NoEstimates is an approach to software project management that questions the traditional practice of providing detailed time-based estimates for every task, user story, or project phase. Instead of estimating in hours or days, NoEstimates advocates for a shift in focus towards delivering value and managing work based on priorities, capacity, and empirical data.
The NoEstimates movement suggests that estimates often consume valuable time, introduce unnecessary complexity, and may not significantly improve project outcomes. Proponents argue that by eliminating or reducing the reliance on detailed estimates, teams can be more flexible, adaptive, and focused on delivering valuable software.
The NoEstimates movement gained prominence in the software development community in the early 2010s. Its principles are influenced by Agile methodologies, Lean thinking, and the experiences of practitioners who found that excessive time spent on estimation did not always lead to better project outcomes.
Key Principles of NoEstimates
NoEstimates is guided by several key principles:
Focus on Value: Prioritize work based on its value to the customer or organization. Focus on delivering the most valuable features and functionality first.
Limited Upfront Estimation: Minimize or eliminate the time and effort spent on detailed upfront estimation. Instead, rely on empirical data and feedback to inform decisions.
Continuous Delivery: Embrace a mindset of continuous delivery, where small, frequent releases provide real-world feedback and guide future work.
Cycle Time: Measure and manage cycle time—the time it takes for work to move from initiation to completion—as a key performance indicator.
Capacity-Based Planning: Plan and manage work based on the team’s capacity rather than rigid time estimates. Adjust priorities as needed to stay within capacity constraints.
Methods and Practices in NoEstimates
NoEstimates embraces several methods and practices to guide software development:
1. Kanban
Kanban is a visual management method that focuses on optimizing the flow of work. Teams using Kanban boards visualize their work items and move them through various stages, from backlog to completion. Kanban relies on cycle time and work-in-progress (WIP) limits to manage and optimize the flow of work without the need for detailed time estimates.
2. Relative Sizing
Instead of providing absolute time estimates, teams may use relative sizing techniques, such as story points or t-shirt sizes (small, medium, large), to compare the size and complexity of user stories or tasks. These sizing methods help teams prioritize and plan work based on relative effort rather than precise time estimates.
3. Monte Carlo Simulations
Some NoEstimates proponents use Monte Carlo simulations to predict project timelines and outcomes based on historical data and probabilistic models. While this approach still relies on data, it doesn’t involve detailed upfront estimation.
4. Cumulative Flow Diagrams
Cumulative Flow Diagrams (CFDs) are used to visualize the flow of work items over time. CFDs can help teams identify bottlenecks, measure cycle time, and make data-driven decisions without relying on traditional time-based estimates.
Real-World Examples of NoEstimates
Let’s explore a few real-world examples to illustrate how NoEstimates principles are applied in different contexts:
1. Agile Software Development
Agile development teams often embrace NoEstimates principles by focusing on delivering a Minimum Viable Product (MVP) or Minimum Marketable Feature (MMF) without detailed upfront estimation. They prioritize user stories based on value, adjust scope as needed, and use cycle time metrics to guide future iterations.
2. Continuous Deployment
Companies practicing continuous deployment aim to release small changes frequently without upfront estimation. They rely on automated testing, monitoring, and real-time feedback to assess the impact of changes and make data-driven decisions about future work.
3. Lean Startup Methodology
Startups following the Lean Startup methodology emphasize building a Minimal Viable Product (MVP) quickly to gather real-world feedback. Instead of detailed estimation, they focus on fast iterations and learning from customer interactions and data.
4. Kanban in Operations
In IT operations and support teams, Kanban boards are used to manage and prioritize incoming requests and incidents. Teams focus on resolving issues based on priority and capacity rather than estimating the time each task will take.
Benefits and Challenges of NoEstimates
Benefits of NoEstimates
Focus on Value: NoEstimates keeps the focus on delivering value to customers and stakeholders, as teams prioritize work based on value rather than estimation.
Reduced Overhead: Eliminating or reducing detailed estimation efforts saves time and resources that can be better spent on actual development and delivery.
