Blue Ocean Strategy Vs. Stuck In The Middle

The blue ocean strategy is a theory that states companies can gain a competitive advantage by creating whole new markets through value innovation (so-called blue oceans) where competition doesn’t exist yet. Stuck in the middle is a scenario from Porter’s Generic Strategies, where for lack of focus or differentiation, a company finds itself in a place where it lacks strategic advantage.

AspectBlue Ocean StrategyStuck in the Middle Strategy
DefinitionBlue Ocean Strategy is a business strategy that aims to create uncontested market spaces, making competition irrelevant by innovating and offering unique value to customers.Stuck in the Middle Strategy, also known as the Hybrid Strategy, refers to a business that neither focuses on differentiation nor cost leadership, resulting in mediocre performance.
Focus– Focuses on differentiation and creating new markets. – Aims to break out of existing industry boundaries. – Seeks to provide unique value to customers.– Lacks a clear focus on differentiation or cost leadership. – Tries to appeal to a broad customer base without excelling in either low cost or differentiation.
Market Space– Creates a new market space with limited or no direct competition. – Emphasizes value innovation. – Seeks to redefine industry norms and customer expectations.– Operates in existing market spaces but struggles to distinguish itself significantly. – Faces competition from both low-cost and differentiated competitors.
Competition– Aims to make competition irrelevant by offering unique value. – Focuses on non-customers as potential new customers. – Often enjoys a first-mover advantage.– Faces intense competition from both low-cost and differentiated competitors. – Struggles to capture a substantial market share. – Competitive position is weak.
Innovation– Prioritizes innovation to create new products, services, or business models. – Emphasizes value innovation, often resulting in disruptive solutions.– Typically lacks significant innovation and relies on existing products or services. – Rarely introduces groundbreaking ideas or concepts.
ExamplesCirque du Soleil: Created a new market space between circus and theater by eliminating animal acts and focusing on artistic performances. – Nintendo Wii: Offered a unique gaming experience appealing to non-gamers.Sears: Struggled to differentiate itself in the retail industry and lost market share to both low-cost retailers like Walmart and differentiated ones like Macy’s. – AOL: Failed to adapt to changing internet dynamics and faced competition from various directions.
Risk Tolerance– Blue Ocean Strategy involves a moderate to high level of risk due to the uncertainty associated with creating entirely new markets. – Success can lead to substantial rewards.– Stuck in the Middle Strategy often involves a lower risk as it operates within existing markets but may lead to mediocre financial performance and gradual decline.
Long-term Viability– Blue Ocean Strategy aims for long-term sustainability by continually innovating and adapting to changing market dynamics. – Seeks to maintain a competitive advantage.– Stuck in the Middle Strategy tends to be less viable in the long term, as it struggles to keep up with competitors and adapt to market shifts. – May face eventual decline.
Strategic Focus– Places a strong emphasis on strategy formulation and innovative thinking. – Requires a clear vision and commitment to value innovation.– Often lacks a clear strategic focus and relies on an existing business model without significant adaptation or innovation.
Customer Perception– Aims to create a positive customer perception through innovative products or services, leading to strong brand loyalty and customer retention.– Often faces challenges in establishing a distinctive customer perception, which may result in weaker customer loyalty and susceptibility to price competition.
Resource Allocation– Allocates resources toward research, development, and innovation. – Prioritizes creating and capturing new demand in untapped market spaces.– May allocate resources toward cost-cutting measures to compete with low-cost competitors, limiting investment in differentiation or innovation.

Blue Ocean Strategy

blue-ocean-strategy
A blue ocean is a strategy where the boundaries of existing markets are redefined, and new uncontested markets are created. At its core, there is value innovation, for which uncontested markets are created, where competition is made irrelevant. And the cost-value trade-off is broken. Thus, companies following a blue ocean strategy offer much more value at a lower cost for the end customers.

Porter’s Generic Strategies

porters-generic-strategies
In his book “Competitive Advantage,” in 1985, Porter conceptualized the concept of competitive advantage by looking at two key aspects. Industry attractiveness and the company’s strategic positioning. According to Porter, the latter can be achieved via cost leadership, differentiation, or focus.
stuck-in-the-middle

Key Similarities between Blue Ocean Strategy and Stuck in the Middle:

  • Competitive Advantage: Both concepts are related to a company’s competitive advantage in the market. Blue Ocean Strategy seeks to create a unique and uncontested market space, while being stuck in the middle implies a lack of strategic advantage due to a lack of focus or differentiation.
  • Market Positioning: Both concepts are about the positioning of a company within its market. Blue Ocean Strategy aims to create a new market position that is distinct from existing competitors, while being stuck in the middle means being unable to establish a clear and compelling market position.

