panas-schedule

What Is PANAS Schedule? PANAS Schedule In A Nutshell

The positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS) was developed by researchers from Southern Methodist University and the University of Minnesota in 1988. The PANAS schedule is the most widely and frequently used scale to assess positive and negative emotions through two scales of measure: positive affect, and negative affect.

AspectExplanation
Concept OverviewThe Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) is a widely used psychological tool developed by David Watson, Lee Anna Clark, and Auke Tellegen in 1988. It is designed to measure and assess an individual’s emotional state by gauging their positive and negative affect or emotions. PANAS helps psychologists, researchers, and clinicians understand and evaluate a person’s mood and emotional well-being. It comprises two separate scales—one for positive emotions (PA) and one for negative emotions (NA).
Key PrinciplesPANAS is guided by several key principles:
1. Emotional Dimensionality: It recognizes that emotions are multi-dimensional and can be categorized into positive and negative affect.
2. Self-Report: PANAS relies on self-reporting, where individuals rate the extent to which they have experienced specific emotions.
3. Mood Assessment: It assesses an individual’s mood or emotional state at a particular point in time, providing a snapshot of their feelings.
4. Scalability: PANAS can be adapted for various settings and purposes, making it a versatile tool in psychological research.
5. Language and Cultural Variations: Consideration of linguistic and cultural differences is important to ensure the questionnaire’s validity across diverse populations.
Two SubscalesPANAS consists of two subscales:
1. Positive Affect (PA): This scale assesses the extent to which individuals experience positive emotions such as joy, enthusiasm, and alertness. It helps measure one’s overall sense of well-being and happiness.
2. Negative Affect (NA): The negative affect scale evaluates the experience of negative emotions like fear, sadness, and distress. It provides insights into feelings of anxiety, depression, and overall emotional distress.
Scoring and InterpretationRespondents are typically presented with a list of emotions or feelings and asked to rate the intensity or frequency of their experience over a specific time frame (e.g., the past week) using a Likert-type scale (e.g., 1 to 5). – Scores on the PA and NA subscales are summed separately. Higher scores on the PA scale indicate a greater presence of positive emotions and a more positive emotional state. Conversely, higher scores on the NA scale suggest a higher level of negative emotions and emotional distress. – Interpretation of PANAS scores can provide valuable insights into an individual’s emotional well-being, mood fluctuations, and overall mental health. Researchers may also use PANAS scores to examine the emotional states of groups or populations.
ApplicationsPANAS is widely used in psychological research and clinical practice. Its applications include:
1. Research: Psychologists and researchers use PANAS to study emotional responses, mood disorders, and the impact of interventions on emotional well-being.
2. Clinical Assessment: It can assist in diagnosing mood disorders like depression and anxiety and in monitoring changes during treatment.
3. Stress Assessment: PANAS is used to measure the emotional impact of stressors and life events.
4. Positive Psychology: It plays a role in the field of positive psychology, focusing on the promotion of well-being and positive emotions.

Understanding the PANAS schedule

The schedule is comprised of two scales, with each consisting of different words that describe feelings and emotions. More specifically, the two scales measure:

Positive affect

Or the propensity of an individual to experience positive emotions and interact with others positively with joy, cheerfulness, or contentment. 

Negative affect

Where the individual experiences negative emotions that influence how they interact with others and their surroundings.

These emotions may include sadness, anger, or fear.

Here, the term affect simply describes the emotions or feelings an individual experiences at any given moment and how these emotions or feelings influence behavior. 

The PANAS schedule is used as a self-reporting diagnostic tool in community and clinical contexts.

The scale shows the relationship between positive and negative affect according to certain personality traits. 

Since both affects exist on a scale, a person can exhibit both positive and negative emotions at the same time.

For example, an individual whose colleague receives a promotion may feel happy for them but also jealous.

Completing a PANAS schedule

For each of the two scales outlined in the previous section, researchers identified 10 positive and negative affect terms strongly correlated with mood.

These are listed below.

Positive affect

  1. Attentive.
  2. Active.
  3. Alert.
  4. Excited.
  5. Enthusiastic.
  6. Determined.
  7. Inspired.
  8. Proud.
  9. Interested. 
  10. Strong.