Flexibility: NoEstimates allows teams to adapt to changing priorities and requirements without the constraint of fixed time estimates.
Empirical Data: Teams rely on real-world data and feedback to make decisions, leading to more informed and data-driven choices.
Challenges of NoEstimates
Uncertainty: NoEstimates can be challenging in environments where stakeholders demand fixed timeframes or where uncertainty in project outcomes is unacceptable.
Expectation Management: Managing expectations, especially with stakeholders accustomed to traditional project management, can be challenging when using NoEstimates.
Data Availability: NoEstimates relies on historical data and feedback, which may not be readily available for new or unique projects.
Change Resistance: Teams and organizations may resist transitioning from traditional estimation practices to NoEstimates due to familiarity and comfort with existing processes.
Conclusion
NoEstimates challenges the traditional approach to software project estimation and offers an alternative path to delivering value and managing work. By prioritizing value, minimizing upfront estimation, and relying on empirical data and feedback, teams and organizations can become more adaptive, efficient, and customer-focused.
While NoEstimates may not be suitable for every project or organization, it has proven to be a valuable approach in contexts where flexibility, rapid delivery, and a focus on value are paramount. Embracing NoEstimates requires a shift in mindset and a willingness to explore new ways of managing software development projects. As the software industry continues to evolve, NoEstimates stands as an innovative approach to project management that challenges the status quo and encourages a more value-driven and adaptable approach to software development.
Key Highlights:
Definition and Purpose: NoEstimates is an approach to software project management that challenges the traditional practice of providing detailed time-based estimates for every task, user story, or project phase. Instead, it focuses on delivering value and managing work based on priorities, capacity, and empirical data.
Origins: The NoEstimates movement gained prominence in the early 2010s within the software development community. It draws inspiration from Agile methodologies, Lean thinking, and practitioners’ experiences showing that excessive time spent on estimation may not always improve project outcomes.
Key Principles: NoEstimates principles include focusing on value, minimizing upfront estimation efforts, embracing continuous delivery, measuring cycle time, and planning based on team capacity rather than rigid time estimates.
Methods and Practices: NoEstimates employs methods such as Kanban, relative sizing, Monte Carlo simulations, and Cumulative Flow Diagrams to guide software development without relying on detailed time estimates.
Real-World Examples: Examples of NoEstimates application include Agile software development, continuous deployment practices, Lean startup methodology, and the use of Kanban boards in IT operations.
Benefits: NoEstimates promotes a focus on value delivery, reduces overhead associated with detailed estimation, offers flexibility to adapt to changing priorities, and relies on empirical data for decision-making.
Challenges: Challenges of NoEstimates include uncertainty in environments where fixed timeframes are expected, managing stakeholder expectations, availability of historical data, and resistance to change from traditional estimation practices.
Conclusion: NoEstimates challenges traditional estimation practices in software project management and offers an alternative approach focused on value delivery, adaptability, and empirical data-driven decision-making. While not suitable for every project, NoEstimates has proven valuable in contexts where flexibility and rapid delivery are priorities. Embracing NoEstimates requires a shift in mindset and a willingness to explore new ways of managing software development projects.
AIOps is the application of artificial intelligence to IT operations. It has become particularly useful for modern IT management in hybridized, distributed, and dynamic environments. AIOps has become a key operational component of modern digital-based organizations, built around software and algorithms.
Agile started as a lightweight development method compared to heavyweight software development, which is the core paradigm of the previous decades of software development. By 2001 the Manifesto for Agile Software Development was born as a set of principles that defined the new paradigm for software development as a continuous iteration. This would also influence the way of doing business.
Agile Program Management is a means of managing, planning, and coordinating interrelated work in such a way that value delivery is emphasized for all key stakeholders. Agile Program Management (AgilePgM) is a disciplined yet flexible agile approach to managing transformational change within an organization.
Agile project management (APM) is a strategy that breaks large projects into smaller, more manageable tasks. In the APM methodology, each project is completed in small sections – often referred to as iterations. Each iteration is completed according to its project life cycle, beginning with the initial design and progressing to testing and then quality assurance.