Key Differences between Blue Ocean Strategy and Stuck in the Middle:

  • Focus on Innovation: Blue Ocean Strategy emphasizes value innovation and the creation of new markets with unique value propositions. In contrast, being stuck in the middle is a situation where a company fails to differentiate itself and lacks a clear strategy for competitive advantage.
  • Market Environment: Blue Ocean Strategy operates in an environment where competition is non-existent or irrelevant, as the company creates its unique market space. On the other hand, being stuck in the middle occurs in a highly competitive market where the company struggles to stand out.
  • Value-Cost Trade-off: Blue Ocean Strategy aims to break the value-cost trade-off by offering significantly more value at a lower cost to customers. In contrast, being stuck in the middle implies a company’s inability to achieve a distinct value proposition that justifies premium pricing or cost leadership.

Blue Ocean Strategy Examples:

  • Apple’s iPhone: When Apple introduced the iPhone, it wasn’t just another phone. It combined an iPod, a phone, and an Internet communication device. Apple created a new market space, moving away from the traditional phone market.
  • Netflix: Instead of competing with traditional movie rental stores, Netflix created a new market with online streaming. They offered a vast selection of movies and shows for a monthly subscription, making the need for physical rentals obsolete.
  • Cirque du Soleil: By blending opera and ballet with circus, Cirque du Soleil created a unique market space and took the traditional circus experience to a whole new level, attracting a different segment of the audience.
  • Nespresso: Rather than competing in the crowded coffee market, Nespresso introduced single-serving espresso machines for homes, creating a new market space.
  • Tesla: Instead of just another car manufacturer, Tesla focused on high-performance electric vehicles, carving out a unique space in the automobile industry.

Stuck in the Middle Examples:

  • Blackberry: Post iPhone era, Blackberry tried to maintain its business-oriented image while also attempting to cater to the general consumer market with touchscreens and app stores. This lack of clear focus led to a decline as they got overshadowed by both business and consumer mobile devices.
  • J.C. Penney: In an attempt to revitalize the brand, J.C. Penney tried to shift from sales and discounts to “everyday low prices.” This strategy alienated their core discount-loving customer base, and they didn’t gain a new customer segment, leaving them in a challenging middle position.
  • Yahoo: Over the years, Yahoo tried to be everything – a web portal, a search engine, an e-commerce site, a web directory, and a news site. This lack of clear identity made them lose out to competitors who specialized in these areas.
  • RadioShack: Instead of focusing on its strengths in electronics components, RadioShack tried to compete with big-box electronics retailers and cell phone service providers. This left them in a middle ground where they couldn’t compete effectively with either segment.
  • Sears: Once a retail giant, Sears struggled in the 2000s as they were caught between better-endowed general merchandise competitors like Walmart and more specialized retailers in sectors like tools and appliances.

Key Takeaways:

  • Blue Ocean Strategy encourages companies to seek uncontested market space through value innovation, providing unique value at a lower cost to create new demand and render competition irrelevant.
  • Stuck in the middle is a situation where a company lacks a clear strategic advantage due to a lack of differentiation or focus, making it vulnerable to intense competition and limited growth opportunities.
  • While Blue Ocean Strategy offers the potential for substantial growth and success by creating new market space, being stuck in the middle is often associated with mediocrity and challenges in sustaining profitability.
  • Companies should carefully assess their market positioning and competitive advantage to avoid getting stuck in the middle and consider adopting Blue Ocean Strategy principles to break away from traditional competitive boundaries and find new avenues for growth and success.

