The Austrian School of Economics, often referred to as the Austrian School, is a school of economic thought that originated in the late 19th century in Austria-Hungary. It has since gained recognition and influence worldwide for its unique approach to economic analysis. The Austrian School is known for its commitment to individual freedom, market-driven processes, and a focus on understanding human action in economic decision-making.
Key characteristics of the Austrian School include:
Methodological Individualism: The Austrian School places the individual at the center of economic analysis. It emphasizes that all economic phenomena are the result of individual actions, choices, and preferences.
Subjectivism: Austrian economists emphasize the subjectivity of value. They believe that value is determined by individual preferences and can’t be objectively measured.
Market Process: The Austrian School emphasizes the dynamic and ever-changing nature of markets. It argues that markets are driven by a continuous process of entrepreneurship, competition, and discovery.
Spontaneous Order: Austrian economists view economic order as emerging spontaneously from the interactions of individuals in a free market, rather than being centrally planned or designed.
Free-Market Advocacy: The Austrian School is known for its advocacy of free-market capitalism, limited government intervention, and individual property rights.
Time and Capital: Austrian economists have developed theories of capital and the role of time in economic decision-making, often referred to as the Austrian theory of capital.
The Austrian School has a rich history, with several key figures who have made significant contributions to its development. Here are some of the notable economists associated with the Austrian School:
1. Carl Menger (1840-1921):
Often considered the founder of the Austrian School, Menger’s work laid the foundation for many of its key principles. His book “Principles of Economics” (1871) introduced the concept of marginal utility and challenged classical labor theory of value.
2. Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk (1851-1914):
Böhm-Bawerk expanded on Menger’s ideas and developed the Austrian theory of capital. His work, “Capital and Interest” (1884), explored the role of time and interest in economic theory.
3. Ludwig von Mises (1881-1973):
Mises is one of the most influential Austrian economists. He is known for his defense of classical liberalism and his works on economic calculation, socialism, and praxeology (the study of human action).
4. Friedrich Hayek (1899-1992):
Hayek’s contributions include his work on business cycles, the price system, and the role of knowledge in the economy. He was awarded the Nobel Prize in Economics in 1974.
5. Murray Rothbard (1926-1995):
Rothbard further developed Austrian economic thought and was a prominent libertarian thinker. His work covered a wide range of topics, including ethics, economics, and political philosophy.
Key Principles of the Austrian School
The Austrian School of Economics is guided by several key principles that distinguish it from other economic schools of thought:
1. Methodological Individualism:
The Austrian School starts with the premise that economic analysis must focus on individual human action and choice. All economic phenomena can be understood by examining the decisions and preferences of individuals.
2. Subjective Value Theory:
Austrian economists reject the classical labor theory of value and emphasize that value is subjective. The value of a good or service is determined by an individual’s subjective preferences and utility.
3. Spontaneous Order:
The Austrian School argues that complex economic order emerges spontaneously from the decentralized actions of individuals in a free market. It believes that central planning is inherently flawed.
4. Time and Capital Theory:
Austrian economists have developed a unique theory of capital that emphasizes the role of time in production and investment decisions. This theory helps explain business cycles and economic fluctuations.
5. Entrepreneurship:
Entrepreneurs play a central role in the Austrian School’s view of the market process. They identify opportunities, allocate resources, and drive innovation.
6. Hayek’s Knowledge Problem:
Friedrich Hayek’s idea of the “knowledge problem” argues that the dispersed nature of information in an economy makes centralized planning impossible. He contends that only a free-market price system can effectively coordinate economic activity.
7. Critique of Central Banking:
Austrian economists are often critical of central banks and their role in monetary policy. They argue that central bank interventions can lead to distortions in the economy and contribute to business cycles.
The Austrian School’s Impact
The Austrian School of Economics has had a lasting impact on economic thought and policy. Its influence can be seen in various areas:
1. Monetary Policy: The Austrian School’s critique of central banking and fiat currency has influenced discussions on monetary policy, alternative currencies like cryptocurrencies, and the gold standard.
2. Business Cycles: Austrian theories on business cycles have contributed to the understanding of economic fluctuations and the role of central banks in exacerbating or mitigating these cycles.
3. Free-Market Advocacy: The Austrian School’s advocacy of free markets, limited government intervention, and individual liberty has influenced political and economic ideologies, particularly in libertarian and classical liberal circles.
4. Entrepreneurship: The Austrian emphasis on entrepreneurship as a driving force of economic progress has shaped discussions on innovation and economic development.
5. Subjectivism and Behavioral Economics: The Austrian School’s subjectivist view of value has connections to behavioral economics, which also emphasizes the role of individual perceptions and preferences.
Criticisms of the Austrian School
While the Austrian School has a devoted following, it is not without its critics. Some common criticisms include:
1. Lack of Mathematical Formalism: Critics argue that the Austrian School’s emphasis on verbal reasoning and qualitative analysis lacks the mathematical rigor found in other economic schools.
