis
Post-mortem analyses review projects from start to finish to determine process improvements and ensure that inefficiencies are not repeated in the future. In the Project Management Book of Knowledge (PMBOK), this process is referred to as “lessons learned”.

Retrospective Analysis

retrospective-analysis
Retrospective analyses are held after a project to determine what worked well and what did not. They are also conducted at the end of an iteration in Agile project management. Agile practitioners call these meetings retrospectives or retros. They are an effective way to check the pulse of a project team, reflect on the work performed to date, and reach a consensus on how to tackle the next sprint cycle.

Root Cause Analysis

root-cause-analysis
In essence, a root cause analysis involves the identification of problem root causes to devise the most effective solutions. Note that the root cause is an underlying factor that sets the problem in motion or causes a particular situation such as non-conformance.

Blindspot Analysis

blindspot-analysis

Break-even Analysis

break-even-analysis
A break-even analysis is commonly used to determine the point at which a new product or service will become profitable. The analysis is a financial calculation that tells the business how many products it must sell to cover its production costs.  A break-even analysis is a small business accounting process that tells the business what it needs to do to break even or recoup its initial investment. 

Decision Analysis

decision-analysis
Stanford University Professor Ronald A. Howard first defined decision analysis as a profession in 1964. Over the ensuing decades, Howard has supervised many doctoral theses on the subject across topics including nuclear waste disposal, investment planning, hurricane seeding, and research strategy. Decision analysis (DA) is a systematic, visual, and quantitative decision-making approach where all aspects of a decision are evaluated before making an optimal choice.

DESTEP Analysis

destep-analysis
A DESTEP analysis is a framework used by businesses to understand their external environment and the issues which may impact them. The DESTEP analysis is an extension of the popular PEST analysis created by Harvard Business School professor Francis J. Aguilar. The DESTEP analysis groups external factors into six categories: demographic, economic, socio-cultural, technological, ecological, and political.

STEEP Analysis

steep-analysis
The STEEP analysis is a tool used to map the external factors that impact an organization. STEEP stands for the five key areas on which the analysis focuses: socio-cultural, technological, economic, environmental/ecological, and political. Usually, the STEEP analysis is complementary or alternative to other methods such as SWOT or PESTEL analyses.

STEEPLE Analysis

steeple-analysis
The STEEPLE analysis is a variation of the STEEP analysis. Where the step analysis comprises socio-cultural, technological, economic, environmental/ecological, and political factors as the base of the analysis. The STEEPLE analysis adds other two factors such as Legal and Ethical.

Other related business frameworks:

Additional resources:

Scroll to Top

Discover more from FourWeekMBA

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

FourWeekMBA