Diminishing marginal returns, also known as the law of diminishing returns or the principle of diminishing marginal productivity, is a critical concept in economics. It reflects the idea that as more and more of a variable input (such as labor, capital, or raw materials) is added to a fixed set of inputs, the additional output produced per unit of the variable input will eventually decrease.
This phenomenon can be traced back to the work of classical economists like David Ricardo and Thomas Malthus. It has since become a cornerstone of economic analysis, particularly in the fields of microeconomics, macroeconomics, and production theory.
To fully understand diminishing marginal returns, let’s explore its key principles:
1. Fixed and Variable Inputs
Diminishing marginal returns occur in the context of production processes where some inputs are fixed (unchangeable) while others are variable (can be adjusted or varied). For example, in agriculture, the amount of land (fixed input) is constant, but the number of laborers (variable input) can be changed.
2. Marginal Product
The marginal product is the additional output (or benefit) that is obtained from adding one more unit of the variable input while keeping the other inputs constant. It represents the rate of change in output as the variable input is increased incrementally.
3. Law of Diminishing Marginal Returns
The law of diminishing marginal returns states that as more units of the variable input are added to the production process, the marginal product of that input will eventually decrease. In other words, the additional output gained from each additional unit of input becomes progressively smaller.
4. Stages of Production
Diminishing marginal returns are often observed in three stages of production:
Increasing Returns: In the initial stages, adding more units of the variable input leads to an increase in output at an increasing rate. This is a phase of high productivity and efficiency.
Diminishing Returns: As production continues, the rate of increase in output per additional unit of input begins to slow down. This is the phase where diminishing marginal returns become evident.
Negative Returns: Eventually, if too much of the variable input is added relative to the fixed inputs, the marginal product may become negative. This means that additional units of input are causing a decrease in overall output.
Real-World Examples of Diminishing Marginal Returns
Let’s explore real-world examples to illustrate the concept of diminishing marginal returns:
1. Agriculture
In agriculture, the law of diminishing marginal returns is often observed when adding more laborers to cultivate a fixed amount of land. Initially, each additional laborer may lead to increased crop yields. However, as more laborers are added, the benefits of additional workers may diminish, leading to lower marginal returns.
2. Manufacturing
In manufacturing, the addition of more workers to operate a fixed number of machines may result in higher production initially. However, beyond a certain point, overcrowding or inefficiencies may lead to diminishing marginal returns. This can manifest as decreased output per additional worker.
3. Mining
In mining, the law of diminishing marginal returns can be seen when extracting natural resources such as coal or minerals. Initially, each additional unit of labor and equipment may yield more output. However, as the mine is excavated deeper, the cost and effort required to extract resources can increase significantly, leading to diminishing marginal returns.
4. Agriculture Fertilization
When fertilizing a field, the initial application of fertilizer can lead to substantial increases in crop yields. However, as more fertilizer is added, the incremental gains in yield become smaller, and the cost-effectiveness of additional fertilization diminishes.
5. Restaurant Staffing
In the restaurant industry, hiring additional kitchen staff may improve the speed and quality of food preparation initially. However, if the kitchen becomes overcrowded, the workspace may become inefficient, leading to longer wait times and lower food quality, thus illustrating diminishing marginal returns.
Significance in Economic Analysis
Diminishing marginal returns hold significant importance in economic analysis and decision-making:
1. Resource Allocation
Understanding the concept helps firms and individuals allocate resources efficiently. It encourages a balance in the use of inputs to maximize output without reaching the point of diminishing returns.
2. Cost-Benefit Analysis
Diminishing marginal returns play a critical role in cost-benefit analysis. It helps decision-makers assess whether the costs of adding additional inputs outweigh the benefits in terms of increased output or productivity.
3. Pricing
In markets, diminishing marginal returns can affect pricing strategies. Firms must consider the cost structure and marginal product of inputs when setting prices for their products or services.
4. Environmental Sustainability
Diminishing marginal returns are relevant in sustainable resource management. Overexploitation of natural resources can lead to negative returns and environmental degradation. Sustainable practices aim to avoid reaching the point of diminishing returns.
5. Policy Formulation
Policymakers use the concept of diminishing marginal returns to design effective policies. For instance, in agriculture, policies may incentivize optimal resource use to prevent overuse of inputs and declining yields.
Challenges and Considerations
While the concept of diminishing marginal returns is fundamental, there are challenges and considerations to keep in mind:
1. Assumptions
The law of diminishing marginal returns assumes that all other factors remain constant, which may not always hold true in real-world situations. Changing technology or external factors can affect the outcome.
2. Identifying the Threshold
Determining the point at which diminishing marginal returns begin can be challenging and varies across industries and contexts. It often requires empirical analysis.
3. Decision Timing
Timing plays a role in decision-making. Firms must consider when to expand or reduce their inputs to optimize productivity and avoid diminishing marginal returns.
4. Technological Innovation
Technological advancements can alter the dynamics of diminishing marginal returns. Innovations may enable firms to bypass traditional constraints and achieve higher productivity levels.
