predatory-pricing

What Is Predatory Pricing? Predatory Pricing In A Nutshell

Predatory pricing is the act of setting prices low to eliminate competition. Industry dominant firms use predatory pricing to undercut the prices of their competitors to the point where they are making a loss in the short term. Predatory prices help incumbents keep a monopolistic position, by forcing new entrants out of the market.

Understanding predatory pricing

The ultimate goal of predatory pricing is to force competitors out of the market since they will not be able to compete with the dominant firm without themselves making a loss. Once the competition has been eliminated, the dominant firm raises its prices to recoup its losses. 

The practice of predatory pricing often results in the formation of monopolies since the already dominant firm increases its market share further once competitors have been forced out. This also creates barriers to entry for new businesses.

Short and long-term effects of predatory pricing

What are the short and long-term effects of predatory pricing?

Short-term effects

In the short term, consumers may benefit from low prices as the dominant firm undercuts its competitors. 

For companies, however, profitability declines as competitors undercut each other to attract new business. In this so-called “race to the bottom”, only one or two companies will survive and reap the rewards of increased market share. 

Long-term effects

Once competitors have been forced out of the market, the dominant firm can raise prices and recover lost profits. 

Since the consumer is more averse to purchasing as prices rise, the dominant firm will find that price appreciation is most effective on inelastic goods such as gasoline, water, consumer electronics, rail tickets, and cigarettes. 

Is predatory pricing legal?

Predatory pricing is illegal in many countries because it contravenes competition laws and causes consumer harm. 

A pricing strategy is considered predatory if it is implemented to price competitors out of the market. This intent may be difficult to prove because a company could claim to be lowering its prices for some other reason. Exacerbating this difficulty is the fact that, at least initially, predatory pricing appears similar to healthy market competition.

Nevertheless, it is important to understand that the act of undercutting a competitor in isolation is not indicative of predatory pricing – regardless of the size or market dominance of the company in question. For pricing to be predatory, there must be sustained very low pricing, an anti-competitive purpose, and substantial market power.

Predatory pricing examples

Let’s now take a look at some predatory pricing examples:

Walmart and Target

In the U.S. state of Minnesota, Walmart and Target engaged in a prescription drug price war. To undercut the competition, Walmart started selling prescription drugs well below the price floor, which is the lowest price a good can be sold for to make a profit. Target then matched Walmart’s prices before the Minnesota state authorities stepped in and forbade the companies from selling prescription drugs below the floor price.

The Darlington Bus War

When the bus system was deregulated in the United Kingdom in 1986, several private companies began competing with established public transport operators. One such company, Busways, offered free rides to consumers to put rival DTC out of business. A commission formed to investigate the matter said the company’s actions were “predatory, deplorable and against the public interest.

Air Canada

In 2001, the Canadian airline company was alleged to have engaged in predatory pricing to force two smaller operators out of the market. Representatives from WestJet and CanJet claimed Air Canada was offering $99 fares on multiple routes where the normal fare was $600. Despite receiving cease-and-desist orders from the Competition Bureau in the past, Air Canada explained it was simply matching prices in this case and not undertaking predatory pricing.

Key takeaways:

  • Predatory pricing is the act of setting prices low to eliminate the competition.
  • In the short-term, predatory pricing creates a buyer’s market where consumers have access to low prices. In the long-term, monopolistic companies recoup their initial losses by forcing consumers to pay higher prices for inelastic goods.
  • For pricing to be predatory, there must be sustained very low pricing, an anti-competitive purpose, and substantial market power. Nevertheless, it can be difficult to prove since the act of undercutting prices is not indicative of predatory pricing and may instead be an aspect of healthy market competition.

Main Free Guides:

Connected Business Concepts

Economies of Scale

economies-of-scale
In Economics, Economies of Scale is a theory for which, as companies grow, they gain cost advantages. More precisely, companies manage to benefit from these cost advantages as they grow, due to increased efficiency in production. Thus, as companies scale and increase production, a subsequent decrease in the costs associated with it will help the organization scale further.

Diseconomies of Scale

diseconomies-of-scale
In Economics, a Diseconomy of Scale happens when a company has grown so large that its costs per unit will start to increase. Thus, losing the benefits of scale. That can happen due to several factors arising as a company scales. From coordination issues to management inefficiencies and lack of proper communication flows.

Network Effects

network-effects
A network effect is a phenomenon in which as more people or users join a platform, the more the value of the service offered by the platform improves for those joining afterward.

Negative Network Effects

negative-network-effects
In a negative network effect as the network grows in usage or scale, the value of the platform might shrink. In platform business models network effects help the platform become more valuable for the next user joining. In negative network effects (congestion or pollution) reduce the value of the platform for the next user joining. 

Creative Destruction

creative-destruction
Creative destruction was first described by Austrian economist Joseph Schumpeter in 1942, who suggested that capital was never stationary and constantly evolving. To describe this process, Schumpeter defined creative destruction as the “process of industrial mutation that incessantly revolutionizes the economic structure from within, incessantly destroying the old one, incessantly creating a new one.” Therefore, creative destruction is the replacing of long-standing practices or procedures with more innovative, disruptive practices in capitalist markets.

Happiness Economics

happiness-economics
Happiness economics seeks to relate economic decisions to wider measures of individual welfare than traditional measures which focus on income and wealth. Happiness economics, therefore, is the formal study of the relationship between individual satisfaction, employment, and wealth.

Command Economy

command-economy
In a command economy, the government controls the economy through various commands, laws, and national goals which are used to coordinate complex social and economic systems. In other words, a social or political hierarchy determines what is produced, how it is produced, and how it is distributed. Therefore, the command economy is one in which the government controls all major aspects of the economy and economic production.

Animal Spirits

animal-spirits
The term “animal spirits” is derived from the Latin spiritus animalis, loosely translated as “the breath that awakens the human mind”. As far back as 300 B.C., animal spirits were used to explain psychological phenomena such as hysterias and manias. Animal spirits also appeared in literature where they exemplified qualities such as exuberance, gaiety, and courage.  Thus, the term “animal spirits” is used to describe how people arrive at financial decisions during periods of economic stress or uncertainty.

State Capitalism

state-capitalism
State capitalism is an economic system where business and commercial activity is controlled by the state through state-owned enterprises. In a state capitalist environment, the government is the principal actor. It takes an active role in the formation, regulation, and subsidization of businesses to divert capital to state-appointed bureaucrats. In effect, the government uses capital to further its political ambitions or strengthen its leverage on the international stage.

Boom And Bust Cycle

boom-and-bust-cycle
The boom and bust cycle describes the alternating periods of economic growth and decline common in many capitalist economies. The boom and bust cycle is a phrase used to describe the fluctuations in an economy in which there is persistent expansion and contraction. Expansion is associated with prosperity, while the contraction is associated with either a recession or a depression.
Scroll to Top
FourWeekMBA
[class^="wpforms-"]
[class^="wpforms-"]