What Is The Heckscher-Ohlin model? The Heckscher-Ohlin Model In A Nutshell

The Heckscher-Ohlin model is named after Swedish economists Bertil Ohlin and Eli Filip Heckscher. Ohlin, who developed the model while a student of Heckscher, won the Nobel Prize for Economics in 1977. The Heckscher-Ohlin model is an economic theory suggesting countries only export what they can produce efficiently and in sufficient quantity.

Understanding the Heckscher-Ohlin model

In general terms, the Heckscher-Ohlin model is a theory of international trade suggesting nations with relatively plentiful capital and relatively scarce labor will tend to export capital-intensive products and import labor-intensive products.

Conversely, a nation where labor is relatively plentiful and capital relatively scarce will tend to export labor-intensive products and import capital-intensive products.

Wealthy nations have access to more capital, which means workers are assisted by equipment and technology.

As a result, the cost of producing labor-intensive goods tends to be higher than in poorer, less advanced countries with plentiful labor and lower wages.

By the same token, goods requiring more capital and less labor tend to be cheaper in wealthy countries because the cost of paying employees is reduced. 

This leads to a situation where a wealthy nation can produce capital-intensive goods more cheaply than a poorer country.

These goods are then exported to the poorer nation to pay for the import of labor-intensive goods in return. In theory, this should be a mutually beneficial arrangement for both parties.

The two assumptions of the Heckscher-Ohlin model

The model makes two major assumptions that are worth mentioning.

Firstly, it assumes each country in a trade arrangement will differ according to the factors of production it has available.

For example, one country may have a large and uneducated population with an abundance of labor and land but relatively less access to capital.

The other country may have access to capital and be technologically advanced, but have less access to land and a smaller workforce.

Secondly, Heckscher and Ohlin assumed that different countries have the same preferences for one good over another.

With preferences being equal, it is the relative cost of production (and not the relative demand) that drives how much of a good is produced and consumed before being traded.

Using these assumptions, model posits that countries with an abundance of land, labor, or capital will have a comparative market advantage for the goods produced over other countries. 

As an example, relatively wealthy Saudi Arabia holds 17% of the world’s known petroleum resources.

The country is the largest exporter in the world because petroleum is a capital-intensive resource that is easy to extract – which reduces labor costs.

In other words, Saudi Arabia has an advantage over competing nations because it can export petroleum more efficiently and in greater quantities.

Criticisms of the Heckscher-Ohlin model

Despite the model appearing plausible on paper, it frequently differs from actual patterns of dynamic international trade.

The Heckscher-Ohlin model:

Does not account for rent-seeking

This occurs when a government is lobbied by a group or body to protect its interests through tax breaks, extra duties, or bans on imported products.

This may result in a wealthy nation exporting labor-intensive products and importing capital-intensive products, instead of the more economically viable reverse.

Assumes all workers are employed

In other words, the model does not account for the prevalence of unpaid work in poorer countries which reduces labor costs.

Assumes that production is equal

Rather unrealistically, Heckscher and Ohlin suggest every nation has the same level of production technology.

This ignores the major discrepancies in technological innovation and design between some countries.

Ignores trade between two wealthy countries

The model implies that trade will not occur between two capital-intensive nations, despite obvious evidence to the contrary.

Indeed, a significant proportion of world trade occurs between the United States and the countries of Western Europe.

In this case, comparative advantage is driven by transport costs, economies of scale, and cost or price differences.

Ignores factor mobility

Both capital and labor can move between countries, which the model does not consider.

Capital moves from advanced countries to those with petroleum, mineral, or plantation resources, among other things.

Similarly, the large-scale movement of labor from third-world countries to much richer countries is well documented. In the resource-rich nation of the United Arab Emirates, there are thought to be 8 million foreign temporary contract workers from poor nations such as India, Bangladesh, Nepal, Sri Lanka, and Pakistan.