Conclusion
Diminishing marginal returns are a fundamental concept in economics that illustrates the diminishing benefits of adding more units of a variable input to a production process. This concept has far-reaching implications, from resource allocation and cost-benefit analysis to environmental sustainability and policy formulation. Understanding the law of diminishing marginal returns helps individuals, firms, and policymakers make informed decisions and optimize resource use in a world where resource scarcity is a prevalent economic challenge.
Key Highlights:
Definition: Diminishing marginal returns refers to the decrease in the additional output gained from adding one more unit of a variable input, while keeping other inputs constant, in a production process.
Origin: Rooted in the works of classical economists like David Ricardo and Thomas Malthus, the concept is fundamental in economic analysis, particularly in microeconomics, macroeconomics, and production theory.
Principles: It operates based on fixed and variable inputs, marginal product, the law of diminishing marginal returns, and stages of production, including increasing returns, diminishing returns, and negative returns.
Examples: Examples include agriculture (adding labor to fixed land), manufacturing (adding workers to fixed machines), mining (adding labor and equipment to extract resources), agriculture fertilization, and restaurant staffing.
Significance: It is crucial for resource allocation, cost-benefit analysis, pricing strategies, environmental sustainability, and policy formulation.
Challenges: Challenges include assumptions of constant factors, identifying the threshold of diminishing returns, timing in decision-making, and the impact of technological innovation.
The idea of a market economy first came from classical economists, including David Ricardo, Jean-Baptiste Say, and Adam Smith. All three of these economists were advocates for a free market. They argued that the “invisible hand” of market incentives and profit motives were more efficient in guiding economic decisions to prosperity than strict government planning.
Positive economics is concerned with describing and explaining economic phenomena; it is based on facts and empirical evidence. Normative economics, on the other hand, is concerned with making judgments about what “should be” done. It contains value judgments and recommendations about how the economy should be.
When there is an increased price of goods and services over a long period, it is called inflation. In these times, currency shows less potential to buy products and services. Thus, general prices of goods and services increase. Consequently, decreases in the purchasing power of currency is called inflation.
Asymmetric information as a concept has probably existed for thousands of years, but it became mainstream in 2001 after Michael Spence, George Akerlof, and Joseph Stiglitz won the Nobel Prize in Economics for their work on information asymmetry in capital markets. Asymmetric information, otherwise known as information asymmetry, occurs when one party in a business transaction has access to more information than the other party.
Autarky comes from the Greek words autos (self)and arkein (to suffice) and in essence, describes a general state of self-sufficiency. However, the term is most commonly used to describe the economic system of a nation that can operate without support from the economic systems of other nations. Autarky, therefore, is an economic system characterized by self-sufficiency and limited trade with international partners.
Creative destruction was first described by Austrian economist Joseph Schumpeter in 1942, who suggested that capital was never stationary and constantly evolving. To describe this process, Schumpeter defined creative destruction as the “process of industrial mutation that incessantly revolutionizes the economic structure from within, incessantly destroying the old one, incessantly creating a new one.” Therefore, creative destruction is the replacing of long-standing practices or procedures with more innovative, disruptive practices in capitalist markets.
Happiness economics seeks to relate economic decisions to wider measures of individual welfare than traditional measures which focus on income and wealth. Happiness economics, therefore, is the formal study of the relationship between individual satisfaction, employment, and wealth.
An oligopsony is a market form characterized by the presence of only a small number of buyers. These buyers have market power and can lower the price of a good or service because of a lack of competition. In other words, the seller loses its bargaining power because it is unable to find a buyer outside of the oligopsony that is willing to pay a better price.
The term “animal spirits” is derived from the Latin spiritus animalis, loosely translated as “the breath that awakens the human mind”. As far back as 300 B.C., animal spirits were used to explain psychological phenomena such as hysterias and manias. Animal spirits also appeared in literature where they exemplified qualities such as exuberance, gaiety, and courage. Thus, the term “animal spirits” is used to describe how people arrive at financial decisions during periods of economic stress or uncertainty.
State capitalism is an economic system where business and commercial activity is controlled by the state through state-owned enterprises. In a state capitalist environment, the government is the principal actor. It takes an active role in the formation, regulation, and subsidization of businesses to divert capital to state-appointed bureaucrats. In effect, the government uses capital to further its political ambitions or strengthen its leverage on the international stage.
The boom and bust cycle describes the alternating periods of economic growth and decline common in many capitalist economies. The boom and bust cycle is a phrase used to describe the fluctuations in an economy in which there is persistent expansion and contraction. Expansion is associated with prosperity, while the contraction is associated with either a recession or a depression.
The paradox of thrift was popularised by British economist John Maynard Keynes and is a central component of Keynesian economics. Proponents of Keynesian economics believe the proper response to a recession is more spending, more risk-taking, and less saving. They also believe that spending, otherwise known as consumption, drives economic growth. The paradox of thrift, therefore, is an economic theory arguing that personal savings are a net drag on the economy during a recession.
In simplistic terms, the circular flow model describes the mutually beneficial exchange of money between the two most vital parts of an economy: households, firms and how money moves between them. The circular flow model describes money as it moves through various aspects of society in a cyclical process.
