tuckmans-model

What Is Tuckman’s Model of Group Development? Tuckman’s Model of Group Development In A Nutshell

Tuckman suggested groups transition through five stages of development, starting from the time the group first meets until project completion. As members of the team become familiar with each other, the team itself becomes more mature as relationships become established. During the developmental phase, the leader of the group also adopts a new leadership style. Tuckman’s stages of group development were developed by psychologist Bruce Tuckman in 1965. Tuckman’s stages of group development is a concise and elegant framework for team development and behavior.

Understanding Tuckman’s stages of group development

Tuckman suggested groups transition through five stages of development, starting from the time the group first meets until project completion.

As members of the team become familiar with each other, the team itself becomes more mature as relationships become established.

During the developmental phase, the leader of the group also adopts a new leadership style.

The model offers a relatively simple way to understand how groups evolve and is particularly useful in helping individuals work together as a cohesive unit.

The model is also similar to the Tannenbaum and Schmidt continuum and Hersey and Blanchard’s situational leadership tool – both of which having been developed around the same time.

The five stages of Tuckman’s group development model

Let’s now take a look at the five stages a group progresses through:

storming-norming-performing-forming

Forming

During the first stage, individual team members are introduced to each other.

The atmosphere is formal and polite, but most members are excited to begin work and get to know their new colleagues.

Personal skills, background, and interests are discussed.

So too are project goals, timelines, ground rules, and individual roles.

Storming

In the storming stage, the realities of having to complete the task are beginning to sink in.

Excitement is replaced with frustration and anger, which causes some personalities to clash.

At this point, the team can either become frustrated with the flaws of others or choose to accept them.

Norming

Here, team members start to notice and appreciate the unique strengths of their colleagues.

There is also a realization that a variety of opinions and experiences ultimately make the team stronger.

As a result, individuals feel they are part of something larger, which increases team cohesion and effectiveness.

Performing

During the fourth stage, members are satisfied with the team’s process toward a goal.

They feel confident in their abilities and also in the abilities of colleagues.

Roles and responsibilities may also become more fluid as help is provided to those who need it.

Adjourning

Once the goal has been achieved, the team recognizes individual contributions and then disbands.

This is sometimes called the mourning stage because members feel a sense of loss after separating from those they’ve shared a meaningful experience with.

Any lessons learned from the process should be passed to a responsible person for use by future teams.

Why is Tuckman’s model important?

Tuckman’s model is important because it increases group effectiveness. Many businesses make the mistake of assuming teams operate at the fourth or performing stage indefinitely.

However, assembling a bunch of talented individuals in a room does not automatically result in a talented group. Here are some general tips to use in conjunction with the five stages:

Set a clear purpose

And then revisit it at regular intervals.

Purpose defines the framework for which all subsequent decisions are made.

Set ground rules

If nothing else, rules define acceptable standards of behavior.

Each person has their own style of working.

Left to their own devices, these styles conflict with others and cause inefficiencies and a lack of productivity.

Identify a facilitator

A good facilitator enforces the ground rules and drives the group forward.

The most effective teams can rotate leaders regularly to avoid burnout without affecting their performance.

Accept conflict

Conflict should not be avoided but accepted as a natural and healthy consequence of individuals in a group voicing their own opinions.

How conflict is managed determines whether the group improves existing processes and strengthens the bonds between individuals.

Participation

Group participation is vital since the group is only as strong as its weakest link.

Every member should be instilled with a sense of responsibility for completing their assigned tasks.

To increase productive participation, time tracking or other employee monitoring software can be used.

Case Studies

  • Product Development Team in a Software Company
    • Forming: The team members are introduced, and the project goals are outlined.
    • Storming: Disagreements occur regarding the choice of programming languages and project timelines.
    • Norming: The team resolves conflicts, adopts Agile methodologies, and defines coding standards.
    • Performing: The software development proceeds efficiently, with successful sprints and regular releases.
    • Adjourning: The team reviews the project’s success, conducts a post-mortem, and prepares for the next software release.
  • Marketing Team in a Consumer Goods Company
    • Forming: New marketers join the team, and marketing strategies are discussed.
    • Storming: Conflicts arise over campaign priorities and budget allocations.
    • Norming: The team aligns on a marketing plan, establishes KPIs, and begins implementing campaigns.
    • Performing: Marketing efforts lead to increased sales and brand recognition.
    • Adjourning: The team celebrates successful campaigns, evaluates ROI, and plans for future marketing initiatives.
  • Quality Control Team in an Automotive Manufacturing Plant
    • Forming: New inspectors join the team, and quality control processes are reviewed.
    • Storming: Disagreements occur over inspection criteria and defect categorization.
    • Norming: The team standardizes inspection protocols, conducts training, and improves communication.
    • Performing: Defective parts are significantly reduced, leading to cost savings.
    • Adjourning: The team reflects on quality improvements, documents best practices, and transitions new inspectors.
  • Finance Team in a Multinational Corporation
    • Forming: New financial analysts join the team, and financial reporting requirements are discussed.
    • Storming: Conflicts arise over data accuracy and interpretation of financial statements.
    • Norming: The team establishes standardized reporting templates and conducts financial analysis workshops.
    • Performing: Financial reports are consistently accurate and provide valuable insights.
    • Adjourning: The team reviews annual financial achievements, prepares for audits, and sets new financial goals.
  • Project Management Team in a Construction Company
    • Forming: The project team is assembled, and project scope and deadlines are defined.
    • Storming: Conflicts arise over resource allocation and subcontractor management.
    • Norming: The team collaboratively plans resource utilization, conducts regular project status meetings, and addresses issues proactively.
    • Performing: The construction project is completed on time and within budget.
    • Adjourning: The team conducts a project review, identifies areas for improvement, and moves on to the next project.