Key Highlights:

  • Blue Ocean Strategy: This strategy involves companies creating new, uncontested market spaces (or “blue oceans”) rather than competing in existing industries. It emphasizes value innovation to make competition irrelevant.
  • Stuck in the Middle: This refers to a situation where a company fails to achieve a competitive advantage because it does not differentiate itself or focus on cost leadership. It’s a scenario where a company struggles to stand out amidst fierce competition.
  • Competitive Advantage: Both concepts relate to how a company positions itself in the market. The blue ocean strategy aims to establish dominance in new market spaces, while being “stuck in the middle” indicates a lack of clear strategic advantage.
  • Value Innovation: Blue ocean strategy prioritizes creating value in new ways, breaking away from industry norms, while a company that’s stuck in the middle often lacks a clear value proposition.
  • Market Environment: While the blue ocean strategy seeks areas with little to no competition, being stuck in the middle happens in saturated markets where differentiation is hard to achieve.
  • Implications: Adopting a blue ocean strategy can lead to significant growth and success. In contrast, companies that are stuck in the middle often face challenges in profitability and growth.

Read Next: Blue Ocean StrategyPorter’s Generic Strategies.

Related Strategy Concepts: Go-To-Market StrategyMarketing StrategyBusiness ModelsTech Business ModelsJobs-To-Be DoneDesign ThinkingLean Startup CanvasValue ChainValue Proposition CanvasBalanced ScorecardBusiness Model CanvasSWOT AnalysisGrowth HackingBundlingUnbundlingBootstrappingVenture Capital, Porter’s Five Forces.

More Strategy Tools: Porter’s Five ForcesPESTEL AnalysisSWOTPorter’s Diamond ModelAnsoffTechnology Adoption CurveTOWSSOARBalanced ScorecardOKRAgile MethodologyValue PropositionVTDF Framework.

Main Guides:

Connected Strategy Frameworks

ADKAR Model

adkar-model
The ADKAR model is a management tool designed to assist employees and businesses in transitioning through organizational change. To maximize the chances of employees embracing change, the ADKAR model was developed by author and engineer Jeff Hiatt in 2003. The model seeks to guide people through the change process and importantly, ensure that people do not revert to habitual ways of operating after some time has passed.

Ansoff Matrix

ansoff-matrix
You can use the Ansoff Matrix as a strategic framework to understand what growth strategy is more suited based on the market context. Developed by mathematician and business manager Igor Ansoff, it assumes a growth strategy can be derived from whether the market is new or existing, and whether the product is new or existing.

Business Model Canvas

business-model-canvas
The business model canvas is a framework proposed by Alexander Osterwalder and Yves Pigneur in Busines Model Generation enabling the design of business models through nine building blocks comprising: key partners, key activities, value propositions, customer relationships, customer segments, critical resources, channels, cost structure, and revenue streams.

Lean Startup Canvas

lean-startup-canvas
The lean startup canvas is an adaptation by Ash Maurya of the business model canvas by Alexander Osterwalder, which adds a layer that focuses on problems, solutions, key metrics, unfair advantage based, and a unique value proposition. Thus, starting from mastering the problem rather than the solution.

Blitzscaling Canvas

blitzscaling-business-model-innovation-canvas
The Blitzscaling business model canvas is a model based on the concept of Blitzscaling, which is a particular process of massive growth under uncertainty, and that prioritizes speed over efficiency and focuses on market domination to create a first-scaler advantage in a scenario of uncertainty.

Blue Ocean Strategy

blue-ocean-strategy
A blue ocean is a strategy where the boundaries of existing markets are redefined, and new uncontested markets are created. At its core, there is value innovation, for which uncontested markets are created, where competition is made irrelevant. And the cost-value trade-off is broken. Thus, companies following a blue ocean strategy offer much more value at a lower cost for the end customers.

Business Analysis Framework

business-analysis
Business analysis is a research discipline that helps driving change within an organization by identifying the key elements and processes that drive value. Business analysis can also be used in Identifying new business opportunities or how to take advantage of existing business opportunities to grow your business in the marketplace.

BCG Matrix

bcg-matrix
In the 1970s, Bruce D. Henderson, founder of the Boston Consulting Group, came up with The Product Portfolio (aka BCG Matrix, or Growth-share Matrix), which would look at a successful business product portfolio based on potential growth and market shares. It divided products into four main categories: cash cows, pets (dogs), question marks, and stars.

Balanced Scorecard

balanced-scorecard
First proposed by accounting academic Robert Kaplan, the balanced scorecard is a management system that allows an organization to focus on big-picture strategic goals. The four perspectives of the balanced scorecard include financial, customer, business process, and organizational capacity. From there, according to the balanced scorecard, it’s possible to have a holistic view of the business.