Agile Modeling (AM) is a methodology for modeling and documenting software-based systems. Agile Modeling is critical to the rapid and continuous delivery of software. It is a collection of values, principles, and practices that guide effective, lightweight software modeling.
Agile Business Analysis (AgileBA) is certification in the form of guidance and training for business analysts seeking to work in agile environments. To support this shift, AgileBA also helps the business analyst relate Agile projects to a wider organizational mission or strategy. To ensure that analysts have the necessary skills and expertise, AgileBA certification was developed.
Agile leadership is the embodiment of agile manifesto principles by a manager or management team. Agile leadership impacts two important levels of a business. The structural level defines the roles, responsibilities, and key performance indicators. The behavioral level describes the actions leaders exhibit to others based on agile principles.
The andon system alerts managerial, maintenance, or other staff of a production process problem. The alert itself can be activated manually with a button or pull cord, but it can also be activated automatically by production equipment. Most Andon boards utilize three colored lights similar to a traffic signal: green (no errors), yellow or amber (problem identified, or quality check needed), and red (production stopped due to unidentified issue).
Bimodal Portfolio Management (BimodalPfM) helps an organization manage both agile and traditional portfolios concurrently. Bimodal Portfolio Management – sometimes referred to as bimodal development – was coined by research and advisory company Gartner. The firm argued that many agile organizations still needed to run some aspects of their operations using traditional delivery models.
Business innovation is about creating new opportunities for an organization to reinvent its core offerings, revenue streams, and enhance the value proposition for existing or new customers, thus renewing its whole business model. Business innovation springs by understanding the structure of the market, thus adapting or anticipating those changes.
Business modelinnovation is about increasing the success of an organization with existing products and technologies by crafting a compelling value proposition able to propel a new business model to scale up customers and create a lasting competitive advantage. And it all starts by mastering the key customers.
A consumer brand company like Procter & Gamble (P&G) defines “Constructive Disruption” as: a willingness to change, adapt, and create new trends and technologies that will shape our industry for the future. According to P&G, it moves around four pillars: lean innovation, brand building, supply chain, and digitalization & data analytics.
That is a process that requires a continuous feedback loop to develop a valuable product and build a viable business model. Continuous innovation is a mindset where products and services are designed and delivered to tune them around the customers’ problem and not the technical solution of its founders.
A design sprint is a proven five-day process where critical business questions are answered through speedy design and prototyping, focusing on the end-user. A design sprint starts with a weekly challenge that should finish with a prototype, test at the end, and therefore a lesson learned to be iterated.
Tim Brown, Executive Chair of IDEO, defined design thinking as “a human-centered approach to innovation that draws from the designer’s toolkit to integrate the needs of people, the possibilities of technology, and the requirements for business success.” Therefore, desirability, feasibility, and viability are balanced to solve critical problems.
DevOps refers to a series of practices performed to perform automated software development processes. It is a conjugation of the term “development” and “operations” to emphasize how functions integrate across IT teams. DevOps strategies promote seamless building, testing, and deployment of products. It aims to bridge a gap between development and operations teams to streamline the development altogether.
Product discovery is a critical part of agile methodologies, as its aim is to ensure that products customers love are built. Product discovery involves learning through a raft of methods, including design thinking, lean start-up, and A/B testing to name a few. Dual Track Agile is an agile methodology containing two separate tracks: the “discovery” track and the “delivery” track.
eXtreme Programming was developed in the late 1990s by Ken Beck, Ron Jeffries, and Ward Cunningham. During this time, the trio was working on the Chrysler Comprehensive Compensation System (C3) to help manage the company payroll system. eXtreme Programming (XP) is a software development methodology. It is designed to improve software quality and the ability of software to adapt to changing customer needs.
Feature-Driven Development is a pragmatic software process that is client and architecture-centric. Feature-Driven Development (FDD) is an agile software development model that organizes workflow according to which features need to be developed next.