Trade deficits occur when a country’s imports outweigh its exports over a specific period. Experts also refer to this as a negative balance of trade. Most of the time, trade balances are calculated based on a variety of different categories.
A market type is a way a given group of consumers and producers interact, based on the context determined by the readiness of consumers to understand the product, the complexity of the product; how big is the existing market and how much it can potentially expand in the future.
Rational choice theory states that an individual uses rational calculations to make rational choices that are most in line with their personal preferences. Rational choice theory refers to a set of guidelines that explain economic and social behavior. The theory has two underlying assumptions, which are completeness (individuals have access to a set of alternatives among they can equally choose) and transitivity.
The peer-to-peer (P2P) economy is one where buyers and sellers interact directly without the need for an intermediary third party or other business. The peer-to-peer economy is a business model where two individuals buy and sell products and services directly. In a peer-to-peer company, the seller has the ability to create the product or offer the service themselves.
The term “knowledge economy” was first coined in the 1960s by Peter Drucker. The management consultant used the term to describe a shift from traditional economies, where there was a reliance on unskilled labor and primary production, to economies reliant on service industries and jobs requiring more thinking and data analysis. The knowledge economy is a system of consumption and production based on knowledge-intensive activities that contribute to scientific and technical innovation.
In a command economy, the government controls the economy through various commands, laws, and national goals which are used to coordinate complex social and economic systems. In other words, a social or political hierarchy determines what is produced, how it is produced, and how it is distributed. Therefore, the command economy is one in which the government controls all major aspects of the economy and economic production.
How do you protect your rights as a worker? Who is there to help defend you against unfair and unjust work conditions? Both of these questions have an answer, and it’s a solution that many are familiar with. The answer is a labor union. From construction to teaching, there are labor unions out there for just about any field of work.
The bottom of the pyramid is a term describing the largest and poorest global socio-economic group. Franklin D. Roosevelt first used the bottom of the pyramid (BOP) in a 1932 public address during the Great Depression. Roosevelt noted that – when talking about the ‘forgotten man:’ “these unhappy times call for the building of plans that rest upon the forgotten, the unorganized but the indispensable units of economic power.. that build from the bottom up and not from the top down, that put their faith once more in the forgotten man at the bottom of the economic pyramid.”
Glocalization is a portmanteau of the words “globalization” and “localization.” It is a concept that describes a globally developed and distributed product or service that is also adjusted to be suitable for sale in the local market. With the rise of the digital economy, brands now can go global by building a local footprint.
Market fragmentation is most commonly seen in growing markets, which fragment and break away from the parent market to become self-sustaining markets with different products and services. Market fragmentation is a concept suggesting that all markets are diverse and fragment into distinct customer groups over time.
The L-shaped recovery refers to an economy that declines steeply and then flatlines with weak or no growth. On a graph plotting GDP against time, this precipitous fall combined with a long period of stagnation looks like the letter “L”. The L-shaped recovery is sometimes called an L-shaped recession because the economy does not return to trend line growth. The L-shaped recovery, therefore, is a recession shape used by economists to describe different types of recessions and their subsequent recoveries. In an L-shaped recovery, the economy is characterized by a severe recession with high unemployment and near-zero economic growth.
Comparative advantage was first described by political economist David Ricardo in his book Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. Ricardo used his theory to argue against Great Britain’s protectionist laws which restricted the import of wheat from 1815 to 1846. Comparative advantage occurs when a country can produce a good or service for a lower opportunity cost than another country.
The Easterlin paradox was first described by then professor of economics at the University of Pennsylvania Richard Easterlin. In the 1970s, Easterlin found that despite the American economy experiencing growth over the previous few decades, the average level of happiness seen in American citizens remained the same. He called this the Easterlin paradox, where income and happiness correlate with each other until a certain point is reached after at least ten years or so. After this point, income and happiness levels are not significantly related. The Easterlin paradox states that happiness is positively correlated with income, but only to a certain extent.
In Economics, Economies of Scale is a theory for which, as companies grow, they gain cost advantages. More precisely, companies manage to benefit from these cost advantages as they grow, due to increased efficiency in production. Thus, as companies scale and increase production, a subsequent decrease in the costs associated with it will help the organizationscale further.
In Economics, a Diseconomy of Scale happens when a company has grown so large that its costs per unit will start to increase. Thus, losing the benefits of scale. That can happen due to several factors arising as a company scales. From coordination issues to management inefficiencies and lack of proper communication flows.
An economy of scope means that the production of one good reduces the cost of producing some other related good. This means the unit cost to produce a product will decline as the variety of manufactured products increases. Importantly, the manufactured products must be related in some way.
Price sensitivity can be explained using the price elasticity of demand, a concept in economics that measures the variation in product demand as the price of the product itself varies. In consumer behavior, price sensitivity describes and measures fluctuations in product demand as the price of that product changes.
Gennaro is the creator of FourWeekMBA, which reached about four million business people, comprising C-level executives, investors, analysts, product managers, and aspiring digital entrepreneurs in 2022 alone | He is also Director of Sales for a high-tech scaleup in the AI Industry | In 2012, Gennaro earned an International MBA with emphasis on Corporate Finance and Business Strategy.