Key takeaways

  • Tuckman’s stages of group development is a concise and elegant framework for team development and behavior. The model was developed by psychologist Bruce Tuckman in 1965.
  • Tuckman’s stages of group development comprise five stages: forming, storming, norming, performing, and adjourning. Each stage has associated feelings or behavioral patterns which primarily help the group move past challenges.
  • Tuckman’s stages of group development suggest talent is only one part of an effective team. Some general tips for improving effectiveness include setting a clear purpose and ground rules, identifying facilitators, accepting conflict, and encouraging group participation.

Key Highlights

  • Stages of Development: Tuckman’s model identifies five stages that groups go through from their formation to project completion:
    • Forming: In this initial stage, members are introduced to each other, discussing personal backgrounds, skills, and project goals.
    • Storming: Conflicts and tensions emerge as members work together, leading to challenges and disagreements.
    • Norming: Members recognize each other’s strengths, appreciate diversity, and start working cohesively as a team.
    • Performing: The group reaches a stage of high productivity, where members collaborate effectively to achieve the project’s goals.
    • Adjourning: After the completion of the task, the group disbands, acknowledging individual contributions and reflecting on the experience.
  • Importance of Tuckman’s Model:
    • Group Effectiveness: The model helps businesses understand the different stages of team development and anticipate challenges that can arise.
    • Leadership Adaptation: Leaders must adjust their leadership style as the group progresses through various stages, ensuring effective guidance.
  • Tips for Improving Group Effectiveness:
    • Clear Purpose: Define the project’s purpose and revisit it regularly to align the team’s efforts.
    • Ground Rules: Establish clear rules to guide behavior and maintain a productive working environment.
    • Facilitator Role: Appoint a facilitator to enforce ground rules and ensure smooth progress.
    • Conflict Acceptance: View conflicts as opportunities for growth, as they can lead to improved processes and stronger bonds.
    • Participation: Encourage active participation from all members to ensure collective responsibility and task completion.

What are the 5 stages of group development?

The five stages of group development are:

What are the steps in the Tuckman’s stages of group development?

Why is Tuckman’s model important?

Tuckman’s model is important because it increases group effectiveness. Many businesses make the mistake of assuming teams operate at the fourth or performing stage indefinitely. While Tuckman’s model helps organizations understand that group development goes through five primary stages forming, storming, morning, performing, and adjourning. Thus, performing is one of the stages in the process.

Connected Group Decision-Making Frameworks

Six Thinking Hats

six-thinking-hats-model
The Six Thinking Hats model was created by psychologist Edward de Bono in 1986, who noted that personality type was a key driver of how people approached problem-solving. For example, optimists view situations differently from pessimists. Analytical individuals may generate ideas that a more emotional person would not, and vice versa.

Value Stream Mapping

value-stream-mapping
Value stream mapping uses flowcharts to analyze and then improve on the delivery of products and services. Value stream mapping (VSM) is based on the concept of value streams – which are a series of sequential steps that explain how a product or service is delivered to consumers.

Affinity Grouping

affinity-grouping
Affinity grouping is a collaborative prioritization process where group participants brainstorm ideas and opportunities according to their similarities. Affinity grouping is a broad and versatile process based on simple but highly effective ideas. It helps teams generate and then organize teams according to their similarity or likeness.

FIshbone Diagram

fishbone-diagram
The Fishbone Diagram is a diagram-based technique used in brainstorming to identify potential causes for a problem, thus it is a visual representation of cause and effect. The problem or effect serves as the head of the fish. Possible causes of the problem are listed on the individual “bones” of the fish. This encourages problem-solving teams to consider a wide range of alternatives.

SCAMPER Method

scamper-method
Eighteen years later, it was adapted by psychologist Bob Eberle in his book SCAMPER: Games for Imagination Development. The SCAMPER method was first described by advertising executive Alex Osborne in 1953. The SCAMPER method is a form of creative thinking or problem solving based on evaluating ideas or groups of ideas.

MECE Framework

mece-framework
The MECE framework is an exhaustive expression of information that must account for all conceivable scenarios. While the framework is used in categorizing information and data processing, it is commonly used in formulating problems and then solving them. The MECE framework is a means of the exhaustive grouping of information into categories that are both mutually exclusive (ME) and collectively exhaustive (CE).

Nadler-Tushman Congruence Model

nadler-tushman-congruence-model
The Nadler-Tushman Congruence Model was created by David Nadler and Michael Tushman at Columbia University. The Nadler-Tushman Congruence Model is a diagnostic tool that identifies problem areas within a company. In the context of business, congruence occurs when the goals of different people or interest groups coincide.

Lewin’s Change Management

lewins-change-management-model
Lewin’s change management model helps businesses manage the uncertainty and resistance associated with change. Kurt Lewin, one of the first academics to focus his research on group dynamics, developed a three-stage model. He proposed that the behavior of individuals happened as a function of group behavior.

Main Free Guides:

About The Author

Scroll to Top
FourWeekMBA