Negative affect

  1. Hostile.
  2. Irritable.
  3. Ashamed.
  4. Guilty.
  5. Distressed.
  6. Upset.
  7. Scared.
  8. Afraid.
  9. Jittery.
  10. Nervous.

Participants then use a 5-point Likert scale to evaluate the extent to which an emotion applies. 

Specifically:

  1. Very slightly or not at all.
  2. A little.
  3. Moderately.
  4. Quite a bit.
  5. Extremely.

In a clinical context, the client is asked to rate the degree to which they are experiencing emotions in the present moment or the past week. 

Once completed, the participants sum the scores from each of the ten positive and negative affect terms.

Scores range from 10 and 50 in both cases, with lower scores representing lower levels of positive and negative affect and higher scores representing higher levels.

Subsequent interpretations of the PANAS schedule

The PANAS schedule has undergone several revisions since it was released, including:

PANAS-C

For clinicians who work with school-age children.

This test was designed to make it simpler for children to identify different emotions.

A shortened version with 10 questions instead of 29 is also available.

I-PANAS-SF

A short-form iteration for those with competent but non-native English speaking skills.

This test has fewer ambiguities, which reduces the likelihood a question will be misinterpreted.

PANAS-X

A shorter and more refined version released in 1994 that can be completed in as little as ten minutes.

In addition to positive and negative affect, PANAS-X incorporates other affective states such as shyness, serenity, and surprise.

Components of the PANAS Schedule

The PANAS Schedule consists of two main components:

  1. Positive Affect (PA): This component assesses the extent to which an individual is experiencing positive emotions, such as joy, enthusiasm, and excitement. Respondents rate the extent to which they have felt specific positive emotions over a defined time period.
  2. Negative Affect (NA): The negative affect component assesses the extent to which an individual is experiencing negative emotions, including fear, anger, sadness, and distress. Similar to the positive affect component, respondents rate the extent to which they have felt specific negative emotions during a defined time frame.

How the PANAS Schedule Works

The PANAS Schedule is typically administered through self-report questionnaires. Respondents are presented with a list of emotion words, and they rate the frequency and intensity of experiencing these emotions over a specific time period, often within the past week. The responses are recorded on a Likert scale, where individuals rate each emotion on a scale from “1” (very slightly or not at all) to “5” (extremely).

Advantages of the PANAS Schedule

  1. Measuring Both Positive and Negative Affect: The PANAS Schedule provides a comprehensive assessment of an individual’s emotional state by capturing both positive and negative emotions.
  2. Versatility: It can be used across various age groups, cultures, and settings, making it a versatile tool for research and clinical assessment.
  3. Validity and Reliability: The PANAS Schedule has been extensively validated and is considered a reliable instrument for measuring emotions.
  4. Clinical Applications: It has applications in clinical settings for assessing mood disorders, including depression and anxiety.
  5. Research Tool: Researchers use the PANAS Schedule to investigate emotional responses in a wide range of fields, including psychology, health sciences, and social sciences.

Drawbacks of the PANAS Schedule

  1. Self-Report Bias: Like many self-report measures, the PANAS Schedule is subject to response bias, as individuals may not always accurately report their emotional experiences.
  2. Situational Influence: Emotional states can vary depending on the situation, so the timing of the assessment can influence the results.
  3. Limited Depth: The PANAS Schedule provides a broad overview of emotional states but may not capture the complexity of individual emotions or their causes.
  4. Cultural Variations: Some emotions may be culturally specific, and the PANAS Schedule may not fully account for these cultural differences.

Applications of the PANAS Schedule

The PANAS Schedule is employed in various domains:

  1. Psychological Research: Researchers use it to investigate the relationship between emotions, behavior, and psychological well-being.
  2. Clinical Assessment: It aids in the assessment of mood disorders, helping clinicians evaluate the emotional state of patients.
  3. Health Psychology: It is used to study the impact of emotions on physical health and the development of interventions to improve emotional well-being.
  4. Educational Psychology: In educational settings, it helps assess students’ emotional states and their impact on learning and academic performance.
  5. Counseling and Therapy: Mental health professionals use the PANAS Schedule to assess and monitor emotional changes in therapy clients.