A Gemba Walk is a fundamental component of lean management. It describes the personal observation of work to learn more about it. Gemba is a Japanese word that loosely translates as “the real place”, or in business, “the place where value is created”. The Gemba Walk as a concept was created by Taiichi Ohno, the father of the Toyota Production System of lean manufacturing. Ohno wanted to encourage management executives to leave their offices and see where the real work happened. This, he hoped, would build relationships between employees with vastly different skillsets and build trust.
GIST Planning is a relatively easy and lightweight agile approach to product planning that favors autonomous working. GIST Planning is a lean and agile methodology that was created by former Google product manager Itamar Gilad. GIST Planning seeks to address this situation by creating lightweight plans that are responsive and adaptable to change. GIST Planning also improves team velocity, autonomy, and alignment by reducing the pervasive influence of management. It consists of four blocks: goals, ideas, step-projects, and tasks.
The ICE Scoring Model is an agile methodology that prioritizes features using data according to three components: impact, confidence, and ease of implementation. The ICE Scoring Model was initially created by author and growth expert Sean Ellis to help companies expand. Today, the model is broadly used to prioritize projects, features, initiatives, and rollouts. It is ideally suited for early-stage product development where there is a continuous flow of ideas and momentum must be maintained.
An innovation funnel is a tool or process ensuring only the best ideas are executed. In a metaphorical sense, the funnel screens innovative ideas for viability so that only the best products, processes, or business models are launched to the market. An innovation funnel provides a framework for the screening and testing of innovative ideas for viability.
According to how well defined is the problem and how well defined the domain, we have four main types of innovations: basic research (problem and domain or not well defined); breakthrough innovation (domain is not well defined, the problem is well defined); sustaining innovation (both problem and domain are well defined); and disruptive innovation (domain is well defined, the problem is not well defined).
The innovation loop is a methodology/framework derived from the Bell Labs, which produced innovation at scale throughout the 20th century. They learned how to leverage a hybrid innovation management model based on science, invention, engineering, and manufacturing at scale. By leveraging individual genius, creativity, and small/large groups.
The Agile methodology has been primarily thought of for software development (and other business disciplines have also adopted it). Lean thinking is a process improvement technique where teams prioritize the value streams to improve it continuously. Both methodologies look at the customer as the key driver to improvement and waste reduction. Both methodologies look at improvement as something continuous.
A startup company is a high-tech business that tries to build a scalable business model in tech-driven industries. A startup company usually follows a lean methodology, where continuous innovation, driven by built-in viral loops is the rule. Thus, driving growth and building network effects as a consequence of this strategy.
As pointed out by Eric Ries, a minimum viable product is that version of a new product which allows a team to collect the maximum amount of validated learning about customers with the least effort through a cycle of build, measure, learn; that is the foundation of the lean startup methodology.
Kanban is a lean manufacturing framework first developed by Toyota in the late 1940s. The Kanban framework is a means of visualizing work as it moves through identifying potential bottlenecks. It does that through a process called just-in-time (JIT) manufacturing to optimize engineering processes, speed up manufacturing products, and improve the go-to-market strategy.
Jidoka was first used in 1896 by Sakichi Toyoda, who invented a textile loom that would stop automatically when it encountered a defective thread. Jidoka is a Japanese term used in lean manufacturing. The term describes a scenario where machines cease operating without human intervention when a problem or defect is discovered.
The PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) cycle was first proposed by American physicist and engineer Walter A. Shewhart in the 1920s. The PDCA cycle is a continuous process and product improvement method and an essential component of the lean manufacturing philosophy.
RAD was first introduced by author and consultant James Martin in 1991. Martin recognized and then took advantage of the endless malleability of software in designing development models. Rapid Application Development (RAD) is a methodology focusing on delivering rapidly through continuous feedback and frequent iterations.
Retrospective analyses are held after a project to determine what worked well and what did not. They are also conducted at the end of an iteration in Agile project management. Agile practitioners call these meetings retrospectives or retros. They are an effective way to check the pulse of a project team, reflect on the work performed to date, and reach a consensus on how to tackle the next sprint cycle. These are the five stages of a retrospective analysis for effective Agile project management: set the stage, gather the data, generate insights, decide on the next steps, and close the retrospective.
Scaled Agile Lean Development (ScALeD) helps businesses discover a balanced approach to agile transition and scaling questions. The ScALed approach helps businesses successfully respond to change. Inspired by a combination of lean and agile values, ScALed is practitioner-based and can be completed through various agile frameworks and practices.
The SMED (single minute exchange of die) method is a lean production framework to reduce waste and increase production efficiency. The SMED method is a framework for reducing the time associated with completing an equipment changeover.
The Spotify Model is an autonomous approach to scaling agile, focusing on culture communication, accountability, and quality. The Spotify model was first recognized in 2012 after Henrik Kniberg, and Anders Ivarsson released a white paper detailing how streaming company Spotify approached agility. Therefore, the Spotify model represents an evolution of agile.
As the name suggests, TDD is a test-driven technique for delivering high-quality software rapidly and sustainably. It is an iterative approach based on the idea that a failing test should be written before any code for a feature or function is written. Test-Driven Development (TDD) is an approach to software development that relies on very short development cycles.
Timeboxing is a simple yet powerful time-management technique for improving productivity. Timeboxing describes the process of proactively scheduling a block of time to spend on a task in the future. It was first described by author James Martin in a book about agile software development.
Scrum is a methodology co-created by Ken Schwaber and Jeff Sutherland for effective team collaboration on complex products. Scrum was primarily thought for software development projects to deliver new software capability every 2-4 weeks. It is a sub-group of agile also used in project management to improve startups’ productivity.
Scrumban is a project management framework that is a hybrid of two popular agile methodologies: Scrum and Kanban. Scrumban is a popular approach to helping businesses focus on the right strategic tasks while simultaneously strengthening their processes.
Scrum anti-patterns describe any attractive, easy-to-implement solution that ultimately makes a problem worse. Therefore, these are the practice not to follow to prevent issues from emerging. Some classic examples of scrum anti-patterns comprise absent product owners, pre-assigned tickets (making individuals work in isolation), and discounting retrospectives (where review meetings are not useful to really make improvements).
Scrum at Scale (Scrum@Scale) is a framework that Scrum teams use to address complex problems and deliver high-value products. Scrum at Scale was created through a joint venture between the Scrum Alliance and Scrum Inc. The joint venture was overseen by Jeff Sutherland, a co-creator of Scrum and one of the principal authors of the Agile Manifesto.
Six Sigma is a data-driven approach and methodology for eliminating errors or defects in a product, service, or process. Six Sigma was developed by Motorola as a management approach based on quality fundamentals in the early 1980s. A decade later, it was popularized by General Electric who estimated that the methodology saved them $12 billion in the first five years of operation.
Stretch objectives describe any task an agile team plans to complete without expressly committing to do so. Teams incorporate stretch objectives during a Sprint or Program Increment (PI) as part of Scaled Agile. They are used when the agile team is unsure of its capacity to attain an objective. Therefore, stretch objectives are instead outcomes that, while extremely desirable, are not the difference between the success or failure of each sprint.
The Toyota Production System (TPS) is an early form of lean manufacturing created by auto-manufacturer Toyota. Created by the Toyota Motor Corporation in the 1940s and 50s, the Toyota Production System seeks to manufacture vehicles ordered by customers most quickly and efficiently possible.
The Total Quality Management (TQM) framework is a technique based on the premise that employees continuously work on their ability to provide value to customers. Importantly, the word “total” means that all employees are involved in the process – regardless of whether they work in development, production, or fulfillment.
The waterfall model was first described by Herbert D. Benington in 1956 during a presentation about the software used in radar imaging during the Cold War. Since there were no knowledge-based, creative software development strategies at the time, the waterfall method became standard practice. The waterfall model is a linear and sequential project management framework.
Gennaro is the creator of FourWeekMBA, which reached about four million business people, comprising C-level executives, investors, analysts, product managers, and aspiring digital entrepreneurs in 2022 alone | He is also Director of Sales for a high-tech scaleup in the AI Industry | In 2012, Gennaro earned an International MBA with emphasis on Corporate Finance and Business Strategy.