2. Policy Implications: The Austrian School’s laissez-faire approach to economics is criticized for being too idealistic and impractical in addressing complex real-world issues.
3. Market Fundamentalism: Detractors accuse the Austrian School of advocating for an unregulated market without considering the need for certain government interventions or regulations.
4. Limited Empirical Research: Some critics contend that the Austrian School places less emphasis on empirical research and data analysis compared to other economic schools.
Conclusion
The Austrian School of Economics stands as a distinctive and influential approach to economic analysis. Its emphasis on methodological individualism, subjectivism, and free-market principles has shaped economic thought and influenced debates on monetary policy, entrepreneurship, and the role of government in the economy. While it has faced criticisms, the Austrian School’s enduring impact continues to resonate in contemporary discussions of economic theory and policy.
The idea of a market economy first came from classical economists, including David Ricardo, Jean-Baptiste Say, and Adam Smith. All three of these economists were advocates for a free market. They argued that the “invisible hand” of market incentives and profit motives were more efficient in guiding economic decisions to prosperity than strict government planning.
Positive economics is concerned with describing and explaining economic phenomena; it is based on facts and empirical evidence. Normative economics, on the other hand, is concerned with making judgments about what “should be” done. It contains value judgments and recommendations about how the economy should be.
When there is an increased price of goods and services over a long period, it is called inflation. In these times, currency shows less potential to buy products and services. Thus, general prices of goods and services increase. Consequently, decreases in the purchasing power of currency is called inflation.
Asymmetric information as a concept has probably existed for thousands of years, but it became mainstream in 2001 after Michael Spence, George Akerlof, and Joseph Stiglitz won the Nobel Prize in Economics for their work on information asymmetry in capital markets. Asymmetric information, otherwise known as information asymmetry, occurs when one party in a business transaction has access to more information than the other party.
Autarky comes from the Greek words autos (self)and arkein (to suffice) and in essence, describes a general state of self-sufficiency. However, the term is most commonly used to describe the economic system of a nation that can operate without support from the economic systems of other nations. Autarky, therefore, is an economic system characterized by self-sufficiency and limited trade with international partners.
Creative destruction was first described by Austrian economist Joseph Schumpeter in 1942, who suggested that capital was never stationary and constantly evolving. To describe this process, Schumpeter defined creative destruction as the “process of industrial mutation that incessantly revolutionizes the economic structure from within, incessantly destroying the old one, incessantly creating a new one.” Therefore, creative destruction is the replacing of long-standing practices or procedures with more innovative, disruptive practices in capitalist markets.
Happiness economics seeks to relate economic decisions to wider measures of individual welfare than traditional measures which focus on income and wealth. Happiness economics, therefore, is the formal study of the relationship between individual satisfaction, employment, and wealth.
An oligopsony is a market form characterized by the presence of only a small number of buyers. These buyers have market power and can lower the price of a good or service because of a lack of competition. In other words, the seller loses its bargaining power because it is unable to find a buyer outside of the oligopsony that is willing to pay a better price.
The term “animal spirits” is derived from the Latin spiritus animalis, loosely translated as “the breath that awakens the human mind”. As far back as 300 B.C., animal spirits were used to explain psychological phenomena such as hysterias and manias. Animal spirits also appeared in literature where they exemplified qualities such as exuberance, gaiety, and courage. Thus, the term “animal spirits” is used to describe how people arrive at financial decisions during periods of economic stress or uncertainty.
State capitalism is an economic system where business and commercial activity is controlled by the state through state-owned enterprises. In a state capitalist environment, the government is the principal actor. It takes an active role in the formation, regulation, and subsidization of businesses to divert capital to state-appointed bureaucrats. In effect, the government uses capital to further its political ambitions or strengthen its leverage on the international stage.
The boom and bust cycle describes the alternating periods of economic growth and decline common in many capitalist economies. The boom and bust cycle is a phrase used to describe the fluctuations in an economy in which there is persistent expansion and contraction. Expansion is associated with prosperity, while the contraction is associated with either a recession or a depression.
The paradox of thrift was popularised by British economist John Maynard Keynes and is a central component of Keynesian economics. Proponents of Keynesian economics believe the proper response to a recession is more spending, more risk-taking, and less saving. They also believe that spending, otherwise known as consumption, drives economic growth. The paradox of thrift, therefore, is an economic theory arguing that personal savings are a net drag on the economy during a recession.
In simplistic terms, the circular flow model describes the mutually beneficial exchange of money between the two most vital parts of an economy: households, firms and how money moves between them. The circular flow model describes money as it moves through various aspects of society in a cyclical process.
Trade deficits occur when a country’s imports outweigh its exports over a specific period. Experts also refer to this as a negative balance of trade. Most of the time, trade balances are calculated based on a variety of different categories.
A market type is a way a given group of consumers and producers interact, based on the context determined by the readiness of consumers to understand the product, the complexity of the product; how big is the existing market and how much it can potentially expand in the future.
Rational choice theory states that an individual uses rational calculations to make rational choices that are most in line with their personal preferences. Rational choice theory refers to a set of guidelines that explain economic and social behavior. The theory has two underlying assumptions, which are completeness (individuals have access to a set of alternatives among they can equally choose) and transitivity.
The peer-to-peer (P2P) economy is one where buyers and sellers interact directly without the need for an intermediary third party or other business. The peer-to-peer economy is a business model where two individuals buy and sell products and services directly. In a peer-to-peer company, the seller has the ability to create the product or offer the service themselves.
The term “knowledge economy” was first coined in the 1960s by Peter Drucker. The management consultant used the term to describe a shift from traditional economies, where there was a reliance on unskilled labor and primary production, to economies reliant on service industries and jobs requiring more thinking and data analysis. The knowledge economy is a system of consumption and production based on knowledge-intensive activities that contribute to scientific and technical innovation.
In a command economy, the government controls the economy through various commands, laws, and national goals which are used to coordinate complex social and economic systems. In other words, a social or political hierarchy determines what is produced, how it is produced, and how it is distributed. Therefore, the command economy is one in which the government controls all major aspects of the economy and economic production.
How do you protect your rights as a worker? Who is there to help defend you against unfair and unjust work conditions? Both of these questions have an answer, and it’s a solution that many are familiar with. The answer is a labor union. From construction to teaching, there are labor unions out there for just about any field of work.
The bottom of the pyramid is a term describing the largest and poorest global socio-economic group. Franklin D. Roosevelt first used the bottom of the pyramid (BOP) in a 1932 public address during the Great Depression. Roosevelt noted that – when talking about the ‘forgotten man:’ “these unhappy times call for the building of plans that rest upon the forgotten, the unorganized but the indispensable units of economic power.. that build from the bottom up and not from the top down, that put their faith once more in the forgotten man at the bottom of the economic pyramid.”
Glocalization is a portmanteau of the words “globalization” and “localization.” It is a concept that describes a globally developed and distributed product or service that is also adjusted to be suitable for sale in the local market. With the rise of the digital economy, brands now can go global by building a local footprint.
Market fragmentation is most commonly seen in growing markets, which fragment and break away from the parent market to become self-sustaining markets with different products and services. Market fragmentation is a concept suggesting that all markets are diverse and fragment into distinct customer groups over time.
The L-shaped recovery refers to an economy that declines steeply and then flatlines with weak or no growth. On a graph plotting GDP against time, this precipitous fall combined with a long period of stagnation looks like the letter “L”. The L-shaped recovery is sometimes called an L-shaped recession because the economy does not return to trend line growth. The L-shaped recovery, therefore, is a recession shape used by economists to describe different types of recessions and their subsequent recoveries. In an L-shaped recovery, the economy is characterized by a severe recession with high unemployment and near-zero economic growth.
Comparative advantage was first described by political economist David Ricardo in his book Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. Ricardo used his theory to argue against Great Britain’s protectionist laws which restricted the import of wheat from 1815 to 1846. Comparative advantage occurs when a country can produce a good or service for a lower opportunity cost than another country.
The Easterlin paradox was first described by then professor of economics at the University of Pennsylvania Richard Easterlin. In the 1970s, Easterlin found that despite the American economy experiencing growth over the previous few decades, the average level of happiness seen in American citizens remained the same. He called this the Easterlin paradox, where income and happiness correlate with each other until a certain point is reached after at least ten years or so. After this point, income and happiness levels are not significantly related. The Easterlin paradox states that happiness is positively correlated with income, but only to a certain extent.
In Economics, Economies of Scale is a theory for which, as companies grow, they gain cost advantages. More precisely, companies manage to benefit from these cost advantages as they grow, due to increased efficiency in production. Thus, as companies scale and increase production, a subsequent decrease in the costs associated with it will help the organizationscale further.
In Economics, a Diseconomy of Scale happens when a company has grown so large that its costs per unit will start to increase. Thus, losing the benefits of scale. That can happen due to several factors arising as a company scales. From coordination issues to management inefficiencies and lack of proper communication flows.
An economy of scope means that the production of one good reduces the cost of producing some other related good. This means the unit cost to produce a product will decline as the variety of manufactured products increases. Importantly, the manufactured products must be related in some way.
Price sensitivity can be explained using the price elasticity of demand, a concept in economics that measures the variation in product demand as the price of the product itself varies. In consumer behavior, price sensitivity describes and measures fluctuations in product demand as the price of that product changes.
Gennaro is the creator of FourWeekMBA, which reached about four million business people, comprising C-level executives, investors, analysts, product managers, and aspiring digital entrepreneurs in 2022 alone | He is also Director of Sales for a high-tech scaleup in the AI Industry | In 2012, Gennaro earned an International MBA with emphasis on Corporate Finance and Business Strategy.