Limitations and Future Directions

While the PANAS Schedule is a valuable tool for assessing emotional states, researchers continue to explore ways to improve its accuracy and applicability. This includes addressing cultural variations in emotional expression, incorporating real-time assessments, and developing more nuanced measures of specific emotions.

In conclusion, the PANAS Schedule is a widely used instrument for measuring both positive and negative affect in research and clinical settings. Its versatility, reliability, and validity make it a valuable tool for understanding the role of emotions in human behavior and well-being. As research in the field of psychology and related disciplines continues to evolve, the PANAS Schedule remains a valuable resource for studying the complex interplay of emotions in our lives.

Key takeaways

  • The PANAS schedule is the most widely and frequently used scale to assess positive and negative emotions. It was developed by researchers from Southern Methodist University and the University of Minnesota in 1988.
  • The PANAS schedule measures positive and negative affect, or the moment-by-moment emotions and feelings an individual experiences which influence their behavior. Both are measured on a scale since positive and negative emotions can occur simultaneously.
  • The PANAS schedule has been adapted to multiple applications since its release. Variations of the test are now administered to children and non-native English speakers, among other uses.

Case Studies

Positive Affect Case Studies:

  • Employee Engagement at Tech Company:
    • Scenario: A tech company uses PANAS to assess the positive affect of its employees. After analyzing the data, they find that employees who report higher positive affect tend to be more engaged, productive, and satisfied with their work.
    • Implications: The company focuses on initiatives to boost positive emotions among employees, such as wellness programs, team-building activities, and recognition programs. As a result, employee engagement and performance improve.
  • Positive Emotions and Physical Health:
    • Scenario: A research study collects PANAS data from participants over several months. The findings reveal a strong correlation between experiencing positive affect and improved physical health, including reduced stress levels and better immune function.
    • Implications: Healthcare providers incorporate interventions that promote positive emotions, like mindfulness and relaxation techniques, into patient treatment plans to enhance overall well-being.
  • Customer Satisfaction in Retail:
    • Scenario: A retail chain uses PANAS surveys to measure the positive affect of customers after shopping experiences. They find a direct link between positive affect and customer loyalty, repeat purchases, and positive word-of-mouth recommendations.
    • Implications: The company focuses on creating positive shopping experiences, training staff in customer service, and improving store aesthetics to boost customer satisfaction and loyalty.

Negative Affect Case Studies:

  • Employee Burnout in Healthcare:
    • Scenario: A hospital administers PANAS surveys to healthcare workers. The results reveal that those experiencing high negative affect are more prone to burnout, absenteeism, and reduced patient care quality.
    • Implications: The hospital implements stress reduction programs, offers counseling services, and encourages self-care among staff to reduce negative affect and mitigate burnout.
  • Academic Performance and Negative Emotions:
    • Scenario: An educational institution conducts a study using PANAS among students. They find that students reporting high negative affect tend to have lower academic performance, higher dropout rates, and increased stress levels.
    • Implications: The institution introduces student support services, mental health resources, and stress management workshops to address negative affect and improve students’ academic success.
  • Consumer Behavior in the Financial Industry:
    • Scenario: A financial institution administers PANAS surveys to assess the emotional state of its clients during financial transactions. They discover that high negative affect is linked to impulsive financial decisions, including withdrawing investments during market downturns.
    • Implications: The institution offers financial education and investment advice to help clients manage emotions and make more informed decisions during volatile markets.

Key Highlights of the PANAS Schedule:

  • Development and Purpose: The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) was developed by researchers from Southern Methodist University and the University of Minnesota in 1988. It is a widely used tool to assess positive and negative emotions through two scales: positive affect and negative affect.
  • Components of the PANAS Schedule: The schedule consists of two scales that measure:
    • Positive Affect: Measures an individual’s propensity to experience positive emotions such as joy, cheerfulness, and contentment.
    • Negative Affect: Measures negative emotions that influence interactions with others and the environment, including sadness, anger, and fear.
  • Understanding Affect: The term “affect” refers to the emotions or feelings an individual experiences at a particular moment and how these emotions influence behavior.
  • Use and Interpretation: The PANAS schedule is used as a self-reporting diagnostic tool in various contexts, including community and clinical settings. It helps assess the relationship between positive and negative affect and certain personality traits. Individuals can experience both positive and negative emotions simultaneously.
  • Completing the PANAS Schedule: Participants rate their emotions using a 5-point Likert scale, indicating the extent to which each emotion applies to them:
    • Very slightly or not at all.
    • A little.
    • Moderately.
    • Quite a bit.
    • Extremely.
  • Scoring and Interpretation: Scores are summed for each positive and negative affect term, ranging from 10 to 50. Lower scores indicate lower levels of affect, while higher scores represent higher levels of affect.
  • Revisions and Adaptations:
    • PANAS-C: Simplified version for school-age children.
    • I-PANAS-SF: Short-form version for non-native English speakers with reduced ambiguities.
    • PANAS-X: A refined version released in 1994, including additional affective states like shyness and surprise.
  • Key Takeaways: The PANAS schedule is a widely used tool to assess positive and negative emotions. It measures momentary affect and its influence on behavior. The schedule has been adapted for various applications and populations, including children and non-native English speakers. Variations of the test offer more specific insights into emotional experiences.

Alternative Frameworks

Framework / Assessment ToolDescriptionKey Features
PANAS ScheduleThe Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) is a psychological assessment tool used to measure an individual’s positive and negative affectivity or mood. It consists of two subscales: Positive Affect (PA) and Negative Affect (NA).– Assesses an individual’s mood or affective states by measuring positive and negative emotions. – Provides a standardized and reliable measure of affectivity for research and clinical purposes.
Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI)The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator is a personality assessment tool based on Carl Jung’s theory of psychological types. It categorizes individuals into one of 16 personality types based on their preferences for four dichotomous personality dimensions: Extraversion/Introversion, Sensing/Intuition, Thinking/Feeling, and Judging/Perceiving.– Provides insights into individual preferences, behaviors, and communication styles. – Facilitates self-awareness, team building, and career development.
Big Five Personality TraitsThe Big Five Personality Traits, also known as the Five-Factor Model (FFM), are five broad dimensions of personality: Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism (OCEAN). They represent stable and enduring patterns of behavior, cognition, and emotion.– Provides a comprehensive framework for understanding personality traits and individual differences. – Offers a nuanced assessment of personality across multiple dimensions.
Emotional Intelligence (EQ)Emotional Intelligence (EQ) refers to the ability to recognize, understand, manage, and express emotions effectively, both in oneself and others. It encompasses skills such as self-awareness, self-regulation, social awareness, empathy, and relationship management.– Assess individual’s emotional intelligence skills and competencies. – Predicts success in personal and professional domains, including leadership, teamwork, and conflict resolution.
StrengthsFinderStrengthsFinder, based on the Clifton StrengthsFinder assessment, identifies an individual’s top strengths or talents among 34 themes. It focuses on leveraging strengths rather than fixing weaknesses, aiming to maximize individual performance, engagement, and fulfillment.– Identifies and leverages individual strengths to enhance performance and well-being. – Provides a positive framework for personal and professional development.
DiSC Personality AssessmentThe DiSC Personality Assessment categorizes individuals into one of four primary behavioral styles: Dominance, Influence, Steadiness, and Conscientiousness. It helps individuals understand their communication preferences, work styles, and interpersonal dynamics.– Facilitates self-awareness and understanding of communication and behavioral tendencies. – Enhances teamwork, conflict resolution, and collaboration by recognizing and adapting to different personality styles.
360-Degree Feedback360-Degree Feedback is a multi-rater assessment process that gathers feedback from multiple sources, including supervisors, peers, direct reports, and other stakeholders, to provide a comprehensive view of an individual’s performance, behavior, and competencies.– Provides comprehensive feedback on an individual’s strengths, development areas, and leadership effectiveness. – Promotes self-awareness, personal growth, and professional development. – Facilitates alignment between individual goals and organizational objectives.

Connected Business Matrices

SFA Matrix

sfa-matrix
The SFA matrix is a framework that helps businesses evaluate strategic options. Gerry Johnson and Kevan Scholes created the SFA matrix to help businesses evaluate their strategic options before committing. Evaluation of strategic opportunities is performed by considering three criteria that make up the SFA acronym: suitability, feasibility, and acceptability.

Hoshin Kanri X-Matrix

hoshin-kanri-x-matrix
The Hoshin Kanri X-Matrix is a strategy deployment tool that helps businesses achieve goals over the short and long term. Hoshin Kanri is a method that seeks to bridge the gap between strategy and execution. Strategic objectives are clearly defined and the goals of every level of the organization are aligned. With everyone moving in the same direction, process coordination and decision-making ability are strengthened.

Kepner-Tregoe Matrix

kepner-tregoe-matrix
The Kepner-Tregoe matrix was created by management consultants Charles H. Kepner and Benjamin B. Tregoe in the 1960s, developed to help businesses navigate the decisions they make daily, the Kepner-Tregoe matrix is a root cause analysis used in organizational decision making.

Eisenhower Matrix

eisenhower-matrix
The Eisenhower Matrix is a tool that helps businesses prioritize tasks based on their urgency and importance, named after Dwight D. Eisenhower, President of the United States from 1953 to 1961, the matrix helps businesses and individuals differentiate between the urgent and important to prevent urgent things (seemingly useful in the short-term) cannibalize important things (critical for long-term success).

Decision Matrix

decision-matrix
A decision matrix is a decision-making tool that evaluates and prioritizes a list of options. Decision matrices are useful when: A list of options must be trimmed to a single choice. A decision must be made based on several criteria. A list of criteria has been made manageable through the process of elimination.

Action Priority Matrix

action-priority-matrix
An action priority matrix is a productivity tool that helps businesses prioritize certain tasks and objectives over others. The matrix itself is represented by four quadrants on a typical cartesian graph. These quadrants are plotted against the effort required to complete a task (x-axis) and the impact (benefit) that each task brings once completed (y-axis). This matrix helps assess what projects need to be undertaken and the potential impact for each.

TOWS Matrix

tows-matrix
The TOWS Matrix is an acronym for Threats, Opportunities, Weaknesses, and Strengths. The matrix is a variation on the SWOT Analysis, and it seeks to address criticisms of the SWOT Analysis regarding its inability to show relationships between the various categories.

GE McKinsey Matrix

ge-mckinsey-matrix
The GE McKinsey Matrix was developed in the 1970s after General Electric asked its consultant McKinsey to develop a portfolio management model. This matrix is a strategy tool that provides guidance on how a corporation should prioritize its investments among its business units, leading to three possible scenarios: invest, protect, harvest, and divest.

BCG Matrix

bcg-matrix
In the 1970s, Bruce D. Henderson, founder of the Boston Consulting Group, came up with The Product Portfolio (aka BCG Matrix, or Growth-share Matrix), which would look at a successful business product portfolio based on potential growth and market shares. It divided products into four main categories: cash cows, pets (dogs), question marks, and stars.

Growth Matrix

growth-strategies
In the FourWeekMBA growth matrix, you can apply growth for existing customers by tackling the same problems (gain mode). Or by tackling existing problems, for new customers (expand mode). Or by tackling new problems for existing customers (extend mode). Or perhaps by tackling whole new problems for new customers (reinvent mode).

Ansoff Matrix

ansoff-matrix
You can use the Ansoff Matrix as a strategic framework to understand what growth strategy is more suited based on the market context. Developed by mathematician and business manager Igor Ansoff, it assumes a growth strategy can be derived by whether the market is new or existing, and the product is new or existing.

Read Next: Growth Hacking, SWOT Analysis, Personal SWOT Analysis, TOWS Matrix, PESTEL Analysis, Porter’s Five Forces.

Read Next: Root Cause Analysis, 5 Whys.

Related Strategy Concepts: Go-To-Market StrategyMarketing StrategyBusiness ModelsTech Business ModelsJobs-To-Be DoneDesign ThinkingLean Startup CanvasValue ChainValue Proposition CanvasBalanced ScorecardBusiness Model CanvasSWOT AnalysisGrowth HackingBundlingUnbundlingBootstrappingVenture CapitalPorter’s Five ForcesPorter’s Generic StrategiesPorter’s Five ForcesPESTEL AnalysisSWOTPorter’s Diamond ModelAnsoffTechnology Adoption CurveTOWSSOARBalanced ScorecardOKRAgile MethodologyValue PropositionVTDF FrameworkBCG MatrixGE McKinsey Matrix, Kotter’s 8-Step Change Model.

Main Free Guides:

Scroll to Top

Discover more from FourWeekMBA

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

FourWeekMBA