Key takeaways:

  • The Heckscher-Ohlin model is an economic theory suggesting countries only export what they can produce efficiently and in sufficient quantity. It was developed by Swedish economists Bertil Ohlin and Eli Filip Heckscher
  • The Heckscher-Ohlin model assumes international trade is mutually beneficial to both parties. It also assumes that the relative cost of production is the key driver of how much of a good is produced and consumed.
  • The Heckscher-Ohlin model has several limitations. It does not account for workers in poor nations who are not employed, which reduces total labor costs. Nor does it account for trade between two wealthy nations or the high mobility of capital and labor across international borders.

Connected Business Concepts

Economies of Scale

economies-of-scale
In Economics, Economies of Scale is a theory for which, as companies grow, they gain cost advantages. More precisely, companies manage to benefit from these cost advantages as they grow, due to increased efficiency in production. Thus, as companies scale and increase production, a subsequent decrease in the costs associated with it will help the organization scale further.

Diseconomies of Scale

diseconomies-of-scale
In Economics, a Diseconomy of Scale happens when a company has grown so large that its costs per unit will start to increase. Thus, losing the benefits of scale. That can happen due to several factors arising as a company scales. From coordination issues to management inefficiencies and lack of proper communication flows.

Network Effects

negative-network-effects
In a negative network effect as the network grows in usage or scale, the value of the platform might shrink. In platform business models network effects help the platform become more valuable for the next user joining. In negative network effects (congestion or pollution) reduce the value of the platform for the next user joining. 

Negative Network Effects

negative-network-effects
In a negative network effect as the network grows in usage or scale, the value of the platform might shrink. In platform business models network effects help the platform become more valuable for the next user joining. In negative network effects (congestion or pollution) reduce the value of the platform for the next user joining. 

Creative Destruction

creative-destruction
Creative destruction was first described by Austrian economist Joseph Schumpeter in 1942, who suggested that capital was never stationary and constantly evolving. To describe this process, Schumpeter defined creative destruction as the “process of industrial mutation that incessantly revolutionizes the economic structure from within, incessantly destroying the old one, incessantly creating a new one.” Therefore, creative destruction is the replacing of long-standing practices or procedures with more innovative, disruptive practices in capitalist markets.

Happiness Economics

happiness-economics
Happiness economics seeks to relate economic decisions to wider measures of individual welfare than traditional measures which focus on income and wealth. Happiness economics, therefore, is the formal study of the relationship between individual satisfaction, employment, and wealth.

Command Economy

command-economy
In a command economy, the government controls the economy through various commands, laws, and national goals which are used to coordinate complex social and economic systems. In other words, a social or political hierarchy determines what is produced, how it is produced, and how it is distributed. Therefore, the command economy is one in which the government controls all major aspects of the economy and economic production.

Animal Spirits

animal-spirits
The term “animal spirits” is derived from the Latin spiritus animalis, loosely translated as “the breath that awakens the human mind”. As far back as 300 B.C., animal spirits were used to explain psychological phenomena such as hysterias and manias. Animal spirits also appeared in literature where they exemplified qualities such as exuberance, gaiety, and courage.  Thus, the term “animal spirits” is used to describe how people arrive at financial decisions during periods of economic stress or uncertainty.

State Capitalism

state-capitalism
State capitalism is an economic system where business and commercial activity is controlled by the state through state-owned enterprises. In a state capitalist environment, the government is the principal actor. It takes an active role in the formation, regulation, and subsidization of businesses to divert capital to state-appointed bureaucrats. In effect, the government uses capital to further its political ambitions or strengthen its leverage on the international stage.

Boom And Bust Cycle

boom-and-bust-cycle
The boom and bust cycle describes the alternating periods of economic growth and decline common in many capitalist economies. The boom and bust cycle is a phrase used to describe the fluctuations in an economy in which there is persistent expansion and contraction. Expansion is associated with prosperity, while the contraction is associated with either a recession or a depression.

Main Free Guides:

Scroll to Top
FourWeekMBA