A 51% Attack is an attack on the blockchain network by an entity or organization. The primary goal of such an attack is the exclusion or modification of blockchain transactions. A 51% attack is carried out by a miner or group of miners endeavoring to control more than half of a network’s mining power, hash rate, or computing power. For this reason, it is sometimes called a majority attack. This can corrupt a blockchain protocol that malicious attackers would take over.
|Definition||A 51% Attack, also known as a majority attack or double-spending attack, is a cybersecurity threat in blockchain technology, particularly in Proof-of-Work (PoW) and Proof-of-Stake (PoS) based blockchain networks. In a 51% Attack, a single entity or group of malicious actors gains control of more than 50% of the network’s mining power or staking power, allowing them to manipulate the blockchain’s transactions and potentially undermine its security and integrity. This control enables the attacker to reverse transactions, engage in double-spending, and disrupt the consensus process, causing network instability and loss of trust. A successful 51% Attack can have severe consequences for the affected blockchain and its users.|
|Key Concepts||– Blockchain Consensus: The security of blockchain networks relies on consensus mechanisms, such as PoW or PoS, where participants validate transactions and create new blocks. – Majority Control: The core concept of a 51% Attack is that the attacker gains control of over 50% of the network’s computational power (PoW) or staking power (PoS). – Double-Spending: With majority control, the attacker can execute double-spending by spending the same cryptocurrency tokens in multiple transactions. – Network Manipulation: The attacker can manipulate the blockchain’s transactions, block creation, and consensus process.|
|Characteristics||– Control Over Consensus: The attacker has the ability to control the consensus process, allowing them to decide which transactions are valid and which are not. – Double-Spending: One of the primary goals of a 51% Attack is to perform double-spending, where the same cryptocurrency tokens are spent in multiple transactions. – Blockchain Reorganization: The attacker can reorganize blocks in the blockchain by creating an alternative longer chain, potentially invalidating previous transactions. – Network Instability: Successful attacks can lead to network instability, distrust, and a loss of confidence among users.|
|Implications||– Transaction Reversal: The attacker can reverse transactions, potentially causing financial losses to network users. – Double-Spending: Double-spending can undermine the trust in the cryptocurrency and disrupt its use as a medium of exchange. – Network Integrity: A 51% Attack can damage the integrity and credibility of the affected blockchain network. – Security Concerns: It highlights the importance of security measures to protect against such attacks, especially in PoW and PoS systems.|
|Advantages||There are no inherent advantages to a 51% Attack. It is considered a severe security breach and is typically carried out with malicious intent. However, awareness of the threat has led to increased emphasis on blockchain security and the development of countermeasures to prevent and mitigate such attacks.|
|Drawbacks||– Security Risk: The primary drawback is the significant security risk it poses to blockchain networks, as it can undermine trust and confidence in the technology. – Loss of Trust: Successful attacks can lead to a loss of trust among users, potentially damaging the reputation of the affected blockchain. – Reversal of Transactions: Transaction reversals can cause financial harm to individuals and businesses using the blockchain. – Mitigation Complexity: Preventing and mitigating 51% Attacks can be technically complex and may require network upgrades and protocol changes.|
|Applications||A 51% Attack is not a legitimate or sanctioned application but rather a threat to blockchain networks. However, it is a concept that developers, miners, and stakeholders must be aware of to protect blockchain systems from potential attacks.|
|Use Cases||– Ethereum Classic (ETC): Ethereum Classic experienced a 51% Attack in 2020, highlighting the vulnerability of PoW-based blockchains. – Verge (XVG): Verge faced multiple 51% Attacks, leading to concerns about its security. – Bitcoin Gold (BTG): Bitcoin Gold suffered a 51% Attack that resulted in double-spending. – Feathercoin (FTC): Feathercoin experienced a 51% Attack that led to concerns about blockchain security. – Litecoin Cash (LCC): Litecoin Cash was subjected to a 51% Attack, raising questions about the security of PoW networks.|
Understanding a 51% attack
In controlling at least 51% of the blockchain network, miners can double-spend cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin. This is achieved by reversing transactions that have already taken place. Consider the example of the purchase of a new car for 10 Bitcoins. Once the car has been delivered to the buyer, logic dictates that Bitcoins are transferred to the seller. In a 51% Attack, however, the buyer (attacker) cancels the transaction before it is confirmed. This means they take ownership of the car in addition to the 10 Bitcoins used to fund its “purchase”.
The attack relies on a few conditions being met. Miners intent on attacking the network need enough computational power to solve equations more quickly than other miners. This gives them the ability to act as somewhat of an auditor, reversing transactions that need to be confirmed while also preventing new transactions from being confirmed.
Invariably, attackers use their power to solve equations in secret and not broadcast solutions to the rest of the network. This results in the formation of a separate and secret blockchain operating in parallel to the original, legitimate chain. Corrupt miners then spend their surreptitiously mined Bitcoin rewards on this legitimate version.
Preventing a 51% attack
Generally speaking, the likelihood of a 51% attack occurring is almost nil. Some have gone as far as suggesting that such an attack is purely theoretical. As a blockchain grows large enough, it becomes near impossible for a single entity to obtain enough computing power to overwhelm all other users. Such a move would also require an exorbitant amount of capital to fund energy and hardware costs.
Nevertheless, the mining pool GHash.IO reached a level of approximately 55% of Bitcoin’s hash rate over 24 hours in June 2014. While this was not a deliberate attempt to gain control of the network, it does illustrate that an attack is possible. This is particularly salient for networks with a smaller hash rate such as Ethereum Classic, which has suffered from numerous 51% attacks in recent years.
Preventing attacks on smaller networks means following the example of Bitcoin. The first and most obvious strategy involves the decentralization of mining power to ensure that no one has more than 50% control.
The second (and arguably longer-term) strategy involves making smaller networks more robust. In the case of Bitcoin, the network is so robust that attackers can make more money mining legitimately than they can by orchestrating a 51% Attack. This fact alone reduces the vulnerability of the network significantly.
- A 51% attack is an attack on the blockchain network by an entity or organization for financial gain.
- A 51% attack allows the attacker to double-spend cryptocurrency by reversing or preventing transactions from being confirmed.
- A 51% attack on the Bitcoin network is near impossible because of the integrity and size of the blockchain network. Such an attack would also require immense financial resources. However, smaller networks such as Ethereum Classic are more vulnerable.
Related Blockchain Business Frameworks
Main Free Guides: