Both are management tools whose aim is to help companies deal with change. Lewin’s change management model helps businesses manage the uncertainty and resistance associated with change. Kotter’s 8-step change model helps business managers deal with organizational change. Kotter created the 8-step model to drive organizational transformation.
Aspect
Lewin Change Model
Kotter 8-Step Change Model
Change Model Origin
– Lewin Change Model was developed by psychologist Kurt Lewin in the 1940s. It is one of the earliest models for understanding and managing organizational change.
– Kotter 8-Step Change Model was created by Harvard Business School professor John P. Kotter in his book “Leading Change” in 1996. It addresses the challenges of modern organizational change.
Foundation
– Lewin’s model is based on the idea that change involves three key stages: unfreezing, changing, and refreezing. It emphasizes the need to create a state of readiness for change before implementing it.
– Kotter’s model is based on eight interconnected steps that guide organizations through change, emphasizing the importance of leadership and a sense of urgency.
Number of Steps
– The Lewin model involves three main steps: unfreezing the current state, making the desired change, and refreezing the new state to make it the new norm.
– Kotter’s model consists of eight distinct steps designed to be followed sequentially, providing a structured approach to change management.
Change Process
– Lewin’s approach starts with unfreezing, which involves creating awareness and motivation for change by identifying current behaviors and their consequences. The change step introduces new practices and behaviors. Refreezing stabilizes the change and reinforces it as the new norm.
– Kotter’s process begins with creating a sense of urgency to establish the need for change. It proceeds through a series of steps, including forming a powerful coalition, creating a vision, communicating it, empowering others to act on it, and anchoring the change in the organization’s culture.
Leadership Role
– Lewin’s model highlights the importance of leadership in guiding the change process, but it doesn’t provide a detailed leadership structure.
– Kotter’s model emphasizes the critical role of strong, visible leadership throughout the change effort. It suggests creating a guiding coalition and identifies the leader as a key change agent.
Flexibility and Adaptability
– Lewin’s approach offers a simple, adaptable framework for change. It can be applied to various situations and is not limited to specific industries or types of organizations.
– Kotter’s model is more prescriptive and structured, which can be both an advantage and a limitation. It may require customization to suit different contexts and industries.
Emphasis on Culture
– Lewin’s model acknowledges the role of culture in change but does not explicitly address cultural transformation.
– Kotter’s model recognizes the importance of changing organizational culture and includes it as a crucial step (Step 6: Generate Short-Term Wins).
Communication Strategy
– Lewin’s model suggests that communication is vital for creating awareness and motivation during the unfreezing stage. It doesn’t provide a detailed communication plan.
– Kotter’s model dedicates steps to creating a vision and communicating it effectively (Step 3: Create a Vision and Strategy, Step 4: Communicate the Vision). It emphasizes continuous and clear communication throughout the change process.
Resistance Management
– Lewin’s approach acknowledges resistance to change as a natural reaction during the unfreezing stage. However, it doesn’t offer specific strategies for managing resistance.
– Kotter’s model addresses resistance explicitly (Step 5: Enable Action), recommending the removal of obstacles, empowering employees, and encouraging non-traditional thinking.
Measurement of Success
– Lewin’s model doesn’t specify detailed metrics for measuring success, but it implies that success involves achieving the desired new state and stabilizing it.
– Kotter’s model emphasizes the importance of short-term wins (Step 6: Generate Short-Term Wins) and continuous evaluation of progress (Step 7: Sustain Acceleration) to measure success.
Applicability
– Lewin’s model is applicable to various types of organizational change but is particularly suited to incremental changes where the organization’s existing culture and structure largely remain intact.
– Kotter’s model is designed for more complex and transformational changes, particularly those requiring a shift in organizational culture and values. It is adaptable but may be most effective in larger organizations.
Legacy and Influence
– Lewin’s Change Model is a foundational concept in change management and has influenced subsequent models and theories. It remains relevant today.
– Kotter’s 8-Step Change Model has had a significant impact on change management practices in modern organizations and is widely taught and applied.
Lewin’s change management model helps businesses manage the uncertainty and resistance associated with change. Kurt Lewin, one of the first academics to focus his research on group dynamics, developed a three-stage model. He proposed that the behavior of individuals happened as a function of group behavior.
Harvard Business School professor Dr. John Kotter has been a thought leader on organizational change, and he developed Kotter’s 8-step change model, which helps business managers deal with organizational change. Kotter created the 8-step model to drive organizational transformation.
Similarities:
Change Management Models: Both Lewin’s Change Management Model and Kotter’s 8-Step Change Model are frameworks used for managing and facilitating change within organizations. They provide structured approaches to navigate the complexities of change.
Addressing Resistance: Both models acknowledge the presence of resistance and uncertainty when organizations undergo change. They recognize that individuals and groups may resist change and offer strategies to address and mitigate this resistance.
Differences:
Number of Stages/Steps:
Lewin’s Model: Lewin’s model consists of three primary stages—Unfreeze, Change, and Refreeze. These stages represent distinct phases in the change process.
Kotter’s Model: Kotter’s model comprises eight sequential steps that guide the change process. It offers a more granular and detailed approach to change management.
Leadership and Communication:
Lewin’s Model: While Lewin’s model recognizes the importance of leadership, it doesn’t provide a specific step or emphasis on building a guiding coalition or communicating a vision as prominently as Kotter’s model.
Kotter’s Model: Kotter’s model places a strong emphasis on leadership, particularly in steps like “Create a Sense of Urgency,” “Build a Guiding Coalition,” and “Enable Action by Removing Barriers.” Communication and engagement are central themes throughout Kotter’s model.
Focus on Urgency and Momentum:
Lewin’s Model: Lewin’s model does not explicitly emphasize creating a sense of urgency or sustaining momentum as distinct steps.
Kotter’s Model: Kotter’s model starts with the step “Create a Sense of Urgency,” highlighting the importance of urgency in initiating change. It also includes steps like “Generate Short-Term Wins” and “Sustain Acceleration” to maintain momentum throughout the change process.
Group Dynamics vs. Leadership:
Lewin’s Model: Lewin’s model is rooted in group dynamics and emphasizes that individual behavior is influenced by the dynamics of the group. It focuses on the stages of change and how group behavior impacts individual change.
Kotter’s Model: Kotter’s model places a stronger emphasis on the role of leadership in driving change. It emphasizes the need for a guiding coalition, strategic vision, and strong leadership throughout the change journey.
Scenarios Suitable for Lewin’s Change Management Model:
Implementing New Technology: When an organization decides to adopt a new software system, employees may initially resist the change due to uncertainty and fear of the unknown. Lewin’s model can help in the “Unfreeze” stage by creating awareness and addressing concerns, followed by implementing the change and stabilizing it (Refreeze).
Restructuring Teams: If a company restructures its teams or departments, it can create uncertainty among employees about their roles and relationships. Lewin’s model can be applied to unfreeze the existing team structures, implement the changes, and then refreeze the new team dynamics.
Change in Organizational Culture: Shifting from a traditional hierarchical culture to a more collaborative and innovative one can face resistance. Lewin’s model can guide the process by first unfreezing the current culture, introducing the cultural change, and then stabilizing the desired culture.
Scenarios Suitable for Kotter’s 8-Step Change Model:
Merger or Acquisition: When two companies merge, there’s a need to align cultures, processes, and teams. Kotter’s model can help create a sense of urgency, build a guiding coalition, and define a clear vision for the merger, ensuring successful integration.
Leadership Transition: When a new CEO or top leadership team takes charge, Kotter’s model can be used to communicate the change, enlist a volunteer army of supporters, and sustain the momentum for the new leadership’s vision.
Strategic Business Transformation: A company deciding to shift its core business strategy or enter new markets requires a structured approach. Kotter’s model can be used to establish urgency around the strategic shift, create a guiding coalition of leaders, and execute the transformation steps systematically.
Crisis Management: When an organization faces a crisis, such as a financial setback or a public relations issue, Kotter’s model can help mobilize stakeholders, address the crisis with a clear plan, and ensure that changes are sustained to prevent future crises.
Product Innovation: Launching a new product or service can involve complex changes. Kotter’s model can guide the process by creating urgency around innovation, building a coalition of innovators, and sustaining the innovation culture.
Change is an important and necessary fact of life for all organizations. But change is often unsuccessful because the people within organizations are resistant to change. Change management is a systematic approach to managing the transformation of organizational goals, values, technologies, or processes.
Harvard Business School professor Dr. John Kotter has been a thought-leader on organizational change, and he developed Kotter’s 8-step change model, which helps business managers deal with organizational change. Kotter created the 8-step model to drive organizational transformation.
McKinsey’s Seven Degrees of Freedom for Growth is a strategy tool. Developed by partners at McKinsey and Company, the tool helps businesses understand which opportunities will contribute to expansion, and therefore it helps to prioritize those initiatives.
The McKinsey 7-S Model was developed in the late 1970s by Robert Waterman and Thomas Peters, who were consultants at McKinsey & Company. Waterman and Peters created seven key internal elements that inform a business of how well positioned it is to achieve its goals, based on three hard elements and four soft elements.
Lewin’s change management model helps businesses manage the uncertainty and resistance associated with change. Kurt Lewin, one of the first academics to focus his research on group dynamics, developed a three-stage model. He proposed that the behavior of individuals happened as a function of group behavior.
The ADKAR model is a management tool designed to assist employees and businesses in transitioning through organizational change. To maximize the chances of employees embracing change, the ADKAR model was developed by author and engineer Jeff Hiatt in 2003. The model seeks to guide people through the change process and importantly, ensure that people do not revert to habitual ways of operating after some time has passed.
Social psychologist Kurt Lewin developed the force-field analysis in the 1940s. The force-field analysis is a decision-making tool used to quantify factors that support or oppose a change initiative. Lewin argued that businesses contain dynamic and interactive forces that work together in opposite directions. To institute successful change, the forces driving the change must be stronger than the forces hindering the change.
Business innovation is about creating new opportunities for an organization to reinvent its core offerings, revenue streams, and enhance the value proposition for existing or new customers, thus renewing its whole business model. Business innovation springs by understanding the structure of the market, thus adapting or anticipating those changes.
According to Prosci founder Jeff Hiatt, the secret to successful change “lies beyond the visible and busy activities that surround change. Successful change, at its core, is rooted in something much simpler: how to facilitate change with one person.”
Leadership styles encompass the behavioral qualities of a leader. These qualities are commonly used to direct, motivate, or manage groups of people. Some of the most recognized leadership styles include Autocratic, Democratic, or Laissez-Faire leadership styles.
Agile leadership is the embodiment of agile manifesto principles by a manager or management team. Agile leadership impacts two important levels of a business. The structural level defines the roles, responsibilities, and key performance indicators. The behavioral level describes the actions leaders exhibit to others based on agile principles.
Adaptive leadership is a model used by leaders to help individuals adapt to complex or rapidly changing environments. Adaptive leadership is defined by three core components (precious or expendable, experimentation and smart risks, disciplined assessment). Growth occurs when an organization discards ineffective ways of operating. Then, active leaders implement new initiatives and monitor their impact.
Authors and strategy experts Chan Kim and Renée Mauborgne developed the idea of blue ocean leadership. In the same way that Kim and Mauborgne’s blue ocean strategy enables companies to create uncontested market space, blue ocean leadership allows companies to benefit from unrealized employee talent and potential.
Developed by business consultants Kenneth Blanchard and Paul Hersey in the 1960s, delegative leadership is a leadership style where authority figures empower subordinates to exercise autonomy. For this reason, it is also called laissez-faire leadership. In some cases, this type of leadership can lead to increases in work quality and decision-making. In a few other cases, this type of leadership needs to be balanced out to prevent a lack of direction and cohesiveness of the team.
Distributed leadership is based on the premise that leadership responsibilities and accountability are shared by those with the relevant skills or expertise so that the shared responsibility and accountability of multiple individuals within a workplace, bulds up as a fluid and emergent property (not controlled or held by one individual). Distributed leadership is based on eight hallmarks, or principles: shared responsibility, shared power, synergy, leadership capacity, organizational learning, equitable and ethical climate, democratic and investigative culture, and macro-community engagement.
Ethical leaders adhere to certain values and beliefs irrespective of whether they are in the home or office. In essence, ethical leaders are motivated and guided by the inherent dignity and rights of other people.
Transformational leadership is a style of leadership that motivates, encourages, and inspires employees to contribute to company growth. Leadership expert James McGregor Burns first described the concept of transformational leadership in a 1978 book entitled Leadership. Although Burns’ research was focused on political leaders, the term is also applicable for businesses and organizational psychology.
Those who lead by example let their actions (and not their words) exemplify acceptable forms of behavior or conduct. In a manager-subordinate context, the intention of leading by example is for employees to emulate this behavior or conduct themselves.
A leader is someone within an organization who possesses the ability to influence and lead others by example. Leaders inspire, support, and encourage those beneath them and work continuously to achieve objectives. A boss is someone within an organization who gives direct orders to subordinates, tends to be autocratic, and prefers to be in control at all times.
Situational leadership is based on situational leadership theory. Developed by authors Paul Hersey and Kenneth Blanchard in the late 1960s, the theory’s fundamental belief is that there is no single leadership style that is best for every situation. Situational leadership is based on the belief that no single leadership style is best. In other words, the best style depends on the situation at hand.
Succession planning is a process that involves the identification and development of future leaders across all levels within a company. In essence, succession planning is a way for businesses to prepare for the future. The process ensures that when a key employee decides to leave, the company has someone else in the pipeline to fill their position.
Fielder’s contingency model argues no style of leadership is superior to the rest evaluated against three measures of situational control, including leader-member relations, task structure, and leader power level. In Fiedler’s contingency model, task-oriented leaders perform best in highly favorable and unfavorable circumstances. Relationship-oriented leaders perform best in situations that are moderately favorable but can improve their position by using superior interpersonal skills.
In the context of an organization, cultural models are frameworks that define, shape, and influence corporate culture. Cultural models also provide some structure to a corporate culture that tends to be fluid and vulnerable to change. Once upon a time, most businesses utilized a hierarchical culture where various levels of management oversaw subordinates below them. Today, however, there exists a greater diversity in models as leaders realize the top-down approach is outdated in many industries and that success can be found elsewhere.
Action-centered leadership defines leadership in the context of three interlocking areas of responsibility and concern. This framework is used by leaders in the management of teams, groups, and organizations.
Developed in the 1960s and first published in 1973, action-centered leadership was revolutionary for its time because it believed leaders could learn the skills they needed to manage others effectively.
Adair believed that effective leadership was exemplified by three overlapping circles (responsibilities): achieve the task, build and maintain the team, and develop the individual.
High-performance coaches work with individuals in personal and professional contexts to enable them to reach their full potential. While these sorts of coaches are commonly associated with sports, it should be noted that the act of coaching is a specific type of behavior that is also useful in business and leadership.
When most people are asked to define power, they think about the power a leader possesses as a function of their responsibility for subordinates. Others may think that power comes from the title or position this individual holds.
Tipping Point Leadership is a low-cost means of achieving a strategic shift in an organization by focusing on extremes. Here, the extremes may refer to small groups of people, acts, and activities that exert a disproportionate influence over business performance.
The Vroom-Yetton decision model is a decision-making process based on situational leadership. According to this model, there are five decision-making styles guides group-based decision-making according to the situation at hand and the level of involvement of subordinates: Autocratic Type 1 (AI), Autocratic Type 2 (AII), Consultative Type 1 (CI), Consultative Type 2 (CII), Group-based Type 2 (GII).
Likert’s management systems were developed by American social psychologist Rensis Likert. Likert’s management systems are a series of leadership theories based on the study of various organizational dynamics and characteristics. Likert proposed four systems of management, which can also be thought of as leadership styles: Exploitative authoritative, Benevolent authoritative, Consultative, Participative.
Gennaro is the creator of FourWeekMBA, which reached about four million business people, comprising C-level executives, investors, analysts, product managers, and aspiring digital entrepreneurs in 2022 alone | He is also Director of Sales for a high-tech scaleup in the AI Industry | In 2012, Gennaro earned an International MBA with emphasis on Corporate Finance and Business Strategy.