Blue Ocean Strategy 

blue-ocean-strategy
A blue ocean is a strategy where the boundaries of existing markets are redefined, and new uncontested markets are created. At its core, there is value innovation, for which uncontested markets are created, where competition is made irrelevant. And the cost-value trade-off is broken. Thus, companies following a blue ocean strategy offer much more value at a lower cost for the end customers.

GAP Analysis

gap-analysis
A gap analysis helps an organization assess its alignment with strategic objectives to determine whether the current execution is in line with the company’s mission and long-term vision. Gap analyses then help reach a target performance by assisting organizations to use their resources better. A good gap analysis is a powerful tool to improve execution.

GE McKinsey Model

ge-mckinsey-matrix
The GE McKinsey Matrix was developed in the 1970s after General Electric asked its consultant McKinsey to develop a portfolio management model. This matrix is a strategy tool that provides guidance on how a corporation should prioritize its investments among its business units, leading to three possible scenarios: invest, protect, harvest, and divest.

McKinsey 7-S Model

mckinsey-7-s-model
The McKinsey 7-S Model was developed in the late 1970s by Robert Waterman and Thomas Peters, who were consultants at McKinsey & Company. Waterman and Peters created seven key internal elements that inform a business of how well positioned it is to achieve its goals, based on three hard elements and four soft elements.

McKinsey’s Seven Degrees

mckinseys-seven-degrees
McKinsey’s Seven Degrees of Freedom for Growth is a strategy tool. Developed by partners at McKinsey and Company, the tool helps businesses understand which opportunities will contribute to expansion, and therefore it helps to prioritize those initiatives.

McKinsey Horizon Model

mckinsey-horizon-model
The McKinsey Horizon Model helps a business focus on innovation and growth. The model is a strategy framework divided into three broad categories, otherwise known as horizons. Thus, the framework is sometimes referred to as McKinsey’s Three Horizons of Growth.

Porter’s Five Forces

porter-five-forces
Porter’s Five Forces is a model that helps organizations to gain a better understanding of their industries and competition. Published for the first time by Professor Michael Porter in his book “Competitive Strategy” in the 1980s. The model breaks down industries and markets by analyzing them through five forces.

Porter’s Generic Strategies

competitive-advantage
According to Michael Porter, a competitive advantage, in a given industry could be pursued in two key ways: low cost (cost leadership), or differentiation. A third generic strategy is focus. According to Porter a failure to do so would end up stuck in the middle scenario, where the company will not retain a long-term competitive advantage.

Porter’s Value Chain Model

porters-value-chain-model
In his 1985 book Competitive Advantage, Porter explains that a value chain is a collection of processes that a company performs to create value for its consumers. As a result, he asserts that value chain analysis is directly linked to competitive advantage. Porter’s Value Chain Model is a strategic management tool developed by Harvard Business School professor Michael Porter. The tool analyses a company’s value chain – defined as the combination of processes that the company uses to make money.

Porter’s Diamond Model

porters-diamond-model
Porter’s Diamond Model is a diamond-shaped framework that explains why specific industries in a nation become internationally competitive while those in other nations do not. The model was first published in Michael Porter’s 1990 book The Competitive Advantage of Nations. This framework looks at the firm strategy, structure/rivalry, factor conditions, demand conditions, related and supporting industries.

SWOT Analysis

swot-analysis
A SWOT Analysis is a framework used for evaluating the business‘s Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats. It can aid in identifying the problematic areas of your business so that you can maximize your opportunities. It will also alert you to the challenges your organization might face in the future.

PESTEL Analysis

pestel-analysis

Scenario Planning

scenario-planning
Businesses use scenario planning to make assumptions on future events and how their respective business environments may change in response to those future events. Therefore, scenario planning identifies specific uncertainties – or different realities and how they might affect future business operations. Scenario planning attempts at better strategic decision making by avoiding two pitfalls: underprediction, and overprediction.

STEEPLE Analysis

steeple-analysis
The STEEPLE analysis is a variation of the STEEP analysis. Where the step analysis comprises socio-cultural, technological, economic, environmental/ecological, and political factors as the base of the analysis. The STEEPLE analysis adds other two factors such as Legal and Ethical.

SWOT Analysis

swot-analysis
A SWOT Analysis is a framework used for evaluating the business’s Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats. It can aid in identifying the problematic areas of your business so that you can maximize your opportunities. It will also alert you to the challenges your organization might face in the future.

Main Guides:

Scroll to Top

Discover more from FourWeekMBA

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

FourWeekMBA